| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Fredric L. Rice" |
| Date: |
06 May 2007 12:08:28 AM |
| Object: |
Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
---
Christian terrorism murders another half a million people:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/
.
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 12:21:10 AM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lamont Cranston" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
07 May 2007 09:28:45 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
Still fixated on Clinton's penis? lol
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 02:37:35 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Jim E
Jimbo, when did the far right take Clinton of their "Will Do Anything" list?
Oh, you haven't. Yeah, you and yours made a bunch of accusations about the
Clintons sexuality with no proof or evidence. But you freaks aren't big on
the truth, it's kinda boring for you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Solipsism Bush" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 02:29:43 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Jim E
Bush was accused of rape as well.
Link to Original Document on Office of the County Clerk, Fort Bend County,
Texas website (Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader software)
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/CCCIVIL217038-1-7.pdf
Did George Bush rape a black woman?
Wed May 02, 2007 - The following is an excerpt from a column written by
Jackson Thoreau in regards to his investigation of an African American woman
who filed rape charges against current U.S. President, George W. Bush. She
mysteriously died 9 months later and her death was ruled a suicide. He
provides details of his investigation in addition to links to the county's
online database, where the charges were filed, so you can view them for
yourself. This is an interesting and disturbing article to say the least.
You will find a link to the article in its entirety after the excerpt.
To be sure, Schoedinger's accusations - which include being drugged and
sexually assaulted numerous times by Bush and other men purporting to be FBI
agents - are bizarre and hard for most people to believe. But her story fits
in with those told by a growing number of people who say they were used as
guinea pigs or whatever by members of the CIA or another U.S. agency who
wanted to test out the latest mind-controlling drug or just have a strange
form of release. And her death - let's just say government agents have made
murders look like suicides before.
In her court petition, Schoedinger said police in Sugar Land, another
Houston suburb where she said some assailants linked to Bush attempted to
unsuccessfully abduct her from her car shortly before the 2000 election,
refused to take a report or do anything about that incident. She filed a
lawsuit against the Sugar Land department and said that in preparing its
defense, Sugar Land police found out that she dated Bush as a minor. I
didn't get a chance to ask Schoedinger about that tie and didn't meet her in
person, but her driver's license listed her as being 5-foot-8 and weighing
125 pounds, for what that's worth.
The Fort Bend Star story quoted a Sugar Land police captain saying his
department had no record of any complaints by Schoedinger. All he had to do
was what I did - go to the Fort Bend County Internet site and do a simple
search on Schoedinger's name in the area of civil court records. I found the
lawsuit Schoedinger filed in December 2000 against Sugar Land police, and it
even had numerous responses by the department's attorneys in that case.
Read the rest here:
http://www.blackinthecity.net/blog/society/did-george-bush-rape-a-black-woman.html
If you think that's batty, Paula Jones didn't have any corroborating
evidence, either, CTTOI.
Now the people who impeached Bill Clinton should force W to testify against
himself in front of a grand jury.
Then they should ask him a lot of personally embarrassing questions. If his
answers deviate slightly from whatever this woman said they should then
impeach and convict him.
Only they won't do that.;-(
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 02:41:43 AM |
|
|
"Solipsism" <Bush republican-AlQueda@FoxNews.net> wrote in message
news:ruf%h.408$mR2.301@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Jim E
Bush was accused of rape as well.
Lame.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Solipsism Bush" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 10:36:09 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a5f4pF2n9afhU1@mid.individual.net...
"Solipsism" <Bush republican-AlQueda@FoxNews.net> wrote in message
news:ruf%h.408$mR2.301@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Jim E
Bush was accused of rape as well.
Lame.
Bush is a monster metaphor - the ***** of the nuclear age.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lamont Cranston" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
07 May 2007 09:38:28 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a5f4pF2n9afhU1@mid.individual.net...
"Solipsism" <Bush republican-AlQueda@FoxNews.net> wrote in message
news:ruf%h.408$mR2.301@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Jim E
Bush was accused of rape as well.
Lame.
Just as true as your claim about Clinton.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Toki Wartooth" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 03:10:39 AM |
|
|
"dum E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a5f4pF2n9afhU1@mid.individual.net...
Lame.
We KNOW you are, dum E.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 11:47:14 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
Yes, indeed. Finally an issue on which the Republicans can safely take the
moral high ground.
--
"History! Read it and weep!"
-Bokonon
_______________________________________________
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 12:51:43 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote:
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
---
Christian terrorism murders another half a million people:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Toki Wartooth" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 03:09:15 AM |
|
|
"dum E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
news:5a56t7F2mqrvcU1@mid.individual.net...
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:133qoibcut9c665@corp.supernews.com...
An interesting -- and telling -- fact: Democrats don't have to pay
for sex however Republicans either have to rape children or pay
hookers for sex.
The DNC uses their own hookers.
Be real, do you think they would share with the loyal opposition?
And BJ Klintoon was never accused of consorting with hookers to my
recollection.
He was accused of sexual harassment, intimidation, and rape.
See the difference
This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Clinton isn't on hooker's client list |
06 May 2007 11:15:18 AM |
|
|
clinton was not on the client list because he was one of the "hookers "
!!!
" HERE COMES SPIDERMAN !!! '
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
