| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"\Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
04 Aug 2005 04:43:38 PM |
| Object: |
Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
That is the only word I can find when I read on Drudge that the New York
Times is looking into the adoption records of SCOTUS nominee John Roberts
CHILDREN.
If taking swipes and his wife and her personal religious beliefs weren't
enough, the liberal MSM have found a new low at prying into his kids.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the
paper's "standard background check."
I didn't know that it was "standard" to go after someone's kids. Did you do
a background check of Chelsea Clinton, or the children of any other liberal
justice? My guess would be not.
I am glad in today's new media that these sort of acts are brought to light
and people can see the mad liberal media for who they are.
TrackBack
--
USAF VET
3rd LES CAB, PI
.
|
|
| User: "Server 13" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 05:10:08 PM |
|
|
"Harry Hope wrote:
That is the only word I can find when I read on Drudge that the New York
Times is looking into the adoption records of SCOTUS nominee John Roberts
CHILDREN.
If taking swipes and his wife and her personal religious beliefs weren't
enough, the liberal MSM have found a new low at prying into his kids.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the
paper's "standard background check."
I didn't know that it was "standard" to go after someone's kids. Did you do
a background check of Chelsea Clinton, or the children of any other liberal
justice? My guess would be not.
I am glad in today's new media that these sort of acts are brought to light
and people can see the mad liberal media for who they are.
lol tell us about Rove's smear that the Bangladeshi child McCain adopted was a
black child he fathered out of wedlock while you're at it, sad sick serial liar.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bunson Honeydo" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 05:28:19 PM |
|
|
Any republican would welcome any investigation of Clinton or Gore's
families. They are has underhanded. Complaining about this investigation is
flat out hypocrisy...period.
.
|
|
|
| User: "styron" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 06:33:19 PM |
|
|
Bunson Honeydo wrote:
Any republican would welcome any investigation of Clinton or Gore's
families. They are has underhanded. Complaining about this investigation is
flat out hypocrisy...period.
As is not acknowledging it's wrong. It is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bunson Honeydo" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 08:19:09 PM |
|
|
you only care its wrong when its doe to your side. That makes you a
hypocrite whom is not truly concerned for the children.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "robw" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 07:26:26 PM |
|
|
I would refer yr to Rush's short lived tv show. (replaced by info-mercials
in many markets.) where he compared Chelsea to a dog.
Are yr a total hypocrite or do yr still need a couple credits for your
degree?
Of course, yr being someone who actually quoted gossip columist Cindy Adams
(yes folks, this idiot actually did this.) I guess yr have no real defining
line between reality and fantasy.
So tell me Faux Harry, are yr the "young can't get laid because you;re too
weird conservative, or the "old man who feels life has passed him" type?
""Harry Hope" <HH@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:e_vIe.102601$Kp2.6474799@twister.southeast.rr.com...
That is the only word I can find when I read on Drudge that the New York
Times is looking into the adoption records of SCOTUS nominee John Roberts
CHILDREN.
If taking swipes and his wife and her personal religious beliefs weren't
enough, the liberal MSM have found a new low at prying into his kids.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the
paper's "standard background check."
I didn't know that it was "standard" to go after someone's kids. Did you
do
a background check of Chelsea Clinton, or the children of any other
liberal
justice? My guess would be not.
I am glad in today's new media that these sort of acts are brought to
light
and people can see the mad liberal media for who they are.
TrackBack
--
USAF VET
3rd LES CAB, PI
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tag Heuer" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 05:01:10 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:43:38 GMT, "\"The Fake Harry Hope"
<HH@earthlink.com> wrote:
That is the only word I can find when I read on Drudge that the New York
Times is looking into the adoption records of SCOTUS nominee John Roberts
CHILDREN.
Drudge. Yeah right. There is a pillar of journalistic integrity.
If taking swipes and his wife and her personal religious beliefs weren't
enough, the liberal MSM have found a new low at prying into his kids.
Didn't Karl Rove set the standard when he suggested that Plame was
"fair game?"
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the
paper's "standard background check."
I'm sure Judith Miller has done far worst. Look. She's in jail.
I didn't know that it was "standard" to go after someone's kids. Did you do
a background check of Chelsea Clinton, or the children of any other liberal
justice? My guess would be not.
Actually Rush Limbaugh characterized her as a dog on his failed
television show some years back.
I am glad in today's new media that these sort of acts are brought to light
and people can see the mad liberal media for who they are.
"New media?" Drudge is a dinosaur, in dog_years whose humble
beginnings were right here. Heck, he's even on Wiki:
" ......Matthew Drudge (born October 27, 1966) is an American Internet
news personality who is frequently called a "cybergossip". He is best
known as the proprietor of the popular U.S.-based Drudge Report
website, which made national waves when it was the first to break the
news of an inappropriate relationship between "a White House intern"
and President Bill Clinton (the Monica Lewinsky scandal) in 1998.
However, critics regard Drudge's contribution to journalism as
questionable, saying that the only stories he actually breaks are
completely conceived, researched, funded, and written by other
reporters. A federal judge noted in a judgment on a libel lawsuit,
which ended in Drudge's favor, that Drudge was not a "reporter, a
journalist, or a newsgatherer". Drudge's most famous achievement, the
breaking of the Monica Lewinsky story, offended editors because by
publishing details of the story, Drudge essentially made an editorial
decision that overrode Newsweek's (which was sitting on the story)
......" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Drudge
Which is far worst? A President getting a blow-job, or a President
blowing up and killing American troops in a war that was waged under
false pretenses?
"I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a
draft."
--- George W. Bush, 2nd presidential debate, St. Louis, Oct. 8, 2004
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Despicable! Just how sick and deranged are liberals? |
04 Aug 2005 06:58:26 PM |
|
|
There is no such thing as "liberal mainstream U.S. media". It's an
oxymoron, moron.
You are an angry white man who has been duped by the conservative
media- which keeps telling you the media is liberal.
Get it, genius?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
