| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DGVREIMAN" |
| Date: |
09 Apr 2006 06:55:22 PM |
| Object: |
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS |
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS
In article <
,
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" wrote
Doug Said:
: 3. That combat Rifle Company's in the 25th Infantry Division
in
: Vietnam were not composed of "Platoons." (He must believe
they
: were Brownie Scout troops or something)
: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Dai Ducksoup said:
See if you can find any message in which I state that they
didn't.
Once again, the only person saying I have is Doug Grant (Tm). On
the
other hand, Doug himself has made numerous references to his
"team" and
the fantastic number of enemy kills the racked up with only three
WIAs
on his team.
Bear Butt said:
"That's funny; we all called our platoon, guesd what, a
platoon. It had
squads and fire teams in it also."
Doug Says: Dai Dickybrain claimed "there was no evidence I was
ever a platoon sergeant." Yet he admits that the unit I was
assigned to was composed of Platoons and Squads, and even after I
made SFC E-7 in Vietnam I was assigned to a platoon. So what is
he claiming my position was in that Platoon as a SFC E-7? There
is only two positions any SFC E-7 can hold in a platoon, and that
is either Platoon Sergeant, or Platoon Leader if a commissioned
officer is not assigned to the Platoon or is absent. Obviously
Dai Dumdum has been caught in yet another obvious and flagrant
deception and lie.
(So if I was a Platoon Sergeant, and my L.T. was on R&R, or was
hit, or just was not assigned yet, was I an acting Platoon
Leader? Of course, ask anyone in the US Army how the Army works,
and they will agree that Dai Uy is lying about this fact).
Moreover, I have always referenced my team (and I have said this
many times) in Vietnam and in respect to BC as representing every
unit I was ever assigned to during my 2&1/2 tours of duty.
I stated that I "estimated" a BC of 1803 for combined for every
unit I was assigned to during my entire 15 months in Vietnam.
But Dai Dubby has distorted that statement into statements,
forgeries and embellishments that is impossible to recognize as
being anywhere remotely assocated with what I actually said. As
an example, he claimed I said that "I personaly killed 1803 VC in
Vietnam." Which is a complete and total and preposterous Dai Dork
lie. Then he went on to claim that I said " I personaly killed a
"confirmed" 1803 enemy in Vietnam" (or words to that effect). He
went on and on butchering, embellishing, lying, distorting,
fabricating, and lying about what I supposedly said to a point
that no one could even recognize who was telling the truth on
this issue - which is the purpose of a defaming smear merchant.
They distort something, get others to repeat it, then reference
that lie over and over in subsequent posts.
However, you all remember I went back two months ago. and with
proof and message ID's, I showed everyone where Dai Uy had lied,
changed, altered, embellished and forged my statement about my
units recording 1803 BC , many times. I posted that evidence on
this NG, and Dai Dork ran for the hills and would not even
respond to it. Does anyone want to see that evidence of Dai Dorks
most infamous forgeries and lies again? Please say yes someone.
Now giving Bear Butt some slack, he is new here, he does not
realize yet how much and how often the BS Brooks gang lies,
deceives, forges and uses fraud to defamine, but I suspect even
he will eventually realize he has fell in with a den of smear
merchants so unethical they will even forge documents from the
FBI to smear me. But perhaps he wants to become one of them, who
knows, we shall see.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
| User: "Nigel Brooks" |
|
| Title: Re: DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS |
09 Apr 2006 08:09:48 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:Idadnc76m4JBA6TZRVn-tw@comcast.com...
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS
In article <
,
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" wrote
Doug Said:
: 3. That combat Rifle Company's in the 25th Infantry Division in
: Vietnam were not composed of "Platoons." (He must believe they
: were Brownie Scout troops or something)
: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Dai Ducksoup said:
See if you can find any message in which I state that they didn't.
Once again, the only person saying I have is Doug Grant (Tm). On the
other hand, Doug himself has made numerous references to his "team" and
the fantastic number of enemy kills the racked up with only three WIAs
on his team.
Bear Butt said:
"That's funny; we all called our platoon, guesd what, a platoon. It had
squads and fire teams in it also."
Doug Says: Dai Dickybrain claimed "there was no evidence I was ever a
platoon sergeant." Yet he admits that the unit I was assigned to was
composed of Platoons and Squads, and even after I made SFC E-7 in Vietnam
I was assigned to a platoon. So what is he claiming my position was in
that Platoon as a SFC E-7? There is only two positions any SFC E-7 can
hold in a platoon, and that is either Platoon Sergeant, or Platoon Leader
if a commissioned officer is not assigned to the Platoon or is absent.
Obviously Dai Dumdum has been caught in yet another obvious and flagrant
deception and lie.
(So if I was a Platoon Sergeant, and my L.T. was on R&R, or was hit, or
just was not assigned yet, was I an acting Platoon Leader? Of course, ask
anyone in the US Army how the Army works, and they will agree that Dai Uy
is lying about this fact).
So who was your lieutenant - which platoon of D Company?
Moreover, I have always referenced my team (and I have said this many
times) in Vietnam and in respect to BC as representing every unit I was
ever assigned to during my 2&1/2 tours of duty.
You also said that you had only three wounded. The records are quite clear
with regard to the casualties of D Company during the period you were
assigned (Feb 68 - July 68). The Coffelt Data Base shows that 7 members of
D Company were killed in action during the period you were assigned to that
Company.
If as you claim you are referring to every unit your were ever assigned to
during your time in Vietnam - then the casualty figures are much much
greater. The 51st Maintenance Company (LT) suffered no casualties during
the time you were there. But the 25th Infantry Division's casualties during
the period from the end of February 68 through end of July 68 were 684
listed as killed in action.
The conclusion is of course obvious - once again - you made it up.
How do you explain Co D's casualties and the casualties of the entire
Division during your short time there as they relate to your estimated body
count of 1803 with only three wounded on your team?
I stated that I "estimated" a BC of 1803 for combined for every unit I was
assigned to during my entire 15 months in Vietnam.
What body count does the 51st Maintenance Company (LightTruck) claim during
the time you were assigned ?
But Dai Dubby has distorted that statement into statements, forgeries and
embellishments that is impossible to recognize as being anywhere remotely
assocated with what I actually said. As an example, he claimed I said that
"I personaly killed 1803 VC in Vietnam." Which is a complete and total and
preposterous Dai Dork lie. Then he went on to claim that I said " I
personaly killed a "confirmed" 1803 enemy in Vietnam" (or words to that
effect). He went on and on butchering, embellishing, lying, distorting,
fabricating, and lying about what I supposedly said to a point that no one
could even recognize who was telling the truth on this issue - which is
the purpose of a defaming smear merchant. They distort something, get
others to repeat it, then reference that lie over and over in subsequent
posts.
Actually, what is preposterous is your original claim.
Nigel Brooks
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS |
10 Apr 2006 12:28:12 AM |
|
|
"Nigel Brooks" <nbrooks@msn.com> wrote in message
news:49tqmoFpuhr4U1@individual.net...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:Idadnc76m4JBA6TZRVn-tw@comcast.com...
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS
In article <
,
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" wrote
Doug Said:
: 3. That combat Rifle Company's in the 25th Infantry
Division in
: Vietnam were not composed of "Platoons." (He must believe
they
: were Brownie Scout troops or something)
: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Dai Ducksoup said:
See if you can find any message in which I state that they
didn't.
Once again, the only person saying I have is Doug Grant (Tm).
On the
other hand, Doug himself has made numerous references to his
"team" and
the fantastic number of enemy kills the racked up with only
three WIAs
on his team.
Bear Butt said:
"That's funny; we all called our platoon, guesd what, a
platoon. It had
squads and fire teams in it also."
Doug Says: Dai Dickybrain claimed "there was no evidence I was
ever a platoon sergeant." Yet he admits that the unit I was
assigned to was composed of Platoons and Squads, and even
after I made SFC E-7 in Vietnam I was assigned to a platoon.
So what is he claiming my position was in that Platoon as a
SFC E-7? There is only two positions any SFC E-7 can hold in a
platoon, and that is either Platoon Sergeant, or Platoon
Leader if a commissioned officer is not assigned to the
Platoon or is absent. Obviously Dai Dumdum has been caught in
yet another obvious and flagrant deception and lie.
(So if I was a Platoon Sergeant, and my L.T. was on R&R, or
was hit, or just was not assigned yet, was I an acting Platoon
Leader? Of course, ask anyone in the US Army how the Army
works, and they will agree that Dai Uy is lying about this
fact).
So who was your lieutenant - which platoon of D Company?
Doug Says: Do you see any reference to D Company above? BS
Brooks, you have been caught conning the group again. You know I
never made SFC E-7 until after I left the 25th Infantry Division.
Why continue to lie and make a fool out of yourself, not unless
you like it.
Moreover, I have always referenced my team (and I have said
this many times) in Vietnam and in respect to BC as
representing every unit I was ever assigned to during my 2&1/2
tours of duty.
You also said that you had only three wounded. The records are
quite clear with regard to the casualties of D Company during
the period you were assigned (Feb 68 - July 68). The Coffelt
Data Base shows that 7 members of D Company were killed in
action during the period you were assigned to that Company.
BS Brooks, the answer to that question is very simple. But I
told you I am through answering your questions until you start
answering mine. If you want an answer to you obvious distorted
lie, then first you need to post your MOS, duty station, rank and
actual duties while you were in Vietnam. I also would like to
know why you panned yourself off as a fake Wolfhound - and the
Hounds are not very happy about that fraud BTW.
If as you claim you are referring to every unit your were ever
assigned to during your time in Vietnam - then the casualty
figures are much much greater. The 51st Maintenance Company
(LT) suffered no casualties during the time you were there.
But the 25th Infantry Division's casualties during the period
from the end of February 68 through end of July 68 were 684
listed as killed in action.
Doug Says: The whole Division! Why not just include every unit
in Vietnam in your distortions?
BS Brooks, the answer to that question is very simple. But I
told you I am through answering your questions until you start
answering mine. If you want an answer to you obvious distorted
lie, then first you need to post your MOS, duty station, rank and
actual duties while you were in Vietnam. I also would like to
know why you panned yourself off as a fake Wolfhound - and the
Hounds are not very happy about that fraud BTW.
The conclusion is of course obvious - once again - you made it
up. BS Brooks, you create a lie, then draw a lying conclusion
to your own lie. That is the only obvious conclusion.
How do you explain Co D's casualties and the casualties of the
entire Division during your short time there as they relate to
your estimated body count of 1803 with only three wounded on
your team?
Doug Says: Now you are adding Divisions, why not add Corps, and
Theaters of war to my estimations and make your lie look even
more idiotic? I said I had upped that "estimation" of BC for
all of the units I worked with several times, but you are
ignoring those higher estimation posts becuase they do not fit
into your ridicilous conclusion that my "estimation" was wrong.
Of course it was wrong BS Brooks that is why it is called an
"estimation" you loony fruit cake.
Shall I find those posts in which I said I thought my
"estimations" were really very light and embarass you further?
You know I upped those estimations BS Brooks, you even responded
to the posts in which I said that several times, so cut the lies
and the bull, you are not going to get away with conning anyone
anymore, and you look like a fool trying. . NO ONE is going to
be 100% right about every "estimated" figure they post moron,
that is why it is called an "estimation."
Moreover, if someone was killed or they killed a VC in some other
platoon or company that I did not know about, then how in the
hell would that figure into my old "estimation?" I cannot add
into my "estimation" of BC if I don't know about it or hear about
it you screaming lunitic!
Jeeze BS Brooks, you are at your distortions again. How would I
know how many the Division killed every day? How would I know
about every unit in the 25th Body count? I did not run to after
action reports and BC claims and read them moron. I just kept
what I believed was a loose record of a fair "estimate" of what
happened in the units I was assigned to during my entire stint in
Vietnam. And then after a while I even posted that my original "
estimation" had to be light - and that was even before you even
knew what units I was assigned to or made any nonsense out of
the numbers - so cut the Bull BS Brooks, your "semantics" game of
numbers and ***** has been exposed for what it is.
Not to mention the times and dates you are claiming I was with
these units is wrong and you know it becuase I have allready told
you that. And are you now going to claim that the 51st
Maintenance Company also runs "Personnel Offices?"
I stated that I "estimated" a BC of 1803 for combined for
every unit I was assigned to during my entire 15 months in
Vietnam.
What body count does the 51st Maintenance Company (LightTruck)
claim during the time you were assigned ?
Doug Says: You do see the word "estimated" - or, are you
ignoring that word. Also, my duties with the 51st Maintenance
Company was not in Maintenance. Not to mention the fact I
upped my "estimation" even before you received your FOIA
information on me. So quit trying to pin me down on numbers when
it comes to a "guess" and "estimation" and quit trying to claim
that I had to know every BC and casuality every unit took that
was in Vietnam - such claims and false accusations are completely
idiotic!
The obvious conclusion BS Brooks is that you are trying to
distort facts and now figures to try and use lies and distortions
to continue to defame me.
But Dai Dubby has distorted that statement into statements,
forgeries and embellishments that is impossible to recognize
as being anywhere remotely assocated with what I actually
said. As an example, he claimed I said that "I personaly
killed 1803 VC in Vietnam." Which is a complete and total and
preposterous Dai Dork lie. Then he went on to claim that I
said " I personaly killed a "confirmed" 1803 enemy in Vietnam"
(or words to that effect). He went on and on butchering,
embellishing, lying, distorting, fabricating, and lying about
what I supposedly said to a point that no one could even
recognize who was telling the truth on this issue - which is
the purpose of a defaming smear merchant. They distort
something, get others to repeat it, then reference that lie
over and over in subsequent posts.
Actually, what is preposterous is your original claim.
Doug Says: Actually, what is preposterous is your (1) ignoring
that upped my "estimation" and (2) your claim that I had to know
every casualty and BC that occurred in Vietnam, and what is
really hilarious, is your claim that all "estimations" have to be
absolutely correct or they are some kind of a lie. Why would
anyone want to lie about a personal "estimation" of combined
units BC in Vietnam? Not to mention I upped that estimation
several times before you even made the numbers an issue - so cut
the bull BS Brooks, you are acting desperate to try to pin some
defamation on me with more of your lies, distortions, and false
accusations based upon your own trumped up nonsense - as usual.
The real topic of this post, which you have avoided mentioning,
is that your Gang member, Dai Uy, distorted and lied about my
"estimation" so much that it almost makes him appear as a
complete Pathological Liar. Why don't you ask Dai ***** why
he lied so much about this 1803 BC issue if you want to conclude
someone is lying? Why not ask the obvious liar why he lied so
much about this issue? Why not ask Penley why he lied so much
about this issue? What's the matter BS Brooks, don't like to
expose your gang members when they are obviously lying? And you
pan yourself off as "honest" what a Joke.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Doug Grant (Tm)
Nigel Brooks
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS |
10 Apr 2006 04:32:06 PM |
|
|
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-0ED90E.06134310042006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <g8udnXU3W_Z9caTZnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:Idadnc76m4JBA6TZRVn-tw@comcast.com...
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS
The real topic of this post, which you have avoided
mentioning,
is that your Gang member, Dai Uy, distorted and lied about my
"estimation" so much that it almost makes him appear as a
complete Pathological Liar. Why don't you ask Dai *****
why
he lied so much about this 1803 BC issue if you want to
conclude
someone is lying?
Here's what posted:
http://tinyurl.com/ed9tr
Why not ask the obvious liar why he lied so
much about this issue?
Okay, I'll ask the obvious liar nicely one more time: Why
have
YOU, Doug Grant (Tm), lied so much about this issue?
Doug Says: You and other BS Brooks gang members lied about this
issue so much that your nose should be dragging your butt. Do
you want me to again post evidence of your lies along with
message ID's? My original post certainly was not a lie, and if
you have some evidence it was, post it.
Doug Grant (Tm_
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS |
10 Apr 2006 04:29:09 PM |
|
|
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS
In article <
,
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" wrote
Doug Said:
: 3. That combat Rifle Company's in the 25th Infantry Division
in
: Vietnam were not composed of "Platoons." (He must believe
they
: were Brownie Scout troops or something)
: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Dai Ducksoup said:
See if you can find any message in which I state that they
didn't.
Once again, the only person saying I have is Doug Grant (Tm). On
the
other hand, Doug himself has made numerous references to his
"team" and
the fantastic number of enemy kills the racked up with only three
WIAs
on his team.
Bear Butt said:
"That's funny; we all called our platoon, guesd what, a
platoon. It had
squads and fire teams in it also."
Doug Says: Dai Dickybrain claimed "there was no evidence I was
ever a platoon sergeant." Yet he admits that the unit I was
assigned to was composed of Platoons and Squads, and even after I
made SFC E-7 in Vietnam I was assigned to a platoon. So what is
he claiming my position was in that Platoon as a SFC E-7? There
is only two positions any SFC E-7 can hold in a platoon, and that
is either Platoon Sergeant, or Platoon Leader if a commissioned
officer is not assigned to the Platoon or is absent. Obviously
Dai Dumdum has been caught in yet another obvious and flagrant
deception and lie.
(So if I was a Platoon Sergeant, and my L.T. was on R&R, or was
hit, or just was not assigned yet, was I an acting Platoon
Leader? Of course, ask anyone in the US Army how the Army works,
and they will agree that Dai Uy is lying about this fact).
Moreover, I have always referenced my team (and I have said this
many times) in Vietnam and in respect to BC as representing every
unit I was ever assigned to during my 2&1/2 tours of duty.
I stated that I "estimated" a BC of 1803 for combined for every
unit I was assigned to during my entire 15 months in Vietnam.
But Dai Dubby has distorted that statement into statements,
forgeries and embellishments that is impossible to recognize as
being anywhere remotely assocated with what I actually said. As
an example, he claimed I said that "I personaly killed 1803 VC in
Vietnam." Which is a complete and total and preposterous Dai Dork
lie. Then he went on to claim that I said " I personaly killed a
"confirmed" 1803 enemy in Vietnam" (or words to that effect). He
went on and on butchering, embellishing, lying, distorting,
fabricating, and lying about what I supposedly said to a point
that no one could even recognize who was telling the truth on
this issue - which is the purpose of a defaming smear merchant.
They distort something, get others to repeat it, then reference
that lie over and over in subsequent posts.
However, you all remember I went back two months ago. and with
proof and message ID's, I showed everyone where Dai Uy had lied,
changed, altered, embellished and forged my statement about my
units recording 1803 BC , many times. I posted that evidence on
this NG, and Dai Dork ran for the hills and would not even
respond to it. Does anyone want to see that evidence of Dai Dorks
most infamous forgeries and lies again? Please say yes someone.
Now giving Bear Butt some slack, he is new here, he does not
realize yet how much and how often the BS Brooks gang lies,
deceives, forges and uses fraud to defamine, but I suspect even
he will eventually realize he has fell in with a den of smear
merchants so unethical they will even forge documents from the
FBI to smear me. But perhaps he wants to become one of them, who
knows, we shall see.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-AB10A0.06101510042006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <Idadnc76m4JBA6TZRVn-tw@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
DAI UY LIES ABOUT 1803 KILLS
http://tinyurl.com/ed9tr
Doug Says: You respond to all of your lies about this issue with
a single reference to a true post? Is that an apology for all of
your lies and distortions in respect to this issue? See above
for what is just some of the lies you posted about this issue,
and are you now admitting you lied?
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
