| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" |
| Date: |
06 Feb 2006 10:34:05 AM |
| Object: |
Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/060206internetdoomsday.htm
Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It?
Paul Joseph Watson/PrisonPlanet.com | February 6 2006
Several developments that are coming to the fore indicate a noticeable
advance towards a government regulated, taxed and controlled system
that spells doomsday for the Internet as we know it.
The first steps in a move to charge for every e mail sent have already
been taken. Under the pretext of eliminating spam, Bill Gates and
other industry chieftains have proposed Internet users buy credit
stamps which denote how many e mails they will be able to send. This
of course is the death knell for political newsletters and mailing
lists.
The New York Times reports that "America Online and Yahoo, two of the
world's largest providers of e-mail accounts, are about to start using
a system that gives preferential treatment to messages from companies
that pay from 1/4 of a cent to a penny each to have them delivered.
The senders must promise to contact only people who have agreed to
receive their messages, or risk being blocked entirely."
The end game is a system similar to China, whereby no websites even
mildly critical of the government will be authorized.
The Pentagon admitted that they would engage in psychological warfare
and cyber attacks on 'enemy' Internet websites in an attempt to shut
them down. The fact that the NSA surveillance program spied on 5,000
Americans tells us that the enemy is the alternative media and that it
will be targeted for elimination. Court cases are pending after the
Bush administration demanded the Google search terms of American
citizens.
The first wave will simply attempt to price people out of using the
conventional Internet and force people over to Internet 2, a state
regulated hub where permission will need to be obtained directly from
an FCC or government bureau to set up a website.
The original Internet will then be turned into a mass surveillance
database and marketing tool. The Nation magazine reported last week,
"Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are
developing strategies that would track and store information on our
every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing
system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency.
According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone
and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest
pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major
advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these
providers would have first priority on our computer and television
screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer
communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."
We see a move to demonize the Internet and tar its reputation. AOL is
running ads equating Internet users with terrorists. In the next few
years we may see a staged Internet shutdown which is blamed on cyber
terrorists.
For the aspiring dictator, the Internet is a dangerous tool that has
been seized by the enemy. We have come a long way since 1969, when the
ARPANET was created solely for US government use. The Internet is
freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication
is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power
and subjugate the world under a global surveillance panopticon prison.
.
|
|
| User: "Rustic" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
06 Feb 2006 10:55:09 AM |
|
|
It's an attack on democracy itself the companies pushing for it should
be tried for treason.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rustic" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
06 Feb 2006 10:55:09 AM |
|
|
It's an attack on democracy itself the companies pushing for it should
be tried for treason.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rita Refugee" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
06 Feb 2006 11:49:48 AM |
|
|
"Rustic" <holioly@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:1139244909.175812.282720@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
It's an attack on democracy itself the companies pushing for it should
be tried for treason.
Under what definition of treason?
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
06 Feb 2006 02:03:14 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:49:48 -0600, "Rita Refugee"
<Rita_Refugee@Hurricane.com> wrote:
"Rustic" <holioly@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:1139244909.175812.282720@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
It's an attack on democracy itself the companies pushing for it should
be tried for treason.
Under what definition of treason?
His own personal definition, apparently.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scotius" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
10 Feb 2006 02:24:00 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:34:05 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/060206internetdoomsday.htm
Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It?
Paul Joseph Watson/PrisonPlanet.com | February 6 2006
Several developments that are coming to the fore indicate a noticeable
advance towards a government regulated, taxed and controlled system
that spells doomsday for the Internet as we know it.
It ain't taxes that are going to limit net access, it's
assholes like the one who's in charge of Bell who thinks it's
ridiculous that Google and others make a profit using "his pipes".
Fine then. No one will make a profit, at least not in the long run,
BECAUSE; you cannot simply wring and wring and wring as much money out
of people as possible, call it growth, etc, without them someday
taking up arms (or, if those have been banned, rope), and getting rid
of some people who need getting rid of.
The first steps in a move to charge for every e mail sent have already
been taken. Under the pretext of eliminating spam, Bill Gates and
other industry chieftains have proposed Internet users buy credit
stamps which denote how many e mails they will be able to send. This
of course is the death knell for political newsletters and mailing
lists.
Yeah, and a few days ago he said "There's no longer such a
thing as censorship". He's not stupid. Quite the opposite.
The New York Times reports that "America Online and Yahoo, two of the
world's largest providers of e-mail accounts, are about to start using
a system that gives preferential treatment to messages from companies
that pay from 1/4 of a cent to a penny each to have them delivered.
The senders must promise to contact only people who have agreed to
receive their messages, or risk being blocked entirely."
The end game is a system similar to China, whereby no websites even
mildly critical of the government will be authorized.
The Pentagon admitted that they would engage in psychological warfare
and cyber attacks on 'enemy' Internet websites in an attempt to shut
them down.
It has been noted that the NSA didn't leak information about
what the Bush White House is doing because he was spying on Al Qa'ida,
but that he must have been spying on Americans in order to anger the
ELINT people. I'm sure that's true. I'm also true that since you spy
on enemies, and not friends, we can translate what's said to what's
meant without having to use a lot of imagination.
The fact that the NSA surveillance program spied on 5,000
Americans tells us that the enemy is the alternative media and that it
will be targeted for elimination. Court cases are pending after the
Bush administration demanded the Google search terms of American
citizens.
Yeah, but gee, here's my problem with that. They demanded
Google records in the name of fighting exploitation of children
online, and I just have to think that if that's what they really
wanted to do, they might be willing to fund the FBI so it could have
more than 50 people looking for perverts online. That leads me to
believe that the motivation for attacking Google had to be something
else. Remember that a lot of times when the left screams about
censorship, etc, that censorship may not be the goal of the people
who, due to the media's take, would appear to be engaging in dirty
tactics to try to monitor the internet. I don't think that's what's
happening this time.
Look at it this way. Google is now considered the World's #1
brand, and it is predicted that their stock might go up to $2000.00
per share, from the $425.00 per share it's at now. It was also
reported that Google's refusal to give into "Justice" Department
demands made investors "jittery", and that drove down the value of
Google's stock somewhat.
Suppose you'd like to buy into the World's #1 brand. Would you
rather buy in at $425.00, or at, say, $125.00, or maybe $25.00? Get
me?
The first wave will simply attempt to price people out of using the
conventional Internet and force people over to Internet 2, a state
regulated hub where permission will need to be obtained directly from
an FCC or government bureau to set up a website.
That's okay. They'll need our permission to make a big change
in attitude and come down from those nasty gallows they'll be standing
on, if we start getting smart now.
The original Internet will then be turned into a mass surveillance
database and marketing tool. The Nation magazine reported last week,
"Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are
developing strategies that would track and store information on our
every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing
system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency.
It would probably surpass the capabilities of the NSA by a
long shot.
According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone
and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest
pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major
advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these
providers would have first priority on our computer and television
screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer
communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."
We see a move to demonize the Internet and tar its reputation. AOL is
running ads equating Internet users with terrorists. In the next few
years we may see a staged Internet shutdown which is blamed on cyber
terrorists.
For the aspiring dictator, the Internet is a dangerous tool that has
been seized by the enemy. We have come a long way since 1969, when the
ARPANET was created solely for US government use. The Internet is
freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication
is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power
and subjugate the world under a global surveillance panopticon prison.
It's not that they have great big plans for that sort of
thing. It's just that they see a lot of opportunity for a number of
what they think are benefits for them in doing things the way they're
doing them.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Second Amendment Loves You" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
06 Feb 2006 11:38:07 AM |
|
|
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/060206internetdoomsday.htm
Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It?
Paul Joseph Watson/PrisonPlanet.com | February 6 2006
Several developments that are coming to the fore indicate a noticeable
advance towards a government regulated, taxed and controlled system
that spells doomsday for the Internet as we know it.
The first steps in a move to charge for every e mail sent have already
been taken. Under the pretext of eliminating spam, Bill Gates and
other industry chieftains have proposed Internet users buy credit
stamps which denote how many e mails they will be able to send. This
of course is the death knell for political newsletters and mailing
lists.
Do you realize how silly the email stamp idea is on a peer to peer
packet switched network? Oh, never mind. I know your level of analysis.
BTW, Billy G will send you 5 bucks if you forward this message to
him.
I think George Sorocis has proven beyond a doubt that being a billionaire
does not prevent one from going completely insane.
The New York Times reports that "America Online and Yahoo, two of the
world's largest providers of e-mail accounts, are about to start using
a system that gives preferential treatment to messages from companies
that pay from 1/4 of a cent to a penny each to have them delivered.
The senders must promise to contact only people who have agreed to
receive their messages, or risk being blocked entirely."
The end game is a system similar to China, whereby no websites even
mildly critical of the government will be authorized.
The Pentagon admitted that they would engage in psychological warfare
and cyber attacks on 'enemy' Internet websites in an attempt to shut
them down. The fact that the NSA surveillance program spied on 5,000
Americans tells us that the enemy is the alternative media and that it
will be targeted for elimination. Court cases are pending after the
Bush administration demanded the Google search terms of American
citizens.
The first wave will simply attempt to price people out of using the
conventional Internet and force people over to Internet 2, a state
regulated hub where permission will need to be obtained directly from
an FCC or government bureau to set up a website.
The original Internet will then be turned into a mass surveillance
database and marketing tool. The Nation magazine reported last week,
"Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are
developing strategies that would track and store information on our
every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing
system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency.
According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone
and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest
pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major
advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these
providers would have first priority on our computer and television
screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer
communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."
We see a move to demonize the Internet and tar its reputation. AOL is
running ads equating Internet users with terrorists. In the next few
years we may see a staged Internet shutdown which is blamed on cyber
terrorists.
For the aspiring dictator, the Internet is a dangerous tool that has
been seized by the enemy. We have come a long way since 1969, when the
ARPANET was created solely for US government use. The Internet is
freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication
is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power
and subjugate the world under a global surveillance panopticon prison.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde Soli Deo Gloria" |
|
| Title: Re: Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It? |
07 Feb 2006 01:01:25 AM |
|
|
Second Amendment Loves You wrote:
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/060206internetdoomsday.htm
Doomsday For The Internet As We Know It?
Paul Joseph Watson/PrisonPlanet.com | February 6 2006
Several developments that are coming to the fore indicate a noticeable
advance towards a government regulated, taxed and controlled system
that spells doomsday for the Internet as we know it.
The first steps in a move to charge for every e mail sent have already
been taken. Under the pretext of eliminating spam, Bill Gates and
other industry chieftains have proposed Internet users buy credit
stamps which denote how many e mails they will be able to send. This
of course is the death knell for political newsletters and mailing
lists.
Do you realize how silly the email stamp idea is on a peer to peer
packet switched network? Oh, never mind. I know your level of analysis.
BTW, Billy G will send you 5 bucks if you forward this message to
him.
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE (and its other nonsense nyms) has been
trolling this for years now. It does seem to get more bites than Tony
Lance though.
--
"He named his second child Jim after the horse that had brought him to
Washington. He caught his son one day writing 'James' on his lessons,
and he told the boy without raising his voice that if he had wanted to
name him 'James', that is what he would have done." -+Edward P. Jones,
"The Known World"
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|