Politics > Politics-USA > Cyberstalking News and Records ( was Re: Brooks Loses Another Web Site (Was Re: Is this man a traitor?
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DGVREIMAN" |
| Date: |
30 May 2006 07:26:10 AM |
| Object: |
Cyberstalking News and Records ( was Re: Brooks Loses Another Web Site (Was Re: Is this man a traitor? |
"i2p6 west" <nospam@rr.net> wrote in message
news:127kc5i65apup7b@corp.supernews.com...
DGVREIMAN wrote:
I said once any *impartial* arbitrator evaluated all of the
evidence I have they would agree that Nigel Brooks is lying
and using libel to defame me, so far I have been right seven
times, and Brooks has been proved a liar, libeler and defamer
by independent sources seven out of seven times!
Sir, as much as I dislike your opinions, I have always said
that you are
honest, and Brooks is a big liar.
I really wish you would criminally prosecute the *****. If not
that, then sue the *****.
Thank you for listening.
You should really join my anti-cyberstalking group. You are
entitled to publish your opinion and I mine without the
requirement to suffer personal attacks, threats, cyberstalking
and unlawful harassment by the BS Brooks smear merchant gang or
any other cyberstalker or cyberstalking gang or cyberstalking web
site. Cyberstalking and harassment on USENET is now a criminal
act in most states, and certain Federal Laws have been recently
modified to include USENET cyberstalking that simply causes
emotional distress, and other similar forms of mental injury.
However, since most of these laws are new the prosecutors want to
see a lot of evidence, especially flagrant, repetitive and
arrogant evidence that although the cyberstalkers have been
informed of the statutes, and informed that they are causing
emotional harm and distress with their personal attacks and
libel, they still continue with their cyberstalking, libel and
personal harassment.
I have been advised by several lawyers that in most cases it is
better to accumulate enough evidence to file criminal charges
before or in conjunction with civil litigation. If a prosecutor
in your state or in the state of the perpetrator can be convinced
of the cyberstalking to a degree he is willing to prosecute, then
that is the only real way cyberstalkers can be brought to justice
as many of these dregs are penniless and worse, actually
dangerous. Not to mention once you have a civil record of their
cyberstalking, and/or if they are convicted or cop a plea, then
the next time their cyberstalking will be considered a felony.
You should join my new anti-cyberstalking group, and keep a
record of all the personal attacks you have suffered from the BS
Brooks smear merchant gang, and that goes for anyone else
attacked by this gang or any other cyberstalking gang. In some
cases it might even be better to have an independent expert
review your evidence and post a warning to the gang to cease and
desist. Then if they continue, the expert will recommend
prosecution to their local prosecutor. We are in the process of
accumulating experts to monitor these NG for this very purpose.
We already have a few, but more are willing to join. In fact it
is amazing how many lawyers will take on cyberstalking cases pro
bono just to help bring these criminals to justice.
If you feel you are being defamed by Mr. Brooks, and he is
repeatedly using personal attacks against you (or members of his
gang are doing so) then simply join my anti-cyberstalking group
and send me a copy of each attack. We will maintain a
cyberstalking record for you, and provide notice to the
perpetrator that you consider personal attacks to be emotionally
distressing and represents harassment.
Also, if you know of any other posters that have been
cyberstalked and/or otherwise attacked by the Brooks gang, or
have been driven from the NG, then let me know their names, or
have them contact me.
Also, tell them not to worry if the cyberstalker is using an
alias or a re-mailer. We went through this during our last libel
lawsuits and as soon as the Cyberstalking criminal task forces
gets involved the alias and re-mailer is worthless to the
perpetrator. The re-mailer is only not culpable for content if
(1) he allows the means for the re-mailer to be contacted if his
service is being abused, and (2) his service is not allowing
criminal acts, if he is allowing a client to use his service to
perpetrate criminal acts (such as cyberstalking) then both the
culprit and the re-mailer are then culpable. (Note that many
cyberstalkers set up their own re-mailer systems and this
apparently is common and a classic trait of a cyberstalker - and
is almost a de facto confession of cyberstalking if found to be
true). Like I said, the laws have changed. I am being told
there is no way a group or an individual cyberstalker (s) that
are clearly singling out and attacking anyone on USENET for the
purpose of harassment and to cause emotional distress can avoid
criminal charges as long as enough evidence is properly gathered.
Make sure you copy the headers and the message ID's from the
cyberstalker. In the case of cyberstalker using a re-mailer, or
proxy server, all you need is their service and the headers. The
Cyberstalking Task Force will handle the rest if you keep sending
them evidence of cyberstalking. They get paid to run down these
dregs, and they enjoy bring them to justice. Send me your
evidence and we will do the rest. Remember, you need to have
patience when you are dealing with these dregs, and if you do,
then there is no way they can escape justice. (Note there is a
two year statute of limitations in most cases, but once you file
a complaint then the statutes are tolled).
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
