| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DemsLackGravitas" |
| Date: |
14 Dec 2003 07:37:24 AM |
| Object: |
Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
.
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 12:48:33 PM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being elected
President in 2004.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GENOMEMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 01:09:11 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being elected
President in 2004.
Translation: No matter what, you and your demmy friends will find SOMETHING
to carp at.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 05:24:52 PM |
|
|
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:rz2Db.145732$655.25797170@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq
was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How
sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being
elected
President in 2004.
Translation: No matter what, you and your demmy friends will find
SOMETHING
to carp at.
Not at all. I think Bush would have an extremely good shot at being elected
in 2004 if he can accomplish all, if not the majority, of the above. That's
what we have elections for in this country. Of course, we could just hand
over all of the rule to the Republicans and forget the dual or multiple
party system.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DemsLackGravitas" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 05:38:21 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mrqdnTfAfJTYbEGiRVn-jg@wideopenwest.com...
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:rz2Db.145732$655.25797170@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq
was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How
sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of
the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in
a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being
elected
President in 2004.
Translation: No matter what, you and your demmy friends will find
SOMETHING
to carp at.
Not at all. I think Bush would have an extremely good shot at being
elected
in 2004 if he can accomplish all, if not the majority, of the above.
Actually, he has an extremely good shot at being reelected in 2004 even if
he accomplishes NONE of the above, THAT is how thin the Democrat Party's
bench is these days, Joey.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
15 Dec 2003 05:23:56 AM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:Nv6Db.393403$ao4.1302037@attbi_s51...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mrqdnTfAfJTYbEGiRVn-jg@wideopenwest.com...
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:rz2Db.145732$655.25797170@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in
Iraq
was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak.
How
sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of
the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up
in
a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being
elected
President in 2004.
Translation: No matter what, you and your demmy friends will find
SOMETHING
to carp at.
Not at all. I think Bush would have an extremely good shot at being
elected
in 2004 if he can accomplish all, if not the majority, of the above.
Actually, he has an extremely good shot at being reelected in 2004 even if
he accomplishes NONE of the above, THAT is how thin the Democrat Party's
bench is these days, Joey.
Well, we sort of expected that type of response from you, Babs, now for
others....
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GENOMEMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 07:28:11 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mrqdnTfAfJTYbEGiRVn-jg@wideopenwest.com...
Not at all. I think Bush would have an extremely good shot at being
elected
in 2004 if he can accomplish all, if not the majority, of the above.
That's
what we have elections for in this country. Of course, we could just hand
over all of the rule to the Republicans and forget the dual or multiple
party system.
Bush's election victory is his to lose at this point. There is no "good
shot" at it if he can accomplish A, B, and C. He's already there, and with
Dean as the apparent competition, this isn't going to be a close one with 6
recounts.
Meanwhile, libs will still be re-living the 2000 election.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
15 Dec 2003 05:26:49 AM |
|
|
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:L68Db.153381$655.27957803@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mrqdnTfAfJTYbEGiRVn-jg@wideopenwest.com...
Not at all. I think Bush would have an extremely good shot at being
elected
in 2004 if he can accomplish all, if not the majority, of the above.
That's
what we have elections for in this country. Of course, we could just
hand
over all of the rule to the Republicans and forget the dual or multiple
party system.
Bush's election victory is his to lose at this point. There is no "good
shot" at it if he can accomplish A, B, and C. He's already there, and with
Dean as the apparent competition, this isn't going to be a close one with
6
recounts.
Meanwhile, libs will still be re-living the 2000 election.
I wouldn't imagine the Democrats would ask for six re-counts or any at all
if the race a) weren't so close, b) wasn't the deciding state, and c) a
state run by another Bush. Florida was destined to be re-counted under those
circumstances... just the same as if the tables had been turned and it was
NY that was at issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "loaferboss" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
15 Dec 2003 05:53:43 AM |
|
|
in article HsGdnU-GqaznB0CiRVn-vA@wideopenwest.com, JoettaB at
joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com wrote on 12/15/03 6:26 AM:
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:L68Db.153381$655.27957803@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mrqdnTfAfJTYbEGiRVn-jg@wideopenwest.com...
Not at all. I think Bush would have an extremely good shot at being
elected
in 2004 if he can accomplish all, if not the majority, of the above.
That's
what we have elections for in this country. Of course, we could just
hand
over all of the rule to the Republicans and forget the dual or multiple
party system.
Bush's election victory is his to lose at this point. There is no "good
shot" at it if he can accomplish A, B, and C. He's already there, and with
Dean as the apparent competition, this isn't going to be a close one with
6
recounts.
Meanwhile, libs will still be re-living the 2000 election.
I wouldn't imagine the Democrats would ask for six re-counts or any at all
if the race a) weren't so close, b) wasn't the deciding state, and c) a
state run by another Bush. Florida was destined to be re-counted under those
circumstances... just the same as if the tables had been turned and it was
NY that was at issue.
Bush is still toast - finding Saddam isn't the same thing as finding the
traitor in the White House, scamming the elderly or bullying congressman and
offering bribes - to name but three.
Glad the soldiers got him - but the plastic turkey in the White House is
still a goner in 2004.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rhinehold" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 02:07:01 PM |
|
|
GENOMEMAN wrote:
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being elected
President in 2004.
Translation: No matter what, you and your demmy friends will find SOMETHING
to carp at.
My question is if the DOES all of that, which I think he will, then will
these people vote for him? Or at least give him that credit?
My answer is 'NO' but that's just my opinion...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 02:51:09 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being elected
President in 2004.
Bush set up his own standards.
The goal is a Democratic middle east. Anything less is total failure
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 05:27:25 PM |
|
|
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:134Db.1334$Bg5.478@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq
was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How
sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being
elected
President in 2004.
Bush set up his own standards.
The goal is a Democratic middle east. Anything less is total failure
I think it would also have to include a stable homefront as well for him to
have the 2004 election sown up, but the Iraq situation will give him points
if he can manage to bring it to a democracy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DemsLackGravitas" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 05:38:22 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hYKdnSjyxqxDbEGiRVn-vg@wideopenwest.com...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:134Db.1334$Bg5.478@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq
was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How
sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of
the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in
a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being
elected
President in 2004.
Bush set up his own standards.
The goal is a Democratic middle east. Anything less is total failure
I think it would also have to include a stable homefront as well for him
to
have the 2004 election sown up, but the Iraq situation will give him
points
if he can manage to bring it to a democracy.
The Iraq "situation" has earned Bush points already.
The Democrat Party is stuck in a spider hole of its own making.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Grogan" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 10:55:02 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_l_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:<SvudnSWUhKAeLUGiRVn-ig@wideopenwest.com>...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
Hail King Bush!
Now, if Bush can a) catch Bin Laden, b) quell the insurgences
in Iraq, c) bring our troops home, d) continue the present course of the
economy, and e) hold unemployment under 5% or so without winding up in a
Halliburton or other scandal or war, he might have a shot at being elected
President in 2004.
Oh,you mean you'd vote for him??YYYEEEAAAAHHHHH,RRRRRIIIGGGGHHHTT!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "abdul rahim" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 09:50:31 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
The anger and fury created by this deliberately humiliating arrest
will make the Mideast a lake of fire for the United States. That is my
prediction.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: DemsLackGravitas is a fool, as usual |
14 Dec 2003 08:19:31 AM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
Why?
The ENTIRE JUSTIFICATION for the war was the WMDs - which as it turns out
don't exist!
You certainlty lack gravitas!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into!
LOL
Why is that? We opposed the war, and we were right! Saddam captured? Great.
But at the cost of 100+billion and hundreds of American lives lost,
thousands of American soldiers crippled? We could have bribed him to step
down for a lot less.
.
|
|
|
| User: "scott." |
|
| Title: Re: DemsLackGravitas is a fool, as usual |
14 Dec 2003 08:22:00 AM |
|
|
Oh shut up you Democrats kill 4,000 kids per day here in the USA. You don't
give a dam about life.
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tj_Cb.1634$mC1.563@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
Why?
The ENTIRE JUSTIFICATION for the war was the WMDs - which as it turns out
don't exist!
You certainlty lack gravitas!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into!
LOL
Why is that? We opposed the war, and we were right! Saddam captured?
Great.
But at the cost of 100+billion and hundreds of American lives lost,
thousands of American soldiers crippled? We could have bribed him to step
down for a lot less.
.
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re:Scott is insane |
14 Dec 2003 08:40:26 AM |
|
|
"scott." <gg@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:-pCdnYZsYsaZ70GiRVn-sQ@intertex.net...
Oh shut up you Democrats kill 4,000 kids per day here in the USA. You
don't
give a dam about life.
What the ***** are you talking about?
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tj_Cb.1634$mC1.563@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq
was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
Why?
The ENTIRE JUSTIFICATION for the war was the WMDs - which as it turns
out
don't exist!
You certainlty lack gravitas!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into!
LOL
Why is that? We opposed the war, and we were right! Saddam captured?
Great.
But at the cost of 100+billion and hundreds of American lives lost,
thousands of American soldiers crippled? We could have bribed him to
step
down for a lot less.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry Grogan" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 10:53:50 PM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message news:<oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53>...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
The only reason they're "praising" him is because the have'nt
received the Terry McCawfull talking points yet.The focus groups had
emergency meetings all day Sunday.Expect Dean to open his mouth and
insert his foot early monday.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Art Class" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 05:40:55 PM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message news:<oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53>...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
I have not seen a single instance of any Democrat or anyone else
against the invasion and occupation of a contained Iraq who said "This
war will be justified if they find Saddam."
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
What corner? Whether the US would win in a battle against Saddam and
Iraq was never a question. Of course we would.
The question was whether a contained Iraq and Saddam posed a threat
that justified a costly invasion and occupation. The question was
whether the actual threat posed by Iraq justifies the continuing loss
of US life and limited resources.
As much as you would like to think that simply finding Saddam in a
hole erases those questions, it doesn't.
Hell, unlike Bin Laden, (remember him? the Saudi who actually DID
attack the US!) we knew exactly where Saddam was before we invaded.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DemsLackGravitas" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 05:51:03 PM |
|
|
"Art Class" <art_classmn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:174c7990.0312141540.20dd01ab@posting.google.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:<oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53>...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
I have not seen a single instance of any Democrat or anyone else
against the invasion and occupation of a contained Iraq who said "This
war will be justified if they find Saddam."
Dean The Democrat has made it CLEAR he is opposed to waging war against
Muslim Terrorists in Iraq.
You must have been living under some sort of rock, or hiding out in some
spider hole, for the past year or so to have missed Dean's public comments
about his attitude concerning waging war in Iraq, Art. Dean made it clear
he was opposed to going to war in Iraq. Which makes it equally clear that
he is upset by the capture of Saddam Hussein. Al Gore is probably not a
happy camper today either, because he just got through endorsing Dean and
Dean's attitude concerning fighting the Muslim Terrorist in Iraq.
Make no mistake, Art - the Dean/Gore Wing of the Democrat Party looks very,
very stupid today.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Class" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
15 Dec 2003 11:59:53 AM |
|
|
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message news:<HH6Db.114715$_M.597453@attbi_s54>...
"Art Class" <art_classmn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:174c7990.0312141540.20dd01ab@posting.google.com...
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:<oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53>...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
I have not seen a single instance of any Democrat or anyone else
against the invasion and occupation of a contained Iraq who said "This
war will be justified if they find Saddam."
Dean The Democrat has made it CLEAR he is opposed to waging war against
Muslim Terrorists in Iraq.
You must have been living under some sort of rock, or hiding out in some
spider hole, for the past year or so to have missed Dean's public comments
about his attitude concerning waging war in Iraq, Art. Dean made it clear
he was opposed to going to war in Iraq. Which makes it equally clear that
he is upset by the capture of Saddam Hussein. Al Gore is probably not a
happy camper today either, because he just got through endorsing Dean and
Dean's attitude concerning fighting the Muslim Terrorist in Iraq.
Make no mistake, Art - the Dean/Gore Wing of the Democrat Party looks very,
very stupid today.
Make no mistake, idiot, your lies make you look stupid.
People opposing the war never based their opposition on whether Saddam
would be caught or not. They based it on the question:
"Does Iraq pose a threat that justifies a US invasion and occupation?
Please cite the threat."
Bush cited Iraq's supposed WMD capability and made many allusions to
9/11. Bush also cited Saddam's mass murders, but the catch there is
that Saddam did most of these killings during the '80's while Reagan,
Bush I, Rummy and Cheney watched.
We were all glad that Saddam has been captured, but Saddam's capture
does nothing to support Bush's case in justifying the invasion and
ongoing occupation.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DemsLackGravitas" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 07:00:11 PM |
|
|
"Thumper" <jaylsmithXYZ@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2p1qtvgk85aaq0b7e72opi77qc1gnq41rr@4ax.com...
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:51:03 GMT, "DemsLackGravitas"
<LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote:
Dean The Democrat has made it CLEAR he is opposed to waging war against
Muslim Terrorists in Iraq.
That's a lie.
Thumper
No, it's the truth.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GENOMEMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 07:45:50 AM |
|
|
WMD's coming soon.
I have always speculated that Bush would release the real info when the time
is right.
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
.
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 08:19:55 AM |
|
|
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:iQZCb.140642$655.24105865@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
WMD's coming soon.
I have always speculated that Bush would release the real info when the
time
is right.
You'll be waiting a long time, fool
.
|
|
|
| User: "Keynes" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
15 Dec 2003 03:22:15 PM |
|
|
Look, when a clown manages to slide halfway out of
his own shitty drawers, it's not really a triumph.
The praise belongs to the guy who doesn't soil himself in the first place.
"All Hail Son of a Bush, the true messiah, who has brought us
true peace and prosperity, just as he promised. Bow down,
ye sinners. Black is white and up is down, just as foretold."
LOL
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "az-willie" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 09:55:03 AM |
|
|
No, getting rid of Saddam was the ONLY thing Bush had any authorization
to do from the U.N.
He was NOT authorized to force a " democracy " on Iraq,
He was NOT authorized to remove mayors of various towns from office and
install his own henchmen.
He was NOT authorized to hand out contracts to American companies ..
issuing contracts to rebuild Iraqi is the business of the Iraqi people,
the the business of Halliburton and other Republican campaign contributors.
Getting Saddam was GOOD.
Everything else he has done falls pretty much on the bad side of the ledger.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DDB" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 08:44:27 AM |
|
|
"GENOMEMAN" <bassist@DNA.com> wrote in message
news:iQZCb.140642$655.24105865@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
WMD's coming soon.
They've there the entire time you know WMD=Weasels of Mass Deception. If
sonmeone had known for sure taht WMD's didn't exist they would have said so
in the UN and resisted or even vetoed resolution 1441. To do otherwise would
have been a crime against Iraq and its people. Since that didn't happen we
all must assume that every world leader agreed that the evidence pointed to
Saddam having weapons of mass destruction. Your attempt to claim hind site
as foresite is laughable and an extension of the WMD program I outlined in
the first sentence of this responce.
I have always speculated that Bush would release the real info when the
time
is right.
"DemsLackGravitas" <LiteWeightDems@RNC.net> wrote in message
news:oIZCb.388542$275.1244054@attbi_s53...
Democrats, you BLAMED President Bush earlier for how the war in Iraq was
going; now you must PRAISE him for how the war is going!
What an unfortunate corner you Democrats have foolishly backed
yourselves
into! You have put yourselves in a spider hole, so to speak. How sad
it
must be to be a Democrat these days....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "fiend999" |
|
| Title: Re: Dems BLAMED Bush before; Now they must PRAISE him! |
14 Dec 2003 10:10:53 AM |
|
|
In article <iQZCb.140642$655.24105865@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>,
GENOMEMAN <bassist@DNA.com> wrote:
WMD's coming soon.
I have always speculated that Bush would release the real info when the time
is right.
When is that - right before the election rather than when they are
actually found (assuming they are actually found)? Now there is a fine
example of restoring honesty and integrity to the whitehouse.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
