did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11



 Politics > Politics-USA > did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Joe Blowtowski"
Date: 25 Aug 2004 05:37:13 PM
Object: did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11
Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11
That's what Kerry told Larry King
is anyone smart enough to find the Link?
.

User: "Raptor514"

Title: Re: did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11 25 Aug 2004 07:40:17 PM
"Joe Blowtowski" <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com...


Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11


That's what Kerry told Larry King

is anyone smart enough to find the Link?

Kerry wasn't the Commander in Chief. He couldn't order interceptors into
the air. He couldn't call NORAD to get information. He couldn't order all
air traffic grounded. He couldn't order combat air patrols over Washington
and New York.
Bush could and he sat their reading a damn children's book while a passenger
plane slammed into the Pentagon. If it had been Clinton who carried on with
a photo op during a national emergency you'd be screaming for his damn head.
(As would I.)
Raptor514
.

User: "Barney Lyon"

Title: Re: did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11 25 Aug 2004 10:42:22 PM
Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com>...

Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11

I was watching TV when GMA interrupted their regular programming to
announce that a plane had crashed into the WTC. They then switched to
a roof camera and showed the smoking building. My mind started ticking
off lists, what to do in the event of such an emergency, was there
anything that I could do, should do, was responsible for doing. (No)
Charlie Gibson was speculating about it being "an accident," and I
thought "How is it that the media puts such naive idiots in these
jobs" (answer for another day) - I didn't need the 2nd plane to hit to
know that it was no accident.
Bush knew before he got to the elementary school that a plane had hit
the WTC. The same WTC that was hit by terrorists in 1993, in the
heart of the world's financial center. At the very least, reassuring
both the citizens of NY and America, and calming panicking money
institutions was not something that Bush had considered.
There was nothing John Kerry, as Senator for the state of
Massachusetts, could have done or should have done. John Kerry had no
responsibility for the security of the nation and the safety of the
American people on that day.
George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.
Conservatives want to excuse Bush's non-response because "there was
nothing that he could have done to prevent the death and destruction
in that time." That is factually not true.
At the very least, at the very LEAST, the 189 Americans who were in
the Pentagon when Flight 77 crashed into it would still be alive if
Bush had excused himself from the children's reading as soon as Andrew
Card had informed him that America was being attacked by terrorists.
Before the 1st plane struck the WTC, the FAA knew that 4 planes had
been hijacked. The controllers at the Boston Center, thinking on
their feet, broke standard procedure, didn't wait for headquarters to
contact the military and did it themselves. Before the 1st plane
struck the WTC, 2 F-15s were in the skies over NY looking for it. It
did NOT, however, have clearance to take any planes down.
This nightmare had been going on for a considerable time before the
White House Situation Room Director who was traveling with Bush in
Florida informed him of the crash into the WTC.
I find it hard to swallow that she (WH Sit Rm Director) told him about
the crash, but didn't tell him about the fact that the FAA had
informed the NMCC which had dispatched F-15s after the hijacked plane.
But we'll never know what Bush told the 9/11 Commission about that in
the closed door session.
Had Bush had the intellect and instincts that are required of the
leader of the most powerful nation on the planet, he never would have
even entered the elementary school once he'd heard about the first
plane hitting the WTC while in the limo on the way to the school.
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message news:<cfesoq$bfng$1@news3.infoave.net>...

"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:80mlh0ppcd4808c6hgf1kq592nvqnosnl5@4ax.com...

As viewed from alt.california, Larry Hewitt wrote:

"Jafo" wrote...
3. Legally only Bush could order an airlinre shot down. It appears
that Cheney made the order, but it is not certain. In any event, no
fighter ever intercepted either of the last two hijacked airliners.
This is particularly telling because Barabara Olson made the phone
call to her husband at 9:16, and National Airport reported the plane
heading for the White House at 9:34. It hit the Pentagon 4 minutes
later. It would have taken less than 18 minutes for fighters to
arrive from Andrews AFB. It would have been close, but they didn;t
even try.


NO reply to this?? Conceding that Bush should have given the order? And that
giving that order may have changed events?

4. The 4th airliner crashed in PA at 10:06. NORAD had been tracking
it as a hijacked plane since 9:16. We were lucky that the passengers
took it down in a field. The Air Force had 50 minutes to get to this
plane, and didn't because Bush and Cheney spent the time arguing
about who was in charge and whether or not Bush should go back to
DC.


Indeed? And you know for a fact that they were "arguing about who
was in charge"?


See the link below. Cheney had started issuing orders - including calling DC
a "freefire zone". Bush wanted to go back to DC. Cheney insisted he not come
to DC. CHeney won. AF1 circled Sarasota while the decision about a
destination was being made. A decisive, in control president would have made
a decision, not been bullied by the VP.

Has anybody here read the 9/11 Commission's report?
An order to shoot down a commercial aircraft would have to be issued
by the National Command Authority (a phrase used to describe the
President and Secretary of Defense). Cheney has absolutely no
constitutional authority to do anything at all, and yet it seems that
Cheney was running the show, arguing with Bush over the phone and
inventing reasons to keep Bush out of D.C. (Cheney apparently was the
one starting the rumors of threats to AF1).
Rumsfeld, was the only one with constitutional authority (along with
the President) to mobilize the military, to protect and defend the
U.S., and he was not contacted (although he was allegedly in his
office at the Pentagon all morning) until at least 1/2 hour after the
last of the 4 hijacked planes crashed.
You really have to read the 9/11 Commission's report to appreciate how
pretty much everybody down on the lower rungs of the procedural ladder
had done their jobs, determined we were under attack and that the
military was required. ALL BEFORE THE 2nd PLANE HIT THE WTC.
It was at the upper rungs of the ladder that were FUBAR.
At one point, F-15 fighter planes were in the air over NY, going after
Flight 11 (the 1st of the 4 hijacked planes to crash), BEFORE it hit
the WTC. This was BEFORE Bush entered the elementary school.
I know that I'm repeating myself, but you really have to read the 9/11
Commission's report to understand the procedural protocol and how it
broke down. You may ultimately then recognize why it is that we need
fully engaged, intelligent and actively interested Presidents.
People, mistakenly, think Bush is stupid. He's no genius, but he's
not stupid. He's lazy. Anything that doesn't interest Bush, if he
has to learn about it, is work. "The boss doesn't work. That's what
the employees are for." Every achievement and success in Bush's life
has come from somebody else's effort.
The job of POTUS is mostly public relations. Like sales, it's a
personality job. Speechmaking, ceremonial, spouting advertising
slogans that sell to the American people whatever it is that your
political party and patrons have backed your bid for the White House
for. There is rarely any split-second executive decision-making
required. Drones craft the policy, legislation, paperwork and (with
Bush in the job) other drones invent the language and advertising
campaign to get the American people behind it. An android could do
the job. Except for that odd emergency. Like planes hitting
skyscrapers in NY and the seat of America's military industrial
complex in Virginia.
The U.S. is an emergency-driven culture. The protocols that we have
in place for emergencies cover most contingencies. But when that new
contingency happens, that a protocol hasn't been written to cover, we
need somebody in charge who can think on his feet.
There are always going to be systems *****-ups, failures, mistakes due
to having not taken something into account. "Unforseen events." But
that's not really what happened here on 9/11/01. What we had here was
an inept, lazy George W. Bush.
No amount of a POTUS surrounding himself with solid, experienced
advisors to make up for his own inadequacy is going to provide the
security and protection necessary for the United States in the 21st
century.
(9:38 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
There are conflicting accounts of what Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld does in the 35 minutes between the second WTC crash (see
(After 9:03 a.m.)) and the Pentagon crash. In his 9/11 Commission
testimony, he covers the time with a "shortly thereafter:" "I was in
my office with a CIA briefer and I was told that a second plane had
hit the other tower. Shortly thereafter, at 9:38, the Pentagon shook
with an explosion of then unknown origin." [Independent Commission,
3/23/04] In the book , Bob Woodward writes, "Aware of the attacks on
the World Trade Center, Rumsfeld had been proceeding with his daily
intelligence briefing in his office" when the Pentagon gets hit. [Bush
at War, by Bob Woodward, 11/02 , p. 22.] However, according to
counterterrorism "tsar" Richard Clarke, Rumsfeld joins a video
conference shortly after the second WTC hit (see (9:10 a.m.)) and
stays with the conference, apparently from his office. After being
told the Pentagon has been hit, Clarke says, "I can still see Rumsfeld
on the screen, so the whole building didn't get hit" (see (Between
9:38-9:45 a.m.)). The military response to the 9/11 crisis is being
coordinated in the NMCC, apparently located only around 200 feet away,
directly below Rumsfeld's office. [Defense Department, 9/15/01 (B),
Reuters, 9/11/01] At 9:39, Captain Charles Leidig, a low ranking
officer temporarily in charge of the NMCC, is handling a crisis
teleconference. He mentions reports of a crash into the opposite side
of the Pentagon, and requests that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld be added
to the conference. [Independent Commission Report, 6/17/04] As one
magazine has noted, "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval
procedure was for an FAA official to contact the [NMCC] and request
Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call NORAD's command
center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from
the Defense Secretary?Donald H. Rumsfeld?to launch fighters."
[Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02] But rather than join the
NMCC conference, Rumsfeld goes out of the Pentagon to see the crash
site, and remains out of contact for some time (see (After 9:38 a.m.)
and (10:30 a.m.)).

9:46 a.m. Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's office and acting Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Myers' office report to the NMCC teleconference that
they are still trying to track down Rumsfeld and Myers, respectively,
and bring them into the conference. [Independent Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld is apparently outside the Pentagon looking at the
Flight 77 crash site, though Richard Clarke suggests Rumsfeld is
elsewhere in the Pentagon for much of the time (see (After 9:38
a.m.)). Myers' whereabouts in the period after the Pentagon crash have
not been fully explained (see (Before 10:30 a.m.)). Rumsfeld and Myers
don't enter the NMCC until about 10:30 (see (10:30 a.m.)).

(Between 10:00-10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
In Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's testimony before the 9/11
Commission, he states that he returns from the Pentagon crash site "by
shortly before or after 10:00 a.m." (see (After 9:38 a.m.)). Then he
has "one or more calls in my office, one of which was with the
president." [9/11 Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] According to the 9/11
Commission, the call with Bush has little impact: "No one can recall
any content beyond a general request to alert forces." The possibility
of shooting down hijacked planes is not mentioned. [9/11 Commission
Report, 6/17/04] Then Rumsfeld goes to the Executive Support Center
before finally entering the NMCC (see (10:30 a.m.)). Acting Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers repeats all these details.
[Independent Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] The Executive Support Center has
secure video facilities [Washington Times, 2/23/04], so it is possible
Rumsfeld joins or rejoins the video conference that Richard Clarke
claims Rumsfeld is a part of much of the morning (see (After 9:03
a.m.)and(Before 9:38 a.m.)).

(10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld finally enters the Pentagon's
National Military Command Center (NMCC), where the military's response
to the 9/11 attacks is being coordinated. [shortly before 10:30, 9/11
Commission Report, 6/17/04, 10:30, CNN, 9/4/02] Rumsfeld later claims
that he only begins to gain a situational awareness of what's
happening after arriving at the NMCC. [9/11 Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld was in his office only 200 feet away from the NMCC
until the Pentagon crash; what he does there during that time is
disputed (see (After 9:03 a.m.) and (9:38 a.m.))). He then went
outside to the Flight 77 crash site (see (9:38 a.m.) and (After 9:38
a.m.)) and then stayed elsewhere in the Pentagon (see (Between
10:00-10:30 a.m.)). Brigadier General Montague Winfield later says,
"For 30 minutes we couldn't find him. And just as we began to worry,
he walked into the door of the National Military Command Center." [ABC
News, 9/11/02] Winfield himself apparently only shows up at the NMCC
around 10:30 as well (see 8:30 a.m.).

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld
.
User: "Joe Blowtowski"

Title: Re: did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11 26 Aug 2004 12:11:35 AM
On 25 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0700,
(Barney Lyon)
wrote:

George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.

that's pure Liberal *****
and it's also why Kerry is already predicting that he will
lose in the DEBATES with Bush. Yes that's right Kerry
is already making up excuses for losing Debates he hasn't
even participated in..
you Liberals are out of your minds
.
User: "murray"

Title: Re: did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11 26 Aug 2004 01:18:23 AM
"Joe Blowtowski" <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1sqi05qgc3848bv5pbksp616l4bqoopdu@4ax.com...

On 25 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0700,

(Barney Lyon)
wrote:

George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.


that's pure Liberal *****

read the official accounts, idiot.
its all there.


and it's also why Kerry is already predicting that he will
lose in the DEBATES with Bush. Yes that's right Kerry
is already making up excuses for losing Debates he hasn't
even participated in..

you Liberals are out of your minds

the truth hurts, dont it pal?...:)
.

User: "* US *"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 26 Aug 2004 07:42:14 AM
On 25 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0700,
(Barney Lyon) wrote:

Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com>...

Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11


I was watching TV when GMA interrupted their regular programming to
announce that a plane had crashed into the WTC. They then switched to
a roof camera and showed the smoking building. My mind started ticking
off lists, what to do in the event of such an emergency, was there
anything that I could do, should do, was responsible for doing. (No)
Charlie Gibson was speculating about it being "an accident," and I
thought "How is it that the media puts such naive idiots in these
jobs" (answer for another day) - I didn't need the 2nd plane to hit to
know that it was no accident.

Bush knew before he got to the elementary school that a plane had hit
the WTC. The same WTC that was hit by terrorists in 1993, in the
heart of the world's financial center. At the very least, reassuring
both the citizens of NY and America, and calming panicking money
institutions was not something that Bush had considered.

There was nothing John Kerry, as Senator for the state of
Massachusetts, could have done or should have done. John Kerry had no
responsibility for the security of the nation and the safety of the
American people on that day.

George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.

Conservatives want to excuse Bush's non-response because "there was
nothing that he could have done to prevent the death and destruction
in that time." That is factually not true.

At the very least, at the very LEAST, the 189 Americans who were in
the Pentagon when Flight 77 crashed into it would still be alive if
Bush had excused himself from the children's reading as soon as Andrew
Card had informed him that America was being attacked by terrorists.

Before the 1st plane struck the WTC, the FAA knew that 4 planes had
been hijacked. The controllers at the Boston Center, thinking on
their feet, broke standard procedure, didn't wait for headquarters to
contact the military and did it themselves. Before the 1st plane
struck the WTC, 2 F-15s were in the skies over NY looking for it. It
did NOT, however, have clearance to take any planes down.

This nightmare had been going on for a considerable time before the
White House Situation Room Director who was traveling with Bush in
Florida informed him of the crash into the WTC.

I find it hard to swallow that she (WH Sit Rm Director) told him about
the crash, but didn't tell him about the fact that the FAA had
informed the NMCC which had dispatched F-15s after the hijacked plane.
But we'll never know what Bush told the 9/11 Commission about that in
the closed door session.

Had Bush had the intellect and instincts that are required of the
leader of the most powerful nation on the planet, he never would have
even entered the elementary school once he'd heard about the first
plane hitting the WTC while in the limo on the way to the school.

"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message news:<cfesoq$bfng$1@news3.infoave.net>...

"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:80mlh0ppcd4808c6hgf1kq592nvqnosnl5@4ax.com...

As viewed from alt.california, Larry Hewitt wrote:

"Jafo" wrote...
3. Legally only Bush could order an airlinre shot down. It appears
that Cheney made the order, but it is not certain. In any event, no
fighter ever intercepted either of the last two hijacked airliners.
This is particularly telling because Barabara Olson made the phone
call to her husband at 9:16, and National Airport reported the plane
heading for the White House at 9:34. It hit the Pentagon 4 minutes
later. It would have taken less than 18 minutes for fighters to
arrive from Andrews AFB. It would have been close, but they didn;t
even try.


NO reply to this?? Conceding that Bush should have given the order? And that
giving that order may have changed events?

4. The 4th airliner crashed in PA at 10:06. NORAD had been tracking
it as a hijacked plane since 9:16. We were lucky that the passengers
took it down in a field. The Air Force had 50 minutes to get to this
plane, and didn't because Bush and Cheney spent the time arguing
about who was in charge and whether or not Bush should go back to
DC.


Indeed? And you know for a fact that they were "arguing about who
was in charge"?


See the link below. Cheney had started issuing orders - including calling DC
a "freefire zone". Bush wanted to go back to DC. Cheney insisted he not come
to DC. CHeney won. AF1 circled Sarasota while the decision about a
destination was being made. A decisive, in control president would have made
a decision, not been bullied by the VP.


Has anybody here read the 9/11 Commission's report?

An order to shoot down a commercial aircraft would have to be issued
by the National Command Authority (a phrase used to describe the
President and Secretary of Defense). Cheney has absolutely no
constitutional authority to do anything at all, and yet it seems that
Cheney was running the show, arguing with Bush over the phone and
inventing reasons to keep Bush out of D.C. (Cheney apparently was the
one starting the rumors of threats to AF1).

Rumsfeld, was the only one with constitutional authority (along with
the President) to mobilize the military, to protect and defend the
U.S., and he was not contacted (although he was allegedly in his
office at the Pentagon all morning) until at least 1/2 hour after the
last of the 4 hijacked planes crashed.

You really have to read the 9/11 Commission's report to appreciate how
pretty much everybody down on the lower rungs of the procedural ladder
had done their jobs, determined we were under attack and that the
military was required. ALL BEFORE THE 2nd PLANE HIT THE WTC.

It was at the upper rungs of the ladder that were FUBAR.

At one point, F-15 fighter planes were in the air over NY, going after
Flight 11 (the 1st of the 4 hijacked planes to crash), BEFORE it hit
the WTC. This was BEFORE Bush entered the elementary school.

I know that I'm repeating myself, but you really have to read the 9/11
Commission's report to understand the procedural protocol and how it
broke down. You may ultimately then recognize why it is that we need
fully engaged, intelligent and actively interested Presidents.

People, mistakenly, think Bush is stupid. He's no genius, but he's
not stupid. He's lazy. Anything that doesn't interest Bush, if he
has to learn about it, is work. "The boss doesn't work. That's what
the employees are for." Every achievement and success in Bush's life
has come from somebody else's effort.

The job of POTUS is mostly public relations. Like sales, it's a
personality job. Speechmaking, ceremonial, spouting advertising
slogans that sell to the American people whatever it is that your
political party and patrons have backed your bid for the White House
for. There is rarely any split-second executive decision-making
required. Drones craft the policy, legislation, paperwork and (with
Bush in the job) other drones invent the language and advertising
campaign to get the American people behind it. An android could do
the job. Except for that odd emergency. Like planes hitting
skyscrapers in NY and the seat of America's military industrial
complex in Virginia.

The U.S. is an emergency-driven culture. The protocols that we have
in place for emergencies cover most contingencies. But when that new
contingency happens, that a protocol hasn't been written to cover, we
need somebody in charge who can think on his feet.

There are always going to be systems *****-ups, failures, mistakes due
to having not taken something into account. "Unforseen events." But
that's not really what happened here on 9/11/01. What we had here was
an inept, lazy George W. Bush.

No amount of a POTUS surrounding himself with solid, experienced
advisors to make up for his own inadequacy is going to provide the
security and protection necessary for the United States in the 21st
century.

(9:38 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
There are conflicting accounts of what Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld does in the 35 minutes between the second WTC crash (see
(After 9:03 a.m.)) and the Pentagon crash. In his 9/11 Commission
testimony, he covers the time with a "shortly thereafter:" "I was in
my office with a CIA briefer and I was told that a second plane had
hit the other tower. Shortly thereafter, at 9:38, the Pentagon shook
with an explosion of then unknown origin." [Independent Commission,
3/23/04] In the book , Bob Woodward writes, "Aware of the attacks on
the World Trade Center, Rumsfeld had been proceeding with his daily
intelligence briefing in his office" when the Pentagon gets hit. [Bush
at War, by Bob Woodward, 11/02 , p. 22.] However, according to
counterterrorism "tsar" Richard Clarke, Rumsfeld joins a video
conference shortly after the second WTC hit (see (9:10 a.m.)) and
stays with the conference, apparently from his office. After being
told the Pentagon has been hit, Clarke says, "I can still see Rumsfeld
on the screen, so the whole building didn't get hit" (see (Between
9:38-9:45 a.m.)). The military response to the 9/11 crisis is being
coordinated in the NMCC, apparently located only around 200 feet away,
directly below Rumsfeld's office. [Defense Department, 9/15/01 (B),
Reuters, 9/11/01] At 9:39, Captain Charles Leidig, a low ranking
officer temporarily in charge of the NMCC, is handling a crisis
teleconference. He mentions reports of a crash into the opposite side
of the Pentagon, and requests that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld be added
to the conference. [Independent Commission Report, 6/17/04] As one
magazine has noted, "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval
procedure was for an FAA official to contact the [NMCC] and request
Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call NORAD's command
center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from
the Defense Secretary?Donald H. Rumsfeld?to launch fighters."
[Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02] But rather than join the
NMCC conference, Rumsfeld goes out of the Pentagon to see the crash
site, and remains out of contact for some time (see (After 9:38 a.m.)
and (10:30 a.m.)).

9:46 a.m. Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's office and acting Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Myers' office report to the NMCC teleconference that
they are still trying to track down Rumsfeld and Myers, respectively,
and bring them into the conference. [Independent Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld is apparently outside the Pentagon looking at the
Flight 77 crash site, though Richard Clarke suggests Rumsfeld is
elsewhere in the Pentagon for much of the time (see (After 9:38
a.m.)). Myers' whereabouts in the period after the Pentagon crash have
not been fully explained (see (Before 10:30 a.m.)). Rumsfeld and Myers
don't enter the NMCC until about 10:30 (see (10:30 a.m.)).

(Between 10:00-10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
In Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's testimony before the 9/11
Commission, he states that he returns from the Pentagon crash site "by
shortly before or after 10:00 a.m." (see (After 9:38 a.m.)). Then he
has "one or more calls in my office, one of which was with the
president." [9/11 Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] According to the 9/11
Commission, the call with Bush has little impact: "No one can recall
any content beyond a general request to alert forces." The possibility
of shooting down hijacked planes is not mentioned. [9/11 Commission
Report, 6/17/04] Then Rumsfeld goes to the Executive Support Center
before finally entering the NMCC (see (10:30 a.m.)). Acting Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers repeats all these details.
[Independent Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] The Executive Support Center has
secure video facilities [Washington Times, 2/23/04], so it is possible
Rumsfeld joins or rejoins the video conference that Richard Clarke
claims Rumsfeld is a part of much of the morning (see (After 9:03
a.m.)and(Before 9:38 a.m.)).

(10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld finally enters the Pentagon's
National Military Command Center (NMCC), where the military's response
to the 9/11 attacks is being coordinated. [shortly before 10:30, 9/11
Commission Report, 6/17/04, 10:30, CNN, 9/4/02] Rumsfeld later claims
that he only begins to gain a situational awareness of what's
happening after arriving at the NMCC. [9/11 Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld was in his office only 200 feet away from the NMCC
until the Pentagon crash; what he does there during that time is
disputed (see (After 9:03 a.m.) and (9:38 a.m.))). He then went
outside to the Flight 77 crash site (see (9:38 a.m.) and (After 9:38
a.m.)) and then stayed elsewhere in the Pentagon (see (Between
10:00-10:30 a.m.)). Brigadier General Montague Winfield later says,
"For 30 minutes we couldn't find him. And just as we began to worry,
he walked into the door of the National Military Command Center." [ABC
News, 9/11/02] Winfield himself apparently only shows up at the NMCC
around 10:30 as well (see 8:30 a.m.).

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld

Excellent rebuttal. Thanks for posting it.
.
User: "John Kerry, Horses Ass"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 26 Aug 2004 07:46:08 AM

Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:<v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com>...

Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11

Well yes, as a matter of fact I *did* know that, Joe. But Kerry's not
sitting silent any longer. No sireee! In fact, Johnny is now howling his
head off, and he's flopping about like a gutted perch, while his rather
amused band of brothers continue to pump the bilge contents of Kerry's own
Swiftboat over the side onto Johnny's head.
Poor Johnny! He's floundering helpless in the water, and NONE of his band
of brothers want to pull him out of the water!!
Sink, Johnny, Sink!!!
New LA TIMES Poll:
Kerry hurt by Swift Boat attacks, Bush ahead 49% -46% for the first time
this year, Bush takes 15% of all Democrats, 20% of 'conservative/moderate'
Democrats while Kerry takes 3% of Republicans...
LOL!! Sink, Johnny, Sink!!
.
User: "* US *"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 26 Aug 2004 10:17:56 AM
On 25 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0700,
(Barney Lyon) wrote:

Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com>...

Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11


I was watching TV when GMA interrupted their regular programming to
announce that a plane had crashed into the WTC. They then switched to
a roof camera and showed the smoking building. My mind started ticking
off lists, what to do in the event of such an emergency, was there
anything that I could do, should do, was responsible for doing. (No)
Charlie Gibson was speculating about it being "an accident," and I
thought "How is it that the media puts such naive idiots in these
jobs" (answer for another day) - I didn't need the 2nd plane to hit to
know that it was no accident.

Bush knew before he got to the elementary school that a plane had hit
the WTC. The same WTC that was hit by terrorists in 1993, in the
heart of the world's financial center. At the very least, reassuring
both the citizens of NY and America, and calming panicking money
institutions was not something that Bush had considered.

There was nothing John Kerry, as Senator for the state of
Massachusetts, could have done or should have done. John Kerry had no
responsibility for the security of the nation and the safety of the
American people on that day.

George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.

Conservatives want to excuse Bush's non-response because "there was
nothing that he could have done to prevent the death and destruction
in that time." That is factually not true.

At the very least, at the very LEAST, the 189 Americans who were in
the Pentagon when Flight 77 crashed into it would still be alive if
Bush had excused himself from the children's reading as soon as Andrew
Card had informed him that America was being attacked by terrorists.

Before the 1st plane struck the WTC, the FAA knew that 4 planes had
been hijacked. The controllers at the Boston Center, thinking on
their feet, broke standard procedure, didn't wait for headquarters to
contact the military and did it themselves. Before the 1st plane
struck the WTC, 2 F-15s were in the skies over NY looking for it. It
did NOT, however, have clearance to take any planes down.

This nightmare had been going on for a considerable time before the
White House Situation Room Director who was traveling with Bush in
Florida informed him of the crash into the WTC.

I find it hard to swallow that she (WH Sit Rm Director) told him about
the crash, but didn't tell him about the fact that the FAA had
informed the NMCC which had dispatched F-15s after the hijacked plane.
But we'll never know what Bush told the 9/11 Commission about that in
the closed door session.

Had Bush had the intellect and instincts that are required of the
leader of the most powerful nation on the planet, he never would have
even entered the elementary school once he'd heard about the first
plane hitting the WTC while in the limo on the way to the school.

"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message news:<cfesoq$bfng$1@news3.infoave.net>...

"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:80mlh0ppcd4808c6hgf1kq592nvqnosnl5@4ax.com...

As viewed from alt.california, Larry Hewitt wrote:

"Jafo" wrote...
3. Legally only Bush could order an airlinre shot down. It appears
that Cheney made the order, but it is not certain. In any event, no
fighter ever intercepted either of the last two hijacked airliners.
This is particularly telling because Barabara Olson made the phone
call to her husband at 9:16, and National Airport reported the plane
heading for the White House at 9:34. It hit the Pentagon 4 minutes
later. It would have taken less than 18 minutes for fighters to
arrive from Andrews AFB. It would have been close, but they didn;t
even try.


NO reply to this?? Conceding that Bush should have given the order? And that
giving that order may have changed events?

4. The 4th airliner crashed in PA at 10:06. NORAD had been tracking
it as a hijacked plane since 9:16. We were lucky that the passengers
took it down in a field. The Air Force had 50 minutes to get to this
plane, and didn't because Bush and Cheney spent the time arguing
about who was in charge and whether or not Bush should go back to
DC.


Indeed? And you know for a fact that they were "arguing about who
was in charge"?


See the link below. Cheney had started issuing orders - including calling DC
a "freefire zone". Bush wanted to go back to DC. Cheney insisted he not come
to DC. CHeney won. AF1 circled Sarasota while the decision about a
destination was being made. A decisive, in control president would have made
a decision, not been bullied by the VP.


Has anybody here read the 9/11 Commission's report?

An order to shoot down a commercial aircraft would have to be issued
by the National Command Authority (a phrase used to describe the
President and Secretary of Defense). Cheney has absolutely no
constitutional authority to do anything at all, and yet it seems that
Cheney was running the show, arguing with Bush over the phone and
inventing reasons to keep Bush out of D.C. (Cheney apparently was the
one starting the rumors of threats to AF1).

Rumsfeld, was the only one with constitutional authority (along with
the President) to mobilize the military, to protect and defend the
U.S., and he was not contacted (although he was allegedly in his
office at the Pentagon all morning) until at least 1/2 hour after the
last of the 4 hijacked planes crashed.

You really have to read the 9/11 Commission's report to appreciate how
pretty much everybody down on the lower rungs of the procedural ladder
had done their jobs, determined we were under attack and that the
military was required. ALL BEFORE THE 2nd PLANE HIT THE WTC.

It was at the upper rungs of the ladder that were FUBAR.

At one point, F-15 fighter planes were in the air over NY, going after
Flight 11 (the 1st of the 4 hijacked planes to crash), BEFORE it hit
the WTC. This was BEFORE Bush entered the elementary school.

I know that I'm repeating myself, but you really have to read the 9/11
Commission's report to understand the procedural protocol and how it
broke down. You may ultimately then recognize why it is that we need
fully engaged, intelligent and actively interested Presidents.

People, mistakenly, think Bush is stupid. He's no genius, but he's
not stupid. He's lazy. Anything that doesn't interest Bush, if he
has to learn about it, is work. "The boss doesn't work. That's what
the employees are for." Every achievement and success in Bush's life
has come from somebody else's effort.

The job of POTUS is mostly public relations. Like sales, it's a
personality job. Speechmaking, ceremonial, spouting advertising
slogans that sell to the American people whatever it is that your
political party and patrons have backed your bid for the White House
for. There is rarely any split-second executive decision-making
required. Drones craft the policy, legislation, paperwork and (with
Bush in the job) other drones invent the language and advertising
campaign to get the American people behind it. An android could do
the job. Except for that odd emergency. Like planes hitting
skyscrapers in NY and the seat of America's military industrial
complex in Virginia.

The U.S. is an emergency-driven culture. The protocols that we have
in place for emergencies cover most contingencies. But when that new
contingency happens, that a protocol hasn't been written to cover, we
need somebody in charge who can think on his feet.

There are always going to be systems *****-ups, failures, mistakes due
to having not taken something into account. "Unforseen events." But
that's not really what happened here on 9/11/01. What we had here was
an inept, lazy George W. Bush.

No amount of a POTUS surrounding himself with solid, experienced
advisors to make up for his own inadequacy is going to provide the
security and protection necessary for the United States in the 21st
century.

(9:38 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
There are conflicting accounts of what Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld does in the 35 minutes between the second WTC crash (see
(After 9:03 a.m.)) and the Pentagon crash. In his 9/11 Commission
testimony, he covers the time with a "shortly thereafter:" "I was in
my office with a CIA briefer and I was told that a second plane had
hit the other tower. Shortly thereafter, at 9:38, the Pentagon shook
with an explosion of then unknown origin." [Independent Commission,
3/23/04] In the book , Bob Woodward writes, "Aware of the attacks on
the World Trade Center, Rumsfeld had been proceeding with his daily
intelligence briefing in his office" when the Pentagon gets hit. [Bush
at War, by Bob Woodward, 11/02 , p. 22.] However, according to
counterterrorism "tsar" Richard Clarke, Rumsfeld joins a video
conference shortly after the second WTC hit (see (9:10 a.m.)) and
stays with the conference, apparently from his office. After being
told the Pentagon has been hit, Clarke says, "I can still see Rumsfeld
on the screen, so the whole building didn't get hit" (see (Between
9:38-9:45 a.m.)). The military response to the 9/11 crisis is being
coordinated in the NMCC, apparently located only around 200 feet away,
directly below Rumsfeld's office. [Defense Department, 9/15/01 (B),
Reuters, 9/11/01] At 9:39, Captain Charles Leidig, a low ranking
officer temporarily in charge of the NMCC, is handling a crisis
teleconference. He mentions reports of a crash into the opposite side
of the Pentagon, and requests that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld be added
to the conference. [Independent Commission Report, 6/17/04] As one
magazine has noted, "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval
procedure was for an FAA official to contact the [NMCC] and request
Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call NORAD's command
center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from
the Defense Secretary?Donald H. Rumsfeld?to launch fighters."
[Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02] But rather than join the
NMCC conference, Rumsfeld goes out of the Pentagon to see the crash
site, and remains out of contact for some time (see (After 9:38 a.m.)
and (10:30 a.m.)).

9:46 a.m. Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's office and acting Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Myers' office report to the NMCC teleconference that
they are still trying to track down Rumsfeld and Myers, respectively,
and bring them into the conference. [Independent Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld is apparently outside the Pentagon looking at the
Flight 77 crash site, though Richard Clarke suggests Rumsfeld is
elsewhere in the Pentagon for much of the time (see (After 9:38
a.m.)). Myers' whereabouts in the period after the Pentagon crash have
not been fully explained (see (Before 10:30 a.m.)). Rumsfeld and Myers
don't enter the NMCC until about 10:30 (see (10:30 a.m.)).

(Between 10:00-10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
In Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's testimony before the 9/11
Commission, he states that he returns from the Pentagon crash site "by
shortly before or after 10:00 a.m." (see (After 9:38 a.m.)). Then he
has "one or more calls in my office, one of which was with the
president." [9/11 Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] According to the 9/11
Commission, the call with Bush has little impact: "No one can recall
any content beyond a general request to alert forces." The possibility
of shooting down hijacked planes is not mentioned. [9/11 Commission
Report, 6/17/04] Then Rumsfeld goes to the Executive Support Center
before finally entering the NMCC (see (10:30 a.m.)). Acting Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers repeats all these details.
[Independent Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] The Executive Support Center has
secure video facilities [Washington Times, 2/23/04], so it is possible
Rumsfeld joins or rejoins the video conference that Richard Clarke
claims Rumsfeld is a part of much of the morning (see (After 9:03
a.m.)and(Before 9:38 a.m.)).

(10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld finally enters the Pentagon's
National Military Command Center (NMCC), where the military's response
to the 9/11 attacks is being coordinated. [shortly before 10:30, 9/11
Commission Report, 6/17/04, 10:30, CNN, 9/4/02] Rumsfeld later claims
that he only begins to gain a situational awareness of what's
happening after arriving at the NMCC. [9/11 Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld was in his office only 200 feet away from the NMCC
until the Pentagon crash; what he does there during that time is
disputed (see (After 9:03 a.m.) and (9:38 a.m.))). He then went
outside to the Flight 77 crash site (see (9:38 a.m.) and (After 9:38
a.m.)) and then stayed elsewhere in the Pentagon (see (Between
10:00-10:30 a.m.)). Brigadier General Montague Winfield later says,
"For 30 minutes we couldn't find him. And just as we began to worry,
he walked into the door of the National Military Command Center." [ABC
News, 9/11/02] Winfield himself apparently only shows up at the NMCC
around 10:30 as well (see 8:30 a.m.).

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld

Excellent rebuttal. Thanks for posting it.
Bush is a detriment to the USA and nothing else. For the sake of all
good Americans, he must be removed, legally and permanently, from
any public office whatsoever, in perpetuity, along with his cohort.
.
User: "John Kerry, Horses Ass"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 26 Aug 2004 10:25:54 AM
<* US *> wrote in message news:a3vri0t2rn0jelkegslmhhmm4bdal2o7av@4ax.com...

Bush is a detriment to the USA and nothing else. For the sake of all
good Americans, he must be removed, legally and permanently, from
any public office whatsoever, in perpetuity, along with his cohort.

He's certainly a detriment to the Democrat Party, that much is increasingly
obvious!
.
User: "* US *"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 26 Aug 2004 11:45:50 AM
On 25 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0700,
(Barney Lyon) wrote:

Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com>...

Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11


I was watching TV when GMA interrupted their regular programming to
announce that a plane had crashed into the WTC. They then switched to
a roof camera and showed the smoking building. My mind started ticking
off lists, what to do in the event of such an emergency, was there
anything that I could do, should do, was responsible for doing. (No)
Charlie Gibson was speculating about it being "an accident," and I
thought "How is it that the media puts such naive idiots in these
jobs" (answer for another day) - I didn't need the 2nd plane to hit to
know that it was no accident.

Bush knew before he got to the elementary school that a plane had hit
the WTC. The same WTC that was hit by terrorists in 1993, in the
heart of the world's financial center. At the very least, reassuring
both the citizens of NY and America, and calming panicking money
institutions was not something that Bush had considered.

There was nothing John Kerry, as Senator for the state of
Massachusetts, could have done or should have done. John Kerry had no
responsibility for the security of the nation and the safety of the
American people on that day.

George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.

Conservatives want to excuse Bush's non-response because "there was
nothing that he could have done to prevent the death and destruction
in that time." That is factually not true.

At the very least, at the very LEAST, the 189 Americans who were in
the Pentagon when Flight 77 crashed into it would still be alive if
Bush had excused himself from the children's reading as soon as Andrew
Card had informed him that America was being attacked by terrorists.

Before the 1st plane struck the WTC, the FAA knew that 4 planes had
been hijacked. The controllers at the Boston Center, thinking on
their feet, broke standard procedure, didn't wait for headquarters to
contact the military and did it themselves. Before the 1st plane
struck the WTC, 2 F-15s were in the skies over NY looking for it. It
did NOT, however, have clearance to take any planes down.

This nightmare had been going on for a considerable time before the
White House Situation Room Director who was traveling with Bush in
Florida informed him of the crash into the WTC.

I find it hard to swallow that she (WH Sit Rm Director) told him about
the crash, but didn't tell him about the fact that the FAA had
informed the NMCC which had dispatched F-15s after the hijacked plane.
But we'll never know what Bush told the 9/11 Commission about that in
the closed door session.

Had Bush had the intellect and instincts that are required of the
leader of the most powerful nation on the planet, he never would have
even entered the elementary school once he'd heard about the first
plane hitting the WTC while in the limo on the way to the school.

"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message news:<cfesoq$bfng$1@news3.infoave.net>...

"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:80mlh0ppcd4808c6hgf1kq592nvqnosnl5@4ax.com...

As viewed from alt.california, Larry Hewitt wrote:

"Jafo" wrote...
3. Legally only Bush could order an airlinre shot down. It appears
that Cheney made the order, but it is not certain. In any event, no
fighter ever intercepted either of the last two hijacked airliners.
This is particularly telling because Barabara Olson made the phone
call to her husband at 9:16, and National Airport reported the plane
heading for the White House at 9:34. It hit the Pentagon 4 minutes
later. It would have taken less than 18 minutes for fighters to
arrive from Andrews AFB. It would have been close, but they didn;t
even try.


NO reply to this?? Conceding that Bush should have given the order? And that
giving that order may have changed events?

4. The 4th airliner crashed in PA at 10:06. NORAD had been tracking
it as a hijacked plane since 9:16. We were lucky that the passengers
took it down in a field. The Air Force had 50 minutes to get to this
plane, and didn't because Bush and Cheney spent the time arguing
about who was in charge and whether or not Bush should go back to
DC.


Indeed? And you know for a fact that they were "arguing about who
was in charge"?


See the link below. Cheney had started issuing orders - including calling DC
a "freefire zone". Bush wanted to go back to DC. Cheney insisted he not come
to DC. CHeney won. AF1 circled Sarasota while the decision about a
destination was being made. A decisive, in control president would have made
a decision, not been bullied by the VP.


Has anybody here read the 9/11 Commission's report?

An order to shoot down a commercial aircraft would have to be issued
by the National Command Authority (a phrase used to describe the
President and Secretary of Defense). Cheney has absolutely no
constitutional authority to do anything at all, and yet it seems that
Cheney was running the show, arguing with Bush over the phone and
inventing reasons to keep Bush out of D.C. (Cheney apparently was the
one starting the rumors of threats to AF1).

Rumsfeld, was the only one with constitutional authority (along with
the President) to mobilize the military, to protect and defend the
U.S., and he was not contacted (although he was allegedly in his
office at the Pentagon all morning) until at least 1/2 hour after the
last of the 4 hijacked planes crashed.

You really have to read the 9/11 Commission's report to appreciate how
pretty much everybody down on the lower rungs of the procedural ladder
had done their jobs, determined we were under attack and that the
military was required. ALL BEFORE THE 2nd PLANE HIT THE WTC.

It was at the upper rungs of the ladder that were FUBAR.

At one point, F-15 fighter planes were in the air over NY, going after
Flight 11 (the 1st of the 4 hijacked planes to crash), BEFORE it hit
the WTC. This was BEFORE Bush entered the elementary school.

I know that I'm repeating myself, but you really have to read the 9/11
Commission's report to understand the procedural protocol and how it
broke down. You may ultimately then recognize why it is that we need
fully engaged, intelligent and actively interested Presidents.

People, mistakenly, think Bush is stupid. He's no genius, but he's
not stupid. He's lazy. Anything that doesn't interest Bush, if he
has to learn about it, is work. "The boss doesn't work. That's what
the employees are for." Every achievement and success in Bush's life
has come from somebody else's effort.

The job of POTUS is mostly public relations. Like sales, it's a
personality job. Speechmaking, ceremonial, spouting advertising
slogans that sell to the American people whatever it is that your
political party and patrons have backed your bid for the White House
for. There is rarely any split-second executive decision-making
required. Drones craft the policy, legislation, paperwork and (with
Bush in the job) other drones invent the language and advertising
campaign to get the American people behind it. An android could do
the job. Except for that odd emergency. Like planes hitting
skyscrapers in NY and the seat of America's military industrial
complex in Virginia.

The U.S. is an emergency-driven culture. The protocols that we have
in place for emergencies cover most contingencies. But when that new
contingency happens, that a protocol hasn't been written to cover, we
need somebody in charge who can think on his feet.

There are always going to be systems *****-ups, failures, mistakes due
to having not taken something into account. "Unforseen events." But
that's not really what happened here on 9/11/01. What we had here was
an inept, lazy George W. Bush.

No amount of a POTUS surrounding himself with solid, experienced
advisors to make up for his own inadequacy is going to provide the
security and protection necessary for the United States in the 21st
century.

(9:38 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
There are conflicting accounts of what Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld does in the 35 minutes between the second WTC crash (see
(After 9:03 a.m.)) and the Pentagon crash. In his 9/11 Commission
testimony, he covers the time with a "shortly thereafter:" "I was in
my office with a CIA briefer and I was told that a second plane had
hit the other tower. Shortly thereafter, at 9:38, the Pentagon shook
with an explosion of then unknown origin." [Independent Commission,
3/23/04] In the book , Bob Woodward writes, "Aware of the attacks on
the World Trade Center, Rumsfeld had been proceeding with his daily
intelligence briefing in his office" when the Pentagon gets hit. [Bush
at War, by Bob Woodward, 11/02 , p. 22.] However, according to
counterterrorism "tsar" Richard Clarke, Rumsfeld joins a video
conference shortly after the second WTC hit (see (9:10 a.m.)) and
stays with the conference, apparently from his office. After being
told the Pentagon has been hit, Clarke says, "I can still see Rumsfeld
on the screen, so the whole building didn't get hit" (see (Between
9:38-9:45 a.m.)). The military response to the 9/11 crisis is being
coordinated in the NMCC, apparently located only around 200 feet away,
directly below Rumsfeld's office. [Defense Department, 9/15/01 (B),
Reuters, 9/11/01] At 9:39, Captain Charles Leidig, a low ranking
officer temporarily in charge of the NMCC, is handling a crisis
teleconference. He mentions reports of a crash into the opposite side
of the Pentagon, and requests that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld be added
to the conference. [Independent Commission Report, 6/17/04] As one
magazine has noted, "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval
procedure was for an FAA official to contact the [NMCC] and request
Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call NORAD's command
center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from
the Defense Secretary?Donald H. Rumsfeld?to launch fighters."
[Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02] But rather than join the
NMCC conference, Rumsfeld goes out of the Pentagon to see the crash
site, and remains out of contact for some time (see (After 9:38 a.m.)
and (10:30 a.m.)).

9:46 a.m. Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's office and acting Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Myers' office report to the NMCC teleconference that
they are still trying to track down Rumsfeld and Myers, respectively,
and bring them into the conference. [Independent Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld is apparently outside the Pentagon looking at the
Flight 77 crash site, though Richard Clarke suggests Rumsfeld is
elsewhere in the Pentagon for much of the time (see (After 9:38
a.m.)). Myers' whereabouts in the period after the Pentagon crash have
not been fully explained (see (Before 10:30 a.m.)). Rumsfeld and Myers
don't enter the NMCC until about 10:30 (see (10:30 a.m.)).

(Between 10:00-10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
In Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's testimony before the 9/11
Commission, he states that he returns from the Pentagon crash site "by
shortly before or after 10:00 a.m." (see (After 9:38 a.m.)). Then he
has "one or more calls in my office, one of which was with the
president." [9/11 Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] According to the 9/11
Commission, the call with Bush has little impact: "No one can recall
any content beyond a general request to alert forces." The possibility
of shooting down hijacked planes is not mentioned. [9/11 Commission
Report, 6/17/04] Then Rumsfeld goes to the Executive Support Center
before finally entering the NMCC (see (10:30 a.m.)). Acting Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers repeats all these details.
[Independent Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] The Executive Support Center has
secure video facilities [Washington Times, 2/23/04], so it is possible
Rumsfeld joins or rejoins the video conference that Richard Clarke
claims Rumsfeld is a part of much of the morning (see (After 9:03
a.m.)and(Before 9:38 a.m.)).

(10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld finally enters the Pentagon's
National Military Command Center (NMCC), where the military's response
to the 9/11 attacks is being coordinated. [shortly before 10:30, 9/11
Commission Report, 6/17/04, 10:30, CNN, 9/4/02] Rumsfeld later claims
that he only begins to gain a situational awareness of what's
happening after arriving at the NMCC. [9/11 Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld was in his office only 200 feet away from the NMCC
until the Pentagon crash; what he does there during that time is
disputed (see (After 9:03 a.m.) and (9:38 a.m.))). He then went
outside to the Flight 77 crash site (see (9:38 a.m.) and (After 9:38
a.m.)) and then stayed elsewhere in the Pentagon (see (Between
10:00-10:30 a.m.)). Brigadier General Montague Winfield later says,
"For 30 minutes we couldn't find him. And just as we began to worry,
he walked into the door of the National Military Command Center." [ABC
News, 9/11/02] Winfield himself apparently only shows up at the NMCC
around 10:30 as well (see 8:30 a.m.).

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld

Excellent rebuttal. Thanks for posting it.
Bush is a detriment to the USA and nothing else. For the sake of all
good Americans, he must be removed, legally and permanently, from
any public office whatsoever, in perpetuity, along with his cohort.
Then the bushkulties will need to be treated and educated if possible.
.
User: "gaffo"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 26 Aug 2004 07:26:02 PM
* US * wrote:

On 25 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0700,

(Barney Lyon) wrote:


Joe Blowtowski <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<v15qi0da332k28nr2ddr0r1u47ofr1930n@4ax.com>...

Did you know that Lt. John Forbes Winthorp Kerry
sat silent and did nothing for 40 minutes on 9-11


I was watching TV when GMA interrupted their regular programming to
announce that a plane had crashed into the WTC. They then switched to
a roof camera and showed the smoking building. My mind started ticking
off lists, what to do in the event of such an emergency, was there
anything that I could do, should do, was responsible for doing. (No)
Charlie Gibson was speculating about it being "an accident," and I
thought "How is it that the media puts such naive idiots in these
jobs" (answer for another day) - I didn't need the 2nd plane to hit to
know that it was no accident.

Bush knew before he got to the elementary school that a plane had hit
the WTC. The same WTC that was hit by terrorists in 1993, in the
heart of the world's financial center. At the very least, reassuring
both the citizens of NY and America, and calming panicking money
institutions was not something that Bush had considered.

There was nothing John Kerry, as Senator for the state of
Massachusetts, could have done or should have done. John Kerry had no
responsibility for the security of the nation and the safety of the
American people on that day.

George W. Bush did have that responsibility. And he did nothing.

Conservatives want to excuse Bush's non-response because "there was
nothing that he could have done to prevent the death and destruction
in that time." That is factually not true.

At the very least, at the very LEAST, the 189 Americans who were in
the Pentagon when Flight 77 crashed into it would still be alive if
Bush had excused himself from the children's reading as soon as Andrew
Card had informed him that America was being attacked by terrorists.

Before the 1st plane struck the WTC, the FAA knew that 4 planes had
been hijacked. The controllers at the Boston Center, thinking on
their feet, broke standard procedure, didn't wait for headquarters to
contact the military and did it themselves. Before the 1st plane
struck the WTC, 2 F-15s were in the skies over NY looking for it. It
did NOT, however, have clearance to take any planes down.

This nightmare had been going on for a considerable time before the
White House Situation Room Director who was traveling with Bush in
Florida informed him of the crash into the WTC.

I find it hard to swallow that she (WH Sit Rm Director) told him about
the crash, but didn't tell him about the fact that the FAA had
informed the NMCC which had dispatched F-15s after the hijacked plane.
But we'll never know what Bush told the 9/11 Commission about that in
the closed door session.

Had Bush had the intellect and instincts that are required of the
leader of the most powerful nation on the planet, he never would have
even entered the elementary school once he'd heard about the first
plane hitting the WTC while in the limo on the way to the school.

"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message news:<cfesoq$bfng$1@news3.infoave.net>...

"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:80mlh0ppcd4808c6hgf1kq592nvqnosnl5@4ax.com...

As viewed from alt.california, Larry Hewitt wrote:


"Jafo" wrote...
3. Legally only Bush could order an airlinre shot down. It appears
that Cheney made the order, but it is not certain. In any event, no
fighter ever intercepted either of the last two hijacked airliners.
This is particularly telling because Barabara Olson made the phone
call to her husband at 9:16, and National Airport reported the plane
heading for the White House at 9:34. It hit the Pentagon 4 minutes
later. It would have taken less than 18 minutes for fighters to
arrive from Andrews AFB. It would have been close, but they didn;t
even try.


NO reply to this?? Conceding that Bush should have given the order? And that
giving that order may have changed events?


4. The 4th airliner crashed in PA at 10:06. NORAD had been tracking
it as a hijacked plane since 9:16. We were lucky that the passengers
took it down in a field. The Air Force had 50 minutes to get to this
plane, and didn't because Bush and Cheney spent the time arguing
about who was in charge and whether or not Bush should go back to
DC.


Indeed? And you know for a fact that they were "arguing about who
was in charge"?


See the link below. Cheney had started issuing orders - including calling DC
a "freefire zone". Bush wanted to go back to DC. Cheney insisted he not come
to DC. CHeney won. AF1 circled Sarasota while the decision about a
destination was being made. A decisive, in control president would have made
a decision, not been bullied by the VP.


Has anybody here read the 9/11 Commission's report?

An order to shoot down a commercial aircraft would have to be issued
by the National Command Authority (a phrase used to describe the
President and Secretary of Defense). Cheney has absolutely no
constitutional authority to do anything at all, and yet it seems that
Cheney was running the show, arguing with Bush over the phone and
inventing reasons to keep Bush out of D.C. (Cheney apparently was the
one starting the rumors of threats to AF1).

Rumsfeld, was the only one with constitutional authority (along with
the President) to mobilize the military, to protect and defend the
U.S., and he was not contacted (although he was allegedly in his
office at the Pentagon all morning) until at least 1/2 hour after the
last of the 4 hijacked planes crashed.

You really have to read the 9/11 Commission's report to appreciate how
pretty much everybody down on the lower rungs of the procedural ladder
had done their jobs, determined we were under attack and that the
military was required. ALL BEFORE THE 2nd PLANE HIT THE WTC.

It was at the upper rungs of the ladder that were FUBAR.

At one point, F-15 fighter planes were in the air over NY, going after
Flight 11 (the 1st of the 4 hijacked planes to crash), BEFORE it hit
the WTC. This was BEFORE Bush entered the elementary school.

I know that I'm repeating myself, but you really have to read the 9/11
Commission's report to understand the procedural protocol and how it
broke down. You may ultimately then recognize why it is that we need
fully engaged, intelligent and actively interested Presidents.

People, mistakenly, think Bush is stupid. He's no genius, but he's
not stupid. He's lazy. Anything that doesn't interest Bush, if he
has to learn about it, is work. "The boss doesn't work. That's what
the employees are for." Every achievement and success in Bush's life
has come from somebody else's effort.

The job of POTUS is mostly public relations. Like sales, it's a
personality job. Speechmaking, ceremonial, spouting advertising
slogans that sell to the American people whatever it is that your
political party and patrons have backed your bid for the White House
for. There is rarely any split-second executive decision-making
required. Drones craft the policy, legislation, paperwork and (with
Bush in the job) other drones invent the language and advertising
campaign to get the American people behind it. An android could do
the job. Except for that odd emergency. Like planes hitting
skyscrapers in NY and the seat of America's military industrial
complex in Virginia.

The U.S. is an emergency-driven culture. The protocols that we have
in place for emergencies cover most contingencies. But when that new
contingency happens, that a protocol hasn't been written to cover, we
need somebody in charge who can think on his feet.

There are always going to be systems *****-ups, failures, mistakes due
to having not taken something into account. "Unforseen events." But
that's not really what happened here on 9/11/01. What we had here was
an inept, lazy George W. Bush.

No amount of a POTUS surrounding himself with solid, experienced
advisors to make up for his own inadequacy is going to provide the
security and protection necessary for the United States in the 21st
century.

(9:38 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
There are conflicting accounts of what Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld does in the 35 minutes between the second WTC crash (see
(After 9:03 a.m.)) and the Pentagon crash. In his 9/11 Commission
testimony, he covers the time with a "shortly thereafter:" "I was in
my office with a CIA briefer and I was told that a second plane had
hit the other tower. Shortly thereafter, at 9:38, the Pentagon shook
with an explosion of then unknown origin." [Independent Commission,
3/23/04] In the book , Bob Woodward writes, "Aware of the attacks on
the World Trade Center, Rumsfeld had been proceeding with his daily
intelligence briefing in his office" when the Pentagon gets hit. [Bush
at War, by Bob Woodward, 11/02 , p. 22.] However, according to
counterterrorism "tsar" Richard Clarke, Rumsfeld joins a video
conference shortly after the second WTC hit (see (9:10 a.m.)) and
stays with the conference, apparently from his office. After being
told the Pentagon has been hit, Clarke says, "I can still see Rumsfeld
on the screen, so the whole building didn't get hit" (see (Between
9:38-9:45 a.m.)). The military response to the 9/11 crisis is being
coordinated in the NMCC, apparently located only around 200 feet away,
directly below Rumsfeld's office. [Defense Department, 9/15/01 (B),
Reuters, 9/11/01] At 9:39, Captain Charles Leidig, a low ranking
officer temporarily in charge of the NMCC, is handling a crisis
teleconference. He mentions reports of a crash into the opposite side
of the Pentagon, and requests that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld be added
to the conference. [Independent Commission Report, 6/17/04] As one
magazine has noted, "On Sept. 11, the normal scramble-approval
procedure was for an FAA official to contact the [NMCC] and request
Pentagon air support. Someone in the NMCC would call NORAD's command
center and ask about availability of aircraft, then seek approval from
the Defense Secretary?Donald H. Rumsfeld?to launch fighters."
[Aviation Week and Space Technology, 6/3/02] But rather than join the
NMCC conference, Rumsfeld goes out of the Pentagon to see the crash
site, and remains out of contact for some time (see (After 9:38 a.m.)
and (10:30 a.m.)).

9:46 a.m. Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's office and acting Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Myers' office report to the NMCC teleconference that
they are still trying to track down Rumsfeld and Myers, respectively,
and bring them into the conference. [Independent Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld is apparently outside the Pentagon looking at the
Flight 77 crash site, though Richard Clarke suggests Rumsfeld is
elsewhere in the Pentagon for much of the time (see (After 9:38
a.m.)). Myers' whereabouts in the period after the Pentagon crash have
not been fully explained (see (Before 10:30 a.m.)). Rumsfeld and Myers
don't enter the NMCC until about 10:30 (see (10:30 a.m.)).

(Between 10:00-10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
In Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's testimony before the 9/11
Commission, he states that he returns from the Pentagon crash site "by
shortly before or after 10:00 a.m." (see (After 9:38 a.m.)). Then he
has "one or more calls in my office, one of which was with the
president." [9/11 Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] According to the 9/11
Commission, the call with Bush has little impact: "No one can recall
any content beyond a general request to alert forces." The possibility
of shooting down hijacked planes is not mentioned. [9/11 Commission
Report, 6/17/04] Then Rumsfeld goes to the Executive Support Center
before finally entering the NMCC (see (10:30 a.m.)). Acting Joint
Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers repeats all these details.
[Independent Commission, 6/17/04 (B)] The Executive Support Center has
secure video facilities [Washington Times, 2/23/04], so it is possible
Rumsfeld joins or rejoins the video conference that Richard Clarke
claims Rumsfeld is a part of much of the morning (see (After 9:03
a.m.)and(Before 9:38 a.m.)).

(10:30 a.m.) Complete 911 Timeline
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld finally enters the Pentagon's
National Military Command Center (NMCC), where the military's response
to the 9/11 attacks is being coordinated. [shortly before 10:30, 9/11
Commission Report, 6/17/04, 10:30, CNN, 9/4/02] Rumsfeld later claims
that he only begins to gain a situational awareness of what's
happening after arriving at the NMCC. [9/11 Commission Report,
6/17/04] Rumsfeld was in his office only 200 feet away from the NMCC
until the Pentagon crash; what he does there during that time is
disputed (see (After 9:03 a.m.) and (9:38 a.m.))). He then went
outside to the Flight 77 crash site (see (9:38 a.m.) and (After 9:38
a.m.)) and then stayed elsewhere in the Pentagon (see (Between
10:00-10:30 a.m.)). Brigadier General Montague Winfield later says,
"For 30 minutes we couldn't find him. And just as we began to worry,
he walked into the door of the National Military Command Center." [ABC
News, 9/11/02] Winfield himself apparently only shows up at the NMCC
around 10:30 as well (see 8:30 a.m.).

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld



Excellent rebuttal. Thanks for posting it.


Bush is a detriment to the USA and nothing else. For the sake of all
good Americans, he must be removed, legally and permanently, from
any public office whatsoever, in perpetuity, along with his cohort.


Then the bushkulties will need to be treated and educated if possible.

some "re-education" camps should do......................no the
reichturds are beyond educating.
--
http://baltimorechronicle.com/041704reTreason.shtml
http://www.truthinaction.net/iraq/illegaljayne.htm
As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both
instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged.
And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air
-- however slight -lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.
Justice William O. Douglas, US Supreme Court (1939-75)
"It shows us that there were senior people in the Bush administration who
were seriously contemplating the use of torture, and trying to figure out
whether there were any legal loopholes that might allow them to commit
criminal acts, They seem to be putting forward a theory that the president
in wartime can essentially do what he wants regardless of what the law
may say,"
Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch - commenting upon Defense
Department Lawyer
Will Dunham's 56-page legalization of torture memo.
If you add all of those up, you should have a conservative rebellion against
the giant corporation in the White House masquerading as a human being named
George W. Bush. Just as progressives have been abandoned by the corporate
Democrats and told, "You got nowhere to go other than to stay home or
vote for
the Democrats", this is the fate of the authentic conservatives in the
Republican Party.
Ralph Nader - June 2004 - The American Conservative Magazine
"But I believe in torture and I will torture you."
-An American soldier shares the joys of Democracy with
an Iraqi prisoner.
"My mother praises me for fighting the Americans. If we are killed,
our wives and mothers will rejoice that we died defending the
freedom of our country.
-Iraqi Mahdi fighter
"We were bleeding from 3 a.m. until sunrise, soon American soldiers came.
One of them kicked me to see if I was alive. I pretended I was dead
so he wouldn't kill me. The soldier was laughing, when Yousef cried,
the soldier said: "'No, stop,"
-Shihab, survivor of USSA bombing of Iraqi wedding.
"the absolute convergence of the neoconservatives with the Christian
Zionists
and the pro-Israel lobby, driving U.S. Mideast policy."
-Don Wagner, an evangelical South Carolina minister
"Bush, in Austin, criticized President Clinton's administration for
the Kosovo military action.'Victory means exit strategy, and it's important
for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is,' Bush said."
Houston Chronicle 4/9/99
"Iraqis are sick of foreign people coming in their country and trying to
destabilize their country."
Washington, D.C., May 5, 2004
"The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem
of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along until there's a major
incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh my God, shouldn't we be organized
to deal with this?'"
- Paul Bremer, speaking to a McCormick Tribune Foundation conference
on terrorism in Wheaton, Ill. on Feb. 26, 2001.
"On Jan. 26, 1998, President Clinton received a letter imploring him to use
his State of the Union address to make removal of Saddam Hussein's regime
the "aim of American foreign policy" and to use military action because
"diplomacy is failing." Were Clinton to do that, the signers pledged, they
would "offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor."
Signing the pledge were Elliott Abrams, Bill Bennett, John Bolton, Robert
Kagan, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Richard L. Armitage, Jeffrey
Bergner,
Paula Dobriansky, Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, Peter W. Rodman,
William Schneider, Jr., Vin Weber, R. James Woolsey and Robert B. Zoellick,
Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. Four years before 9/11, the neocons had
Baghdad on their minds."
-philip (usenet)
"I had better things to do in the 60s than fight in Vietnam,"
-Richard Cheney, Kerry critic.
"I hope they will understand that in order for this government to get up
and running
- to be effective - some of its sovereignty will have to be given
back, if I can put it that way,
or limited by them, It's sovereignty but [some] of that sovereignty they
are going to allow us to exercise
on their behalf and with their permission."
- Powell 4/27/04
"We're trying to explain how things are going, and they are going as they
are going," he said, adding: "Some things are going well and some things
obviously are not going well. You're going to have good days and bad days."
On the road to democracy, this "is one moment, and there will be other
moments. And there will be good moments and there will be less good
moments."
- Rumsfeld 4/6/04
"I also have this belief, strong belief, that freedom is not this
country's gift to the world; freedom is the Almighty's gift to
every man and woman in this world. And as the greatest power on
the face of the Earth, we have an obligation to help the spread
of freedom."
~ Bush the Crusader
RUSSERT: Are you prepared to lose?
BUSH: No, I'm not going to lose.
RUSSERT: If you did, what would you do?
BUSH: Well, I don't plan on losing. I've got a vision for what I want to
do for the country.
See, I know exactly where I want to lead.................And we got
changing times
here in America, too., 2/8/04
"And that's very important for, I think, the people to understand where
I'm coming from,
to know that this is a dangerous world. I wish it wasn't. I'm a war
president.
I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with
war on my mind.
- pResident of the United State of America, 2/8/04
"Let's talk about the nuclear proposition for a minute. We know that
based on intelligence, that he has been very, very good at hiding
these kinds of efforts. He's had years to get good at it and we know
he has been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons.
And we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."
- Vice President ***** Cheney, on "Meet the Press", 3/16/03
"I don't know anybody that I can think of who has contended that the
Iraqis had nuclear weapons."
- Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, 6/24/03
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.

User: "Fact Checker"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 28 Aug 2004 07:00:22 AM
On 08/26/2004 11:45 AM, Raven reads the ravings of * US *:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld



Excellent rebuttal. Thanks for posting it.


Bush is a detriment to the USA and nothing else. For the sake of all
good Americans, he must be removed, legally and permanently, from
any public office whatsoever, in perpetuity, along with his cohort.


Then the bushkulties will need to be treated and educated if possible.

I agree it was an excellent post. The Center for Cooperative
Research is extremely thorough in their fact checking and source
citations. Something I definitely admire.
Anyhow, even more interesting than the pandemonium that morning
is what occurred later the same day.
source and context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld
Hours after the 9/11 attacks, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld is given
information that three of the names on the airplane passenger
manifests are suspected al-Qaeda operatives. The notes he
composes at the time are leaked nearly a year later. Rumsfeld
writes he wants the “best info fast. Judge whether good enough
hit S.H. [Saddam Hussein] at same time. Not only UBL. [Usama bin
Laden] Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not.”
[CBS, 9/4/02]
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml
He presents the idea to Bush the next day. It is later revealed
that shortly after 9/11, Rumsfeld sets up “a small team of
defense officials outside regular intelligence channels to focus
on unearthing details about Iraqi ties with al-Qaeda and other
terrorist networks.” It has continued to sift “through much of
the same databases available to government intelligence analysts
but with the aim of spotlighting information the spy agencies
have either overlooked or played down.” [Washington Post, 10/25/02]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A14056-2002Oct24&notFound=true
Time will report in May 2002 that Defense Secretary “Rumsfeld has
been so determined to find a rationale for an attack that on 10
separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq
to the terror attacks of Sept. 11. The intelligence agency
repeatedly came back empty-handed.” [CNN, Time Out, 5/6/02 (B)]
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/06/time.out/
But while the CIA hasn't been helpful to Rumsfeld, one former
senior official later says, “If it became known that [Rumsfeld]
wanted [the Defense Intelligence Agency] to link the government
of Tonga to 9/11, within a few months they would come up with
sources who'd do it.” [New Yorker, 12/16/02]
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?021223fa_fact
Since the plan to defeat Iraq is planned despite a complete lack
of evidence showing Iraqi involvement in 9/11, how can any later
evidence pointing to Iraq's complicity in 9/11 be trusted?
see also:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/item.jsp?item=a091701topsecret&timeline=complete_911_timeline
complete context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld
This explains the waffling when the administration was asked for
evidence against UBL. They didn't want to end it there.
[BONUS: Can anyone find a reliable source with a quote of Bush
definitatively stating that UBL was behind 9/11?]
--
Warm Regards,
Raven Cecil
"I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that
much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you... I truly am
not that concerned about him." [George W. Bush] "Considering
that Bush's Administration regularly initiates ... terror
alerts based on threats from bin Laden's organization, it's
a little disconcerting that the President pays the man no
mind. He certainly seems to want the rest of us to worry
about Osama. Why doesn't he worry about him?"
[Michael Manville]
"_Staying Angry_ is the best article you've never read."
http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/article.asp?id=304
[Raven Cecil]
.
User: "* US *"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 29 Aug 2004 05:27:26 PM
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:00:22 -0500, Fact Checker <freedom@hatemail.com> wrote:
[Re: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld ]


I agree it was an excellent post. The Center for Cooperative
Research is extremely thorough in their fact checking and source
citations. Something I definitely admire.

Anyhow, even more interesting than the pandemonium that morning
is what occurred later the same day.

source and context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld

Hours after the 9/11 attacks, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld is given
information that three of the names on the airplane passenger
manifests are suspected al-Qaeda operatives. The notes he
composes at the time are leaked nearly a year later. Rumsfeld
writes he wants the best info fast. Judge whether good enough
hit S.H. [Saddam Hussein] at same time. Not only UBL. [Usama bin
Laden] Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not.
[CBS, 9/4/02]
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml

He presents the idea to Bush the next day. It is later revealed
that shortly after 9/11, Rumsfeld sets up a small team of
defense officials outside regular intelligence channels to focus
on unearthing details about Iraqi ties with al-Qaeda and other
terrorist networks. It has continued to sift through much of
the same databases available to government intelligence analysts
but with the aim of spotlighting information the spy agencies
have either overlooked or played down. [Washington Post, 10/25/02]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A14056-2002Oct24&notFound=true

Time will report in May 2002 that Defense Secretary Rumsfeld has
been so determined to find a rationale for an attack that on 10
separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq
to the terror attacks of Sept. 11. The intelligence agency
repeatedly came back empty-handed. [CNN, Time Out, 5/6/02 (B)]
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/06/time.out/

But while the CIA hasn't been helpful to Rumsfeld, one former
senior official later says, If it became known that [Rumsfeld]
wanted [the Defense Intelligence Agency] to link the government
of Tonga to 9/11, within a few months they would come up with
sources who'd do it. [New Yorker, 12/16/02]
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?021223fa_fact

Since the plan to defeat Iraq is planned despite a complete lack
of evidence showing Iraqi involvement in 9/11, how can any later
evidence pointing to Iraq's complicity in 9/11 be trusted?

see also:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/item.jsp?item=a091701topsecret&timeline=complete_911_timeline

complete context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld

This explains the waffling when the administration was asked for
evidence against UBL. They didn't want to end it there.

Insightful compilation. Thanks for posting it.


[BONUS: Can anyone find a reliable source with a quote of Bush
definitatively stating that UBL was behind 9/11?]

"bin Laden again denied having anything to do with the attacks.
Bush shrugged off the denial and said, "No question, he is the prime suspect." ..."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34469,00.html
Of course, Bush knew who the designated scapegoat would be, as he'd done
what he was told to help clear the way for the accusation:
http://gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=103&row=1
.
User: "Fact Checker"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 30 Aug 2004 10:27:25 PM
On 08/29/2004 05:27 PM, Raven reads the ravings of * US *:

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:00:22 -0500, Fact Checker <freedom@hatemail.com> wrote:

[Re: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld ]

I agree it was an excellent post. The Center for Cooperative
Research is extremely thorough in their fact checking and source
citations. Something I definitely admire.

Anyhow, even more interesting than the pandemonium that morning
is what occurred later the same day.

source and context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld

Hours after the 9/11 attacks, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld is given
information that three of the names on the airplane passenger
manifests are suspected al-Qaeda operatives. The notes he
composes at the time are leaked nearly a year later. Rumsfeld
writes he wants the �best info fast. Judge whether good enough
hit S.H. [Saddam Hussein] at same time. Not only UBL. [Usama bin
Laden] Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not.�
[CBS, 9/4/02]
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml

He presents the idea to Bush the next day. It is later revealed
that shortly after 9/11, Rumsfeld sets up �a small team of
defense officials outside regular intelligence channels to focus
on unearthing details about Iraqi ties with al-Qaeda and other
terrorist networks.� It has continued to sift �through much of
the same databases available to government intelligence analysts
but with the aim of spotlighting information the spy agencies
have either overlooked or played down.� [Washington Post, 10/25/02]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A14056-2002Oct24&notFound=true

Time will report in May 2002 that Defense Secretary �Rumsfeld has
been so determined to find a rationale for an attack that on 10
separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq
to the terror attacks of Sept. 11. The intelligence agency
repeatedly came back empty-handed.� [CNN, Time Out, 5/6/02 (B)]
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/06/time.out/

But while the CIA hasn't been helpful to Rumsfeld, one former
senior official later says, �If it became known that [Rumsfeld]
wanted [the Defense Intelligence Agency] to link the government
of Tonga to 9/11, within a few months they would come up with
sources who'd do it.� [New Yorker, 12/16/02]
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?021223fa_fact

Since the plan to defeat Iraq is planned despite a complete lack
of evidence showing Iraqi involvement in 9/11, how can any later
evidence pointing to Iraq's complicity in 9/11 be trusted?

see also:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/item.jsp?item=a091701topsecret&timeline=complete_911_timeline

complete context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld

This explains the waffling when the administration was asked for
evidence against UBL. They didn't want to end it there.



Insightful compilation. Thanks for posting it.

[BONUS: Can anyone find a reliable source with a quote of Bush
definitatively stating that UBL was behind 9/11?]



"bin Laden again denied having anything to do with the attacks.

Bush shrugged off the denial and said, "No question, he is the prime suspect." ..."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34469,00.html

Unfortunately "prime suspect" still leaves the weasels a way out
of the statement. I have found plenty of those statements. I am
still trying to find a quote where Bush stated unequivocally that
bin Laden was the person who orchestrated 9/11.
I'm sure it has to be documented somewhere, so it is just a
matter of time.
--
Warm Regards,
Raven Cecil
"I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that
much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you... I truly am
not that concerned about him." [George W. Bush] "Considering
that Bush's Administration regularly initiates ... terror
alerts based on threats from bin Laden's organization, it's
a little disconcerting that the President pays the man no
mind. He certainly seems to want the rest of us to worry
about Osama. Why doesn't he worry about him?"
[Michael Manville]
"_Staying Angry_ is the best article you've never read."
http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/article.asp?id=304
[Raven Cecil]
.
User: "* US *"

Title: Re: Bush did nothing but clear the way for the attacks of 9-11 31 Aug 2004 12:31:29 PM
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:27:25 -0500, Fact Checker <freedom@hatemail.com> wrote:

On 08/29/2004 05:27 PM, Raven reads the ravings of * US *:

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:00:22 -0500, Fact Checker <freedom@hatemail.com> wrote:
[Re: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a938rumsfeld ]

I agree it was an excellent post. The Center for Cooperative
Research is extremely thorough in their fact checking and source
citations. Something I definitely admire.

Anyhow, even more interesting than the pandemonium that morning
is what occurred later the same day.

source and context:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091101rumsfeld

Hours after the 9/11 attacks, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld is given
information that three of the names on the airplane passeng