| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"C.T. Waters" |
| Date: |
03 Jul 2007 06:37:25 PM |
| Object: |
Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
Place your bets..........Internet betting website, Sportbooks.com, has the
lovely Hillary winning the 2008 election, in a whooping 2 to 1 odds. Even
the U.K. book maker, BET 365 has Hillary ahead with 6 to 4 odds.
Republicans are playing with their pee pee's, while watching kiddie porn,
babbling something about unfair.
.
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
03 Jul 2007 09:28:37 PM |
|
|
Any time the Democratic party is that sure, it means the voter rolls have
already been cooked.
.
|
|
|
| User: "zzpat" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
04 Jul 2007 10:27:36 AM |
|
|
Docky Wocky wrote:
Any time the Democratic party is that sure, it means the voter rolls have
already been cooked.
If the original post is correct, it has nothing to do with the
Democratic Party but instead what the odd makers say they think will
happen. Try to keep up.
--
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.bravehost.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Baldin Lee Pramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
05 Jul 2007 12:51:43 PM |
|
|
On Jul 3, 5:37 pm, "C.T. Waters" <C...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Place your bets..........Internet betting website, Sportbooks.com, has the
lovely Hillary winning the 2008 election, in a whooping 2 to 1 odds. Even
the U.K. book maker, BET 365 has Hillary ahead with 6 to 4 odds.
Republicans are playing with their pee pee's, while watching kiddie porn,
babbling something about unfair.
The oddsmakers there are out of their minds. No Republican will vote
for her, and none of the Democrats I know will. I wonder how they
figured those odds?
BLP
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Grapman" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
05 Jul 2007 01:02:14 PM |
|
|
Baldin Lee Pramer wrote:
On Jul 3, 5:37 pm, "C.T. Waters" <C...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Place your bets..........Internet betting website, Sportbooks.com, has the
lovely Hillary winning the 2008 election, in a whooping 2 to 1 odds. Even
the U.K. book maker, BET 365 has Hillary ahead with 6 to 4 odds.
Republicans are playing with their pee pee's, while watching kiddie porn,
babbling something about unfair.
The oddsmakers there are out of their minds. No Republican will vote
for her, and none of the Democrats I know will. I wonder how they
figured those odds?
BLP
Odds set by a bookmaker have nothing to do with the probability of an
event happening. They are set to try to assure a profit regardless of
the outcome.
Let's say the line on a football game is set at 7 points. That does
not mean the bookie expects the favorite to win by 7 points just that
they hope an equal number of people bet on each team. Since people are
betting $11 for each $10 they can win if an equal amount is bet on both
teams the bookie wins either way. If too many people bet on the favorite
the line will be moved up to attract more money on the underdog. If too
many bet on the underdog the line is moved down.
One of the few places this does not hold true is horse racing where
the track neither sets the odds or has any interest in the outcome.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "James McGill" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
05 Jul 2007 12:53:05 PM |
|
|
Baldin Lee Pramer wrote:
The oddsmakers there are out of their minds. No Republican will vote
for her, and none of the Democrats I know will. I wonder how they
figured those odds?
They probably didn't ask any of the "Democrats you know."
They also probably used different methods than yours, to determine that
"No Republican" will vote for her.
You have staked your turf on the logical fallacies of "No True Scotsman"
and "Hasty Generalization".
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Merlin" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
05 Jul 2007 10:14:56 AM |
|
|
On Jul 3, 7:37 pm, "C.T. Waters" <C...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Place your bets..........Internet betting website, Sportbooks.com, has the
lovely Hillary winning the 2008 election, in a whooping 2 to 1 odds. Even
the U.K. book maker, BET 365 has Hillary ahead with 6 to 4 odds.
Republicans are playing with their pee pee's, while watching kiddie porn,
babbling something about unfair.
Every time I hear something about political figures and porn, it's
from a demoncrat. It seems to occupy much of their time.
Billary has NO CHANCE of winning. No way, no how.
I couldn't care less what the odds makers say at this point in time.
The Demoncrats have fallin on their collective asses again. This time,
it'll make them lose the 08 elections.
8 more years of good solid Republican leadership and Demoncratic
whining.
Try again in 2016, Demoncrats.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gringo" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton ahead 2-1, odds makers say...... |
05 Jul 2007 12:44:55 PM |
|
|
Merlin wrote:
On Jul 3, 7:37 pm, "C.T. Waters" <C...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Place your bets..........Internet betting website, Sportbooks.com, has the
lovely Hillary winning the 2008 election, in a whooping 2 to 1 odds. Even
the U.K. book maker, BET 365 has Hillary ahead with 6 to 4 odds.
Republicans are playing with their pee pee's, while watching kiddie porn,
babbling something about unfair.
Every time I hear something about political figures and porn, it's
from a demoncrat. It seems to occupy much of their time.
it requires a lot of careful work to protect children from republiCON
legislators and christian church leaders
Billary has NO CHANCE of winning. No way, no how.
true, billigirl has never won a usenet argument.
I couldn't care less what the odds makers say at this point in time.
The Demoncrats have fallin on their collective asses again. This time,
it'll make them lose the 08 elections.
Try again in 2016, Demoncrats.
you betcha. after four consecutive terms of Democratic leadership, the
country will begin to recover from bush jr's malfeasance.
--
"Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."
--- George Herbert Walker Bush, in an interview with Sarah McClendon, 1992
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
