DemocRAT CONGRESSMAN BRIAN BAIRD(WHO ORIGINALLY VOTED AGAINST THE WAR) SAYS THAT "his recent trip to Iraq convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S. security."



 Politics > Politics-USA > DemocRAT CONGRESSMAN BRIAN BAIRD(WHO ORIGINALLY VOTED AGAINST THE WAR) SAYS THAT "his recent trip to Iraq convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S. security."

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: ""
Date: 21 Aug 2007 08:58:43 AM
Object: DemocRAT CONGRESSMAN BRIAN BAIRD(WHO ORIGINALLY VOTED AGAINST THE WAR) SAYS THAT "his recent trip to Iraq convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S. security."
Baird sees need for longer U.S. role in Iraq
Brad Shannon
The Olympian
U.S. Rep. Brian Baird said Thursday that his recent trip to Iraq
convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a
hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S.
security.
http://www.theolympian.com/news/story/192500.html
Baird, a five-term Democrat, voted against President Bush ordering the
Iraq invasion - at a time when he was in a minority in Congress and at
risk of alienating voters. He returned late Tuesday from a trip that
included stops in Israel, Jordan and Iraq, where he met troops, U.S.
advisers and Iraqis, whose stories have convinced him that U.S. troops
must stay longer.
With Congress poised next month to look at U.S. progress in Iraq and a
vote looming on U.S. funding for the war, Baird said he's inclined to
seek a continued U.S. presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient
Americans want. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus, who oversees U.S.
troops in Iraq, to seek a redeployment of forces. "People may be
upset. I wish I didn't have to say this," Baird said. He added that
the United States needs to continue with its military troops surge "at
least into early next year, then engage in a gradual redeployment. ... I
know it's going to cost hundreds of American lives and hundreds of
billions of dollars."
.

User: "The Vicar"

Title: Re: DemocRAT CONGRESSMAN BRIAN BAIRD(WHO ORIGINALLY VOTED AGAINST THE WAR) SAYS THAT "his recent trip to Iraq convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S. securit 21 Aug 2007 09:01:07 AM
<PissingOffTheLeft@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1187704723.771172.147640@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

Baird sees need for longer U.S. role in Iraq

Brad Shannon
The Olympian

U.S. Rep. Brian Baird said Thursday that his recent trip to Iraq
convinced him the military needs more time in the region, and that a
hasty pullout would cause chaos that helps Iran and harms U.S.
security.

http://www.theolympian.com/news/story/192500.html

Baird, a five-term Democrat, voted against President Bush ordering the
Iraq invasion - at a time when he was in a minority in Congress and at
risk of alienating voters. He returned late Tuesday from a trip that
included stops in Israel, Jordan and Iraq, where he met troops, U.S.
advisers and Iraqis, whose stories have convinced him that U.S. troops
must stay longer.

there's a difference between voting against a war that hasnt occurred and
saying that we need to stay longer to clean up the mess. sounds like he's a
thoughtful guy that recognizes we have a responsibility to fix what we
broke.


With Congress poised next month to look at U.S. progress in Iraq and a
vote looming on U.S. funding for the war, Baird said he's inclined to
seek a continued U.S. presence in Iraq beyond what many impatient
Americans want. He also expects Gen. David Petraeus, who oversees U.S.
troops in Iraq, to seek a redeployment of forces. "People may be
upset. I wish I didn't have to say this," Baird said. He added that
the United States needs to continue with its military troops surge "at
least into early next year, then engage in a gradual redeployment. ... I
know it's going to cost hundreds of American lives and hundreds of
billions of dollars."

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Billions of bucks for Bush's "Homeland Security" and what have we got? NADA!
Microsoft: A Risk To U.S. Security
By lack of security, we are enriching thugs in Iraq.
Bush Now Directing Attention to Destroying Social Security
Sacrificing Social Security for the Bloodsucking Repugs
Greenspan sez pay for Bush tax cuts for the rich by cutting Social Security benefits.
UN Says Iraq Security Worse Than Before (Bye bye Bu$h!)
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe will track 2004 U.S. election
Bush's Top Ten National Security Flip-Flops.
U.S. DEMANDS: DROP YOUR PANTS IN THE NAME OF SECURITY
Ex-official tells of Bush Homeland Security failures
Chilean program, cited by Bush as model for his Social Security scam, has major shortfall
Bush's Pentagon Says Veterans' Benefits Are "Hurtful" To National Security
Convicted felon becomes deputy national security adviser
Pentagon covers up failure to train and recruit local security forces
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER