Clinton: Don't Do What I Did

Politics > Politics-USA > Clinton: Don't Do What I Did

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 2

Topic:	Politics > Politics-USA
User:	"Ubiquitous"
Date:	08 May 2007 12:23:14 PM
Object:	Clinton: Don't Do What I Did

"Former President Bill Clinton told a crowd of Harvard professors and students
on Friday that the nation's next president must make it a priority to prevent
national crises before they happen, and not simply respond after the fact,"
the Harvard Crimson reports:
Clinton was the keynote speaker at a Kennedy School of
Government conference to launch the school's Acting in
Time Initiative, which will allow students and faculty
members to study how governments and leaders can anticipate
and respond to natural disasters, global climate change,
terrorism, and other issues that may be approaching a
"crisis stage."
"We've got to try to avert disasters--not just be prepared
to bomb somebody if a disaster occurs," the former president
said.
Alas, Clinton only implicitly criticized his own desultory approach to
terrorism; we'd admire him more if he owned up to his own inadequacy in this
regard. (As we recall, he didn't do much about "climate change" either, but we
have yet to be persuaded that that's worth worrying about.)
.

User: "Ken"
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did	08 May 2007 01:56:19 PM

Ubiquitous wrote:

"Former President Bill Clinton told a crowd of Harvard professors and students
on Friday that the nation's next president must make it a priority to prevent
national crises before they happen, and not simply respond after the fact,"
the Harvard Crimson reports:

Clinton was the keynote speaker at a Kennedy School of
Government conference to launch the school's Acting in
Time Initiative, which will allow students and faculty
members to study how governments and leaders can anticipate
and respond to natural disasters, global climate change,
terrorism, and other issues that may be approaching a
"crisis stage."

"We've got to try to avert disasters--not just be prepared
to bomb somebody if a disaster occurs," the former president
said.

Alas, Clinton only implicitly criticized his own desultory approach to
terrorism; we'd admire him more if he owned up to his own inadequacy in this
regard. (As we recall, he didn't do much about "climate change" either, but we
have yet to be persuaded that that's worth worrying about.)

I disagree with your analysis of his remarks. WJC has never admitted
he did anything wrong. Even to this day, he contends he did not lie
when under oath but that the people hearing his words did not know the
definition of the words he used. I cannot think of a single decision he
ever made out of duty to others. Everything was a result of a poll and
how it would better HIM.
Don't take me wrong, we SHOULD take action to "Avert disaster." I just
do not believe he is having any second thoughts about the decisions he
made. And should his wife get elected to the same office, bend over and
grab your ankles!! It will be more of the same only worse.
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did	08 May 2007 04:07:12 PM

On Tue, 08 May 2007 18:56:19 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Well, Kenloon, that's because you're uninformed and
biased
Clinton DID NOT LIE (under oath)
You cannot post ANY lie he uttered under oath that
rises above the lies told (under oath) by your favorite
california turnip, reagan
I suggest this to you, KenLoon
1. Explain to us why THREE (3) OIC's would conclude
that not one allegation from all the "gates", stories
and lies contained enough factual, credible evidence to
issue a GJ indictment
2. Explain to us what "crime" required the SECOND
(2nd) Retiring OIC to "unretire" and investigate
something that would not occur for 6 months---IN THE
FUTURE
3. Explain to us why Joseph Camerata DEMANDED (against
Judge's suggestions) a NEW and UNIQUE definition of
"sexual relations" instead of the ACCEPTED LEGAL
DEFINITION?
4. Explain to us why the HJC, when finally voting on
articles of impeachment, used "Hearsay, innuendo,
conjecture, theory, rumor, story, lies and
unsubstantiated THEORETICAL basis for conducting a sham
political impeachment
5. Explain how a "fib" about sex is a "clear and
present danger" to America.
6 Explain YOUR understanding of the term "perjury" as
it applies to "lying" (this will be funny)
7. Explain why YOU think a defense against a political
smear isn't warranted
8 Explain why an accused isn't afforded a legal
defense based on ACCEPTED LEGAL PRACTICES (as clinton
did against the Jones smear)
9. Explain why YOU'D pay $3-4 MILLION for settling a
civil action YOU won instead of $800,000 like Clinton
did.

Don't take me wrong, we SHOULD take action to "Avert disaster." I just
do not believe he is having any second thoughts about the decisions he
made. And should his wife get elected to the same office, bend over and
grab your ankles!! It will be more of the same only worse.

Prior to 9-11 we had NO moral or legal authority to
attack another COUNTRY for something a motley band of
religious fanatics did.
And finally, tell us why, when in 2002 Al Queda and Bin
Laden were nearly caught, holed up in caves, destitute,
hunted and hated by most of ALL the civilized world
(including Islamic nations), your lying sack of *****
attacked Saddam Hussein who posed NO THREAT to us.
Make us laugh at you KenLoon

==================================================================
President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1

1 McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946

User: "Ken"
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did	08 May 2007 07:43:39 PM

wrote:

On Tue, 08 May 2007 18:56:19 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Well, Kenloon, that's because you're uninformed and
biased

Clinton DID NOT LIE (under oath)

You cannot post ANY lie he uttered under oath that
rises above the lies told (under oath) by your favorite
california turnip, reagan

I suggest this to you, KenLoon

1. Explain to us why THREE (3) OIC's would conclude
that not one allegation from all the "gates", stories
and lies contained enough factual, credible evidence to
issue a GJ indictment

2. Explain to us what "crime" required the SECOND
(2nd) Retiring OIC to "unretire" and investigate
something that would not occur for 6 months---IN THE
FUTURE

3. Explain to us why Joseph Camerata DEMANDED (against
Judge's suggestions) a NEW and UNIQUE definition of
"sexual relations" instead of the ACCEPTED LEGAL
DEFINITION?

4. Explain to us why the HJC, when finally voting on
articles of impeachment, used "Hearsay, innuendo,
conjecture, theory, rumor, story, lies and
unsubstantiated THEORETICAL basis for conducting a sham
political impeachment

5. Explain how a "fib" about sex is a "clear and
present danger" to America.

6 Explain YOUR understanding of the term "perjury" as
it applies to "lying" (this will be funny)

7. Explain why YOU think a defense against a political
smear isn't warranted

8 Explain why an accused isn't afforded a legal
defense based on ACCEPTED LEGAL PRACTICES (as clinton
did against the Jones smear)

9. Explain why YOU'D pay $3-4 MILLION for settling a
civil action YOU won instead of $800,000 like Clinton
did.

Prior to 9-11 we had NO moral or legal authority to
attack another COUNTRY for something a motley band of
religious fanatics did.

And finally, tell us why, when in 2002 Al Queda and Bin
Laden were nearly caught, holed up in caves, destitute,
hunted and hated by most of ALL the civilized world
(including Islamic nations), your lying sack of *****
attacked Saddam Hussein who posed NO THREAT to us.

Because Clinton lied to GWB when he said after eight years in office,
that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Or does his definition of
"Weapons of mass destruction" also differ from the commonly accepted one
as well???? You are a joke!!!
Also, have you noticed how the cost of gasoline has gone up since the
Democrats took over the house and senate??? I think it is due to the
fear that Hillary puts into the minds of citizens. Almost makes you
wish for the good old days when both houses were controlled by the
Republicans, doesn't it?

Make us laugh at you KenLoon

==================================================================

President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1

1 McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946

User: "z"
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did	09 May 2007 11:39:39 AM

On May 8, 8:43 pm, Ken <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

Because Clinton lied to GWB when he said after eight years in office,
that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

There ya go. Clinton tricked Bush into the war. That dratted Clinton!
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did---But KenLoon still don't get it	08 May 2007 08:58:52 PM

On Wed, 09 May 2007 00:43:39 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Click@Knicklas.com wrote:

On Tue, 08 May 2007 18:56:19 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Well, Kenloon, that's because you're uninformed and
biased

Clinton DID NOT LIE (under oath)

You cannot post ANY lie he uttered under oath that
rises above the lies told (under oath) by your favorite
california turnip, reagan

I suggest this to you, KenLoon

1. Explain to us why THREE (3) OIC's would conclude
that not one allegation from all the "gates", stories
and lies contained enough factual, credible evidence to
issue a GJ indictment

2. Explain to us what "crime" required the SECOND
(2nd) Retiring OIC to "unretire" and investigate
something that would not occur for 6 months---IN THE
FUTURE

3. Explain to us why Joseph Camerata DEMANDED (against
Judge's suggestions) a NEW and UNIQUE definition of
"sexual relations" instead of the ACCEPTED LEGAL
DEFINITION?

4. Explain to us why the HJC, when finally voting on
articles of impeachment, used "Hearsay, innuendo,
conjecture, theory, rumor, story, lies and
unsubstantiated THEORETICAL basis for conducting a sham
political impeachment

5. Explain how a "fib" about sex is a "clear and
present danger" to America.

6 Explain YOUR understanding of the term "perjury" as
it applies to "lying" (this will be funny)

7. Explain why YOU think a defense against a political
smear isn't warranted

8 Explain why an accused isn't afforded a legal
defense based on ACCEPTED LEGAL PRACTICES (as clinton
did against the Jones smear)

9. Explain why YOU'D pay $3-4 MILLION for settling a
civil action YOU won instead of $800,000 like Clinton
did.

Prior to 9-11 we had NO moral or legal authority to
attack another COUNTRY for something a motley band of
religious fanatics did.

And finally, tell us why, when in 2002 Al Queda and Bin
Laden were nearly caught, holed up in caves, destitute,
hunted and hated by most of ALL the civilized world
(including Islamic nations), your lying sack of *****
attacked Saddam Hussein who posed NO THREAT to us.

I can't believe anyone would be stupid enough not to
have thought this through logically
So, Kenny, ask yourself this:
1. Did THREE (3) separate people, all hired by GWB go
to Niger and ascertain the truth about "yellow cake"
during Clinton's term? If not, then Clinton had only
OLD outdated intelligence with which to base his
judgements on.
2. During Clinton's term, did the CIA debunk the
nuclear weapons fears by concluding that "aluminum
tubes" were NOT for Nuclear weapons? If not, then
Clinton had only OLD outdated intelligence with which
to base his judgements on.
3. During Clinton's term, did the State department
conclude that there was NO collusion between Saddam
Hussein and Al Queda or Bin Laden? If not, then
Clinton had only OLD outdated intelligence (pre-2003)
with which to base his judgements on.
4, During Clinton's term, was Hans Blix and UNSCOM
allowed to inspect, visit ANY/ALL sites anywhere,
anyplace, any-time in Iraq without guards, harassment,
or other impediments while they inspected? If not,
then Clinton had only OLD outdated intelligence with
which to base his judgements on.
You seem incapapable of independent thought, Kenny.
It's BOGUS to ascribe judgements made PRIOR to 2003
about Iraq's capabilities because he WAS thwarting
required inspections
But AFTER Joe Wilson (the THIRD who concluded the same
thing as he did), EVERY excuse for going to war was
debunked prior to the invasion
Clinton told Rice (Dumbya's NSA) about the terrorists
in Afghanistan and that it GREW during the few years
prior to 2000. But whether it "grew" or not, it still
did not give the US the right to invade a foriegn
government until it was established that they were
aiding the terrorists.
That means, KennyLoon, that evenf though Al Queda
fostered several disparate terrorist attacks, it didn't
allow us to invade anyone
AFTER 2001, that all changed.
So get off that old delusional chestnut about "what
everyone knew before 2003" and stop making yourself
look stupid.

Also, have you noticed how the cost of gasoline has gone up since the
Democrats took over the house and senate??? I think it is due to the
fear that Hillary puts into the minds of citizens. Almost makes you
wish for the good old days when both houses were controlled by the
Republicans, doesn't it?

Ya moron kennyloon
DEMAND for oil worldwide is why oil is high.
The Russians, the Chinese have all been in competition
with us for oil.
Had your lying sack of ***** not invaded Iraq and turned
the world against us, we'd have an easier time making
deals around the world
As it is now, they hate us and give the oil to other
nations.

==================================================================

User: "Ken"
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did---But KenLoon still don't get it	09 May 2007 07:22:51 AM

wrote:

On Wed, 09 May 2007 00:43:39 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

wrote:

On Tue, 08 May 2007 18:56:19 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Well, Kenloon, that's because you're uninformed and
biased

Clinton DID NOT LIE (under oath)

You cannot post ANY lie he uttered under oath that
rises above the lies told (under oath) by your favorite
california turnip, reagan

I suggest this to you, KenLoon

1. Explain to us why THREE (3) OIC's would conclude
that not one allegation from all the "gates", stories
and lies contained enough factual, credible evidence to
issue a GJ indictment

2. Explain to us what "crime" required the SECOND
(2nd) Retiring OIC to "unretire" and investigate
something that would not occur for 6 months---IN THE
FUTURE

3. Explain to us why Joseph Camerata DEMANDED (against
Judge's suggestions) a NEW and UNIQUE definition of
"sexual relations" instead of the ACCEPTED LEGAL
DEFINITION?

4. Explain to us why the HJC, when finally voting on
articles of impeachment, used "Hearsay, innuendo,
conjecture, theory, rumor, story, lies and
unsubstantiated THEORETICAL basis for conducting a sham
political impeachment

5. Explain how a "fib" about sex is a "clear and
present danger" to America.

6 Explain YOUR understanding of the term "perjury" as
it applies to "lying" (this will be funny)

7. Explain why YOU think a defense against a political
smear isn't warranted

8 Explain why an accused isn't afforded a legal
defense based on ACCEPTED LEGAL PRACTICES (as clinton
did against the Jones smear)

9. Explain why YOU'D pay $3-4 MILLION for settling a
civil action YOU won instead of $800,000 like Clinton
did.

Prior to 9-11 we had NO moral or legal authority to
attack another COUNTRY for something a motley band of
religious fanatics did.

And finally, tell us why, when in 2002 Al Queda and Bin
Laden were nearly caught, holed up in caves, destitute,
hunted and hated by most of ALL the civilized world
(including Islamic nations), your lying sack of *****
attacked Saddam Hussein who posed NO THREAT to us.

Ah, we found something we agree upon: Clinton was a liar and
consequently anything he said while in office should NOT have been
believed by anyone. My only question is why did Hillary believe them
and vote for the war as well? You seem to want to condemn GWB when he
followed the words of WJC, but at the same time absolve Hillary of
having followed them. You would think that she would have been smarter
than that? After all, he had lied to her for the many years of their
marriage!! Maybe she is NOT the world's smartest woman as those
supporting her contend??
Also a point you may wish to consider that is NOT on top of your head:
During the Clinton administration Saddam fired upon U.S. aircraft on
numerous occasions, in spite of having signed an agreement to allow them
to do so after the Gulf War. Any one of these incidents could (and
should have) been construed as an act of war. What did WJC do?? Call
Monica over for another BJ, try to hit on a woman who recently lost her
husband, and get his secretary to hide the subpoenaed gifts he had given
to Monica under her bed when the affair became public.
Now the charges related to the hiding of the gifts were dropped,
because they could not prove HE requested she hide them. But any person
with at least three years of grade school education knows they were not
miraculously given back and hidden for no reason. Conclusion: He was a
known liar and here was another attempt to avoid the truth. But you
contend he was telling the truth about Iraq, but GWB was not.
Your hypocrisy is beyond belief. But when I read the racist comments
you made in the post by pyjamarama, it makes it easier to understand why
you support the Clintons.

But AFTER Joe Wilson (the THIRD who concluded the same
thing as he did), EVERY excuse for going to war was
debunked prior to the invasion

Clinton told Rice (Dumbya's NSA) about the terrorists
in Afghanistan and that it GREW during the few years
prior to 2000. But whether it "grew" or not, it still
did not give the US the right to invade a foriegn
government until it was established that they were
aiding the terrorists.

That means, KennyLoon, that evenf though Al Queda
fostered several disparate terrorist attacks, it didn't
allow us to invade anyone

AFTER 2001, that all changed.

So get off that old delusional chestnut about "what
everyone knew before 2003" and stop making yourself
look stupid.

Ya moron kennyloon

DEMAND for oil worldwide is why oil is high.

The Russians, the Chinese have all been in competition
with us for oil.

Had your lying sack of ***** not invaded Iraq and turned
the world against us, we'd have an easier time making
deals around the world

As it is now, they hate us and give the oil to other
nations.

==================================================================

User: ""
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did---But KenLoon still don't get it !!	09 May 2007 01:57:50 PM

On Wed, 09 May 2007 12:22:51 GMT, Ken
<user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Clinton was a liar and
consequently anything he said while in office should NOT have been
believed by anyone.

So then you didn't believe Ronnie Raygun "at any time"?
He LIED "under oath" considerably MORE than CLinton
ever did---and about REAL policy, not sex.

My only question is why did Hillary believe them
and vote for the war as well?

You're still not grasping it
The authorization for "USING FORCE" (not to go to war)
was done PRIOR to Hans Blix and UNSCOM being allowed
back into Iraq.
So, 3 weeks BEFORE Bush attacked Iraq, he knew that
NONE of his stated claims were true
By that time the AUTHORIZATION was already done.
Clinton, etal, could not change the vote.

You seem to want to condemn GWB when he
followed the words of WJC, but at the same time absolve Hillary of
having followed them.

Christsakes, KennyLoon
I just gave you the TIME LINE of WHEN and WHAT was
known by: the world, Hilliary, or Congress.
BEFORE 2003, the only INTEL available was what the CIA
THOUGHT was there in Iraq
AFTER 2003, or just weeks before the Attack on Iraq,
Bush knew ALL excuses were FALSE.

You would think that she would have been smarter
than that? After all, he had lied to her for the many years of their
marriage!! Maybe she is NOT the world's smartest woman as those
supporting her contend??

WHat does a ***** have to do with PUBLIC POLICY,
stupid
Reagan LIED to Congress, LIED to America---Under
oath......

Also a point you may wish to consider that is NOT on top of your head:
During the Clinton administration Saddam fired upon U.S. aircraft on
numerous occasions,

The "no-fly" zones are a fucking UNITED NATIONS
operation, KennyLoon

Inspite of having signed an agreement to allow them
to do so after the Gulf War. Any one of these incidents could (and
should have) been construed as an act of war. What did WJC do?? Call
Monica over for another BJ, try to hit on a woman who recently lost her
husband, and get his secretary to hide the subpoenaed gifts he had given
to Monica under her bed when the affair became public.

The UNITED NATIONS then, would have been the authority
to enforce, attack, or otherwise get Saddam----NOT a
unilateral attack because your lying sack of *****
wanted to "institute democracy" as a "reverse Domino
policy"
Second, you keep insisting that Lewinsky had something
to do with Government policy
Lewinsky and Clinton's "encounters" were LONG OVER by
1995, KennyLoon

Now the charges related to the hiding of the gifts were dropped,
because they could not prove HE requested she hide them. But any person
with at least three years of grade school education knows they were not
miraculously given back and hidden for no reason. Conclusion: He was a
known liar and here was another attempt to avoid the truth. But you
contend he was telling the truth about Iraq, but GWB was not.

KennyLoon
THe WORLDS Finest criminal investigation agency could
find NO EVIDENCE to support your BELIEFS about ANYTHING
concerning Clinton.
Starr grilled Lewinsky for months
Starr Grilled Other witnesses for months
In the end, HE concluded that NO CRIMES WERE COMMITTED.
How fucking hard is that to grasp?
He RETIRED because he couldn't find ANYTHING.
Your "Conclusions" are concocted from "looks
like"------Not from Evidence----which is why NONE were
ever supported by facts and e vidence.
Second, Clinton "told" what he knew about Iraq, Bin
Laden and Al Queda as HE KNEW IT THEN (in 2000)----and
told it to Rice, the NSA queen.
Bush ignored what Clinton told him, Embellished all
KNOWN (at the time) Intelligence to support an attack
on Iraq, BUT by weeks BEFORE the attack, KNEW that
NONE OF IT WAS TRUE.

Your hypocrisy is beyond belief. But when I read the racist comments
you made in the post by pyjamarama, it makes it easier to understand why
you support the Clintons.

What YOU read vis a vis POOPY JAMAS is because I posted
getting after HIM (originally) and his mocking blacks,
suporting racists, allowing racists to support him, and
trying to resurrect LONG dead, discredited crap that
Kurt Nicklas did for YEARS (then finally left here in
disgrace because he makes late-night hang up phone
calls) and got caught.
You'll never find any posts of POOPY taking after
Charley Barta, left/rightwing Hank, Slick Crack or the
dozens of racists that post here
Well, *****---_I DO
POOPY didn't like it
What's the matter, KennyLoon
So far all you've done is parrot the bush line of
propaganda
Why didn't you respond to the 4 or 5 major rebuttals
that are historical record about the REASON for going
to war?
Bush didn't sell the attack on Iraq because "Saddam was
a bad guy", he sold it because HE said "Saddam was an
IMMEDIATE Danger" and had "Masses quantities of WMD"
As I told you, I(and is backed by the public record),
Wilson, the CiA, the State Department, Hans Blix,
UNSCOM----ALL proved NONE were true
Yet you ignored it and merely claim:....."......Well,
Clinton lied about a *****"
BTW, KennyLoon
Clinton didn't lie about not having "sexual relations'
That is LEGALLY TRUTHFUL statement
As "I" stated, no one believed he didn't "do something"
But the denial of Joe Camerata's UNIQUE and NEW
defintion allowed CLinton to deny it and not lie
Don't believe me, Read the fucking Jones Depositions
where Judge Wright tells Jones lawyer..."Don't use a
NEW defintion-.....because it will allow him a legal
way of denying it..."
Then read on where Bob Bennett also says: "Why not use
the ACCEPTED LEGAL DEFINITION" and we can eliminate any
confusion
Then stick it up your ***** about "clinton lying"

Ya moron kennyloon

DEMAND for oil worldwide is why oil is high.

The Russians, the Chinese have all been in competition
with us for oil.

Had your lying sack of ***** not invaded Iraq and turned
the world against us, we'd have an easier time making
deals around the world

As it is now, they hate us and give the oil to other
nations.

==================================================================

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did---But Roselles Posts Vile Racial And Homophobic Slurs Anyway	08 May 2007 11:00:44 PM

On May 8, 6:58 pm,

wrote:

On Wed, 09 May 2007 00:43:39 GMT, Ken

<u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

wrote:

On Tue, 08 May 2007 18:56:19 GMT, Ken
<u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

You seem incapapable of independent thought, Kenny.

Gary "Clicky" Roselles, "Independent Thinker" (duly cited from the
Google Archives):
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles <

>
wrote "Yeah, there's a real fucking credible authority----Hitchens a
***** socialist."
On 11 Mar 2001 5:49:44 -0800, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote:
"The word ***** just describes a gay person"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step
for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <

>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Clinton: Don't Do What I Did-to POOPY	09 May 2007 07:27:16 AM

On 8 May 2007 21:00:44 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

You seem incapapable of independent thought, Kenny.

Gary "Clicky" Roselles, "Independent Thinker" (duly cited from the
Google Archives):

Have you ever had a cogent thought of your own, POOPY?
Try answering the question:
DO YOU HIRE BLACKS
YES OR NO
.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Roselles Tries To Do What Clinton Did -- Lie. And Just Like Clinton, He Done Got BUSTED	09 May 2007 09:45:35 AM

On May 9, 5:27 am,

wrote:

On 8 May 2007 21:00:44 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You seem incapapable of independent thought, Kenny.

Gary "Clicky" Roselles, "Independent Thinker" (duly cited from the
Google Archives):

Have you ever had a cogent thought of your own, POOPY?

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups, thusly:

Try answering the question:

DO YOU HIRE BLACKS

Still waitin' for cites on THESE, fuckwit:
"(You're) someone who mocks blacks, babbles endlessly and
pathologically about being a "big businessman", brags about not hiring
blacks" -- Gary Roselles Dec 17 2006
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" -- Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
Got 'em yet?
Hmmmm????
<chuckle>
.

User: ""
Title: "make-em ups"?? BWHAHAHA	09 May 2007 01:24:42 PM

On 9 May 2007 07:45:35 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

Have you ever had a cogent thought of your own, POOPY?

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups, thusly

Yeah, I guess so
Only you could write "Make-em-ups" and keep a straight
face.
SNICKER
But DO YOU HIRE BLACKS?
"Make-em up" an answser
Or are you mocking indians like you did blacks?
.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: More Mealy-Mouthed EVASIONS From Usenet's Most Sickening Racist, Gary Roselles	09 May 2007 01:39:53 PM

On May 9, 11:24 am,

wrote:

On 9 May 2007 07:45:35 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Have you ever had a cogent thought of your own, POOPY?

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups, thusly

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups by playing stupid, thusly

Yeah, I guess so

No one's interested in your mealy-mouthed babble, numbnuts....
Can you cite THESE or not?
"(You're) someone who mocks blacks, babbles endlessly and
pathologically about being a "big businessman", brags about not hiring
blacks" -- Gary Roselles Dec 17 2006
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" -- Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
Got 'em yet?
Hmmmm????
Chop, chop, fuckwit.
<chuckle>
.

User: ""
Title: Usenet's Most Sickening Racist and friend of SLICKCRACK AND KNICKKKERS BABBLES .......	09 May 2007 02:00:04 PM

On 9 May 2007 11:39:53 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

No one's interested in your mealy-mouthed babble, numbnuts....

But we are interested in hearing why you don't hire
blacks, POOPY
Why is that?

===========================================================================

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:16:35 -0400,

John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
I'd believe Roselles before I'd believe you, dickless.
Now take your fucking playground squabble the hell out of alt.atheism.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Like Clinton, Usenet's Most Sickening Racist Gary Roselles Can't BABBLE His Way Out Of His Lies	09 May 2007 03:20:07 PM

On May 9, 12:00 pm,

wrote:

On 9 May 2007 11:39:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

No one's interested in your mealy-mouthed babble, numbnuts....

But we are interested in hearing why you don't hire
blacks, POOPY

Not as interested as we are in seeing you offer evidence of my
claiming not to...
And not nearly as interested as we are in seeing you cite your prior
assertions on the subject....
And yet you completely failed to do so...
Why is that?
"(You're) someone who mocks blacks, babbles endlessly and
pathologically about being a "big businessman", brags about not hiring
blacks" -- Gary Roselles Dec 17 2006
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" -- Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
Got them cites yet, fucktard?
Hmmmm????
Chop, chop, fuckwit.
.

User: ""
Title: Can't BABBLE His Way Out Of His Lies ---So POOPY gives us CRICKETS	10 May 2007 09:00:06 AM

On 9 May 2007 13:20:07 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

But we are interested in hearing why you don't hire
blacks, POOPY

Not as interested as we are in seeing you offer evidence of my
claiming not to...

****Crickets*****

===========================================================================

POOPY PAJAMAS NEW FRIEND SLICKCRACK SCREECHED:

"Go ahead and get your
teaching certification and find out that while there are lots of jobs,
they're nearly all in inner-city shithole ***** warehouses. We'll
see how long you last after your life has been threatened daily, your
car rountinely vandalized, and the "curricula" consist of feel-good,
pro-*****, anti-White, afrocentric nonsense that you KNOW is 100%
pure ***** and you cannot do a damn thing about it."

User: ""
Title: Mealy-Mouthed EVASIONS--Makes POOPY What he (and Nicklas) are today	10 May 2007 08:58:27 AM

On 9 May 2007 11:39:53 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups by playing stupid, thusly

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart or the dozens of other
racists, homophobes, bigots and rightwing conservative
morons on their beliefs, POOPY?
No, you can't
The only one you've ever attacked is the one who called
YOU on YOUR racist views
Knicklas was whipped and beaten for a dozen years---and
some of the last things he did before he left the
usenet IN SHAME and HUMILIATION was to post names,
personal information of those who were merciless to him
Like YOU
You're a cheap imitation of Nicklas
A REAL CHEAP imitation

===========================================================================

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:16:35 -0400,

John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
I'd believe Roselles before I'd believe you, dickless.
Now take your fucking playground squabble the hell out of alt.atheism.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Roselles Offers His Degenerate Usenet Sex Ad Rummaging As His Latest Mealy-Mouthed EVASION	10 May 2007 09:59:52 AM

On May 10, 6:58 am,

wrote:

On 9 May 2007 11:39:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups by playing stupid, thusly

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart

Your usenet pals and sick sex ad rummaging don't interest me, you
silly twit -- don't know 'em, don't read 'em, don't care...
But I DO know that YOU'RE a racist and I DO know that YOU keep trying
to EVADE posting cites to the following asertions you've made...
Why is that?
"(You're) someone who mocks blacks, babbles endlessly and
pathologically about being a "big businessman", brags about not hiring
blacks" -- Gary Roselles Dec 17 2006
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" -- Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
Best get them cites for us pronto, asswipe...
The laughter won't stop til ya do!
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!!!!
.

User: ""
Title: Degenerate Usenet Sex is an Ad for POOPY'S FRIENDS	10 May 2007 01:21:01 PM

On 10 May 2007 07:59:52 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 10, 6:58 am,

wrote:

On 9 May 2007 11:39:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups by playing stupid, thusly

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart

Your usenet pals and sick sex ad rummaging don't interest me, you
silly twit -- don't know 'em, don't read 'em, don't care...

IOW, you don't really care about racist friends of
yours, or their racist views as long as you can *****
away time at work being spanked by me?
You just said they were "my pals", POOPY
Is it now your claim that when someone calls them
exactly what they are, (racist, homophobes, bigots, and
sleazy hypocrites) that constitutes being "their pal"?
No fucking wonder you're considered a dingbat.

===========================================================================

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:16:35 -0400,

John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
I'd believe Roselles before I'd believe you, dickless.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: See Roselles Rummage Through His Buddies Usenet Sex Ads	10 May 2007 03:58:52 PM

On May 10, 11:21 am,

wrote:

On 10 May 2007 07:59:52 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 10, 6:58 am,

wrote:

On 9 May 2007 11:39:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Roselles attempts yet again (and fails) to EVADE his silly forgeries
and make-em-ups by playing stupid, thusly

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart

Your usenet pals and sick sex ad rummaging don't interest me, you
silly twit -- don't know 'em, don't read 'em, don't care...

IOW, you don't really care about racist friends of
yours, or their racist views as long as you can *****
away time at work being spanked by me?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7, you constantly rummage through their sex
ads and you've actually nymed yourself after them.
You're all peas in the same pod, numbnuts...
That's as obvious to all here as your distinct lack of native
intelligence.
You didn't actually think folks here were laughing WITH you, did you?
<SNORTZ>
See "Clicky" at play with his pals, thusly:
Roselles doppelganger "WayBack" wrote:

Another reason you're bitter is that your parents are white, which is
surprising given that 90% of the guys yo hippie momma fucked were
black.

While Roselles himself wrote:
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles<

> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to ***** all them black guys?"
Peas in a pod, peas in a pod.
SPANK!
.

User: ""
Title: POOPY, THE TRAINED MONKEY tries to Rummage Through His Buddies Usenet Sex Ads	10 May 2007 05:14:39 PM

On 10 May 2007 13:58:52 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart on their racism?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7,

You didn't answer---- how they can be "my pals" if I'm
ridiculing them and making their lives miserable (like
I'm doing yours, Poopy). They did exactly what YOU'RE
doing now.
Are you suggesting that when REAL racists, homophobes,
bigots, and douchbags post that they SHOULDN"T be
"stalked 24/7"??
And, POOPY
They are doing what YOU'RE doing
YOU'RE using their posts, their language,
----everything THEY did-----YOU'RE Doing
You didn't think that out very well, did you POOPY
Ya little trained monkey

===========================================================================

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:16:35 -0400,

John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
I'd believe Roselles before I'd believe you, dickless.
Now take your fucking playground squabble the hell out of alt.atheism.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: 66-Year Old Racist And Usenet Sex Ad Scrounger SCREECHES: "I Make Lives Miserable, Goddamit!" None More So Than His Own.	10 May 2007 06:53:52 PM

On May 10, 3:14 pm,

wrote:

On 10 May 2007 13:58:52 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart on their racism?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7,

You didn't answer---- how they can be "my pals" if I'm
ridiculing them and making their lives miserable

BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!
And yet you're the 66-year old deadbeat living in a HUD-sponsored
project in some rat-*****, backwater town, you goofy *****...
And you're the dumb sumbitch spending 24/7 rummaging through usenet
sex ads, posting threats and making racial slurs...
And you're the dumb ***** who's formal education ceased at Lead HS
<giggle>...
And you're the moron who's life's highlight is a "phone-call" that
never even took place...
And YOU think YOU'RE "making lives miserable?"
Only your own, fuckwit, only your own.
How can you delude yourself like you do, Roselles?
Hmmm??
Fuckin' Ay!
Gary "Clicky" Roselles, RACIST and HOMOPHOBE (duly cited from the
Google Archives):
On May 8, 2:08 pm,

wrote:"Hilliary has more
intellect and balls than you do, you racist *****."
On 6 April 2006 10:23:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to ***** all them black guys?"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the ***** would a dumb ***** like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote in
reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Patterson: "Say
"yes Massa", UncleTom."
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step
for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <

>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
SPANK! SPANK!!
.

User: ""
Title: Trained Chimpboy POOPY Still can't answer BIG Questions;	11 May 2007 09:00:28 AM

On 10 May 2007 16:53:52 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 10, 3:14 pm,

wrote:

On 10 May 2007 13:58:52 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart on their racism?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7,

You didn't answer---- how they can be "my pals" if I'm
ridiculing them and making their lives miserable

BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

You didn't answer again
Why is that?
.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Blowhard Racist Gary Roselles SCREECHES "I Make Lives Miserable, Goddamit!" Yeah, His Own	11 May 2007 02:20:53 PM

On May 11, 7:00 am,

wrote:

On 10 May 2007 16:53:52 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 10, 3:14 pm,

wrote:

On 10 May 2007 13:58:52 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart on their racism?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7,

You didn't answer---- how they can be "my pals" if I'm
ridiculing them and making their lives miserable

BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

You didn't answer again

Au Contraire, fuckwit...
Q: Is Gary Roselles a homophobic racist?
A: Gary "Clicky" Roselles, RACIST and HOMOPHOBIC postings (duly cited
from the Google Archives):
On May 8, 2:08 pm,

wrote:"Hilliary has more
intellect and balls than you do, you racist *****."
On 6 April 2006 10:23:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <

>
wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
SPANK! SPANK!!
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Blowing hard,, Trained Monkey POOPY SCREECHES "My life is miserable"	11 May 2007 07:01:08 PM

On 11 May 2007 12:20:53 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart on their racism?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7,

You didn't answer---- how they can be "my pals" if I'm
ridiculing them and making their lives miserable

BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

You didn't answer again

Au Contraire, fuckwit...

You just told me I "made their lives miserable"
Here's one you say I should have gone easy on.
One of YOUR Kind, POOPY

=====================================================

Here's a friend that POOPY says shouldn't be "harassed"

VRWC Fronteer
Mindspring.com/~wjb3/free/ (Billy Beck) threatened:
"Buy yourself a quality piston. (I recommend the Beretta
admirably served in my own case with the FS--stainless steel
--and custom black walnut grips, but all that is your lookout.)
Get yourelf qualified to handle it. Make damn sure you know
what you're doing. Once that's done, get yourself a bunch
of dry-fire rounds in your caliber. They're usually available
at any quality gun shop in bubble packs of five or less than
about fifteen dollars. (The ones I use are transparent red
plastic, with the pad spring visible above the brass inside) Keeping
one in the chamber at all times, never watch the TEEVEE
without your dry-fire pistol near at hand.
Whenever The Lying *****
appears, (PRESIDENT CLINTON) exploit the opportunity and your visceral
reaction for purposes of target aqquisition training and full-grip squeeze
conditioning"

Billy Beck
VRWC Fronteer
.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Racist Blowhard Gary Roselles Finally Faces Up To The Abject Misery That Is His Life	14 May 2007 10:38:53 AM

On May 11, 5:01 pm,

wrote:

On 11 May 2007 12:20:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can you post anything you've ever said to call Barta,
Right/left wing hank, Raffaniello, SlickCrack, Lurker
Lowe, Robertson, FujiFart on their racism?

You just said they were "my pals", POOPY

They are your "pals", you dumb ***** -- you think alike, you post
alike, you stalk them 24/7,

You didn't answer---- how they can be "my pals" if I'm
ridiculing them and making their lives miserable

BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!!

You didn't answer again

Au Contraire, fuckwit...

You just told me I "made their lives miserable"

Nope -- YOU said you "made their lives miserable"...
I merely pointed out how miserable YOUR life is -- what with the
poverty, the advanced age, the poor health, the lack of education, the
obsession with usenet sex ads, the constant apoplectic rage, the
threats and slurs you post, your virulent racism and the uselessness
of a decade spent trying to convince total strangers of your silly,
made-up, contradictory wet-dreams....
Yup -- that's some "life" you got there numbnuts...
Some life.
Here's about all you got to show for it:
Gary Roselles Usenet Legacy (Source: Google Archives):
On May 8, 2:08 pm,

wrote:"Hilliary has more
intellect and balls than you do, you racist *****."
On 6 April 2006 10:23:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote
(of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
You've lost, numbnuts.
Again.
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Racist Blowhard forced to use Company TIme to evade his racist views.	14 May 2007 11:46:11 AM

On 14 May 2007 08:38:53 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

You just told me I "made their lives miserable"

Nope -- YOU said you "made their lives miserable"...

I merely pointed out how miserable YOUR life is --

I'm proud I made their lives miserable you fruitcake
And I got some bad news for you, (as long as you're
wasting business time)
I'm not miserable making fun of racists, homophobies,
gunwhores, bigots and sleazy bastards like you
Without morons like you, I would be miserable not being
able to be a good american.
Had more "good germans" did what I'm doing to you (and
your filthy racist political ideology), Hitler wouldn't
have risen to power to appoint those who agreed with
him like your idiot-in-charge is doing
I know why you like him, POOPY
It's because your racist political heros still maintain
that Jim Crow and segregation was a STATE RIGHT and
that means YOU wouldn't have to be held accountable for
not hiring blacks
SNICKER>

===========================================================

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:53:38 -0500, "ouroboros rex"
c-bee1@NOSPUMMYitg.uiuc.edu> wrote:

"pyjamarama" <pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote in message

You're actually bragging that I constantly slap you shitless

You forget - we're read your lies before. lol
.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Re: Racist Blowhard Gary Roselles Forced To Confront The Misery That Is His Life	14 May 2007 11:51:36 AM

On May 14, 9:46 am,

wrote:

On 14 May 2007 08:38:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You just told me I "made their lives miserable"

Nope -- YOU said you "made their lives miserable"...

I merely pointed out how miserable YOUR life is --

I'm proud I made their lives miserable you fruitcake

You've made no one's life miserable but your OWN, fuckwit -- what with
the poverty, the advanced age, the poor health, the lack of education,
the obsession with usenet sex ads, the constant apoplectic rage, the
threats and slurs you post, your virulent racism and the uselessness
of a decade spent trying to convince total strangers of your silly,
made-up, contradictory wet-dreams....
Yup -- that's some "life" you got there numbnuts...
Some life.
Here's about all you got to show for it:
Gary Roselles Usenet Legacy (Source: Google Archives):
On May 8, 2:08 pm,

wrote:"Hilliary has more
intellect and balls than you do, you racist *****."
On 6 April 2006 10:23:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <

>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <

> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
You've lost, numbnuts.
Again.
.

User: ""
Title: POOPY Forced To Confront The Misery That he NEVER goes after his racist friends---just agrees with them.	14 May 2007 01:23:11 PM

On 14 May 2007 09:51:36 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 14, 9:46 am,

wrote:

On 14 May 2007 08:38:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You just told me I "made their lives miserable"

Nope -- YOU said you "made their lives miserable"...

I merely pointed out how miserable YOUR life is --

I'm proud I made their lives miserable you fruitcake

Yup -- that's some "life" you got there numbnuts...

Thanks I agree
And YOU can't post a single one against any of your
friends like SlackJaw, Knicklas, Barta, Right/Left wing
hanks, Viperspit, POOPY
SNICKER.
.

User: "pyjamarama"
Title: Re: POOPY Forced To Confront The Misery That he NEVER goes after his racist friends---just agrees with them.	14 May 2007 04:04:27 PM

On May 14, 11:23 am,

wrote:

On 14 May 2007 09:51:36 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On May 14, 9:46 am,

wrote:

On 14 May 2007 08:38:53 -0700, pyjamarama

<pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You just told me I "made their lives miserable"

Nope -- YOU said you "made their lives miserable"...

I merely pointed out how miserable YOUR life is --

I'm proud I made their lives miserable you fruitcake

Yup -- that's some "life" you got there numbnuts...

Thanks I agree

Why are we not surprised that you'd agree that a life consisting of
HUD-sponsored squalor, skulking through usenet sex ads, posting
threats and racial slurs was "some life" (ie. a good life)?
Christ, Roselles, your education maxed out at Lead HS over 47 years
ago -- it's no wonder you never aspired to anything more.
Ya goofy old *****, ya!
BWAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!
.

User: ""
Title: Re: POOPY Forced To think about "going postal" like KNICKLAS	14 May 2007 05:07:40 PM

On 14 May 2007 14:04:27 -0700, pyjamarama
<pyjamarama76@yahoo.com> wrote:

Why are we not surprised that you'd agree that a life consisting of
HUD-sponsored squalor,

Why are we not surprised you're talking out your *****?
I haven't a clue as to what the terms the developer
made with respect to loan guaranteed interest rates
over 25 years ago.
That is the only connection HUD has to "this place"
You could have taken the time to read how Knickkkers
(and others) were embarassed when they checked it out.
IDT laughed at Nicklas when he called them about
providing.
So did I
It caused him lots of outrage
Drinking was a side effect, Poopy.
Hang up phone calls came next
THEN----he left in disgrace
Now YOU'RE here
But more stupid, more insane----say, you don't work for
the post office, do you?
SNICKER
.