"George" <spamfree@nospam.forme.tv> wrote in message
news:chmp5d$rhl$0@pita.alt.net...
I like Zell -- and so do most other Americans.
Too bad the truth hurts, eh, toad?
he has succesfully alienated himself from all sides of the debate.
Nope.
There is no "debate" with respect to liberal Democrats. One doesn't
debate
with snakes. One steps on them and makes them into hat bands.
Liberal Democrats ARE part of America's traitor class. And that is
Miller's
point.
If you are brave enough, try reading what true moderate Democrats have to
say:
"Now, as a Democrat, what can I say to that except that, because my party
has been taken over by an astonishingly self-destructive bunch of lunatics
who are so dazzled by Hollywood that they think their ideas make sense, I
have to agree that right now, any President but Bush and any Congress but
a
Republican-dominated one would be disastrous.
As a Democrat, I would hope that a solid trouncing of our fanatic-ruled
party at the polls this November would serve as a wakeup call and remind
Democrats that they only get to do the things that the Democrat Party
exists
to do if they get enough votes to control the White House and Congress.
Which requires that you have serious candidates and embrace serious issues
that most Americans, not just tiny pressure groups, care about.
And on that day, Democratic moderates can take the party back. And yes,
Democratic moderates actually exist. They're all voting for Bush this
year,
but they'd rather have had a Democratic candidate to vote for."
and
"Speaking as an embarrassed and fed-up Democrat, I have to say to the
national leaders of my own party: What were you thinking when you
nominated
this man!
Is there really no one better than this that the Democratic Party can
offer
to the American people to lead us in time of war?
Well, yes, there is. The Democratic Party could have nominated Joe
Lieberman. The Democratic Party could have chosen a candidate who would
help
unite the country in the prosecution of a war forced on us by cruel and
ambitious enemies -- and then put forward the Democratic program for
keeping
America a decent place for people who haven't got great stock options.
Instead, the Democratic Party has nominated a man who has spent his whole
career attacking Americans who actually fight for their country, provoking
divisiveness during wartime for his own political gain, and voting with
absolute consistency to strip America of the means of defending ourselves
against our enemies.
What were the Democratic Party leaders thinking?
Not of America's good, that's for sure."
[Orson Scott Card, Democrat,
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2004-08-29-1.html]
wake up, george you fucking spastic, you are way behind the thinking.
The one who is behind is Traitor Johnny Kerry -- by 11 points.
Actually, it's more on the order of 40 Electoral College votes that he is
now behind by, George. But your point about stomping the liberal Democrat
snakes and using them as hat bands is well taken, and deserves repeating.
My hat's off to Zell Miller, a true American patriot.
.
