| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
30 Jun 2006 10:55:49 AM |
| Object: |
Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
NOVEMBER IS A REFERENDUM ON IMPEACHMENT OF THE BUSH CRIME FAMILY... do
your part to save mankind.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/content2/2006/06/signing_away_our_freedom.html
Signing away our freedom
June 29, 2006
By DOUG THOMPSON
President George W. Bush, through his use of "signing statements," has
declared himself, on more than 750 separate occasions, above the laws
of Congress, the laws of the land and even the Constitution of the
United States.
With each stroke of his pen, Bush wipes away more of the freedoms once
guaranteed by the Constitution, undermines the system of checks and
balances that is supposed to protect our government from despots and
brings this nation closer and closer to the precipice.
His actions come, ironically, as the nation prepares to celebrate the
birthday of its independence, an independence threatened as never
before not by Islam-spouting madmen but by an opportunistic politician
with a fountain pen.
Signing statements allow a President to say he will choose to ignore a
law passed by Congress if he feels that law infringes upon his powers
during times of war or national crisis.
Thanks to Bush, we're at war, a war based on lies, a war predetermined
by an administration that decided, long before the events of September
11, 2001, to wage against a manufactured enemy for political means.
________________________________________________________
Sieg Heil
Harry
(see all of Harry Hope's excellent posts as they break, put this link
in your browser, use it, this is a search on google groups, on the
author Harry Hope sorted by date... nothing fancy):
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&start=0&scoring=d&enc_author=-nIhFBQAAACtBOUGAhN9cSve8yYdFJBuOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A&
With history moving so fast these days you might also want to sort
Harry Hope's posts by "relevance" particulary if the lies and
misdirection that we are all being sujected to by the extensive Bush
Crime Family Propagand machine are confusing you. Using the "sort by
relevance" option has a way of letting you take in the big picture.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&start=0&enc_author=-nIhFBQAAACtBOUGAhN9cSve8yYdFJBuOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A&
.
|
|
| User: "Scott Nudds" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 11:45:12 AM |
|
|
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Understand who the fascists were, what they did, and how they operated.
For a reasonable covering of the subject see:
The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy -- Emilio Gentile,Keith
Botsford ISBN: 0674784758
Understanding Totalitarianism: The Poverty of Great Politics -- David
D. Roberts SBN: 0415192781
Next, understand that the US is a constitutional republic with a strong
triumvirate government.
Anyone who does just a little research on the subject will know that
the author of the above nonsense is a dizzy-eyed loop-nut.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Exley" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 11:50:38 AM |
|
|
"Scott Nudds" <sc0tt_nudds@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Guantanamo Bay is full of thugs and terrorists who've broken Godwin's Law,
which is better than in China where they publicly execute transgressors.
Godwin's Law is so prevalent in today's culture that the latest edition of the
Bible has included Godwin's Law as an 11th Commandment. The seriousness of
violating Godwin's Law cannot be understated.
The BNP has promised to bring back capital punishment, but only in extreme
cases where Godwin's Law has been repeatedly violated.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris X" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 11:57:14 AM |
|
|
"David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit> wrote in message
news:44a69af6$0$9818$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
Send complaints to quoting the headers below;
From: "David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit>
Newsgroups:
tx.politics,nz.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.usa,uk.politics.misc
References: <1151682949.690030.151820@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 12:50:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <44a69af6$0$9818$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Jul 2006 15:55:35 GMT
X-Complaints-To:
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Exley" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 11:57:48 AM |
|
|
You can't complain about someone using their own name, so ***** off.
Imbecile
"Chris X" <Chris_X2006@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:svmdnY4uvPQRNDvZRVnyiQ@giganews.com...
"David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit> wrote in message
news:44a69af6$0$9818$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
Send complaints to quoting the headers below;
From: "David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit>
Newsgroups:
tx.politics,nz.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.usa,uk.politics.misc
References: <1151682949.690030.151820@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 12:50:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <44a69af6$0$9818$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Jul 2006 15:55:35 GMT
X-Complaints-To:
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Abner Hayseed" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 12:00:43 PM |
|
|
"David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit> wrote in message
news:44a69ca4$0$9859$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
You can't complain about someone using their own name, so ***** off.
Imbecile
Why would someone by the name of Chris have a problem with the name David?
Especially if you're David?
He's probably drunk.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris X" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 12:02:25 PM |
|
|
"David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit> wrote in message
news:44a69ca4$0$9859$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
You can't complain about someone using their own name, so ***** off.
Imbecile
Says the top-posing marxist fuckwit. Say good bye to your Teranews account,
lamer.
"Chris X" <Chris_X2006@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:svmdnY4uvPQRNDvZRVnyiQ@giganews.com...
"David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit> wrote in message
news:44a69af6$0$9818$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
Send complaints to quoting the headers below;
From: "David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit>
Newsgroups:
tx.politics,nz.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.usa,uk.politics.misc
References: <1151682949.690030.151820@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 12:50:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <44a69af6$0$9818$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Jul 2006 15:55:35 GMT
X-Complaints-To:
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Exley" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 12:27:01 PM |
|
|
"Chris X" <Chris_X2006@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:EYWdnfmeyqheNzvZnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
"David Exley" <stupid.englishman@fat.brit> wrote in message
news:44a69ca4$0$9859$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
You can't complain about someone using their own name, so ***** off.
Imbecile
Says the top-posing marxist fuckwit. Say good bye to your Teranews account,
lamer.
Listen to the little fascist whine. Boo! Hoo! Teranews will tell you the
same as I told you, to ***** off.
So be a good little boy and do it.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
07 Jul 2006 07:47:05 PM |
|
|
David Exley wrote:
You can't complain about someone using their own name, so ***** off.
It isn't your name, so why are you using the name of an Englishman
and a
Councillor in England. Can't you spell your own name.
Imbecile
Oh, I see, in that case I apologise and suggest you seek mental help
as soon as possible.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
04 Jul 2006 07:39:47 PM |
|
|
David Exley wrote:
"Scott Nudds" <sc0tt_nudds@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Guantanamo Bay is full of thugs and terrorists who've broken Godwin's Law,
which is better than in China where they publicly execute transgressors.
Godwin's Law is so prevalent in today's culture that the latest edition of the
Bible has included Godwin's Law as an 11th Commandment. The seriousness of
violating Godwin's Law cannot be understated.
The BNP has promised to bring back capital punishment, but only in extreme
cases where Godwin's Law has been repeatedly violated.
You are a moron and posting, using the name of a living person who
has not
given you permission to use their name, opens you up to a case for
libel.
I suggest you find a NG more in keeping with your IQ - I suggest
alt.cretinswithIQ'sofgrapes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Allan B." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
05 Jul 2006 06:33:56 AM |
|
|
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote in message
news:1152059986.943199.137360@v61g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
David Exley wrote:
"Scott Nudds" <sc0tt_nudds@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Guantanamo Bay is full of thugs and terrorists who've broken Godwin's Law,
which is better than in China where they publicly execute transgressors.
Godwin's Law is so prevalent in today's culture that the latest edition of
the
Bible has included Godwin's Law as an 11th Commandment. The seriousness
of
violating Godwin's Law cannot be understated.
The BNP has promised to bring back capital punishment, but only in extreme
cases where Godwin's Law has been repeatedly violated.
You are a moron and posting, using the name of a living person who
has not
given you permission to use their name, opens you up to a case for
libel.
Do you suck his *****? *****? What if the poster's name is David Exley as he
claims? Are you saying that someone else here is named David Exley? In that
case, who is it? Why doens't he come forward? Why is he such a quivering,
gutless Woman (he has no balls)?
There's no way of proving that he's deliberately using someone else's name,
are you saying that someone using the name Fred Jones or George Bush could
just as easily be opened up to libel because someone picked it as a name?
You're nothing but a pea brained *****. Go back to your knitting or giving
black men blow jobs, you stupid brainless Nazi *****.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gord H." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
05 Jul 2006 06:48:45 AM |
|
|
"Allan B." <Ablson492@excite.com> wrote in message
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote in message
news:1152059986.943199.137360@v61g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
David Exley wrote:
"Scott Nudds" <sc0tt_nudds@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate
that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Guantanamo Bay is full of thugs and terrorists who've broken Godwin's
Law,
which is better than in China where they publicly execute transgressors.
Godwin's Law is so prevalent in today's culture that the latest edition
of
the
Bible has included Godwin's Law as an 11th Commandment. The
seriousness
of
violating Godwin's Law cannot be understated.
The BNP has promised to bring back capital punishment, but only in
extreme
cases where Godwin's Law has been repeatedly violated.
You are a moron and posting, using the name of a living person who
has not
given you permission to use their name, opens you up to a case for
libel.
Do you suck his *****? *****? What if the poster's name is David Exley as
he
claims? Are you saying that someone else here is named David Exley? In
that
case, who is it? Why doens't he come forward? Why is he such a quivering,
gutless Woman (he has no balls)?
There's no way of proving that he's deliberately using someone else's name,
are you saying that someone using the name Fred Jones or George Bush could
just as easily be opened up to libel because someone picked it as a name?
You're nothing but a pea brained *****. Go back to your knitting or giving
black men blow jobs, you stupid brainless Nazi *****.
What is a Nazi?
A Nazi is above all else, a craven coward.
A Nazi is afraid to compete with others as
equals because he knows he can't measure up.
A Nazi is afraid of his own inadequacy, so
he wants to murder his betters.
A Nazi is afraid of the truth, so he wants
to murder those who tell it.
A Nazi is afraid of history, so he wants to
murder the past, to wipe out the knowledge
of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National Socialism.
Finally, a Nazi is afraid of the power of
educated, informed adults. Freedom of
choice terrifies him... which is why he
chooses minor children as sexual partners.
He can't interact with competent adults in
a consensually sexual way. He needs to be
able to impose himself on a helpless victim,
be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a
mental hospital.
These are the things that a Nazi is, and
there's nothing polite or honest about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
05 Jul 2006 02:14:20 PM |
|
|
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down Müllerstraße it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platorm I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where there
were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised by
what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
05 Jul 2006 08:56:15 PM |
|
|
Gord H. wrote:
"Allan B." <Ablson492@excite.com> wrote in message
<Boedicia@isp.com> wrote in message
news:1152059986.943199.137360@v61g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
David Exley wrote:
"Scott Nudds" <sc0tt_nudds@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate
that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Guantanamo Bay is full of thugs and terrorists who've broken Godwin's
Law,
which is better than in China where they publicly execute transgressors.
Godwin's Law is so prevalent in today's culture that the latest edition
of
the
Bible has included Godwin's Law as an 11th Commandment. The
seriousness
of
violating Godwin's Law cannot be understated.
The BNP has promised to bring back capital punishment, but only in
extreme
cases where Godwin's Law has been repeatedly violated.
You are a moron and posting, using the name of a living person who
has not
given you permission to use their name, opens you up to a case for
libel.
Do you suck his *****? *****? What if the poster's name is David Exley as
he
claims? Are you saying that someone else here is named David Exley? In
that
case, who is it? Why doens't he come forward? Why is he such a quivering,
gutless Woman (he has no balls)?
There's no way of proving that he's deliberately using someone else's name,
are you saying that someone using the name Fred Jones or George Bush could
just as easily be opened up to libel because someone picked it as a name?
You're nothing but a pea brained *****. Go back to your knitting or giving
black men blow jobs, you stupid brainless Nazi *****.
Ooo look, another "clever jew".
What is a Nazi?
Oh my God, it's Oyvey McVay!!!
A Nazi is above all else, a craven coward.
Whatever Nazis were they were not cowards, can't say the same for
the bolshie jew in Russia.
A Nazi is afraid to compete with others as
equals because he knows he can't measure up.
Tee hee, *that* from the idiot who posted "Giving black men blow
jobs".
One has come to expect vile filth from the braindead yids.
A Nazi is afraid of his own inadequacy, so
he wants to murder his betters.
In that case you don't have a thing to worry about.
A Nazi is afraid of the truth, so he wants
to murder those who tell it.
A Nazi is afraid of history, so he wants to
murder the past, to wipe out the knowledge
of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National Socialism.
Finally, a Nazi is afraid of the power of
educated, informed adults. Freedom of
choice terrifies him... which is why he
chooses minor children as sexual partners.
? For God's sake don't tell OyVey McVay, he'll run to the ADL and
report you.
He can't interact with competent adults in
a consensually sexual way. He needs to be
able to impose himself on a helpless victim,
be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a
mental hospital.
Ah, now I see your problem, some blonde, blue eyed nurse with a
German accent was working in the loony bin you they keep *you*
chained
up in. Vat happened, did she try to give you a sponge bath?
These are the things that a Nazi is, and
there's nothing polite or honest about it.
What would a foulmouthed moron like you know about politeness or
honesty.
You are obviously a brick short of a load and merely repeating what
some
other moron has posted in some jew group. Take a hike, this is a
u.k. politic
NG, not a propaganda forum for bolshie jews Oy!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
05 Jul 2006 02:13:27 PM |
|
|
By Walter Ruthard
I myself was brought up in a small village in the southwest of
Germany. In 1939, when the war broke out, we left for the less exposed
Odenwald area until the possible danger of a French invasion had
passed. Shortly after that my father was transferred to the Ruhr
region. He as requested work as a foreman for the Mauser arms factory.
The government, true to their claims to be national and socialist,
took their promises seriously and provided young people starting a
family, as well as those who already had children, with affordable
housing. The first child brought a reduction of the mortgage by 25
percent, and when the fourth child arrived the mortgage was no more.
My parents already had four children then and thus were eligible for a
free newly built house from the government.
This was but one of the many programs the government established in
order to improve the quality of life for its citizens…
Then there was the "Kinderlandverschickung" program. It was started
before the war and enabled mothers in need of recreation to spend some
time in rural settings together with their children…
Another very popular social program of the government was "Fraft
durch Freude" (strength through joy). Here deserving workers could
take all-inclusive tours on luxury liners that were built especially
for this purpose. On these ships there was only one class and
everybody was treated the same. They visited the Azores and
Spitsbergen among other places. Those ships were not allowed to dock
in and English port however. The reason was that the British
government did not want it's citizens to see what it also could have
done for them…
The most misinterpreted program in Germany was the so-called
"Lebensborn". It was the exact opposite of what people are made to
believe it was, or should I say, of what people like to believe… The
Lebensborn was the institution to help unwed mothers who did not know
where to turn for help. They were taken care of during their
pregnancies and afterward as well. This was the Lebensborn, and any
other interpretation is plain hogwash…
My father was able to buy not one but three guns plus two pistols,
together with plenty of ammunition. All it took him was proof that he
was indeed a German citizen without a criminal record. Then in 1945,
when the French "liberated" us, they disarmed him. I know that he was
not the only one to have guns at home, because I saw the many, many
arms that were handed over to the French, and this was in a very small
village…
Then, after the war was over, we had our first experience with a real
democracy. The French introduced it and gave us some shining examples;
one was that the lived off the country and stole everything which
wasn't nailed down…
It was not until many years later that I learned that Hitler held at
least five plebiscites during the first half of his rule. In
democratic Germany, from 1945 until today there has never been a
plebiscite.
There were foreign workers employed in Germany during WWII. I knew
one of them. He worked on a farm and was treated exactly like the son
who was in the army. After the war he stayed on and married the
daughter of the house. He was a prisoner of war from Poland and I
never saw him guarded by any policeman. This is how foreigners were
treated in Germany. They earned the same wages as the Germans, they
took part in the social insurance program, had paid-for holidays
including free train fares, and many came back with friends who also
wanted to work for these "horrible" Germans. Today they are called
slave laborer.
Not everyone was entitled to go on to a university. Only good marks
and above-average performance in schools qualified. But good
performers were promoted with all means available. Today we are much
more democratic; everyone is entitled to a university education and if
the parents are wealthy enough, the son or daughter can study until
they are 35…
Germany was also the country to introduce, in 1933, the first-ever
comprehensive animal protection law. Farm animals had to be kept in
strictly natural environments and no animal factories were allowed. Of
course, no testing of products on animals was permitted, and no kosher
slaughter.
If new industrial facilities were built they had to conform to the
highest standards with adequate lighting and air inside, canteens
where the workers were served nutritious meals at affordable prices,
and beautiful lawns outside: all for the benefit of the workers…In
national socialist Germany, no child labor was allowed as it still was
in other European countries.
And finally, although I could still go on for a while, I would like to
mention that on express orders from Hitler himself, it was strictly
forbidden to use corporal punishment in the army. He was of the
opinion that in was incompatible with the honor of a German to be
punished by such degrading means.
That was the Germany I grew up in, and I am glad that I did.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
02 Jul 2006 03:11:01 AM |
|
|
"Scott Nudds" <sc0tt_nudds@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151772312.928607.11270@h44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry.
The analogy is highly apt.
The two are quite similar.
What's different is the world they live in.
Bush doesn't have the opportunities Hitler did - but he has the same moral
compass.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 12:08:05 PM |
|
|
***** Godwin and ***** all you children that appeal to him
Scott Nudds wrote:
The comparison of Bush to Hitler is way off the mark. I appreciate that
some people don't like the US president but comparing him to fascists
is pure sophistry. See Godwin's Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Understand who the fascists were, what they did, and how they operated.
For a reasonable covering of the subject see:
The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy -- Emilio Gentile,Keith
Botsford ISBN: 0674784758
Understanding Totalitarianism: The Poverty of Great Politics -- David
D. Roberts SBN: 0415192781
Next, understand that the US is a constitutional republic with a strong
triumvirate government.
Anyone who does just a little research on the subject will know that
the author of the above nonsense is a dizzy-eyed loop-nut.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "atruelove" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
30 Jun 2006 11:13:48 AM |
|
|
[usual uk.politics.misc whinge re Bush)
***** off.
Think of it this way ..
Elapsed time while Rogue Nations (USSR etc) were permitted to develop
Nukes: 55 years
(during which, partly as a result, I received present-day $4 million; I
thank you; my 14 direct descendants thank you ..)
Time to date where Bush et al have dictated "No Nukes" : 4 years, and
counting
(I'm still earning, but it got a little more difficult..)
History will look back on this 55 year lapse and say "What the ****!
Were these people crazy?"
May a crazed terrorist let off his knapsack Nuke in yr back yard.
.
|
|
|
| User: "foolsrushin." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
30 Jun 2006 07:55:11 PM |
|
|
'Bertrand Russell's famous prot=E9g=E9 Noam Chomsky wrote a blistering
critique of the US "preventive" attack on Iraq in 2003 as the "supreme
crime." There is quite an irony in this, because long ago, Chomsky's
idol once openly advocated unprovoked, preventive atomic warfare
against the Soviet Union - for the purposes of establishing an
anglo-american led world government. Specifically, Russell was
endorsing a plan drawn up immediately after World War 2 with Wall
Street financier and veteran White House insider Bernard Baruch leading
the effort. The "Baruch Plan" called for the threat of atomic attacks
on Soviet cities to be used to pressure Stalin into joining a
fast-track implementation of world government, which was to have been
structured around an augmented United Nations (Stalin refused).
Historian Paul Johnson relates the details in his book, Intellectuals:
..=2E. .'
To read on, go to:
<http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/russell.html>
The so-called Balance of Terror worked, though dreadful things went on
beneath the nuclear umbrella.
A world government, on the other hand would be a nightmare. We have two
recent negative models for it, George Orwell's and Aldous Huxley's,
though I think that of Hobbes the more likely and the ugliest! [One
supposes Cameron's is Huxley's!. Ed.]
Unlike Russell, I believe that power should be endlessly devolved and
sub-divided - to the point where individual's take responsibility for
their own lives.
It would be good if there were twice as many political parties as
persons!
This, of course, is a sort of extreme in an age when everyone has his
hand in the till, and so few think for themselves or care or know about
their communities.
With Kant, I nevertheless conclude that 'Nothing good can be made out
of the rotten timber of humanity'. And certainly not on a world-wide
scale!
--
'foolsrushin.'
atruelove wrote:
[usual uk.politics.misc whinge re Bush)
***** off.
Think of it this way ..
Elapsed time while Rogue Nations (USSR etc) were permitted to develop
Nukes: 55 years
(during which, partly as a result, I received present-day $4 million; I
thank you; my 14 direct descendants thank you ..)
Time to date where Bush et al have dictated "No Nukes" : 4 years, and
counting
(I'm still earning, but it got a little more difficult..)
History will look back on this 55 year lapse and say "What the ****!
Were these people crazy?"
May a crazed terrorist let off his knapsack Nuke in yr back yard.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 10:59:20 AM |
|
|
The Germans removed the Jews from ruling over them. That is what
America needs to do:
Here are some quotes from a German pamphlet titled "Why the Aryan
Law?":
"In 1793 the famous philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte, author of
"Speeches to the German Nation," wrote a pamphlet titled "A
Contribution to Correcting Judgments about the French Revolution." It
contained the following significant sentence:
"In nearly all the nations of Europe, a powerful, hostile government
is growing, and is at war with all the others, and sometimes oppresses
the people in dreadful ways: It is Jewry!"
The French Revolution, with its "ideas for the improvement of
humanity" thundered past, and in the noise the people who had believed
in world brotherhood entirely missed this serious warning. What Fichte
warned the word about then has today become fact in nearly all the
nations of the world. The Jewish people, once only tolerated, knew how
to raise a hue and cry about discrimination and persecution, winning
the sympathy of the world for the "poor Jews." They increasingly
infiltrated deep within our national organism, growing to have power
over every single area of our national life. The old saga, the "Edda,"
observes that one blocks a river at its source. The failure to do that
was the great mistake of the German people. Thank God, it is not too
late. Our Fuehrer Adolf Hitler recognized the importance of the
problem for Germany's rebirth, and outlined its solution in his
program.
Martin Luther wrote this of the Jews in his book "The Jews and their
Lies": "They hold we Christians captive in our own land. They have
seized our goods by their cursed usury, they mock and insult us
because we work. They are our lords, and we and our goods belong to
them." If in the coming days the Jewish race is driven out of the
non-Jewish world, it will have at least this consolation: It has made
clear to them for all time the value of maintaining the purity of race
and blood in clear, understandable and unforgettable ways.
National Socialist racial legislation has reduced the influence of
Jewry in all professions, and above all excluded them from the leading
offices of the nation. That is an important step in the relationship
between Germans and Jews, but one cannot ignore the fact that we have
not yet fully eliminated the influence of the Jewish foreign body in
German national life. It is not a question of German-Jewish
coexistence, rather of making as great as possible a separation
between blood and blood.
Three things are involved here:
A knowledge of the basic principles of National Socialist racial
thinking,
An understanding of the growth and expansion of Jewry,
The dominant sociological position of Jewry, to show how it dominated
the German people economically, intellectually and politically..."
"In discussing the Jewish Question, even today one encounters
resistance and misunderstandings, especially in intellectual circles.
This can only be explained by the intellectual education of the
political past. This is especially evident when one discusses the
fundamental issues.
Whenever a new thought arises in the world and calls people to
practical action, the old world resists because it feels its
foundations threatened. Its old standpoint has ruled for decades, and
it looks uncomprehendingly at a new idea that does not fit into the
accustomed patterns of thinking. That is natural. When the new idea
and worldview are truly revolutionary, they are on a different level
of human thought and feeling, and there can be no compromise. Its
realization depends on people who support it, and who are ready to
fight to transform the life of the individual and of the nation in
every way..."
"In the long run, no idea is better suited to guarantee peace between
nations than National Socialist racial thinking, which calls for the
furtherance and maintenance of one's own race and one's own people,
and supports similar efforts on the part of other nations..."
"The new Germany that views its own race and ethnicity positively must
therefore distinguish within its territory between one race and
another, between one people and another. Mixing of blood harms both
sides. Race is an issue for every people if they are to live according
to their nature. The German people is not so arrogant as to believe
that is is the chosen people. The familiar quotation from Geibel, "The
world should enjoy German ways," should be understood in the context
of the dreams of world betterment of those past days.
The National Socialist racial viewpoint has clear consequences for the
relationship between Germans and Jews. People have often said that
National Socialism's approach to the racial question is purely
negative and destructive, and that its essential characteristic is
radical anti-Semitism. One must grant that we made the Jewish question
clearer than anyone else, and taught an entire generation that had
been taught to see all people the same to recognize the importance of
the Jewish question not only for our people, but for the entire world.
Our treatment of the Jewish problem in the years before we took power
must be seen as the political education of the German people, which
had lost its racial instincts to a dangerous degree.
The question took on its own nature in Germany, Many citizens had
their eyes opened, and the simultaneous appeal to all the heroic and
manly virtues of the German man resulted in a racial selection of
political fighters who today stand at the head of the new state.
Formerly, the Jewish question, as seen by the state, was a matter of
complete equality and the unhindered immigration of Jews from the
East. This is the best proof of how racial feeling and consciousness
had been lost. Our tone was not purely negative or the simple
rejection of others, rather the emphasis was on the positive values of
our own people. This does require noting that Jewry through its
Marxist class struggle leadership role and its international financial
measures aimed at Germany supported every kind of anti-national action
in the cultural and political fields. Jewry should not complain if its
anti-German activities, which have no counterpart in any other
country, call forth from the people the defensive reaction of
anti-Semitism.
The starting point of the discussion is the scientific fact that the
Jew is different than the German. This is neither arrogant nor
boastful, it simply is the way things are. For us, the Jewish question
is a question between two peoples. Its characteristics are determined
by the racially determined differences between the two, and through
the unusual sociological and numerical development of Jewry in the
course of its history, developments that are particularly evident in
the last decades through a constantly growing process of foreign
infiltration that has reached an intolerable level for the German
people.
More than once over its history, the German people has absorbed
foreign elements, but they were racially identical or similar
population groups, as for example was the case with the Huguenots.
With the Jews, things are fundamentally different. They are seen
everywhere as foreigners, and see themselves that way as well. Walter
Rathenau said it most clearly as early as 1897: "How strange! In the
middle of German life there is a separate, foreign tribe that stands
out in every way with its hot-tempered behavior. An Asiatic horde has
settled on the sands of Mark Brandenburg." Einstein said something in
1931: "I have to laugh when I hear the phrase 'German citizen of the
Jewish faith.' These citizens first of all want nothing to do with my
poor Eastern European brothers, and second do not want to be sons of
my (Jewish) people, but only members of the Jewish cultural community.
Is that honest? Can a non-Jew respect such people? I am not a German
citizen. I am a Jew, and am happy to belong to the Jewish people."
The most remarkable thing about Jewry is that it has not disappeared
over the millennia, even though it lacks its own territory and
language. Even more remarkable is that it lacks the main
characteristic of a minority population, its own pockets of settlement
to which it could if necessary retreat. Only time will tell if
Palestine will someday fill this gap. That question is made more
difficult by the fact that the Arabs maintain their claim on
Palestine. Whatever the twists of history, the Jew has always remained
the same, whether as a grain speculator in ancient Rome or as a bank
or stock exchange potentate in the modern era. They were always able
to control the wealth of whole nations. Nations and peoples once their
contemporaries have vanished, leaving only words and crumbled
monuments behind; only the Jew remains. In ancient days we see him
carrying on his business in the trading centers of the Mediterranean.
In the Middle Ages he provided money for German nobles and free
cities. Today he rules the banks and stock exchanges of the whole
world, forcing the nations under the yoke of financial capitalism. The
power of this people of 15 million rests on these international
relations. This is how they seem to fulfill the commandment of Jehovah
- the world domination of the chosen people.
The secret of the Jewish people, which has enabled them to survive
through all of history's twists and turns, is that it has always
recognized the laws of blood, even anchoring them in the laws of its
religion. The consciousness of blood and family that believing Jews
have has been stronger than all the other forces of history, giving us
a unique example of a people without its own land and language, which
still meets the criteria for being a people, and which has outlasted
many other peoples.
This historic manifestation of Jewry, which is unique, brings to the
fore the question of the relationship between the host and guest
peoples. It has been answered in differing ways throughout history,
depending on the worldview and thinking then predominant.
Since the Jews were dispersed they have been held together by the laws
of their religion and their faith that they were the chosen people.
Until the middle of the 18th Century, Germans and Jews lived apart
from each other. The Jews had no opportunity to become involved in the
religious of political-intellectual life of their host people. On the
other hand, they could practice their own customs without
interference. They had their own religion and their own laws. During
the Middle Ages, the Ghetto was the way Jewry could maintain itself in
the midst of other peoples and fulfill its Jewish duties, which grew
out of its race, origins and laws. The values and ideals of other
peoples were not affected. This separation was only possible because
the views of the host people were as strong as those of the Jews.
According to the writer Grau: "There was no racial defilement or
baptism, no attempt to join a nation that one could never be a member
of, and no attempt to intellectually silence the host people." In the
Ghetto of the Middle Ages, the Jew developed his nature and
characteristics, which were later to become significant, while
maintaining the community of blood and race. The latter is
particularly important, since the strict physical separation between
the host and guest peoples maintained the foreign nature that we daily
see so clearly, now that the barriers between have long since fallen.
Even in the Middle Ages, the most important thing was not the
difference between the Christian and Mosaic faiths. Rather, there was
on the one hand the natural sense that the Jew was of a foreign race,
and on the other hand the strict law of blood which demanded a clear
separation if the Jews were to fulfill Jehovah's mission, which had
guided them from the beginning. Just this has always been kept in the
background by historians, who present the Ghetto as a tolerated asylum
for Jewish martyrs persecuted on account of their faith. There is a
gap to be filled here. The task of historians writing from our new
viewpoint will be to examine the portrait of the Ghetto of the Middle
Ages to discover its importance for the development of Jewry and the
relationship between the guest and host peoples. Even the Jewish side
is demanding that. O. Karbach criticizes historical writing because it
"in significant ways conceals the historical fact that the Jews in the
centuries before their emancipation possessed a legal standing that
was better than the greater part of the rest of the population, namely
complete or partial agricultural freedom. (Ordnung in der Judenfrage,
edited by E. Czermak, Reinhold, Vienna, 1933).
The barriers between Germans and Jews fell as a result of the
Enlightenment and the French Revolution. The path to Jewish world
domination would take a different direction than pious, observant Jews
had expected. Emancipation made it possible to build Jewish dominance
through secular means. With the disappearance of racial consciousness,
only religious differences seemed to remain. It seemed at the time
unjust to give someone a preferred position only because of his
religious beliefs, which are an entirely personal matter. At the time,
this was tied to a belief in human equality and freedom. It was
revolutionary. It shattered the church dogmas that had ruled for
centuries and was the foundation of liberal thinking during the last
two hundred years. The new goal was humanity itself, and nothing stood
in the way of racial mixing. Some had the quiet hope that assimilation
would mean the absorption of Jewry. Jewry itself, however, was more
than willing to use the opportunities of religious assimilation, which
opened the path to all important positions, even to political
leadership. As H. Heine said, "baptism was the ticket to European
culture." Gradually, an intermixing with the German people developed,
particularly in its cultural elite. Foreign blood infiltrated to a
degree that we realize only today now that the "Law to Reestablish a
Professional Bureaucracy" has exposed numerous sources of foreign
blood. This process has greatly accelerated during the last fourteen
years.
Today the age of raceless thinking is being displaced by the ideals of
human variability. Values are rooted in origin and territory, and each
group has a historic mission based on its own unique and eternal
values. Such new racial thinking will of course secure the opposition
of those who either through faith or reason still believe in the unity
of humanity in culture, social order and organization. The Jews will
naturally oppose any discussion of race, since the denial of any
significant differences between people is the foundation of his
infiltration of Western European society. The Jew finds any mention of
the racial question as an attack on his current existence. His leading
role in every anti-national area is characteristic of his mimicry, and
is necessary for his continued existence. That explains the phrase
"German citizen of the Jewish faith."
The recognition that the Jew is of a foreign and different race along
with the reawakening of German racial consciousness must necessarily
lead to a change in the relations between Germans and Jews.
There is one point to keep in mind before examining the statistics.
Only those people who claimed to be Jews and were members of the
Mosaic faith were counted as Jews, not those who for internal or
external reasons belonged to another religion, or those who claimed to
be dissident Jews and therefore did not belong to the standard groups.
This is regrettable for our purposes, since we are interested not in
the influence of those who still claimed the Jewish religion, rather
those who belonged to the Jewish race! That includes all Jews, whether
of the Mosaic faith or baptized Christians. That is just what the
supporters of the Talmud and the Old Testament always said. They
complained that the state opened all offices to those "without
character," to "Christmas Jews," even admitting them to the officer
corps! The statistics given here must therefore be increased
significantly. The Jews are a race, and baptism does not in any way
change the foreign characteristics that are hostile to the German
people..."
Of course, the intellectual atmosphere that enabled the Jew to
infiltrate the German body politic quickly led the Jew himself to see
that conditions for his advancement were favorable, and that the way
to the top was open. He also realized what the population statistics
meant, indeed they were particularly clear to him, since 2/3 of his
kind lived in the big cities, the centers of the liberal worldview..."
"Nothing shows the differences between our people and the Jews more
clearly than their likes and dislikes for certain occupations. In some
occupations, particularly those that are most important for the nation
as a whole, the foreign influence on German life has reached an
intolerable extent not seen elsewhere in Europe. The preference for
certain occupations also gives us an interesting insight into the
spiritual nature of Jewry.
The following figures show how much critical occupations in Germany
have been infiltrated.
112,188 Jews, or 58.8%, far more than half, are employed in the area
of "commerce and transportation, including restaurants and taverns,"
but only 17.11% (3,248,145) of the population as a whole. In the area
of "industry and craft work, including mining and construction,"
19,318 Jews (25.85%) were employed, including 31.82% of foreigners.
For the population as a whole, the figure was 40.94% (7,771,799).
The figures in the field of "public administration, the judiciary, the
army and navy, churches, legal professionals and the independent
professions." 11,324 Jews were employed there, or 5.94% , over against
921,048 (4.85%) in the general population..."
In 1925, 0.81% of Jews were active as civil servants and the army and
navy, as opposed to 2.3% of the general population. In the church,
religious occupations, the legal system and the other independent
professions, the Jewish percentage is 4.3% as opposed to 2% of the
general population. This shows that the Jews are over-represented when
compared to the general population, particularly in the independent
professions.
The percentage of the Jewish population in government positions may
seem less than that of the general population, but the difference is
not as great as the figures first suggest. The most recent figures,
not yet entirely complete, suggest that a not insignificant number of
them are baptized Jews or dissidents formerly of the Jewish faith who
denied their Jewishness to gain an official position.
4.35% of Jews are employed in the medical and health care system,
including welfare, and 2.0% of foreign Jews. The figure for the
general population is 1.88%. The Jewish percentage is thus 2 1/2 times
as high as that of the general population.
In summary, Jewish occupational patterns differ from those of the rest
of the population. Jewry seems to have an aversion to agricultural
work, industrial labor and crafts. They are greatly over-represented
in commerce and transportation, including the entire banking system.
They are also over-represented in the independent professions and the
health care system. These figures alone demonstrate a clear difference
between the native German population and alien Jewry.
Very similar conditions prevail in all Western European nations and
also in North America, since Jews have spread throughout the world in
areas with growing industry and in cities that are centers of economic
and financial power. It is not true, as is often claimed, that the Jew
was systematically forced into commerce by the laws of the various
nations; rather, commerce particularly suits the Jew's nature. This is
supported by Dr. Arthur Ruppin, a scholar respected by the Jews. He
writes in his book The Jews of the Present (2nd edition, Cologne and
Leipzig, 1911, p. 45):
"Thanks to their significant commercial gifts (!), the Jews soon
enjoyed great success in commerce and industry. For 2000 years they
have seemed predestined to work in commerce. It is false to claim, as
some do, that Jews became merchants primarily because the Christians
denied them other occupations during the Middle Ages. The Jews did not
become merchants in Europe, rather they entered the profession in
growing numbers ever since the Babylonian Captivity in Syria, Egypt
and Babylon [because they dislike labor and prefer to have others work
for them! The Editor]. In Palestine until the dispersion they did live
primarily by agriculture. In the Diaspora, there was hardly anywhere
that the Jews lived by agriculture. The Middle Ages did not make them
into merchants. It only affirmed legally that which history had
already established. It is after all the rule that economic laws
generally do not create new conditions, but only legalize and regulate
that which already exists. The law would never have limited the Jews
to commerce in Europe if they had not already immigrated primarily as
merchants..."
Nearly all national economists agree that the Jews owe their role as
merchants not to chance, but to their excellent abilities as
merchants. As W. Sombart wrote: "The Jewish race is by nature the
incarnation of the capitalism-mercantile spirit." (Der moderne
Kapitalismus, Vol. 2, p. 349. Leipzig, 1902). Many others agree..."
"Similarly differences in the relative proportion of Jews by the
self-employed are evident in the medical field, which employs 0.5% of
the general population but 2.8% of the Jews, nearly six times as many.
Similar statistics are found in the cultural area (theater, film,
radio, education, teaching, etc.). The 0.4% of the general population
are employed there, 2.6% of the Jews, also about six times as many.
In the area of public administration and the judiciary, the percentage
of Jews in high positions is 2.0%, over against 1.3% of the general
population, nearly twice as high. The significance of these figures
becomes clear that when one realizes that the 2.3% of professional
Jews in public administration and the judiciary are in a branch where
the Jewish percentage of employees is only 0.81%. That means that the
Jews are especially represented in the important positions that
influence the whole government and leading branches of the economy.."
"The statistics may be interesting. The Jewish workers included 11,406
in industry, 2,220 in commerce and transportation, and 726 in
agriculture.
The following figures show most clearly the different social structure
of Jewry in Prussia over against the general population, and reveal
clearly Jewry's leading role in public life:.."
"On 19 May 1933 Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler gave an interview to
Bernard Ridder, an American journalist for the New York State
Newspaper. Discussing the Jewish Question in Germany, he said: "Should
I allow thousands of German-blooded people to be destroyed so that the
Jews can live and work in luxury while millions starve, falling victim
to Bolshevism out of desperation?"
Can the justice of his words be doubted when one recalls that,
according to the Prussian census of 16 June 1925 6.9% of all
independent pharmacists, 17.9% of all independent physicians, 4.8% of
all independent artists, 27% of all independent attorneys, 4.6% of
editors, 11% of theater directors, 7.5% of actors, and 14.8% of all
independent dentists were Jews! And these huge figures when the Jews
were only 1% of the population! Is that anything other than a
Jewdification of our entire cultural system?! And what would these
figures look like if one had had the ability to include baptized Jews
and dissidents?..."
"Berlin is the Jewish metropolis in Germany. The process of
Jewdification is considerably further along. That is understandable,
since one is in the immediate vicinity of the protective arms of
democracy and social democracy, where developments can occur
unhindered. Thus in Berlin on 16 June 1925 32.2% of the pharmacists
were Jews, as were 49.9% of the physicians, 7.5 of the graphic
artists, 50.2% of the attorneys, 8.5% of the editors, 14.2% of the
directors and theater heads, 12.3% of the actors and 37.5% of the
dentists.
These figures cry out for legal limitations on Jewry, and it is
surprising that former governments did not take the appropriate action
to tell the Jews "this far and no further."
The Jewish influence gave the rest of the world an entirely false
impression of the nature of the German people. Inside the Reich, they
poisoned the soul of the people, and all social and political
relationships. Until the national uprising, the leaders of the
National Socialist movement were persecuted, defamed and suppressed by
a system that was a willing tool in the hands of a foreign and
different race. The national revolution freed the German people from
this foreign influence, which had also dominated and ruined the German
press and public life in significant ways.
He who wants to understand the German revolution of 1933 must
understand that it had this goal: 'Germany must be governed by Germans
for Germans.' The central idea of the National Socialist revolution
was the longing of the German people to once more be master in every
area of its own life. As a great, confident people, we demand only
this of the other peoples: that they permit us, as their equals, to
govern ourselves as we wish and find our own way to happiness (Reich
Minister of the Interior Dr. Frick)..."
"The Jewdification of our colleges and universities over the years has
reached almost frightening proportions. We begin with a publication
from 1931. Karl Hoppmann, in his volume "On the State of Jewdification
in the Academic professions" found the following figures:
1. University of Berlin:
Medical faculty . . . . over 50%
Philosophical faculty . . . . 25%
2. University of Göttingen, 32% of the professors were Jewish:
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40.0%
Mathematics and Natural Sciences . . . 23.0%
3. University of Breslau
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.0%
4. University of Frankfurt (Main)
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.0%
Mathematics and Natural Sciences . . . 28.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.0%
Economics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.0%
Jewry has a dominating role on the stock exchange. The board of the
Berlin stock exchange is almost exclusively Jewish. In the various
committees, the percentage of the Jewish race is sometimes many times
as high as the Aryan. The committees include:
That means that 117 or 147 members are Jews, or nearly 80%.
The extent of the Jewdification of German theater and film is evident
from 1931 figures. Of 234 theater directors, 118 (50.4%) were Jews, 92
(39.3%) were non-Jewish.
Berlin led in this area as well, with 23 of 29 theater directors (80%)
Jewish.
The situation in film is similar. The Viennese Catholic periodical
"Schönere Zukunft," which certainly cannot be accused of
anti-Semitism, wrote the following in its 3 February 1929 issue:
"The percentage of Jewry in today's film industry is so high, at least
by us in Germany, that there is only a tiny part left for Christian
firms."
Jewry has long sought political influence as well. This formerly
happened in covert ways, mostly through direct or indirect control of
money matters. Nearly every noble once had his financial Jew. Since
1848, the birth of political parties in Germany, Jewry has openly
sought to become a political power. The Jew Marx was the founder of
Marxist doctrine, the Jew Lassalle was the founder of the Social
Democratic Party. The founders of the Independent Social Democratic
Party of Germany were the Jews Bernstein, Haase, Kautsky, Hilferding,
Cohn, Davidsohn, Simon, Rosenfeld, Eisner, Levi, etc. Carl Liebknecht
and Rosa Luxemberg were the leaders of the Communist Party, and
recently the Jews Rosenfeld and Seydewitz founded the Socialist
Workers Party. Jews sat in the press offices and the various editorial
offices of party newspapers, and above all in the various
parliamentary factions..."
"We think it necessary to mention that the Communist wave that
threatened to destroy Germany politically, economically and
intellectually can primarily be traced back to Jewry.
Is it any wonder that the Jew is arrogant? The greater the Jewish
influence the more secure they feel, and the more ominously and
clearly their character and goals becomes clear: Pride, intolerance
and superiority on the one hand, a drive for world domination on the
other. Several pointed Jewish statements are examples:
Hochmut: The familiar "Dorfgeschichte"-Auerbach says: "We Jews are the
most intelligent race." "We are the chosen ones," says Dr. Berhard
Cohn (Jüdisch-Politische Streitfragen, 20, 22). He continues: "We may
carry our head high and demand particular respect. We must not only be
treated equally, but better. We deserve the particular respect of
other peoples."
Rabbi Dr. Rulf wrote a book ("Aruchas bar-Ammni," Israel's Healing,
Frankfurt a. M. 1883) in which he says: "The Jewish people is a
blessing for all peoples. The blessing has followed on the heels of
the Jews. A whole world lives from the Jews, who feed everyone, and
everywhere spread wealth and pleasure, comfort and prosperity. Only
the commerce of the Jews creates value. Work alone does not do that.
Half of the world's population would starve without the Jews."
The Jew Dr. Duschak wrote: "The world could not exist without the
Jews." The well-known Jew Sacher-Masoch explained the hatred of
anti-Semites against the Jews in this way: It is the same hatred a
Negro feels against the whites because of their superiority.
That the Jews even went so far as to suggest to Bismark that he make
the Jewish Day of Atonement a national holiday is certainly no sign of
modesty.
Intolerance: The Jew Klausner (Society, edited by Conrad, Volume 12)
wrote: "Anti-Semitism and criminality are nearly the same thing. There
are criminals who were not anti-Semites, but no anti-Semites who were
not criminals."
The work by Dr. E. Fuchs. "The Future of the Jews," (Berlin,
Philo-Verlag, 1924) judges our greatest historians, Hartmann and
Treitschke, who see the Jews as our misfortune: "Men blinded by
prejudice and hatred. Small, tiny men."
World Domination: The Jewish attorney Maurthner in Vienna said back in
the 1880's: "It is not just a matter of fighting anti-Semitism. We
want to oppose it with Jewish domination!"
They made the attempt. If the German people had not recovered their
senses at the last moment, and if they had not had a Fuehrer and
Chancellor named Adolf Hitler who recognized the danger and woke the
German people, we would have fallen into slavery. As we have already
noted, the Jew has always known how to rouse sympathy when things were
rough for him. Consider this report from the meeting of the PEN Club
in Ragusa at the end of May of last year: "Schalom Asch in his keynote
address noted that the suffering of the Jews in Germany had aroused
the sympathy of the entire world. Only the German government remained
untouched. He claimed the Jews has given Germany its deepest thoughts,
its most beautiful songs, its greatest poets, artists and
philosophers. Today one had crucified them in Germany and covered them
with their own blood." Mr. Schalom Asch began crying in the midst of
these outrageous lies. He spoke in the hope that his words would be
heard for the sake of justice and humanity throughout the world.
The Jew Asch cries! The German people are not moved. They want no
torture or persecution, but also no unjustified sympathy, only
justice! Remember always the worlds of Field Marshall Moltke: "The Jew
is a state within the state." Remember also the works of our great
historian Mommsen: "In antiquity too the Jew was the ferment of
cosmopolitanism and national decomposition." And remember Goethe: "The
Israelites have never done much; they possess few virtues, and most of
the deficiencies of other peoples!"
The Racial Question has an important role in the laws of other
nations, though other peoples and races are affected than in the
German Reich. It is in no way new or unusual that the German Reich is
active in this area. Contrary to opinions that surface here and there,
our laws are in no way directed against the Jewish religion, its
practice, or the freedom of the Jewish faith.
The German Reich has done nothing but introduce constitutional
legislation to provide the kind of civil service necessary to
guarantee the secure administration of the Reich. The laws do not
render it impossible for a citizen of a foreign state to become a
civil servant. Indeed, if he is appointed to such a position, he
receives full citizenship in the Reich. German civil servants should
however be of Aryan descent. The so-called Aryan Law requires that
each civil servant be of German blood. Since the vast majority of
non-Aryan civil servants were Jews, the first guidelines to the law
paid particular attention to those who were members of the Jewish
race. But we did not simply throw out the non-Aryan civil servants,
but retired them with honor and a pension. The people's state could
hardly proceed in a more legal and mild manner. Germany did not want
to attack Jewry wildly, rather only deal with its results, is clear
from the fact that the Law of 7 April 1933 left untouched all
non-Aryan civil servants who had been appointed before 1 August 1914,
and by the fact that the private sphere not affected. Some complain
that the law extends to half and quarter Aryans. The answer is that
the foreign influence in the civil service had grown to such a
dangerous extent that it was almost impossible for young Germans to
enter these professions." (Reich Minister of the Interior Dr.
Frick..."
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alex Vange" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Bush works on his Hitlerian fantasy |
01 Jul 2006 11:32:53 AM |
|
|
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1t6da2pennp2g6va9a4natnht4k0ct28ma@4ax.com...
The Germans removed the Jews from ruling over them.
You are a tool of the Jew Overlord oppressors. Here are some quotes from Mein
Kamph. If you haven't already memorized them, you are a race traitor and a
Jew lover.
"Den gewaltigsten Gegensatz zum Arier bildet der Jude. Bei kaum einem Volke
der Welt ist der Selbsterhaltungstrieb stärker entwickelt als beim
sogenannten auserwählten. Als bester Beweis hierfür darf die einfache
Tatsache des Bestehens dieser Rasse allein schon gelten. Wo ist das Volk, das
in den letzten zweitausend Jahren so wenigen Veränderungen der inneren
Veranlagung des Charakters usw. ausgesetzt gewesen wäre als das jüdische?
Welches Volk endlich hat größere Umwälzungen mitgemacht als dieses ? und ist
dennoch immer als dasselbe aus den gewaltigsten Katastrophen der Menschheit
hervorgegangen? Welch ein unendlich zäher Wille zum Leben, zur Erhaltung der
Art spricht aus diesen Tatsachen!Die intellektuellen Eigenschaften des Juden
haben sich im Verlaufe der Jahrtausende geschult. Er gilt heute als
"gescheit" und war es in einem gewissen Sinne zu allen Zeiten. Allein sein
Verstand ist nicht das Ergebnis eigener Entwicklung, sondern eines
Anschauungsunterrichtes durch Fremde. Auch der menschliche Geist vermag nicht
ohne Stufen zur Höhe emporzuklimmen; er braucht zu jedem Schritt nach
aufwärts das Fundament der Vergangenheit und zwar in jenem umfassenden Sinne,
in dem es sich nur in der allgemeinen Kultur zu offenbaren vermag. Alles
Denken beruht nur zum geringen Teile auf eigener Erkenntnis, zum größten aber
auf den Erfahrungen der vor. hergegangenen Zeit. Daß allgemeine Kulturniveau
versorgt den einzelnen Menschen, ohne daß es dieser meistens beachtet, mit
einer solchen Fülle von Vorkenntnissen, daß er, so gerüstet, leichter weiter
eigene Schritte machen kann. Der Knabe von heute zum Beispiel wächst unter
einer wahren Unmenge technischer Errungenschaften der letzten Jahrhunderte
auf, so daß er vieles, das vor hundert Jahren noch den größten Geistern ein
Rätsel war, als selbstverständlich gar nicht mehr beachtet, obwohl es für ihn
zum Verfolgen und Verstehen unserer Fortschritte auf dem betreffenden Gebiete
von ausschlaggebender Bedeutung ist. Würde selbst ein genialer Kopf aus den
zwanziger Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts heute plötzlich sein Grab verlassen,
so wäre sein auch nur geistiges Zurechtfinden in der jetzigen Zeit schwerer,
als dies für einen mittelmäßig begabten fünfzehnjährigen Knaben von
heute der Fall ist. Denn ihm würde all die unendliche Vorbildung fehlen, die
der Zeitgenosse von heute wahrend seines Aufwuchses inmitten der
Erscheinungen der jeweiligen allgemeinen Kultur sozusagen unbewußt in sich
aufnimmt.
Da nun der Jude ? aus Gründen, die sich sofort ergeben werden ? niemals im
Besitze einer eigenen Kultur war, sind die Grundlagen seines geistigen
Arbeitens immer von anderen gegeben worden. Sein Intellekt hat sich zu allen
Zeiten an der ihn umgebenden Kulturwelt entwickelt.
Niemals fand der umgekehrte Vorgang statt.
Denn wenn auch der Selbsterhaltungstrieb des jüdischen Volkes nicht kleiner,
sondern eher noch größer ist als der anderer Völker, wenn auch seine
geistigen Fähigkeiten sehr leicht den Eindruck zu erwecken vermögen, daß sie
der intellektuellen Veranlagung der übrigen Rassen ebenbürtig wären, so fehlt
doch vollständig die allerwesentlichste Voraussetzung für ein Kulturvolk, die
idealistische Gesinnung.
Der Aufopferungswille im jüdischen Volke geht aber den nackten
Selbsterhaltungstrieb des einzelnen nicht hinaus. Das scheinbar große
Zusammengehörigkeitsgefühl ist in einem sehr primitiven Herdeninstinkt
begründet, wie er sich ähnlich bei vielen anderen Lebewesen auf dieser Welt
zeigt. Bemerkenswert ist dabei die Tatsache, daß Herdentrieb stets nur so
lange zu gegenseitiger Unterstützung führt, als eine gemeinsame Gefahr dies
zweckmäßig oder unvermeidlich erscheinen läßt. Das gleiche Rudel Wölfe, das
soeben noch gemeinsam seinen Raub überfällt, löst sich bei nachlassendem
Hunger wieder in seine einzelnen Tiere auf. Das gleiche gilt von den Pferden,
die sich des Angreifers geschlossen zu erwehren suchen, um nach überstandener
Gefahr wieder auseinanderzustieben.
Ähnlich verhält es sich beim Juden. Sein Aufopferungssinn ist nur ein
scheinbarer. Er besteht nur so lange, als die Existenz jedes einzelnen dies
unbedingt erforderlich macht. Sobald jedoch der gemeinsame Feind besiegt, die
allen drohende Gefahr beseitigt, der Raub geborgen ist, hört die scheinbare
Harmonie der Juden untereinander auf, und den ursächlich vorhandenen Anlagen
wieder Platz zu geben. Der Jude ist nur einig, wenn eine gemeinsame Gefahr ihn
dazu zwingt oder eine gemeinsame Beute lockt; fallen beide Gründe weg, so
treten die Eigenschaften eines krassesten Egoismus in ihre Rechte, und aus dem
einigen Volk wird im Handumdrehen eine sich blutig bekämpfende Rotte von
Ratten.
Wären die Juden auf dieser Welt allein, so würden sie ebensosehr in Schmutz
und Unrat ersticken wie in haßerfülltem Kampfe sich gegenseitig zu
übervorteilen und auszurotten versuchen, sofern nicht der sich in ihrer
Feigheit ausdrückende restlose Mangel jedes Aufopferungssinnes auch hier den
Kampf zum Theater werden ließe.
Es ist also grundfalsch, aus der Tatsache des Zusammenstehens der Juden im
Kampfe, richtiger ausgedrückt in der Ausplünderung ihrer Mitmenschen, bei
ihnen auf einen gewissen idealen Aufopferungssinn schließen zu wollen.
Auch hier leitet den Juden weiter nichts als nackter Egoismus des einzelnen.
Daher ist auch der jüdische Staat ? der der lebendige Organismus zur
Erhaltung und Vermehrung einer Rasse sein soll ? territorial vollständig
unbegrenzt. Denn eine bestimmte räumliche Fassung eines Staatsgebildes setzt
immer eine idealistische Gesinnung der Staatsrasse voraus, besonders aber
eine richtige Auffassung des Begriffes Arbeit. In eben dem Maße, in dem es an
dieser Einstellung mangelt, versagt auch jeder Versuch zur Bildung, ja sogar
zur Erhaltung eines räumlich begrenzten Staates. Damit entfällt jedoch die
Grundlage, auf der eine Kultur allein entstehen kann.
Daher ist das jüdische Volk bei allen scheinbaren intellektuellen
Eigenschaften dennoch ohne jede wahre Kultur, besonders aber ohne jede
eigene. Denn was der Jude heute an Scheinkultur besitzt, ist das unter seinen
Händen meist schon verdorbene Gut der anderen Völker.
Als wesentliches Merkmal bei der Beurteilung des Judentums in seiner Stellung
zur Frage der menschlichen Kultur muß man sich immer vor Augen halten, daß es
eine jüdische Kunst niemals gab und demgemäß auch heute nicht gibt, daß vor
allem die beiden Königinnen aller Künste, Architektur und Musik, dem Judentum
nichts Ursprüngliches zu verdanken haben. Was es auf dem Gebiete der Kunst
leistet, ist entweder Verbalhornung oder geistiger Diebstahl. Damit aber
fehlen dem Juden jene Eigenschaften, die schöpferisch und damit kulturell
begnadete Rassen auszeichnen.
Wie sehr der Jude nur nachempfindend, besser aber verderbend fremde Kultur
übernimmt, geht daraus hervor, daß er am meisten in der Kunst zu finden ist,
die auch am wenigsten auf eigene Erfindung eingestellt erscheint, der
Schauspielkunst. Allein selbst hier ist er wirklich nur der "Gaukler", besser
der Nachäffer; denn selbst hier fehlt ihm der allerletzte Wurf zur wirklichen
Größe; selbst hier ist er nicht der geniale Gestalter, sondern äußerlicher
Nachahmer, wobei alle dabei angewendeten Mätzchen und Tricks eben doch nicht
aber die innere Leblosigkeit seiner Gestaltungsgabe hinwegzutäuschen
vermögen. Hier hilft nur die jüdische Presse in liebevollster Weise nach,
indem sie aber jeden, aber auch den mittelmäßigsten Stümper, sofern er eben
nur Jude ist, ein solches Hosiannageschrei erhebt, daß die übrige Mitwelt
endlich wirklich vermeint, einen Künstler vor sich zu sehen, während es sich
in Wahrheit nur um einen jammervollen Komödianten handelt.
Nein, der Jude besitzt keine irgendwie kulturbildende Kraft, da der
Idealismus, ohne den es eine wahrhafte Höherentwicklung des Menschen nicht
gibt, bei ihm nicht vorhanden ist und nie vorhanden war. Daher wird sein
Intellekt niemals aufbauend wirken, sondern zerstörend und in ganz seltenen
Fällen vielleicht höchstens aufpeitschend, dann aber als das Urbild der
"Kraft, die stets das Böse will und stets das Gute schafft". Nicht durch ihn
findet irgendein Fortschritt der Menschheit statt, sondern trotz ihm.
Da der Jude niemals einen Staat mit bestimmter terri- torialer Begrenzung
besaß
und damit auch nie eine Kultur sein eigen nannte,
entstand die Vorstellung, als handle es sich hier um ein Volk, das in die
Reihe der Nomaden zu rechnen wäre. Dies ist ein ebenso großer wie
gefährlicher Irrtum. Der Nomade besitzt sehr wohl einen bestimmt umgrenzten
Lebensraum, nur bebaut er ihn nicht als seßhafter Bauer, sondern lebt vom
Ertrage seiner Herden, mit denen er in seinem Gebiete wandert. Der äußere
Grund hierfür ist in der geringen Fruchtbarkeit eines Bodens zu sehen, der
eine Ansiedlung einfach nicht gestattet. Die tiefere Ursache aber liegt im
Mißverhältnis zwischen der technischen Kultur einer Zeit oder eines Volkes
und der natürlichen Armut eines Lebensraumes. Es gibt Gebiete, in denen auch
der Arier nur durch seine im Laufe von mehr denn tausend Jahren entwickelte
Technik in der Lage ist, in geschlossenen Siedlungen des weiten Bodens Herr
zu werden und die Erfordernisse des Lebens aus ihm zu bestreiten. besäße er
diese Technik nicht, so müßte er entweder diese Gebiete meiden oder ebenfalls
als Nomade in dauernder Wanderschaft das Leben fristen, vorausgesetzt, daß
nicht seine tausendjährige Erziehung und Gewöhnung an Seßhaftigkeit dies für
ihn einfach unerträglich erscheinen ließe. Man muß bedenken, daß in der Zeit
der Erschließung des amerikanischen Kontinents zahlreiche Arier sich ihr
Leben als Fallensteller, Jäger usw. erkämpften, und zwar häufig in größeren
Trupps mit Weib und Kind, immer herumziehend, so das ihr Dasein vollkommen
dem der Nomaden glich. Sobald aber ihre steigende Zahl und bessere
Hilfsmittel gestatteten, den wilden Boden auszuroden und den Ureinwohnern
standzuhalten, schossen immer mehr Siedlungen in dem Lande empor.
Wahrscheinlich war auch der Arier erst Nomade und wurde im Laufe der Zeit
seßhaft, allein deshalb war er doch niemals Jude! Nein, der Jude ist kein
Nomade; denn auch der Nomade hatte schon eine bestimmte Stellung zum Begriffe
"Arbeit", die als Grundlage für eine spätere Entwicklung dienen konnte,
sofern die notwendigen geistigen Voraussetzungen hierzu vorhanden waren. Die
idealistische Grundanschauung aber ist bei ihm, wenn auch in unendlicher
Verdünnung, gegeben, daher erscheint er auch in seinem ganzen Wesen den
arischen Völkern vielleicht fremd, allein nicht unsympathisch. Bei den Juden
hingegen ist diese Einstellung überhaupt nicht vorhanden; er war deshalb auch
kein Nomade,
sondern immer nur Parasit im Körper anderer Völker. Daß er dabei manchmal
seinen bisherigen Lebensraum verläßt, hängt nicht mit seiner Absicht
zusammen, sondern ist das Ergebnis des Hinauswurfes, den er von Zeit zu Zeit
durch die mißbrauchten Gastvölker erfährt. Sein Sich-Weiterverbreiten aber
ist eine typische Erscheinung für alle Parasiten; er sucht immer neuen
Nährboden für seine Rasse.
Dies hat aber mit Nomadentum deshalb nichts zu tun, weil der Jude gar nicht
daran denkt, ein von ihm besetztes Gebiet wieder zu räumen, sondern bleibt,
wo er sitzt, und zwar so seßhaft, daß er selbst mit Gewalt nur mehr sehr
schwer zu vertreiben ist. Sein Ausdehnen auf immer neue Länder erfolgt erst
in dem Augenblick, in dem dort gewisse Bedingungen für sein Dasein gegeben
sind, ohne daß er dadurch ? wie der Nomade ? seinen bisherigen Wohnsitz
verhindern würde. Er ist und bleibt der ewige Parasit, ein Schmarotzer, der
wie ein schädlicher Bazillus sich immer mehr ausbreitet, sowie nur ein
günstiger Nährboden dazu einlädt. Die Wirkung seines Daseins aber gleicht
ebenfalls der von Schmarotzern: wo er auftritt, stirbt das Wirtsvolk nach
kürzerer oder längerer Zeit ab.
So lebte der Jude zu allen Zeiten in den Staaten anderer Völker und bildete
dort seinen eigenen Staat, der allerdings so lange unter der Bezeichnung
"Religionsgemeinschaft" maskiert zu segeln pflegte, als die äußeren Umstände
kein vollständiges Enthüllen seines Wesens angezeigt sein ließen. Glaubte er
sich aber einmal stark genug, um der Schutzdecke entbehren zu können, dann
ließ er noch immer den Schleier fallen und war plötzlich das, was so viele
andere früher nicht glauben und sehen wollten: der Jude.
Im Leben des Juden als Parasit im Körper anderer Nationen und Staaten liegt
eine Eigenart begründet, die Schopenhauer einst zu dem schon erwähnten
Ausspruch veranlaßte, der Jude sei der "große Meister im Lügen". Das Dasein
treibt den Juden zur Lüge, und zwar zur immerwährenden Lüge, wie es den
Nordländer zur warmen Kleidung zwingt.
Sein Leben innerhalb anderer Völker kann auf die Dauer nur währen, wenn es
ihm gelingt, die Meinung zu er. wecken, als handle es sich bei ihm um kein
Volk, sondern um eine, wenn auch besondere "Religionsgemeinschaft".
Dies ist aber die erste große Lüge.
Er muß, um sein Dasein als Völkerparasit führen zu können, zur Verleugnung
seiner inneren Wesensart greifen. Je intelligenter der einzelne Jude ist, um
so mehr wird ihm diese Täuschung auch gelingen. Ja, es kann so weit kommen,
daß große Teile des Wirtsvolkes endlich ernstlich glauben werden, der Jude
sei wirklich ein Franzose oder Engländer, ein Deutscher oder Italiener, wenn
auch von besonderer Konfession. Besonders staatliche Stellen, die ja immer
von dem historischen Bruchteil der Weisheit beseelt zu sein scheinen, fallen
diesem infamen Betrug am leichtesten zum Opfer. Das selbständige Denken gilt
in diesem Kreisen ja manchmal als eine wahre Sünde wider das heilige
Fortkommen, so daß es einen nicht wundernehmen darf, wenn z. B. ein
bayerisches Staatsministerium auch heute noch keine blasse Ahnung davon
besitzt, daß die Juden Angehörige eines Volkes sind und nicht einer
"Konfession", obwohl nur ein Blick in die dem Judentum eigene Zeitungswelt
dies selbst dem bescheidensten Geist sofort aufzeigen müßte. Allerdings ist
das "Jüdische Echo" ja noch nicht das Amtsblatt und folglich für den Verstand
eines solchen Regierungspotentaten unmaßgeblich.
Das Judentum war immer ein Volk mit bestimmten rassischen Eigenarten und
niemals eine Religion, nur sein Fortkommen ließ es schon frühzeitig nach
einem Mittel suchen, das die unangenehme Aufmerksamkeit in bezug auf seine
Angehör | | | | |
