BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones)



 Politics > Politics-USA > BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
Date: 08 Sep 2006 12:27:44 PM
Object: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones)
He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html
BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave
Copyright 2006 Deseret Morning News
By Tad Walch - Deseret Morning News
PROVO — Brigham Young University placed physics professor Steven
Jones on paid leave Thursday while it reviews his involvement in the
so-called "9/11 truth movement" that accuses unnamed government
agencies of orchestrating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World
Trade Center.
BYU will conduct an official review of Jones' actions before
determining a course of action, university spokeswoman Carri Jenkins
said. Such a review is rare for a professor with "continuing status"
at BYU, where Jones has taught since 1985.

Jones became a celebrity among 9/11 conspiracy-theory groups
after he wrote a paper titled "Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center
Buildings Collapse?" The paper was published two weeks ago in the book
"9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" and lays out
Jones' hypothesis that the three towers fell because of pre-positioned
demolition charges — not because of the planes that hit two of the
towers.
(snip)
BYU does not grant tenure, generally regarded as a permanent position,
to professors. However, it does give continuing status to professors
found worthy after six years on campus.
"Continuing status," Jenkins said, "grants the expectation that
faculty members will have continuing employment at the university,
although it is not a guarantee. They still need to meet satisfactory
performance levels for scholarship, citizenship and teaching."
.

User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 08 Sep 2006 08:07:00 PM
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:27:44 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.

He has claimed that the buliding fell in ten seconds. Thats false.
It took more time than that based on cameras with time stamps.
So was he just stupid?
Or was he lying?
Either way, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the box.
But I certainly wouldn't suspend him based on mere mistakes.
We all make mistakes. I made a mistake myself, it was about a decade
ago.
So why do this to him?


http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html

BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave

Copyright 2006 Deseret Morning News

By Tad Walch - Deseret Morning News

PROVO — Brigham Young University placed physics professor Steven
Jones on paid leave Thursday while it reviews his involvement in the
so-called "9/11 truth movement" that accuses unnamed government
agencies of orchestrating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World
Trade Center.

BYU will conduct an official review of Jones' actions before
determining a course of action, university spokeswoman Carri Jenkins
said. Such a review is rare for a professor with "continuing status"
at BYU, where Jones has taught since 1985.

Jones became a celebrity among 9/11 conspiracy-theory groups
after he wrote a paper titled "Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center
Buildings Collapse?" The paper was published two weeks ago in the book
"9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" and lays out
Jones' hypothesis that the three towers fell because of pre-positioned
demolition charges — not because of the planes that hit two of the
towers.

(snip)

BYU does not grant tenure, generally regarded as a permanent position,
to professors. However, it does give continuing status to professors
found worthy after six years on campus.
"Continuing status," Jenkins said, "grants the expectation that
faculty members will have continuing employment at the university,
although it is not a guarantee. They still need to meet satisfactory
performance levels for scholarship, citizenship and teaching."

.
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 08 Sep 2006 10:05:57 PM
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:07:00 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:27:44 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.


He has claimed that the buliding fell in ten seconds. Thats false.

It took more time than that based on cameras with time stamps.

So was he just stupid?

Or was he lying?

Either way, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the box.

How many PHDs in physics do you have.?
.
User: "Orval Fairbairn"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 08 Sep 2006 10:38:56 PM
In article <lrb4g21laffvc2t0r829ociph6mahpv7a5@4ax.com>,
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:07:00 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:27:44 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.


He has claimed that the buliding fell in ten seconds. Thats false.

It took more time than that based on cameras with time stamps.

So was he just stupid?

Or was he lying?

Either way, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the box.


How many PHDs in physics do you have.?

I don't need a PhD to see that he is either lying or just plain dead
wrong!
.

User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 07:55:51 AM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:05:57 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:07:00 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:27:44 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.


He has claimed that the buliding fell in ten seconds. Thats false.

It took more time than that based on cameras with time stamps.

So was he just stupid?

Or was he lying?

Either way, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the box.


How many PHDs in physics do you have.?

None. I repeat - he has made a claim, about the building falling in
ten seconds, which is refuted by cameras with time stamps.
So is he stupid? A liar?
which is it?
and either way, doesn't that cause us to worry about him being a good
teacher?
I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building
means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.
Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.
Did the prof ignore that problem with the alternative hypothesis he
has supported? Sure, he ignored it.
And that means he's either - out to lunch. Or dishonest. One or the
other.
.
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 10:06:19 AM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:51 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:


I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building

means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.

Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.

HAHAHA. Like complaining to congressmen or the cops or the press
would do any good. The way this country was lied into invading iraq
makes it clear that our govt and our media are totally corrupt.
You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.
.
User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 06:19:17 PM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:06:19 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:51 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:



I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building

means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.

Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.


HAHAHA. Like complaining to congressmen or the cops or the press
would do any good.

When 999, the ones asked but who said know, all say the same thing,
it will get noticed.
When four of them go to the Washington Post it will get noticed.
When one of them posts here - I was asked to blow up a building, it
would be noticed.
One video on You tube - would get noticed.
And then when the building was destroyed, someone would remember the
999 people who were screaming their heads off.
Richard Clarke got noticed.
Regnery press routinely publishes uncorroborated claims from single
sources, and those claims get noticed.
And it would be easy to get proof. IF someone asked me to blow up the
building, I would tape the second meeting.
And post it on Youtube, if officials didn't listen to me.
But I think they would listen to me.
Look at President Bush - with all his power, look at how his
conspiracies have been revealed even by loyal close aides, such as his
first Secretary of Treasury. Look at how officials have ratted him out
to the Washington Post, leading to front page stories.
Blowing up the WTC would indeed seem insane, and it would take a lot
of effort to prove it to someone. But if four people said it, then it
would get published.
And the perps would be arrested, tried, and sent to prison for life.
Without the building being blown up.
The way this country was lied into invading iraq

makes it clear that our govt and our media are totally corrupt.

You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.

.
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 10 Sep 2006 12:06:59 AM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:19:17 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:


And it would be easy to get proof. IF someone asked me to blow up the
building, I would tape the second meeting.

So what? Tapes can easily be faked.


Blowing up the WTC would indeed seem insane, and it would take a lot
of effort to prove it to someone. But if four people said it, then it
would get published.

So it gets published. It's still he said, she said.
Again i say look at iraq. The whole country knows bush lied us into
that mess and yet nothing is done about it. Bush got away with it.
.
User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 10 Sep 2006 08:25:21 AM
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:06:59 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:19:17 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:



And it would be easy to get proof. IF someone asked me to blow up the
building, I would tape the second meeting.


So what? Tapes can easily be faked.



Blowing up the WTC would indeed seem insane, and it would take a lot
of effort to prove it to someone. But if four people said it, then it
would get published.


So it gets published. It's still he said, she said.

was it published?
No.
Thus it did not happen.


Again i say look at iraq. The whole country knows bush lied us into
that mess and yet nothing is done about it. Bush got away with it.

.
User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: WTC7: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 10 Sep 2006 09:00:57 AM
George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:06:59 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:19:17 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:

Blowing up the WTC would indeed seem insane, and it would take a lot
of effort to prove it to someone. But if four people said it, then it
would get published.


So it gets published. It's still he said, she said.


was it published?

No.

What do you mean here? There are more than four people who have come
forward to say there was criminal wrong doing in the investigation leading
up to the attacks. I for one believe the accused hijackers were merely
decoys who didn't even know they were being set up. They never got on the
planes. Nonetheless, it's clear there was something going on prior to the
terrorist attacks[*] which indicates fore knowledge.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.second.tower.is.coming.down.wmv
"...it's coming over our radio, get out of the area, the second tower's
coming down."
"They're saying the second tower is coming...?"
"Yes, it's about to collapse."
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html
[*]These were terrorist attacks regardless of who committed the crimes.
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: WTC7: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 11 Sep 2006 05:24:51 PM
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:00:57 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:06:59 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:19:17 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:


Blowing up the WTC would indeed seem insane, and it would take a lot
of effort to prove it to someone. But if four people said it, then it
would get published.


So it gets published. It's still he said, she said.


was it published?

No.


What do you mean here? There are more than four people who have come
forward to say there was criminal wrong doing in the investigation leading
up to the attacks.

To pull off all the tricks alleged by the
Black-helicopters-brought-em-down theories, there would have to be
what? A thousand conspirators? At least hundreds.
And for every person who agreed to murder their fellow New Yorkers
left and right, you'd get a thousand or so when assked to blow up
office buildings etc who would say - am I an Candid Camera?
And when told no, they would do stuff like - pull out a gun and
perform a citizen's arrest, or call 911, or any of a great many other
things that would get a lot of attention.
Yet - we have not seen anyone who said - oh yeah, they asked me to
blow up some office buildings, but of course I clubbed him to death
like a harp seal until I could get backup on the site.
I mean, if some guy asked you to blow up office buildings, after you
were persuaded it wasn't some lame joke, wouldn't you reach for the
nearest blunt object to club him to death, or something like that?
I mean, the guy might escape - right?
I would. Everyone would.
Yet - we have not heard of that. So
no one asked anyone , let alone asked the thousands necessary to get a
few yesses, to do this or we would have heard about it.
I for one believe the accused hijackers were merely

decoys who didn't even know they were being set up. They never got on the
planes. Nonetheless, it's clear there was something going on prior to the
terrorist attacks[*] which indicates fore knowledge.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.second.tower.is.coming.down.wmv

She said the second tower was about to fall. And it was.
They had seen one fall, so it's not surprising that they expected the
next one to do the same thing. That that story started spreading.
Why WOULDNT they expect it to do the same thing that happened to the
first building? They had identical construction, and if a plane flying
in to one would bring it down - wouldn't you say - hey, get out of
here, the next one is going to fall too?
And it GUTS your theory. Your theory is that someone wanted to kill
thousands of people. Now you say - but they were nice people who
warned people to leave.
Tower two was tilting before it fell. It got to a tilt of about twenty
degrees before it fell.
http://wtc.nist.gov/WTC_Conf_Sep13-15/session6/6McAllister.pdf


"...it's coming over our radio, get out of the area, the second tower's
coming down."
"They're saying the second tower is coming...?"
"Yes, it's about to collapse."

Rumors in situations like this are always rampant.
But in addition, if someone bothered to carefully observe, it was
tilting, it was about to come down.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html
[*]These were terrorist attacks regardless of who committed the crimes.

Well, yes. I think Michael Rivero did it. Whenever a conspiracy
happens - Michael is always there.
.
User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: Re: WTC7: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 11 Sep 2006 08:11:18 PM
George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:00:57 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

was it published?

No.


What do you mean here? There are more than four people who have come
forward to say there was criminal wrong doing in the investigation leading
up to the attacks.


To pull off all the tricks alleged by the
Black-helicopters-brought-em-down theories, there would have to be
what? A thousand conspirators? At least hundreds.

I've already addressed this, but I will do so again. Assuming the planes
were commandeered by remote control, it would have required, perhaps, two
people to implement modifications to the aircraft software. Mind you, we
are assuming they have all the technology of at least the US DoD, CIA, DOE,
UK MI5, Mossad and private defense contractors at their disposal. Many of
the participants were probably unaware of the part they were playing. They
were merely told to deliver some particular component to the perpetrators,
or follow some flight path or other operation which facilitated the attack.

We are aware of 5 men being arrested and detained after being observed
filming the attacks and acting in a celebratory manner while watching the
WTC burn and collapse. According to news reports, bomb sniffing dogs acted
as if they had detected explosives in the van these men were in, but no
explosives were discovered. We don't have the details of the floor plans
of the WTC buildings, but it seems reasonable that the cutting charges
could have been hidden in hung ceilings or on the maintenance floors.
Its difficult to say exactly how many floors would have required these
charges, but even if we assume they were place on each of the 47 columns on
each floor, that would mean each of the 5 men would have to place 2063
charges. Assume they had choreographed this already, and worked
systematically. If it took on average 60 seconds to place one charge, they
could have accomplished this in 4 9 hour days. Now, suppose they only
planted the cutting charges on every 4th floor. It would have taken them 1
long work day. At least two of the men had a history in the Mossad, and
one had, according to his lawyer, worked as a spy in the past.

And for every person who agreed to murder their fellow New Yorkers
left and right, you'd get a thousand or so when assked to blow up
office buildings etc who would say - am I an Candid Camera?

Why do you think the perpetrators considered New Yorkers to be "their
people"?

And when told no, they would do stuff like - pull out a gun and
perform a citizen's arrest, or call 911, or any of a great many other
things that would get a lot of attention.

The front line perpetrators were some kind of black ops operatives.

Yet - we have not seen anyone who said - oh yeah, they asked me to
blow up some office buildings, but of course I clubbed him to death
like a harp seal until I could get backup on the site.

It wouldn't be the first time a US administration sacrificed thousands of
Americans for political gains. Several people in positions to know have
come forward to say that Roosevelt was fully aware the Japanese were going
to attack Pearl Harbor, and intentionally permitted it to happen.

I mean, if some guy asked you to blow up office buildings, after you
were persuaded it wasn't some lame joke, wouldn't you reach for the
nearest blunt object to club him to death, or something like that?

I mean, the guy might escape - right?

I would. Everyone would.

Yet - we have not heard of that. So

no one asked anyone , let alone asked the thousands necessary to get a
few yesses, to do this or we would have heard about it.

People fire bombed Dresden and Tokyo, why do you think they would hesitate
to kill innocent people simply because they were on American soil?

I for one believe the accused hijackers were merely

decoys who didn't even know they were being set up. They never got on the
planes. Nonetheless, it's clear there was something going on prior to the
terrorist attacks[*] which indicates fore knowledge.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.second.tower.is.coming.down.wmv


She said the second tower was about to fall. And it was.

There is also clear evidence they had knowledge the first building was going
to collapse before it happened. Now that would be utterly miraculous to
predict. That would have been the first time in history that a steel frame
skyscraper completely collapsed except in the case of controlled
demolition.

They had seen one fall, so it's not surprising that they expected the
next one to do the same thing. That that story started spreading.

Why WOULDNT they expect it to do the same thing that happened to the
first building? They had identical construction, and if a plane flying
in to one would bring it down - wouldn't you say - hey, get out of
here, the next one is going to fall too?

The woman didn't say "it might collapse".

And it GUTS your theory. Your theory is that someone wanted to kill
thousands of people. Now you say - but they were nice people who
warned people to leave.

The goal of terrorists is merely to terrorize. They don't care how many
deaths it takes. After hyping 9/11 for years, now all that have to do is
have a nitrolisterine scare, and everybody in TV land sucks it up.

Tower two was tilting before it fell. It got to a tilt of about twenty
degrees before it fell.

http://wtc.nist.gov/WTC_Conf_Sep13-15/session6/6McAllister.pdf

That is very easy to explain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKxoC4_T-GA

"...it's coming over our radio, get out of the area, the second tower's
coming down."
"They're saying the second tower is coming...?"
"Yes, it's about to collapse."


Rumors in situations like this are always rampant.

But in addition, if someone bothered to carefully observe, it was
tilting, it was about to come down.

Please provide your source that quotes any witness saying he or she noticed
the tower was tilting, concluded it was about to collapse and issued a
warning.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html
[*]These were terrorist attacks regardless of who committed the crimes.


Well, yes. I think Michael Rivero did it. Whenever a conspiracy
happens - Michael is always there.

Let's see, he covered the DynCorp white slave trade which points to the
Franklin Credit Union debacle and Larry King's (no not the arse on TV)
child prostitution ring, which points to the Reagan/Bush White House,
which points to Paul Bonnaci, which points to Jeff Gannon, which points to
GW Bush's White House, which points to Richard Bruce Cheney, which points
to GHW Bush, which points to the CIA, which points to Buzzy Krongard, which
points to Bankers Trust, which points to Ptech, which points to Chertoff,
which points to the FBI, which points to John P. O'Neil, which points to
Kroll Associates, which points to Armitage, which points to Iran Contra,
which points to the Columbian drug trade, which points to Huffman Aviation,
which points to Mohammed Atta, ... You might be on to something there.
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: WTC7: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 12 Sep 2006 12:48:41 AM
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:11:18 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:00:57 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:


was it published?

No.


What do you mean here? There are more than four people who have come
forward to say there was criminal wrong doing in the investigation leading
up to the attacks.


To pull off all the tricks alleged by the
Black-helicopters-brought-em-down theories, there would have to be
what? A thousand conspirators? At least hundreds.


I've already addressed this, but I will do so again. Assuming the planes
were commandeered by remote control,

commercial boeing jets can't be controlled except from the cockpit,
according to the boeing company in response to this point.
the pilots can put it on remote control, but it has to be done from
the cockpit.
it would have required, perhaps, two

people to implement modifications to the aircraft software. Mind you, we
are assuming they have all the technology of at least the US DoD, CIA, DOE,
UK MI5, Mossad and private defense contractors at their disposal.

So all those people who used their cell phones who said that there
were X number of hijackers on their plane - were lying, right before
they died?
Some of those calls were recorded, I believe.
Many of

the participants were probably unaware of the part they were playing. They
were merely told to deliver some particular component to the perpetrators,
or follow some flight path or other operation which facilitated the attack.

We are aware of 5 men being arrested and detained after being observed
filming the attacks and acting in a celebratory manner while watching the
WTC burn and collapse. According to news reports, bomb sniffing dogs acted
as if they had detected explosives in the van these men were in, but no
explosives were discovered. We don't have the details of the floor plans
of the WTC buildings, but it seems reasonable that the cutting charges
could have been hidden in hung ceilings or on the maintenance floors.

and that they would have been caught, tried, and sent to jail for life
the buildings are not left empty and unguarded.
And the buildings are very large, lotta work there.

Its difficult to say exactly how many floors would have required these
charges, but even if we assume they were place on each of the 47 columns on
each floor, that would mean each of the 5 men would have to place 2063
charges. Assume they had choreographed this already, and worked
systematically. If it took on average 60 seconds to place one charge, they
could have accomplished this in 4 9 hour days. Now, suppose they only
planted the cutting charges on every 4th floor. It would have taken them 1
long work day. At least two of the men had a history in the Mossad, and
one had, according to his lawyer, worked as a spy in the past.

and there was zero evidence they had ever been within a mile of the
buildings,
and Israel is not known for extreme stupidity. They have the US in the
palm of its hand now. Blow up an office building and their military
sugar daddy - invades them, captures, tries, and executes everyone in
their government having anything to do with this.
Only a suicidal fool would try that. Look at all the schemes the US
govt has tried - which get on the front page of the Washington Post.
Secret prisons. Secret wire tapping. Efforts to out Valerie Plame. The
Downing Memo. Etc. Odds of getting caught, high.

And for every person who agreed to murder their fellow New Yorkers
left and right, you'd get a thousand or so when assked to blow up
office buildings etc who would say - am I an Candid Camera?


Why do you think the perpetrators considered New Yorkers to be "their
people"?

Most say the US was behind this. If you claim it's Israelis, then
STILL what Israeli in his right mind would do it? It's one thing to
kill arabs, who after all kill Israelis, and who want to see the Jews
leave their country.
There is a certain logic to killing arabs. But to mass murder
Americans? The great benefactors of Israel?
It would hit the Israeli papers the next day after someone was asked
to do such a dumb thing.
Virtually all Israelis would balk at this mission.
There is no moral justification for killing thousands of innocent
Americans, if you are an Israeli.


And when told no, they would do stuff like - pull out a gun and
perform a citizen's arrest, or call 911, or any of a great many other
things that would get a lot of attention.


The front line perpetrators were some kind of black ops operatives.

And a black ops guy asked to kill Hillary Clinton, or President Bush,
or thousands in an office building in New York
is not going to do it
People are not going to kill without a decent reason for doing it,
unless they are Charles Manson.


Yet - we have not seen anyone who said - oh yeah, they asked me to
blow up some office buildings, but of course I clubbed him to death
like a harp seal until I could get backup on the site.


It wouldn't be the first time a US administration sacrificed thousands of
Americans for political gains. Several people in positions to know have
come forward to say that Roosevelt was fully aware the Japanese were going
to attack Pearl Harbor, and intentionally permitted it to happen.

And the evidence for that is weak.
And it's one thing to sacrifice soldiers in a war from - blowing up an
office buliding where tens of thousands of your innocent civilians
work.
And it's a lot harder to keep secrets now than it used to be.
We have a thousand news outlets now - ten thousand maybe. Compared to
very few back then who might get this news.
Leaking over the years has become widespread.
That was not the case back then.
Plus - al-qaeda has admitted they took down the WTC.
You can argue that maybe Israeli intelligence was following some of
the perps here in the US. You can argue that they might have thought
they intended some sort of plane takeover.
But that's not the same as saying it was an inside job.


I mean, if some guy asked you to blow up office buildings, after you
were persuaded it wasn't some lame joke, wouldn't you reach for the
nearest blunt object to club him to death, or something like that?

I mean, the guy might escape - right?

I would. Everyone would.

Yet - we have not heard of that. So

no one asked anyone , let alone asked the thousands necessary to get a
few yesses, to do this or we would have heard about it.


People fire bombed Dresden and Tokyo,

They were bombing the enemy as part of all-out war. Bombing was a
normal sort of thing to do in that war.
Blowing up your own office bulidings is not a normal sort of thing .
I did not see the Japanese drop an atomic bomb on themselves, nor the
Germans set fire to one of their own cities.
why do you think they would hesitate

to kill innocent people simply because they were on American soil?

If you mean Israelis, because we are not the enemy, just the opposite,
and we are not in an all-out war.
And fire bombing Dresden could not come back to hurt us, other than in
the after life.
Israel blowing up the WTC would lead us to retaliate with extreme
prejudice.
So no patriotic Israeli would do such a thing.
They're not mentally retarded.
They would know that the odds of detection would be high.
It would get leaked. There are many honorable people in Israel, and
the odds of one finding out about such a scheme would be high.
ANd there is not a shred of evidence that any such thing happened.
Look at the film - the tops of the buildings started to fall. The
floors below were not at that time falling. Only when the tops hit the
lower floors did those lower floors start falling.
It's obviously not a planted charge sort of thing.


I for one believe the accused hijackers were merely

decoys who didn't even know they were being set up. They never got on the
planes. Nonetheless, it's clear there was something going on prior to the
terrorist attacks[*] which indicates fore knowledge.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/911.wtc.second.tower.is.coming.down.wmv


She said the second tower was about to fall. And it was.


There is also clear evidence they had knowledge the first building was going
to collapse before it happened. Now that would be utterly miraculous to
predict. That would have been the first time in history that a steel frame
skyscraper completely collapsed except in the case of controlled
demolition.

They had seen one fall, so it's not surprising that they expected the
next one to do the same thing. That that story started spreading.

Why WOULDNT they expect it to do the same thing that happened to the
first building? They had identical construction, and if a plane flying
in to one would bring it down - wouldn't you say - hey, get out of
here, the next one is going to fall too?


The woman didn't say "it might collapse".

And it GUTS your theory. Your theory is that someone wanted to kill
thousands of people. Now you say - but they were nice people who
warned people to leave.


The goal of terrorists is merely to terrorize. They don't care how many
deaths it takes. After hyping 9/11 for years, now all that have to do is
have a nitrolisterine scare, and everybody in TV land sucks it up.

Tower two was tilting before it fell. It got to a tilt of about twenty
degrees before it fell.

http://wtc.nist.gov/WTC_Conf_Sep13-15/session6/6McAllister.pdf


That is very easy to explain

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKxoC4_T-GA


"...it's coming over our radio, get out of the area, the second tower's
coming down."
"They're saying the second tower is coming...?"
"Yes, it's about to collapse."


Rumors in situations like this are always rampant.

But in addition, if someone bothered to carefully observe, it was
tilting, it was about to come down.


Please provide your source that quotes any witness saying he or she noticed
the tower was tilting, concluded it was about to collapse and issued a
warning.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/oem_wtc.html
[*]These were terrorist attacks regardless of who committed the crimes.


Well, yes. I think Michael Rivero did it. Whenever a conspiracy
happens - Michael is always there.


Let's see, he covered the DynCorp white slave trade which points to the
Franklin Credit Union debacle and Larry King's (no not the arse on TV)
child prostitution ring, which points to the Reagan/Bush White House,
which points to Paul Bonnaci, which points to Jeff Gannon, which points to
GW Bush's White House, which points to Richard Bruce Cheney, which points
to GHW Bush, which points to the CIA, which points to Buzzy Krongard, which
points to Bankers Trust, which points to Ptech, which points to Chertoff,
which points to the FBI, which points to John P. O'Neil, which points to
Kroll Associates, which points to Armitage, which points to Iran Contra,
which points to the Columbian drug trade, which points to Huffman Aviation,
which points to Mohammed Atta, ... You might be on to something there.

.
User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: Re: WTC7: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 12 Sep 2006 04:30:22 AM
George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:11:18 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:


I've already addressed this, but I will do so again. Assuming the planes
were commandeered by remote control,


commercial boeing jets can't be controlled except from the cockpit,
according to the boeing company in response to this point.

the pilots can put it on remote control, but it has to be done from
the cockpit.

Unless someone modified the equipment before the flight.

So all those people who used their cell phones who said that there
were X number of hijackers on their plane - were lying, right before
they died?

Some of those calls were recorded, I believe.

http://physics911.ca/Rudolf:_Cellphone_Experiments_In_Airlines


and that they would have been caught, tried, and sent to jail for life

the buildings are not left empty and unguarded.

And the buildings are very large, lotta work there.

There were several security anomalies in the days before the attack. Here
are some names to look into. Marvin Bush, Bertha Champagne, Jerome Hauer,
and John P. O'Neil.


Its difficult to say exactly how many floors would have required these
charges, but even if we assume they were place on each of the 47 columns
on each floor, that would mean each of the 5 men would have to place 2063
charges. Assume they had choreographed this already, and worked
systematically. If it took on average 60 seconds to place one charge,
they
could have accomplished this in 4 9 hour days. Now, suppose they only
planted the cutting charges on every 4th floor. It would have taken them
1
long work day. At least two of the men had a history in the Mossad, and
one had, according to his lawyer, worked as a spy in the past.


and there was zero evidence they had ever been within a mile of the
buildings,

Well, that's not true.

and Israel is not known for extreme stupidity. They have the US in the
palm of its hand now. Blow up an office building and their military
sugar daddy - invades them, captures, tries, and executes everyone in
their government having anything to do with this.

Do you really believe US Politicians have the balls to take on the Zionists?

Only a suicidal fool would try that. Look at all the schemes the US
govt has tried - which get on the front page of the Washington Post.
Secret prisons. Secret wire tapping. Efforts to out Valerie Plame. The
Downing Memo. Etc. Odds of getting caught, high.

And no meaningful action has been taken. Congress and the courts have been
neutered.

Why do you think the perpetrators considered New Yorkers to be "their
people"?


Most say the US was behind this.

"Inside job" and "loyal citizen" are not the same thing.

If you claim it's Israelis, then
STILL what Israeli in his right mind would do it?

Why do you assume the perpetrators were in their "right minds"? Wolfowitz,
Cheney, Perle, Feith etc., have long been known by insiders as "the
crazies".

It's one thing to
kill arabs, who after all kill Israelis, and who want to see the Jews
leave their country.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=341600202419569830

There is a certain logic to killing arabs. But to mass murder
Americans? The great benefactors of Israel?

It was a false flag. I don't believe this was exclusively an Israeli
action. I thing one reason the Mossad would be tapped for the ones to
execute the actual murders is because the are the most ruthless, and they
can operate with absolute impunity within the US.

It would hit the Israeli papers the next day after someone was asked
to do such a dumb thing.

This is not the first case of this kind of thing. Take the USS Liberty, for
example.

Virtually all Israelis would balk at this mission.

That's probably why Daniel Lewin is dead.

There is no moral justification for killing thousands of innocent
Americans, if you are an Israeli.

Moral justification? There is a strong strain of downright evil in Zionism.


And when told no, they would do stuff like - pull out a gun and
perform a citizen's arrest, or call 911, or any of a great many other
things that would get a lot of attention.


The front line perpetrators were some kind of black ops operatives.


And a black ops guy asked to kill Hillary Clinton, or President Bush,
or thousands in an office building in New York

is not going to do it

People are not going to kill without a decent reason for doing it,
unless they are Charles Manson.

http://www.realnews247.com/richard_perle.jpg
http://members.aye.net/~gharris/blog/dick_cheney09.jpg
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/img/wolfowitz.jpg
http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/dubya.jpg

It wouldn't be the first time a US administration sacrificed thousands of
Americans for political gains. Several people in positions to know have
come forward to say that Roosevelt was fully aware the Japanese were going
to attack Pearl Harbor, and intentionally permitted it to happen.


And the evidence for that is weak.

And it's one thing to sacrifice soldiers in a war from - blowing up an
office buliding where tens of thousands of your innocent civilians
work.

There was no war at the time the decision was made. It was a blatant stab
in the back by the US CinC.

And it's a lot harder to keep secrets now than it used to be.

Perhaps that's an illusion.

Plus - al-qaeda has admitted they took down the WTC.

So you've been told by the perpetrators.

You can argue that maybe Israeli intelligence was following some of
the perps here in the US. You can argue that they might have thought
they intended some sort of plane takeover.

But that's not the same as saying it was an inside job.

The 19 zealots with box-cutters theory is the most whacked conspiracy theory
around. I can't believe I fell for it for so long.

People fire bombed Dresden and Tokyo,


They were bombing the enemy as part of all-out war. Bombing was a
normal sort of thing to do in that war.

Blowing up your own office bulidings is not a normal sort of thing .

I did not see the Japanese drop an atomic bomb on themselves, nor the
Germans set fire to one of their own cities.

It takes a different ethic to do that kind of thing. One that is foreign to
the very fabric of my being.

why do you think they would hesitate
to kill innocent people simply because they were on American soil?


If you mean Israelis, because we are not the enemy, just the opposite,
and we are not in an all-out war.

And fire bombing Dresden could not come back to hurt us, other than in
the after life.

Israel blowing up the WTC would lead us to retaliate with extreme
prejudice.

That was the whole idea.

So no patriotic Israeli would do such a thing.

They're not mentally retarded.

Well, they did get caught.

They would know that the odds of detection would be high.

It would get leaked. There are many honorable people in Israel, and
the odds of one finding out about such a scheme would be high.

ANd there is not a shred of evidence that any such thing happened.

Other than the solid evidence that such a thing /did/ indeed happen, you are
correct. But Mossad was not the only player.

Look at the film - the tops of the buildings started to fall. The
floors below were not at that time falling. Only when the tops hit the
lower floors did those lower floors start falling.

That's not what I see. That's what it looked like to me at first, but now
it appears that the demolition wave precedes the collapse.

It's obviously not a planted charge sort of thing.

I really don't know what the details were, but there is conclusive proof of
use of large amounts of thermite, some of which was actually thermate.
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: WTC7: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 12 Sep 2006 07:34:46 AM
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:30:22 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:11:18 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:


I've already addressed this, but I will do so again. Assuming the planes
were commandeered by remote control,


commercial boeing jets can't be controlled except from the cockpit,
according to the boeing company in response to this point.

the pilots can put it on remote control, but it has to be done from
the cockpit.


Unless someone modified the equipment before the flight.

who says? Post proof that it's possible to modify a Boeing commercial
jet to do this.



So all those people who used their cell phones who said that there
were X number of hijackers on their plane - were lying, right before
they died?

Some of those calls were recorded, I believe.


http://physics911.ca/Rudolf:_Cellphone_Experiments_In_Airlines

And relatives have reported on receiving the calls.
They wouldn't lie and say that their son, or husband, or wife said
there were hijackers.
So your theory about remote controllers is false.


and that they would have been caught, tried, and sent to jail for life

the buildings are not left empty and unguarded.

And the buildings are very large, lotta work there.


There were several security anomalies in the days before the attack. Here
are some names to look into. Marvin Bush, Bertha Champagne, Jerome Hauer,
and John P. O'Neil.


Its difficult to say exactly how many floors would have required these
charges, but even if we assume they were place on each of the 47 columns
on each floor, that would mean each of the 5 men would have to place 2063
charges. Assume they had choreographed this already, and worked
systematically. If it took on average 60 seconds to place one charge,
they
could have accomplished this in 4 9 hour days. Now, suppose they only
planted the cutting charges on every 4th floor. It would have taken them
1
long work day. At least two of the men had a history in the Mossad, and
one had, according to his lawyer, worked as a spy in the past.


and there was zero evidence they had ever been within a mile of the
buildings,


Well, that's not true.

and Israel is not known for extreme stupidity. They have the US in the
palm of its hand now. Blow up an office building and their military
sugar daddy - invades them, captures, tries, and executes everyone in
their government having anything to do with this.


Do you really believe US Politicians have the balls to take on the Zionists?

Sure. If they blow up one of our office building.
Politicians want to be elected.
The public would demand action against Israel, and at that point the
electoral benefits of supporting Israel are dwarfed by the electoral
costs of ignoring such a mega-crime.


Only a suicidal fool would try that. Look at all the schemes the US
govt has tried - which get on the front page of the Washington Post.
Secret prisons. Secret wire tapping. Efforts to out Valerie Plame. The
Downing Memo. Etc. Odds of getting caught, high.


And no meaningful action has been taken. Congress and the courts have been
neutered.

The public would go ape ***** - look for instance at the reaction to
Timothy McVeigh
The public obviously hates the Bill of Rights. So the revelations
there do not lead to action. But the public also hates - getting
office buildings blown up.
And there are courts. Federal judges are appointed for life. A judge
is supporting efforts to punish those involved in Plame, a judge has
ruled the wiretapping illegal, etc.


Why do you think the perpetrators considered New Yorkers to be "their
people"?


Most say the US was behind this.


"Inside job" and "loyal citizen" are not the same thing.

If you claim it's Israelis, then
STILL what Israeli in his right mind would do it?


Why do you assume the perpetrators were in their "right minds"? Wolfowitz,
Cheney, Perle, Feith etc., have long been known by insiders as "the
crazies".

They aren't crazy. Obviously.
They have views about the likely consequences of geopolitical actions
which others do not share.
Differences of opinion about the likely results of invading Iraq do
not mean one side is crazy in the sense of doing things certain to end
them up in jail for life.


It's one thing to
kill arabs, who after all kill Israelis, and who want to see the Jews
leave their country.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=341600202419569830

Yes, Jews kill arabs.
Jews do not very often kill lots of other Jews.


There is a certain logic to killing arabs. But to mass murder
Americans? The great benefactors of Israel?


It was a false flag. I don't believe this was exclusively an Israeli
action.

Look - planes flew into the buildings, and we know that they were
hijacked by arabs.
We know arabs had a motive to do that.
We know that the stories about detonation etc are *****. For
instance, the floors beneath the entry point of the planes do not
start to fall until the upper floors fall onto them. Detonation would
have them all falling at the same time.
You don't have to imagine absurd theories when a perfectly simple
explanation is available.
I thing one reason the Mossad would be tapped for the ones to

execute the actual murders is because the are the most ruthless, and they
can operate with absolute impunity within the US.

Not once they blow up an office building. Then we would hunt them
down, capture them, and kill them.
Right now - Israel gets all it wants from the US, pretty much.
The notion that they would willingly throw that support away
is absurd. They are not complete fools. So they would not do such a
thing.
These things get found out.
Americans are happy to support Israel now because there is no
particular reason not to. But if they were mass murdering us?
No one in the US would stand for that, no one.
All of us, every man woman and child among us, would be clamoring for
their blood.


It would hit the Israeli papers the next day after someone was asked
to do such a dumb thing.


This is not the first case of this kind of thing. Take the USS Liberty, for
example.

And we shot down an Iranian passenger plane in the same vicinity.
Accidents do happen. Friendly fire deaths are common.
Shooting your allies in error happens all the time in wars.
So what's new with this story? Nothing.
Blowing up an office building by mistake - doesn't happen.


Virtually all Israelis would balk at this mission.


That's probably why Daniel Lewin is dead.

There is no moral justification for killing thousands of innocent
Americans, if you are an Israeli.


Moral justification? There is a strong strain of downright evil in Zionism.

Guided by a sense of moral justification.
Hitler thought he was doing the right thing. So did Stalin. So did Pol
Pot. So does President Bush.
THe road to hell is not generally paved with evil intentions. It is
paved with good intentions.
Thus we can justify dropping an atomic bomb on Japan. Even though it's
evil incarnate to do so without first dropping it on Mount Fuji to see
if the Japanese would get the message that way.
And the Israelis can justify to themselves the things they do. They
face "terrorists" who want to kill them.
Very few people are actually like Hannibal Lecter who kill for fun.
They kill out of a sense of doing the right thing.



And when told no, they would do stuff like - pull out a gun and
perform a citizen's arrest, or call 911, or any of a great many other
things that would get a lot of attention.


The front line perpetrators were some kind of black ops operatives.


And a black ops guy asked to kill Hillary Clinton, or President Bush,
or thousands in an office building in New York

is not going to do it

People are not going to kill without a decent reason for doing it,
unless they are Charles Manson.


http://www.realnews247.com/richard_perle.jpg
http://members.aye.net/~gharris/blog/dick_cheney09.jpg
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/img/wolfowitz.jpg
http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/dubya.jpg

It wouldn't be the first time a US administration sacrificed thousands of
Americans for political gains. Several people in positions to know have
come forward to say that Roosevelt was fully aware the Japanese were going
to attack Pearl Harbor, and intentionally permitted it to happen.


And the evidence for that is weak.

And it's one thing to sacrifice soldiers in a war from - blowing up an
office buliding where tens of thousands of your innocent civilians
work.


There was no war at the time the decision was made. It was a blatant stab
in the back by the US CinC.

And it's a lot harder to keep secrets now than it used to be.


Perhaps that's an illusion.

Plus - al-qaeda has admitted they took down the WTC.


So you've been told by the perpetrators.

You can argue that maybe Israeli intelligence was following some of
the perps here in the US. You can argue that they might have thought
they intended some sort of plane takeover.

But that's not the same as saying it was an inside job.


The 19 zealots with box-cutters theory is the most whacked conspiracy theory
around. I can't believe I fell for it for so long.

People fire bombed Dresden and Tokyo,


They were bombing the enemy as part of all-out war. Bombing was a
normal sort of thing to do in that war.

Blowing up your own office bulidings is not a normal sort of thing .

I did not see the Japanese drop an atomic bomb on themselves, nor the
Germans set fire to one of their own cities.


It takes a different ethic to do that kind of thing. One that is foreign to
the very fabric of my being.

why do you think they would hesitate
to kill innocent people simply because they were on American soil?


If you mean Israelis, because we are not the enemy, just the opposite,
and we are not in an all-out war.

And fire bombing Dresden could not come back to hurt us, other than in
the after life.

Israel blowing up the WTC would lead us to retaliate with extreme
prejudice.


That was the whole idea.

So no patriotic Israeli would do such a thing.

They're not mentally retarded.


Well, they did get caught.

They would know that the odds of detection would be high.

It would get leaked. There are many honorable people in Israel, and
the odds of one finding out about such a scheme would be high.

ANd there is not a shred of evidence that any such thing happened.


Other than the solid evidence that such a thing /did/ indeed happen, you are
correct. But Mossad was not the only player.

Look at the film - the tops of the buildings started to fall. The
floors below were not at that time falling. Only when the tops hit the
lower floors did those lower floors start falling.


That's not what I see. That's what it looked like to me at first, but now
it appears that the demolition wave precedes the collapse.

It's obviously not a planted charge sort of thing.


I really don't know what the details were, but there is conclusive proof of
use of large amounts of thermite, some of which was actually thermate.

.









User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 10:32:30 AM
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:51 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:



I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building

means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.

Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.


HAHAHA. Like complaining to congressmen or the cops or the press
would do any good. The way this country was lied into invading iraq
makes it clear that our govt and our media are totally corrupt.

You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.

Is it possible that the top perpetrators have systematically collected
incriminating evidence on many highly placed officials, and are
blackmailing them to keep quiet? Perhaps not the Kay Griggs thing, but
similar?
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 10 Sep 2006 12:02:05 AM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:32:30 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:


You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.


Is it possible that the top perpetrators have systematically collected
incriminating evidence on many highly placed officials, and are
blackmailing them to keep quiet? Perhaps not the Kay Griggs thing, but
similar?

Very possible as is simple bribery. And of course, once you have
bribed an official, then you can blackmail him for that. Most
presidents and congressmen have been compromised. Democracy is a hoax.
.

User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 06:20:23 PM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:32:30 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:51 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:



I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building

means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.

Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.


HAHAHA. Like complaining to congressmen or the cops or the press
would do any good. The way this country was lied into invading iraq
makes it clear that our govt and our media are totally corrupt.

You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.


Is it possible that the top perpetrators have systematically collected
incriminating evidence on many highly placed officials, and are
blackmailing them to keep quiet? Perhaps not the Kay Griggs thing, but
similar?

Sure. And it's possible that we are in a little zoo run by the
creatures who live on Pluto.
.
User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 08:14:05 PM
George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:32:30 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:51 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:



I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building

means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.

Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.


HAHAHA. Like complaining to congressmen or the cops or the press
would do any good. The way this country was lied into invading iraq
makes it clear that our govt and our media are totally corrupt.

You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.


Is it possible that the top perpetrators have systematically collected
incriminating evidence on many highly placed officials, and are
blackmailing them to keep quiet? Perhaps not the Kay Griggs thing, but
similar?


Sure. And it's possible that we are in a little zoo run by the
creatures who live on Pluto.

Well there is more than a little truth to the fact that people /have/ come
forward and said they were instructed to stop investigating suspected
potential terrorists, etc. Sibel Edmonds is one very good example.
?To become an American citizen, I took the citizenship oath. In taking this
oath, I pledged I would support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
United States and America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Therefore, not only do I have the right to challenge John Ashcroft?s
anti-constitutional and un-American actions, but as an American citizen I
am required to do so. So are you.? - Sibel Edmonds
Another thing to consider is that there have been more than a few
questionable deaths of people who were likely in the know. John O'Neil
comes to mind. Also bear in mind that this operation was most likely
executed in the modus operandi of an intelligence organization. People
would have been recruited and indoctrinated so that they could be relied
upon before anybody contacted them to see if they would play their part.
Furthermore, such an organization operates on a compartmentalized, need to
know basis. Many people could have been involved without even
understanding what they were preparing, or even what role they played in
retrospect.
It's been reported numerous times that witnesses have been ordered by the
FBI or other agencies to keep quiet about what they know.
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
User: ""

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 10 Sep 2006 02:50:43 AM
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:

George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:32:30 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:51 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:



I mean, to align yourself with the view that the government itself
destroyed the building

means you have to believe some extremely unlikely things.

Such as - that the government could find someone to do it, put the
explosives in the building - and that the first thousand or so they
asked to do that, who said - absolutely not - did not call the cops,
did not blog about it, did not post here, did not call the papers,
call the TV stations, did not call their congressmen and senators, did
not scream at the top of their lungs until the perps were caught and
put in prison or a nuthouse.


HAHAHA. Like complaining to congressmen or the cops or the press
would do any good. The way this country was lied into invading iraq
makes it clear that our govt and our media are totally corrupt.

You are a complete idiot for using that pathetic argument "how would
they keep it secret?" They don't have to keep things secret. Our
govt can do the most horrid things and as long as the press and both
parties support them, they get away with it. Again - look at iraq.


Is it possible that the top perpetrators have systematically collected
incriminating evidence on many highly placed officials, and are
blackmailing them to keep quiet? Perhaps not the Kay Griggs thing, but
similar?


Sure. And it's possible that we are in a little zoo run by the
creatures who live on Pluto.


Well there is more than a little truth to the fact that people /have/ come
forward and said they were instructed to stop investigating suspected
potential terrorists, etc. Sibel Edmonds is one very good example.

A mischaracterization of what she's said in the interviews I've found;
she said they were told to work slower as a means of showing a need for
a larger budget for the department, essentially bureaucratic *****.
Not to "stop investigating terrorists" as some nefarious plot.


?To become an American citizen, I took the citizenship oath. In taking this
oath, I pledged I would support and defend the Constitution and laws of the
United States and America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Therefore, not only do I have the right to challenge John Ashcroft?s
anti-constitutional and un-American actions, but as an American citizen I
am required to do so. So are you.? - Sibel Edmonds

Another thing to consider is that there have been more than a few
questionable deaths of people who were likely in the know. John O'Neil
comes to mind.

Questionable death? He was killed in the attack, running into the WTC
to help rescue people. Do you have anything to suggest he was targeted
specifically? Do you have anything to suggest he may have known "too
much"? Do you have anything other than innuendo that trivialized one of
the biggest tragedies on that horrific day?

Also bear in mind that this operation was most likely
executed in the modus operandi of an intelligence organization. People
would have been recruited and indoctrinated so that they could be relied
upon before anybody contacted them to see if they would play their part.
Furthermore, such an organization operates on a compartmentalized, need to
know basis. Many people could have been involved without even
understanding what they were preparing, or even what role they played in
retrospect.

"Could haves" are in no way evidence. Do you have any one offering up
any piece of the puzzle? Anyone say "I did this, and I realize now that
it was in order to have this piece in this conspiracy" ? Or is it all
just imagination?


It's been reported numerous times that witnesses have been ordered by the
FBI or other agencies to keep quiet about what they know.

Then you can cite them, I am sure.

--
Nil conscire sibi

.






User: ""

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 10 Sep 2006 02:59:56 AM
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:07:00 -0700, "George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr."
<tyrebiter@mooresciencehigh.edu> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:27:44 GMT, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.


He has claimed that the buliding fell in ten seconds. Thats false.

It took more time than that based on cameras with time stamps.

So was he just stupid?

Or was he lying?

Either way, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the box.


How many PHDs in physics do you have.?

Doesn't matter. Mr. Jones' work is in metal-catalyzed fusion, which is
a world away from any sort of physics that apply here. Why can't the
conspiracy loons find a mechanical engineer who can put together a
detailed study? Instead, we have yet another professor writing outside
of his actual area of expertise, and putting together a paper that
would get a grad student sent back down to undergraduate classes.
.



User: "Well Done"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 02:57:16 PM
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html
BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave

<snip>
It's so fun watching lefties project their conspiracy theory fantasies
into the future. When their predictions are shown to be false,
they're nowhere to be found. Not that we're looking...
--
): "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think" :(
(: Off the monitor, through the modem, nothing but net :)
.
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 09 Sep 2006 11:59:18 PM
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 12:57:16 -0700, Well Done <WellDone@WellHoned.com>
wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html
BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave

<snip>
It's so fun watching lefties project their conspiracy theory fantasies
into the future. When their predictions are shown to be false,
they're nowhere to be found. Not that we're looking...

There is no wackier CT than the one about 19 arabs doing 9/11 because
they "hate our freedom".
.


User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 08 Sep 2006 08:16:39 PM
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html

BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave

Copyright 2006 Deseret Morning News

By Tad Walch - Deseret Morning News

PROVO — Brigham Young University placed physics professor Steven
Jones on paid leave Thursday while it reviews his involvement in the
so-called "9/11 truth movement" that accuses unnamed government
agencies of orchestrating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World
Trade Center.

BYU will conduct an official review of Jones' actions before
determining a course of action, university spokeswoman Carri Jenkins
said. Such a review is rare for a professor with "continuing status"
at BYU, where Jones has taught since 1985.

Jones became a celebrity among 9/11 conspiracy-theory groups
after he wrote a paper titled "Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center
Buildings Collapse?" The paper was published two weeks ago in the book
"9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" and lays out
Jones' hypothesis that the three towers fell because of pre-positioned
demolition charges — not because of the planes that hit two of the
towers.

(snip)

I've noticed they have also pulled his paper from the BYU web site.
"Kai ginosko Aletheia kai Aletheia eleutheroo humas eleutheroo".
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
User: "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 08 Sep 2006 10:09:13 PM
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:16:39 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:


He'll be out-and-out fired soon, if not murdered. We all knew this was
coming. Gover-media is desperate.

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html

BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave

Copyright 2006 Deseret Morning News

By Tad Walch - Deseret Morning News

PROVO — Brigham Young University placed physics professor Steven
Jones on paid leave Thursday while it reviews his involvement in the
so-called "9/11 truth movement" that accuses unnamed government
agencies of orchestrating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World
Trade Center.

BYU will conduct an official review of Jones' actions before
determining a course of action, university spokeswoman Carri Jenkins
said. Such a review is rare for a professor with "continuing status"
at BYU, where Jones has taught since 1985.

Jones became a celebrity among 9/11 conspiracy-theory groups
after he wrote a paper titled "Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center
Buildings Collapse?" The paper was published two weeks ago in the book
"9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" and lays out
Jones' hypothesis that the three towers fell because of pre-positioned
demolition charges — not because of the planes that hit two of the
towers.

(snip)


I've noticed they have also pulled his paper from the BYU web site.

You wonder what this guy was thinking. Did he really believe he could
just present the facts and that would be it.? If he doesn't shut up,
he and his family are gonna be killed by Bush. Prolly have them all
skinned alive.
.
User: "Hatto von Aquitanien"

Title: Re: BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave (Steven Jones) 08 Sep 2006 10:22:13 PM
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:

On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:16:39 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote:

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
I've noticed they have also pulled his paper from the BYU web site.


You wonder what this guy was thinking. Did he really believe he could
just present the facts and that would be it.? If he doesn't shut up,
he and his family are gonna be killed by Bush. Prolly have them all
skinned alive.

Gary Webb style shot twice in the head "suicide"?
"The cause of death was determined to be self-inflicted gunshot wounds to
the head."
That is not a typo. The plural is intentional.
"It's unusual in a suicide case to have two shots," he said, "but it has
been done in the past, and it is in fact a distinct possibility." - Coroner
Robert Lyons
I have to ask if anybody has shot himself twice in the head without pissing
off the CIA first.
--
Nil conscire sibi
.