| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"GoreRantsForKerry" |
| Date: |
30 May 2004 06:17:44 AM |
| Object: |
damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
Bill Clinton refused to meet with his CIA director, James Woolsey.
John Deutch, Mr. Woolsey's successor, instituted "diversity" quotas for
agent recruitment that effectively made it impossible to infiltrate
terrorist groups.
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army Rangers
critical troop backup - all of which emboldened Osama bin Laden to carry out
further attacks on the United States.
The Clinton administration pressured investigators to abandon their
examination of tax-exempt Islamic charities in the United States that were
linked to terror groups.
The investigation into the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia by
Iranian-supported terrorists failed because the Clinton White House did
nothing to back up FBI investigators.
.
|
|
| User: "Smarty Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 10:09:31 AM |
|
|
"GoreRantsForKerry" <GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote in message
news:spjuc.4441$Yd3.15@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Bill Clinton refused to meet with his CIA director, James Woolsey.
John Deutch, Mr. Woolsey's successor, instituted "diversity" quotas for
agent recruitment that effectively made it impossible to infiltrate
terrorist groups.
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The
October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army
Rangers
critical troop backup - all of which emboldened Osama bin Laden to carry
out
further attacks on the United States.
The Clinton administration pressured investigators to abandon their
examination of tax-exempt Islamic charities in the United States that were
linked to terror groups.
The investigation into the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia
by
Iranian-supported terrorists failed because the Clinton White House did
nothing to back up FBI investigators.
Yeh...and Bush is a much better President than Clinton?....tee hee
hee....right! Bush 1 was a much better president than Jr ever will be.
In fact Bush Jr has to go down in history as one of the worst, if not THE
worst president ever.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "FDR" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 05:01:07 PM |
|
|
"GoreRantsForKerry" <GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote in message
news:spjuc.4441$Yd3.15@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Bill Clinton refused to meet with his CIA director, James Woolsey.
John Deutch, Mr. Woolsey's successor, instituted "diversity" quotas for
agent recruitment that effectively made it impossible to infiltrate
terrorist groups.
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The
October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army
Rangers
critical troop backup - all of which emboldened Osama bin Laden to carry
out
further attacks on the United States.
Then of course, there is the Bush Jr. presidency where Bush Jr. got over 800
soldiers killed on the whim that there might be some WMD's in Iraq. Well,
800+ killed for a shell that was leftover form the Iran/Iraq war which was
probably supplied to Saddam from the Reagan administration.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "mark" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 08:53:57 AM |
|
|
In article <spjuc.4441$Yd3.15@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"GoreRantsForKerry" <GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
Bill Clinton refused to meet with his CIA director, James Woolsey.
John Deutch, Mr. Woolsey's successor, instituted "diversity" quotas for
agent recruitment that effectively made it impossible to infiltrate
terrorist groups.
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army Rangers
critical troop backup - all of which emboldened Osama bin Laden to carry out
further attacks on the United States.
The Clinton administration pressured investigators to abandon their
examination of tax-exempt Islamic charities in the United States that were
linked to terror groups.
The investigation into the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia by
Iranian-supported terrorists failed because the Clinton White House did
nothing to back up FBI investigators.
why are you such an apologist for bush's poor performance?
--
mark
markjs1@*nospam*yahoo.com
"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite."
-John Kenneth Galbraith
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 06:26:37 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:17:44 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army Rangers
critical troop backup -
Clinton was very effective at "cutting and running".
He cowardly pulled our heroes out very quickly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GoreRantsForKerry" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 06:37:10 AM |
|
|
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:94ijb01ggcmgqcq79i0k8snst1p716e00c@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:17:44 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The
October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army
Rangers
critical troop backup -
Clinton was very effective at "cutting and running".
He cowardly pulled our heroes out very quickly.
As disgusting as that is, it's even MORE disgusting that the liberal
Democrats haven't learned a darn thing from Clinton's errors. There are
huge segments of TODAY'S Democrat Party which want to do the same thing in
our war on terror - they want to "cut and run".
The Democrat Party is a DISASTER in terms of national defense and protecting
American lives.
9/11 was basically the RESULT of that Democrat Party attitude.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Murray" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 07:23:24 AM |
|
|
"GoreRantsForKerry" <GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote in message
news:GHjuc.4469$Yd3.3266@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:94ijb01ggcmgqcq79i0k8snst1p716e00c@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:17:44 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
Tthe Clinton years were a series of disastrous miscalculations. The
October
1993 catastrophe in Somalia - in which 18 U.S. servicemen were killed -
occurred after Clinton Defense Secretary Les Aspin denied U.S. Army
Rangers
critical troop backup -
Clinton was very effective at "cutting and running".
He cowardly pulled our heroes out very quickly.
As disgusting as that is, it's even MORE disgusting that the liberal
Democrats haven't learned a darn thing from Clinton's errors. There are
huge segments of TODAY'S Democrat Party which want to do the same thing in
our war on terror - they want to "cut and run".
The Democrat Party is a DISASTER in terms of national defense and
protecting
American lives.
so is it your contention that bush's administration has done enough in terms
of homeland security and saving US soldier's lives?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 06:51:28 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:37:10 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
9/11 was basically the RESULT of that Democrat Party attitude.
The terrorists planned 9/11 while Clinton was in office because they
knew the Chickenhawk Clinton would do nothing, just like he did after
terrorist bombings of US embassies, the USS Cole murders, etc. etc.
etc.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GoreRantsForKerry" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 07:06:44 AM |
|
|
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:thjjb0dieqbcbr469nl56d35vf1ehagfp1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:37:10 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
9/11 was basically the RESULT of that Democrat Party attitude.
The terrorists planned 9/11 while Clinton was in office because they
knew the Chickenhawk Clinton would do nothing, just like he did after
terrorist bombings of US embassies, the USS Cole murders, etc. etc.
etc.
Exactly. And now those same terrorists are playing the liberal element of
the Democrat Party in the same way, like the cheap mindless leftist violins
that they are.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "FDR" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 07:23:15 PM |
|
|
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:thjjb0dieqbcbr469nl56d35vf1ehagfp1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:37:10 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
9/11 was basically the RESULT of that Democrat Party attitude.
The terrorists planned 9/11 while Clinton was in office because they
knew the Chickenhawk Clinton would do nothing, just like he did after
terrorist bombings of US embassies, the USS Cole murders, etc. etc.
etc.
Yeah, and what about the terrorists when they strike again? Will it always
be Clinton's fault or will it be Bush's fault?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Vandolay" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 07:45:30 PM |
|
|
"FDR" <_remove_spam_block_rzitka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:TVuuc.21714$j24.12004@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:thjjb0dieqbcbr469nl56d35vf1ehagfp1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:37:10 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
9/11 was basically the RESULT of that Democrat Party attitude.
The terrorists planned 9/11 while Clinton was in office because they
knew the Chickenhawk Clinton would do nothing, just like he did after
terrorist bombings of US embassies, the USS Cole murders, etc. etc.
etc.
Yeah, and what about the terrorists when they strike again? Will it
always
be Clinton's fault or will it be Bush's fault?
You can point to President Bush's record and be able to say that he tried to
combat and confront terrorism. Clinton can't say that!
.
|
|
|
| User: "FDR" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 10:54:17 PM |
|
|
"Art Vandolay" <art_vandolay@vandolayindustries.net> wrote in message
news:H8vuc.17767$ff2.15027@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"FDR" <_remove_spam_block_rzitka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:TVuuc.21714$j24.12004@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:thjjb0dieqbcbr469nl56d35vf1ehagfp1@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 11:37:10 GMT, "GoreRantsForKerry"
<GoreLiesWontSaveHim@dnc.net> wrote:
9/11 was basically the RESULT of that Democrat Party attitude.
The terrorists planned 9/11 while Clinton was in office because they
knew the Chickenhawk Clinton would do nothing, just like he did after
terrorist bombings of US embassies, the USS Cole murders, etc. etc.
etc.
Yeah, and what about the terrorists when they strike again? Will it
always
be Clinton's fault or will it be Bush's fault?
You can point to President Bush's record and be able to say that he tried
to
combat and confront terrorism. Clinton can't say that!
But what happens when the next terrorist act happens again? Will it still
be Clinton's fault? When does it become Bush's fault?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 07:49:21 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 00:23:15 GMT, "FDR"
<_remove_spam_block_rzitka@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, and what about the terrorists when they strike again? Will it always
be Clinton's fault or will it be Bush's fault?
As long as the Democrats keep cheering the terrorist on there will
always be terrorist threats.
The terrorists just love it when you America haters cry, ***** and moan
like little children.
Democrats encourage terrorism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "FDR" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
30 May 2004 10:53:23 PM |
|
|
<mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:g41lb09c1jjc6jped0j4nutdnlliqve1m1@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 May 2004 00:23:15 GMT, "FDR"
<_remove_spam_block_rzitka@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, and what about the terrorists when they strike again? Will it
always
be Clinton's fault or will it be Bush's fault?
As long as the Democrats keep cheering the terrorist on there will
always be terrorist threats.
The terrorists just love it when you America haters cry, ***** and moan
like little children.
Democrats encourage terrorism.
So it's still going to be Clinton's fault?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: damage the Clinton administration did to national security |
31 May 2004 12:23:04 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 03:53:23 GMT, "FDR"
<_remove_spam_block_rzitka@hotmail.com> wrote:
So it's still going to be Clinton's fault?
No it will be the Democrats fault. The terrorists think if they can
kill a few Americans, the Democratic enemy within will tear this
country apart and withdraw our military.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
