| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"ViperSpit" |
| Date: |
10 Sep 2006 08:55:37 AM |
| Object: |
CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51898
Spit
.
|
|
| User: "John R. Carroll" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
13 Sep 2006 05:39:57 PM |
|
|
Billy wrote:
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:WyZNg.1083$e66.608@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"Lloyd King" <lloydking@kinglloydcom.com> wrote in message
news:12gggskckocji28@corp.supernews.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:OUWNg.5068$y61.2876@fed1read05...
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hIWNg.750$Gd2.673@newsfe12.lga...
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@TheShadowKnows.com> wrote in
message news:45082daa_3@x-privat.org...
FREEP THIS! wrote:
Clinton Confirms PATH TO 911 in his own words a few years ago
Actually, the Path to 9/11 didn't mention this non-event. Even the
slanted propaganda piece couldn't bring itself to stoop that low.
The fact is, the person who "offered" to turn over bin Ladin was a
well-known fraud and someone who had no authority nor connections
to even be involved in such a thing, and the CIA didn't believe
him for a second. Clinton heard about the offer, but at that time
bin Laden hadn't done anything against the US for which he could
be tried, so even if the offer had been legit, there was no way to
accept it. But, of course, the Sudan was at that time ruled by a
guy named al Turabi, who was a Muslim fanatic like Mullah Omar and
bin Laden himself. There is simply no way that he would ever
agree to turn bin Laden over to infidels. Wasn't ever a
possibility.
Clinton Admits Refusing To Take Bin Laden When Sudan Offered To
Hand
Freep knows jack -
You mean back when our government was held accountable to its
citizens and when our government FOLLOWED THE RULE OF LAW!
Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so
concerned with Bin Laden's civil rights?
There are no do-overs in the real world.
With hindsight, maybe we'd all have killed bin Laden. But that's
cheating. In hindsight, it would have been nice if someone had
killed Timothy McVeigh in 1994. But if someone HAD done that, he
would be in prison as a simple murderer. The US government
trained Timothy McVeigh, they taught him how to make explosives,
and they had him in their grasp. They could have prevented the
Oklahoma City bombing by throwing him in prison back then and
never letting him out. Or by simply killing him. But, of course,
they didn't know what was going to happen on April 19, 1995. And
nobody in 1996 knew what Osama bin Laden and his thugs were going
to do 5 years later.
To say today that Clinton did something wrong by not somehow
incapacitating bin Laden back then (if he had the chance, which he
didn't) is just plain wrong.
It was a yes or no question.
It wasn't a question at all. Bin Ladens rights aren't something that
anyone
cares about.
If you are not man enough to answer it, just say so.
For all you know I'm a woman.
Anyway,
"Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so concerned with
Bin Laden's civil rights?"
The mistake you make is in thinking Bin Laden's civil rights had much to do
with anything. They didn't.
You also haven't indicated intelligently just what it would be that would be
"done again".
In other words, you haven't saked a real question. You have attempted, and
it's a poor attempt, to sewt up a straw man.
--
John R. Carroll
Machining Solution Software, Inc.
Los Angeles San Francisco
www.machiningsolution.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
13 Sep 2006 06:29:17 PM |
|
|
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:1N%Ng.866$TV3.321@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:WyZNg.1083$e66.608@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"Lloyd King" <lloydking@kinglloydcom.com> wrote in message
news:12gggskckocji28@corp.supernews.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:OUWNg.5068$y61.2876@fed1read05...
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hIWNg.750$Gd2.673@newsfe12.lga...
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@TheShadowKnows.com> wrote in
message news:45082daa_3@x-privat.org...
FREEP THIS! wrote:
Clinton Confirms PATH TO 911 in his own words a few years ago
Actually, the Path to 9/11 didn't mention this non-event. Even the
slanted propaganda piece couldn't bring itself to stoop that low.
The fact is, the person who "offered" to turn over bin Ladin was a
well-known fraud and someone who had no authority nor connections
to even be involved in such a thing, and the CIA didn't believe
him for a second. Clinton heard about the offer, but at that time
bin Laden hadn't done anything against the US for which he could
be tried, so even if the offer had been legit, there was no way to
accept it. But, of course, the Sudan was at that time ruled by a
guy named al Turabi, who was a Muslim fanatic like Mullah Omar and
bin Laden himself. There is simply no way that he would ever
agree to turn bin Laden over to infidels. Wasn't ever a
possibility.
Clinton Admits Refusing To Take Bin Laden When Sudan Offered To
Hand
Freep knows jack -
You mean back when our government was held accountable to its
citizens and when our government FOLLOWED THE RULE OF LAW!
Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so
concerned with Bin Laden's civil rights?
There are no do-overs in the real world.
With hindsight, maybe we'd all have killed bin Laden. But that's
cheating. In hindsight, it would have been nice if someone had
killed Timothy McVeigh in 1994. But if someone HAD done that, he
would be in prison as a simple murderer. The US government
trained Timothy McVeigh, they taught him how to make explosives,
and they had him in their grasp. They could have prevented the
Oklahoma City bombing by throwing him in prison back then and
never letting him out. Or by simply killing him. But, of course,
they didn't know what was going to happen on April 19, 1995. And
nobody in 1996 knew what Osama bin Laden and his thugs were going
to do 5 years later.
To say today that Clinton did something wrong by not somehow
incapacitating bin Laden back then (if he had the chance, which he
didn't) is just plain wrong.
It was a yes or no question.
It wasn't a question at all. Bin Ladens rights aren't something that
anyone
cares about.
If you are not man enough to answer it, just say so.
For all you know I'm a woman.
Do you know?
Anyway,
"Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so concerned with
Bin Laden's civil rights?"
The mistake you make is in thinking Bin Laden's civil rights had much to
do
with anything. They didn't.
You also haven't indicated intelligently just what it would be that would
be
"done again".
In other words, you haven't saked a real question. You have attempted, and
it's a poor attempt, to sewt up a straw man.
You need to RTFQ
--
John R. Carroll
Machining Solution Software, Inc.
Los Angeles San Francisco
www.machiningsolution.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "John R. Carroll" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
13 Sep 2006 06:33:49 PM |
|
|
Billy wrote:
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:1N%Ng.866$TV3.321@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:WyZNg.1083$e66.608@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"Lloyd King" <lloydking@kinglloydcom.com> wrote in message
news:12gggskckocji28@corp.supernews.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:OUWNg.5068$y61.2876@fed1read05...
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hIWNg.750$Gd2.673@newsfe12.lga...
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@TheShadowKnows.com> wrote in
message news:45082daa_3@x-privat.org...
FREEP THIS! wrote:
Clinton Confirms PATH TO 911 in his own words a few years ago
Actually, the Path to 9/11 didn't mention this non-event. Even
the slanted propaganda piece couldn't bring itself to stoop that
low. The fact is, the person who "offered" to turn over bin
Ladin was a well-known fraud and someone who had no authority
nor connections to even be involved in such a thing, and the CIA
didn't believe him for a second. Clinton heard about the offer,
but at that time bin Laden hadn't done anything against the US
for which he could be tried, so even if the offer had been
legit, there was no way to accept it. But, of course, the Sudan
was at that time ruled by a guy named al Turabi, who was a
Muslim fanatic like Mullah Omar and bin Laden himself. There is
simply no way that he would ever agree to turn bin Laden over to
infidels. Wasn't ever a possibility.
Clinton Admits Refusing To Take Bin Laden When Sudan Offered
To Hand
Freep knows jack -
You mean back when our government was held accountable to its
citizens and when our government FOLLOWED THE RULE OF LAW!
Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so
concerned with Bin Laden's civil rights?
There are no do-overs in the real world.
With hindsight, maybe we'd all have killed bin Laden. But that's
cheating. In hindsight, it would have been nice if someone had
killed Timothy McVeigh in 1994. But if someone HAD done that, he
would be in prison as a simple murderer. The US government
trained Timothy McVeigh, they taught him how to make explosives,
and they had him in their grasp. They could have prevented the
Oklahoma City bombing by throwing him in prison back then and
never letting him out. Or by simply killing him. But, of course,
they didn't know what was going to happen on April 19, 1995. And
nobody in 1996 knew what Osama bin Laden and his thugs were going
to do 5 years later.
To say today that Clinton did something wrong by not somehow
incapacitating bin Laden back then (if he had the chance, which
he didn't) is just plain wrong.
It was a yes or no question.
It wasn't a question at all. Bin Ladens rights aren't something
that anyone
cares about.
If you are not man enough to answer it, just say so.
For all you know I'm a woman.
Do you know?
Anyway,
"Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so concerned
with Bin Laden's civil rights?"
The mistake you make is in thinking Bin Laden's civil rights had
much to do
with anything. They didn't.
You also haven't indicated intelligently just what it would be that
would be
"done again".
In other words, you haven't saked a real question. You have
attempted, and it's a poor attempt, to sewt up a straw man.
You need to RTFQ
I have. It's still baloney and will be regardless the number of times you
repeat it.
What, exactly is your question?
Never mind.....
--
John R. Carroll
Machining Solution Software, Inc.
Los Angeles San Francisco
www.machiningsolution.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
13 Sep 2006 11:58:58 PM |
|
|
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:xz0Og.883$TV3.86@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:1N%Ng.866$TV3.321@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:WyZNg.1083$e66.608@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
Billy wrote:
"Lloyd King" <lloydking@kinglloydcom.com> wrote in message
news:12gggskckocji28@corp.supernews.com...
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:OUWNg.5068$y61.2876@fed1read05...
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hIWNg.750$Gd2.673@newsfe12.lga...
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@TheShadowKnows.com> wrote in
message news:45082daa_3@x-privat.org...
FREEP THIS! wrote:
Clinton Confirms PATH TO 911 in his own words a few years ago
Actually, the Path to 9/11 didn't mention this non-event. Even
the slanted propaganda piece couldn't bring itself to stoop that
low. The fact is, the person who "offered" to turn over bin
Ladin was a well-known fraud and someone who had no authority
nor connections to even be involved in such a thing, and the CIA
didn't believe him for a second. Clinton heard about the offer,
but at that time bin Laden hadn't done anything against the US
for which he could be tried, so even if the offer had been
legit, there was no way to accept it. But, of course, the Sudan
was at that time ruled by a guy named al Turabi, who was a
Muslim fanatic like Mullah Omar and bin Laden himself. There is
simply no way that he would ever agree to turn bin Laden over to
infidels. Wasn't ever a possibility.
Clinton Admits Refusing To Take Bin Laden When Sudan Offered
To Hand
Freep knows jack -
You mean back when our government was held accountable to its
citizens and when our government FOLLOWED THE RULE OF LAW!
Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so
concerned with Bin Laden's civil rights?
There are no do-overs in the real world.
With hindsight, maybe we'd all have killed bin Laden. But that's
cheating. In hindsight, it would have been nice if someone had
killed Timothy McVeigh in 1994. But if someone HAD done that, he
would be in prison as a simple murderer. The US government
trained Timothy McVeigh, they taught him how to make explosives,
and they had him in their grasp. They could have prevented the
Oklahoma City bombing by throwing him in prison back then and
never letting him out. Or by simply killing him. But, of course,
they didn't know what was going to happen on April 19, 1995. And
nobody in 1996 knew what Osama bin Laden and his thugs were going
to do 5 years later.
To say today that Clinton did something wrong by not somehow
incapacitating bin Laden back then (if he had the chance, which
he didn't) is just plain wrong.
It was a yes or no question.
It wasn't a question at all. Bin Ladens rights aren't something
that anyone
cares about.
If you are not man enough to answer it, just say so.
For all you know I'm a woman.
Do you know?
Anyway,
"Do you think if he had it to do over again he would be so concerned
with Bin Laden's civil rights?"
The mistake you make is in thinking Bin Laden's civil rights had
much to do
with anything. They didn't.
You also haven't indicated intelligently just what it would be that
would be
"done again".
In other words, you haven't saked a real question. You have
attempted, and it's a poor attempt, to sewt up a straw man.
You need to RTFQ
I have. It's still baloney and will be regardless the number of times you
repeat it.
What, exactly is your question?
Never mind.....
You did not score high on the comprehension part of the test did ya?
--
John R. Carroll
Machining Solution Software, Inc.
Los Angeles San Francisco
www.machiningsolution.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Buzzy Krongard: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
13 Sep 2006 11:44:23 AM |
|
|
How did Mohammed Atta travel from Airman Flight School in Norman Oklahoma to
Huffman Aviation in Venice Florida? If it was by plane, was it a
commercial flight? Was Atta the pilot? Have you ever seen a person who
was strung out on heroin?
http://www.coranix.com/106bis/mohammed_atta%20.jpg
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: They're Following Us Home Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
19 Sep 2006 07:22:59 PM |
|
|
Lamont Cranston wrote:
Washington Post Service
In '96, Sudan Offered to Arrest bin Laden
Barton Gellman
Thursday, October 4, 2001
Saudis Balked at Accepting U.S. Plan
WASHINGTON The government of Sudan, using a back channel direct from its
president to the Central Intelligence Agency in the United States,
offered in the early spring of 1996 to arrest Osama bin Laden and place
him in custody in Saudi Arabia, according to officials and former
officials in all three countries.
Unsubstantiated humors and hearsay from un-named people, hardly worthy
of use as evidence in any court or law.
But "They're Following Us Home" to the "Supermarket Aisles."
Doing the Math August 16th, 2006
.......
- The "disappearance" of Egyptian college students (all young men)
enroute to an educational exchange program in Montana.
Let's focus on this last item just for a moment. Now, it's been a
while since I was actively involved in the business of
counter-terrorism but there are a few things that I would certainly
want to know about the missing Egyptian students - now apprehended.
The salient fact about the truant Egyptian students is where they
surfaced. The seemingly casual statements issued by Customs and
Immigration officials might lead one to think that the missing men were
simply disoriented. Having been held up in Immigration and Customs
inspections they missed their scheduled flight west. Naturally they
then did the best they could individually. Rather than staying
together as a student group (something that any student group with a
modicum of intelligence would have done) they split up into smaller
groups and headed off to get to their final destination. If that were
the case one would certainly want to know why they have turned up where
they have;
- Two students were renting an apartment in Richmond, Virginia.
- One was picked up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
- Two students were found in Manville, New Jersey;
- One was apprehended causing a disturbance at Chicago's O'Hare
International Airport.
- And three more were picked up by police in Des Moines, Iowa.
Was the Egyptian students' command of the English language so bad
that they could so easily have gone astray? Perhaps I'm being naive
here but the last time I looked none of these locations sounded even
remotely like Bozeman, Montana - their purported final destination.
One would think that the authorities involved in this investigation
would want to know everything they possibly could about how these young
men got where they were going, why they went where they went, what they
did there, and who they knew in the areas in which they were
apprehended. While I imagine that it's possible that they were simply
using the trip as a convenient way to slip into American society where
there are more opportunities than in Egypt for advancement, this is
highly unlikely.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DKat" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN (PROOF) |
09 Sep 2006 08:46:59 PM |
|
|
You mean back when the U.S. of A. followed the rule of law like all
civilized countries?
Yes it would have been just great for Clinton to have brought Bin Laden to
the U.S. and then had to have turned him lose amoung us. Lovely, simply
lovely.
"FREEP THIS!" <freepthis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157852003.769459.295810@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Clinton Confirms PATH TO 911 in his own words a few years ago
Clinton Admits Refusing To Take Bin Laden When Sudan Offered To Hand
Him Over
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wvo2lQe81xk&feature=PlayList&p=752B8F6CD19EBA72&index=2
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miles Long" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
09 Sep 2006 09:36:04 AM |
|
|
I thought Clinton was the one getting blown! <laughing>
Miles "Revisionist Fiction" Long
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "humbubba" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
09 Sep 2006 09:07:01 AM |
|
|
ViperSpit wrote:
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51898
Spit
That was before 9-11. You've missed him dozens of times AFTER 9-11.
You've also murdered more Americans than Bin Laden, and you are still
losing at least two wars. You're also destroying the US financially.
You want to put me into your job before the housing bubble bursts and
we enter the Bush Depression.
"""
At noon on the day after this Amendment is ratified the occupants of
the offices of President and Vice President shall be removed, and
replaced for the remainder of the 2005-2009 term by Richard Allen
Hohensee, President, and Senator Russell Feingold, Vice President. This
replacement and term shall be supported by a special chain of
succession composed of random drawings from all those Senators and
Representatives who voted against the joint resolution allowing the
invasion of Iraq.
"""
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Fazemeier" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
09 Sep 2006 09:32:43 PM |
|
|
ViperSpit wrote:
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51898
Spit
You are so stupid and so ready to believe the propaganda that you
don't even realize they DON'T WANT Bid Laden. He is just a
convenient boogie man.
They dissolved the group that was supposedly looking for him. Don't you read
anything?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ViperSpit" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
10 Sep 2006 09:32:30 AM |
|
|
"humbubba" <hohenseerick@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157810821.715819.25610@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ViperSpit wrote:
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51898
Spit
That was before 9-11. You've missed him dozens of times AFTER 9-11.
You've also murdered more Americans than Bin Laden, and you are still
losing at least two wars. You're also destroying the US financially.
You want to put me into your job before the housing bubble bursts and
we enter the Bush Depression.
"""
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
No, but I would like to send you the cardboard cut-outs I've made of you.
You won't have to go to those communist pro-Castro rallies in person anymore
and sweat.
You can just set up your cardboard cutout and place it next to the flag
burner
and gay activist groups so you don't have to worry about the public being
concerned about your mental
health.
Does Dianne Feinstein really have pierced nipples?
Spit
.
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
10 Sep 2006 12:07:28 AM |
|
|
Do you?
"ViperSpit" <liberalmaster@moveon.org> wrote in message
news:eduje0$q68$1@news.datemas.de...
"humbubba" <hohenseerick@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157810821.715819.25610@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ViperSpit wrote:
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51898
Spit
That was before 9-11. You've missed him dozens of times AFTER 9-11.
You've also murdered more Americans than Bin Laden, and you are still
losing at least two wars. You're also destroying the US financially.
You want to put me into your job before the housing bubble bursts and
we enter the Bush Depression.
"""
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
No, but I would like to send you the cardboard cut-outs I've made of you.
You won't have to go to those communist pro-Castro rallies in person
anymore
and sweat.
You can just set up your cardboard cutout and place it next to the flag
burner
and gay activist groups so you don't have to worry about the public being
concerned about your mental
health.
Does Dianne Feinstein really have pierced nipples?
Spit
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "humbubba" |
|
| Title: Re: CLINTON BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET BIN LADEN |
09 Sep 2006 09:44:42 AM |
|
|
ViperSpit wrote:
"humbubba" <hohenseerick@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157810821.715819.25610@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
ViperSpit wrote:
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51898
Spit
That was before 9-11. You've missed him dozens of times AFTER 9-11.
You've also murdered more Americans than Bin Laden, and you are still
losing at least two wars. You're also destroying the US financially.
You want to put me into your job before the housing bubble bursts and
we enter the Bush Depression.
"""
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
No, but I would like to send you the cardboard cut-outs I've made of you.
Keep those. You'll have a lot of fun with them in jail.
You won't have to go to those communist pro-Castro rallies in person anymore
and sweat.
You can just set up your cardboard cutout and place it next to the flag
burner
and gay activist groups so you don't have to worry about the public being
concerned about your mental
health.
Does Dianne Feinstein really have pierced nipples?
Spit
I don't sweat. Ask the Secret Service. Whipping your ***** is a no sweat
item.
Ah, decadence. A little decadence will be SO represhing after 5 years
of war mob degeneracy and depravity. Good call.
And Feinstein is one of yours, BTW, so I don't know anything about her
nipples yet.
"""
At noon on the day after this Amendment is ratified the occupants of
the offices of President and Vice President shall be removed, and
replaced for the remainder of the 2005-2009 term by Richard Allen
Hohensee, President, and Senator Russell Feingold, Vice President. This
replacement and term shall be supported by a special chain of
succession composed of random drawings from all those Senators and
Representatives who voted against the joint resolution allowing the
invasion of Iraq.
"""
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: PUFF ADDER BLEW 6 CHANCES TO GET WOODY |
12 Sep 2006 05:13:26 PM |
|
|
ViperSpit wrote:
9/11 Mini Series outlines truths on how Woody failed ..........
Spit
I don't know why clowns would even care what happened three
administrations ago - when we are in the middle of a cornucopia of
brand new neocon crap today. Talk about something new.. like a new
mexican boss.. your fav-o-rite chalupa.. or a lead on a prospective
burger flippin job after November.
I also don't know why the dumbass leftards here always, inevitably,
invariably, take your stinking worn out moronic bait - time and time
again..
Y'all must have some sort of psychological weirdo thing going on; You
post mindless drivel, the leftards curse you, and you go away happy..
Stupid stuff.
Seems to me that normal people should chalk you off as a worthless
waste of time and avoid your bizarro-retro-neocon-world infotainment
show.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
