| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Stan Pierce" |
| Date: |
19 Mar 2006 03:29:25 PM |
| Object: |
Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism is that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as everything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or does not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a nation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.html
.
|
|
| User: "David Moss" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 07:10:47 PM |
|
|
In article <V2kTf.10498$dy4.6015@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
ecreipt@bigpond.net.au writes...
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism is that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as everything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or does not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a nation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.html
Hmm, so this classical leaderless organisation is somehow a nation too.
The author seems a little confused.
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
Certainly there are extremists within Islam, just as there are within
Christianity. Yet today it is trendy to condemn Muslims as a group
because of a few fanatics within their ranks, yet turn a blind eye
toward similar problems within Christianity.
Only a few years ago a close relative of mine decided not to visit her
father's grave. The reason for that decision was because her father was
buried in a certain section of the graveyard. Members of a religious
sectarian paramilitary kept a watch on that part of the graveyard and
anyone foolhardy enough to venture into it carrying flowers, or stopping
to pray near a grave, could expect snipers to fire on them.
Christian sectarian violence is openly celebrated in Northern Ireland.
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/murcask.html
but don't get the idea it is all one-sided:
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/smural2.jpg
Yet we don't seem to see the same level of condemnation of this from
many who focus on Muslim extremism.
I wonder whi (te) that may be?
--
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 07:41:08 PM |
|
|
David Moss wrote:
In article <V2kTf.10498$dy4.6015@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
ecreipt@bigpond.net.au writes...
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism is that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as everything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or does not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a nation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.html
Hmm, so this classical leaderless organisation is somehow a nation too.
The author seems a little confused.
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
Certainly there are extremists within Islam, just as there are within
Christianity. Yet today it is trendy to condemn Muslims as a group
because of a few fanatics within their ranks, yet turn a blind eye
toward similar problems within Christianity.
Only a few years ago a close relative of mine decided not to visit her
father's grave. The reason for that decision was because her father was
buried in a certain section of the graveyard. Members of a religious
sectarian paramilitary kept a watch on that part of the graveyard and
anyone foolhardy enough to venture into it carrying flowers, or stopping
to pray near a grave, could expect snipers to fire on them.
Christian sectarian violence is openly celebrated in Northern Ireland.
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/murcask.html
but don't get the idea it is all one-sided:
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/smural2.jpg
Yet we don't seem to see the same level of condemnation of this from
many who focus on Muslim extremism.
I wonder whi (te) that may be?
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Moss" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 08:45:22 PM |
|
|
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
--
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 10:39:34 PM |
|
|
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 11:34:34 PM |
|
|
John Cawston wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
So you don't think the operation was intended to send a message to
other Iraqi cities about what would happen to them if they resisted the
occupation?
Just because the people who do terrifying things wear uniforms doesn't
stop what they do being terrorism. Bombing a restaurant with a worn out
truck full of fertiliser is terrorism, but it is also terrorism if the
weapon is a laser guided bunker buster dropped from an advanced
military aircraft.
The trouble is, many people cannot accept something is bad if our side
do it, but they are quick to condemn it if their enemies do it.
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 11:52:40 PM |
|
|
wrote:
John Cawston wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
So you don't think the operation was intended to send a message to
other Iraqi cities about what would happen to them if they resisted the
occupation?
Indeed. The message being that the Yanks and Iraq Govt. was responding
to their concerns to get rid of the terrorists, would give citizens time
to get out of the way, then kill the terrorists, provide massive support
to repair damages and leave an Iraq army support structure to protect them.
As the Mayor of Tall Afar wrote, they forfilled that promise:
"In the Name of God the Compassionate and Merciful
To the Courageous Men and Women of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who
have changed the city of Tall’ Afar from a ghost town, in which
terrorists spread death and destruction, to a secure city flourishing
with life.
To the lion-hearts who liberated our city from the grasp of terrorists
who were beheading men, women and children in the streets for many months.
To those who spread smiles on the faces of our children, and gave us
restored hope, through their personal sacrifice and brave fighting, and
gave new life to the city after hopelessness darkened our days, and
stole our confidence in our ability to reestablish our city.
Our city was the main base of operations for Abu Mousab Al Zarqawi. The
city was completely held hostage in the hands of his henchmen. Our
schools, governmental services, businesses and offices were closed. Our
streets were silent, and no one dared to walk them. Our people were
barricaded in their homes out of fear; death awaited them around every
corner. Terrorists occupied and controlled the only hospital in the
city. Their savagery reached such a level that they stuffed the corpses
of children with explosives and tossed them into the streets in order to
kill grieving parents attempting to retrieve the bodies of their young.
This was the situation of our city until God prepared and delivered unto
them the courageous soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who
liberated this city, ridding it of Zarqawi’s followers after harsh
fighting, killing many terrorists, and forcing the remaining butchers to
flee the city like rats to the surrounding areas, where the bravery of
other 3d ACR soldiers in Sinjar, Rabiah, Zumar and Avgani finally
destroyed them.
I have met many soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment; they are
not only courageous men and women, but avenging angels sent by The God
Himself to fight the evil of terrorism.
The leaders of this Regiment; COL McMaster, COL Armstrong, LTC Hickey,
LTC Gibson, and LTC Reilly embody courage, strength, vision and wisdom.
Officers and soldiers alike bristle with the confidence and character of
knights in a bygone era. The mission they have accomplished, by means of
a unique military operation, stands among the finest military feats to
date in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and truly deserves to be studied in
military science. This military operation was clean, with little
collateral damage, despite the ferocity of the enemy. With the skill and
precision of surgeons they dealt with the terrorist cancers in the city
without causing unnecessary damage.
God bless this brave Regiment; God bless the families who dedicated
these brave men and women. From the bottom of our hearts we thank the
families. They have given us something we will never forget. To the
families of those who have given their holy blood for our land, we all
bow to you in reverence and to the souls of your loved ones. Their
sacrifice was not in vain. They are not dead, but alive, and their souls
hovering around us every second of every minute. They will never be
forgotten for giving their precious lives. They have sacrificed that
which is most valuable. We see them in the smile of every child, and in
every flower growing in this land. Let America, their families, and the
world be proud of their sacrifice for humanity and life.
Finally, no matter how much I write or speak about this brave Regiment,
I haven’t the words to describe the courage of its officers and
soldiers. I pray to God to grant happiness and health to these legendary
heroes and their brave families.
NAJIM ABDULLAH ABID AL-JIBOURI
Mayor of Tall ‘Afar, Ninewa, Iraq"
JC
"
Just because the people who do terrifying things wear uniforms doesn't
stop what they do being terrorism. Bombing a restaurant with a worn out
truck full of fertiliser is terrorism, but it is also terrorism if the
weapon is a laser guided bunker buster dropped from an advanced
military aircraft.
The trouble is, many people cannot accept something is bad if our side
do it, but they are quick to condemn it if their enemies do it.
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 01:17:31 AM |
|
|
John Cawston wrote:
d-moss@adfa.edu.au wrote:
John Cawston wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
So you don't think the operation was intended to send a message to
other Iraqi cities about what would happen to them if they resisted the
occupation?
Indeed. The message being that the Yanks and Iraq Govt. was responding
to their concerns to get rid of the terrorists, would give citizens time
to get out of the way, then kill the terrorists, provide massive support
to repair damages and leave an Iraq army support structure to protect them.
"U.S. forces bombed the power plant at the beginning of the assault;
for the next several weeks, Fallujah was a blacked-out town, with light
provided by generators only in critical places like mosques and
clinics. The town was placed under siege; the ban on bringing in food,
medicine, and other basic items was broken only when Iraqis en masse
challenged the roadblocks. The atmosphere was one of pervasive fear,
from bombing and the threat of more bombing. Noncombatants and families
with sick people, the elderly, and children were leaving in droves.
After initial instances in which people were prevented from leaving,
U.S. forces began allowing everyone to leave except for what they
called "military age males," men usually between 15 and 60. Keeping
noncombatants from leaving a place under bombardment is a violation of
the laws of war. Of course, if you assume that every military age male
is an enemy, there can be no better sign that you are in the wrong
country, and that, in fact, your war is on the people, not on their
oppressors,, not a war of liberation."
In case you missed it buried in the middle of the eyewitness account
"U.S. forces began allowing everyone to leave except for what they
called "military age males," men usually between 15 and 60."
And we now know they went from house to house killing every male they
found.
Terrorism.
As the Mayor of Tall Afar wrote, they forfilled that promise:
"In the Name of God the Compassionate and Merciful
To the Courageous Men and Women of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who
have changed the city of Tall' Afar from a ghost town, in which
terrorists spread death and destruction, to a secure city flourishing
with life.
To the lion-hearts who liberated our city from the grasp of terrorists
who were beheading men, women and children in the streets for many months.
To those who spread smiles on the faces of our children, and gave us
restored hope, through their personal sacrifice and brave fighting, and
gave new life to the city after hopelessness darkened our days, and
stole our confidence in our ability to reestablish our city.
Our city was the main base of operations for Abu Mousab Al Zarqawi. The
city was completely held hostage in the hands of his henchmen. Our
schools, governmental services, businesses and offices were closed. Our
streets were silent, and no one dared to walk them. Our people were
barricaded in their homes out of fear; death awaited them around every
corner. Terrorists occupied and controlled the only hospital in the
city. Their savagery reached such a level that they stuffed the corpses
of children with explosives and tossed them into the streets in order to
kill grieving parents attempting to retrieve the bodies of their young.
This was the situation of our city until God prepared and delivered unto
them the courageous soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who
liberated this city, ridding it of Zarqawi's followers after harsh
fighting, killing many terrorists, and forcing the remaining butchers to
flee the city like rats to the surrounding areas, where the bravery of
other 3d ACR soldiers in Sinjar, Rabiah, Zumar and Avgani finally
destroyed them.
I have met many soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment; they are
not only courageous men and women, but avenging angels sent by The God
Himself to fight the evil of terrorism.
The leaders of this Regiment; COL McMaster, COL Armstrong, LTC Hickey,
LTC Gibson, and LTC Reilly embody courage, strength, vision and wisdom.
Officers and soldiers alike bristle with the confidence and character of
knights in a bygone era. The mission they have accomplished, by means of
a unique military operation, stands among the finest military feats to
date in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and truly deserves to be studied in
military science. This military operation was clean, with little
collateral damage, despite the ferocity of the enemy. With the skill and
precision of surgeons they dealt with the terrorist cancers in the city
without causing unnecessary damage.
God bless this brave Regiment; God bless the families who dedicated
these brave men and women. From the bottom of our hearts we thank the
families. They have given us something we will never forget. To the
families of those who have given their holy blood for our land, we all
bow to you in reverence and to the souls of your loved ones. Their
sacrifice was not in vain. They are not dead, but alive, and their souls
hovering around us every second of every minute. They will never be
forgotten for giving their precious lives. They have sacrificed that
which is most valuable. We see them in the smile of every child, and in
every flower growing in this land. Let America, their families, and the
world be proud of their sacrifice for humanity and life.
Finally, no matter how much I write or speak about this brave Regiment,
I haven't the words to describe the courage of its officers and
soldiers. I pray to God to grant happiness and health to these legendary
heroes and their brave families.
NAJIM ABDULLAH ABID AL-JIBOURI
Mayor of Tall 'Afar, Ninewa, Iraq"
Sounds like he was sufficiently impressed by the massacre to toe the
line.
Terrorism clearly works.
Its a bit difficult to convince people to abandon terrorism when you
youself successfully employ the tactic.
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 02:36:54 AM |
|
|
wrote:
John Cawston wrote:
wrote:
John Cawston wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
So you don't think the operation was intended to send a message to
other Iraqi cities about what would happen to them if they resisted the
occupation?
Indeed. The message being that the Yanks and Iraq Govt. was responding
to their concerns to get rid of the terrorists, would give citizens time
to get out of the way, then kill the terrorists, provide massive support
to repair damages and leave an Iraq army support structure to protect them.
"U.S. forces bombed the power plant at the beginning of the assault;
for the next several weeks, Fallujah was a blacked-out town, with light
provided by generators only in critical places like mosques and
clinics. The town was placed under siege; the ban on bringing in food,
medicine, and other basic items was broken only when Iraqis en masse
challenged the roadblocks. The atmosphere was one of pervasive fear,
from bombing and the threat of more bombing. Noncombatants and families
with sick people, the elderly, and children were leaving in droves.
After initial instances in which people were prevented from leaving,
U.S. forces began allowing everyone to leave except for what they
called "military age males," men usually between 15 and 60. Keeping
noncombatants from leaving a place under bombardment is a violation of
the laws of war. Of course, if you assume that every military age male
is an enemy, there can be no better sign that you are in the wrong
country, and that, in fact, your war is on the people, not on their
oppressors,, not a war of liberation."
In case you missed it buried in the middle of the eyewitness account
"U.S. forces began allowing everyone to leave except for what they
called "military age males," men usually between 15 and 60."
And we now know they went from house to house killing every male they
found.
Fascinating. There have been no serious challenges to the US claim that
it killed 1200 insurgents in Fallujah and no serious claims of large
numbers of civilians killed. Yet you claim the soldiers went "house to
house killing every male they could find". Seeing as the number of
houses stated to be in Fallujah varies between 40 and 50,000, we should
expect 50,000 executions?
Of course that didn't occur. There are no credible reports that more
than 1200-2000 deaths of insurgents or civilians died. You were reduced
to an account from a German antiwar, antiglobalism site asking a couple
or disgruntled Sunnis about what they saw.. you got possibly several
civilian deaths which may be right and war crimes, but you didn't get
terrorism.
Please check again, the definitions for terrorism.
Terrorism.
As the Mayor of Tall Afar wrote, they forfilled that promise:
"In the Name of God the Compassionate and Merciful
To the Courageous Men and Women of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who
have changed the city of Tall' Afar from a ghost town, in which
terrorists spread death and destruction, to a secure city flourishing
with life.
To the lion-hearts who liberated our city from the grasp of terrorists
who were beheading men, women and children in the streets for many months.
To those who spread smiles on the faces of our children, and gave us
restored hope, through their personal sacrifice and brave fighting, and
gave new life to the city after hopelessness darkened our days, and
stole our confidence in our ability to reestablish our city.
Our city was the main base of operations for Abu Mousab Al Zarqawi. The
city was completely held hostage in the hands of his henchmen. Our
schools, governmental services, businesses and offices were closed. Our
streets were silent, and no one dared to walk them. Our people were
barricaded in their homes out of fear; death awaited them around every
corner. Terrorists occupied and controlled the only hospital in the
city. Their savagery reached such a level that they stuffed the corpses
of children with explosives and tossed them into the streets in order to
kill grieving parents attempting to retrieve the bodies of their young.
This was the situation of our city until God prepared and delivered unto
them the courageous soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who
liberated this city, ridding it of Zarqawi's followers after harsh
fighting, killing many terrorists, and forcing the remaining butchers to
flee the city like rats to the surrounding areas, where the bravery of
other 3d ACR soldiers in Sinjar, Rabiah, Zumar and Avgani finally
destroyed them.
I have met many soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment; they are
not only courageous men and women, but avenging angels sent by The God
Himself to fight the evil of terrorism.
The leaders of this Regiment; COL McMaster, COL Armstrong, LTC Hickey,
LTC Gibson, and LTC Reilly embody courage, strength, vision and wisdom.
Officers and soldiers alike bristle with the confidence and character of
knights in a bygone era. The mission they have accomplished, by means of
a unique military operation, stands among the finest military feats to
date in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and truly deserves to be studied in
military science. This military operation was clean, with little
collateral damage, despite the ferocity of the enemy. With the skill and
precision of surgeons they dealt with the terrorist cancers in the city
without causing unnecessary damage.
God bless this brave Regiment; God bless the families who dedicated
these brave men and women. From the bottom of our hearts we thank the
families. They have given us something we will never forget. To the
families of those who have given their holy blood for our land, we all
bow to you in reverence and to the souls of your loved ones. Their
sacrifice was not in vain. They are not dead, but alive, and their souls
hovering around us every second of every minute. They will never be
forgotten for giving their precious lives. They have sacrificed that
which is most valuable. We see them in the smile of every child, and in
every flower growing in this land. Let America, their families, and the
world be proud of their sacrifice for humanity and life.
Finally, no matter how much I write or speak about this brave Regiment,
I haven't the words to describe the courage of its officers and
soldiers. I pray to God to grant happiness and health to these legendary
heroes and their brave families.
NAJIM ABDULLAH ABID AL-JIBOURI
Mayor of Tall 'Afar, Ninewa, Iraq"
Sounds like he was sufficiently impressed by the massacre to toe the
line.
Terrorism clearly works.
Its a bit difficult to convince people to abandon terrorism when you
youself successfully employ the tactic.
Uhuh. You dont have a terrorist report to refute it, so you spin.
JC
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Moss" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 05:30:24 AM |
|
|
In article <dvlpii$vgv$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Of course that didn't occur. There are no credible reports that more
than 1200-2000 deaths of insurgents or civilians died. You were reduced
to an account from a German antiwar, antiglobalism site asking a couple
or disgruntled Sunnis about what they saw.. you got possibly several
civilian deaths which may be right and war crimes, but you didn't get
terrorism.
OK, since you only find American sources credible, here's one to think
about:
"We do a lot worse than what you saw on the video. In Fallujah when we
come to a apartment building, we shout for the people to come out. Most
times because a lack of translators we couldn=3Ft even say to come out in
Arabic, and these people don=3Ft know what an English =3Fcome out? sounds
like anymore than you reading this would know it if I said it in Arabic.
A lot of people are too afraid to come out. But after we would warn
them, we would go in. You know how? We would riddle the building and
every window with high-caliber, armor piercing machine gun fire, then
often we would throw in a grenade for good measure. If any civilians
were in there they ended up either dead or wounded. (And I can tell you
that over the duration of a week I myself saw at least a hundred bodies
in the burned out and attacked apartments, and I only saw a little
sliver of Fallujah) And what did we do with the wounded? I=3Fll tell you.
We did nothing. We just moved on to the next building. We were fighters
not medics, but there were no medics behind us. I believe the thinking
is that it is better for the wounded enemy to die so they can=3Ft fight us
anymore."
(http://www.davidduke.com/?p=177#more-177)
--
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 06:20:34 AM |
|
|
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvlpii$vgv$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Of course that didn't occur. There are no credible reports that more
than 1200-2000 deaths of insurgents or civilians died. You were reduced
to an account from a German antiwar, antiglobalism site asking a couple
or disgruntled Sunnis about what they saw.. you got possibly several
civilian deaths which may be right and war crimes, but you didn't get
terrorism.
OK, since you only find American sources credible, here's one to think
about:
"We do a lot worse than what you saw on the video. In Fallujah when we
come to a apartment building, we shout for the people to come out. Most
times because a lack of translators we couldn=3Ft even say to come out in
Arabic, and these people don=3Ft know what an English =3Fcome out? sounds
like anymore than you reading this would know it if I said it in Arabic.
A lot of people are too afraid to come out. But after we would warn
them, we would go in. You know how? We would riddle the building and
every window with high-caliber, armor piercing machine gun fire, then
often we would throw in a grenade for good measure. If any civilians
were in there they ended up either dead or wounded. (And I can tell you
that over the duration of a week I myself saw at least a hundred bodies
in the burned out and attacked apartments, and I only saw a little
sliver of Fallujah) And what did we do with the wounded? I=3Fll tell you.
We did nothing. We just moved on to the next building. We were fighters
not medics, but there were no medics behind us. I believe the thinking
is that it is better for the wounded enemy to die so they can=3Ft fight us
anymore."
(http://www.davidduke.com/?p=177#more-177)
And God help you. Here you are supporting the Grand Wizard of the Ku
Klux Klan, the admirer of Hitler and who wore Nazi rig and is an
advocate of White Supremacy, a jailed criminal and, of course, a world
class Jew Hater.
There's not a lot left to learn about you, is there.
JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Moss" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 07:16:23 AM |
|
|
In article <dvm6lt$o5r$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvlpii$vgv$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Of course that didn't occur. There are no credible reports that more
than 1200-2000 deaths of insurgents or civilians died. You were reduced
to an account from a German antiwar, antiglobalism site asking a couple
or disgruntled Sunnis about what they saw.. you got possibly several
civilian deaths which may be right and war crimes, but you didn't get
terrorism.
OK, since you only find American sources credible, here's one to think
about:
"We do a lot worse than what you saw on the video. In Fallujah when we
come to a apartment building, we shout for the people to come out. Most
times because a lack of translators we couldn=3Ft even say to come out in
Arabic, and these people don=3Ft know what an English =3Fcome out? sounds
like anymore than you reading this would know it if I said it in Arabic.
A lot of people are too afraid to come out. But after we would warn
them, we would go in. You know how? We would riddle the building and
every window with high-caliber, armor piercing machine gun fire, then
often we would throw in a grenade for good measure. If any civilians
were in there they ended up either dead or wounded. (And I can tell you
that over the duration of a week I myself saw at least a hundred bodies
in the burned out and attacked apartments, and I only saw a little
sliver of Fallujah) And what did we do with the wounded? I=3Fll tell you.
We did nothing. We just moved on to the next building. We were fighters
not medics, but there were no medics behind us. I believe the thinking
is that it is better for the wounded enemy to die so they can=3Ft fight us
anymore."
(http://www.davidduke.com/?p=177#more-177)
And God help you. Here you are supporting the Grand Wizard of the Ku
Klux Klan, the admirer of Hitler and who wore Nazi rig and is an
advocate of White Supremacy, a jailed criminal and, of course, a world
class Jew Hater.
Is that so?
How does that affect the truth of whats in the letter?
All I know is its an American site. I thought you might find it easier
to believe than Al Jazeera.
There's not a lot left to learn about you, is there.
You'd be amazed.
--
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Dooley" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 04:43:12 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:39:34 +1200, John Cawston
<> wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
So that's ok then.
--
Brian Dooley
Wellington New Zealand
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 05:45:28 AM |
|
|
Brian Dooley wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:39:34 +1200, John Cawston
< > wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <dvl16v$i5g$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, writes...
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Certainly a lot of the terrorism currently in the media is committed by
Muslims. But a lot of the terrorism that gets ignored by the media is
committed by Infidels.
"I saw in Falluja with own eyes a family that had been shot by U.S.
soldiers: The father was in his mid-fifties, his three children between
ten and twelve years old. In the refugee camp a teacher told me she had
been preparing a meal, when soldiers stormed their dwelling in Falluja.
Without preliminary warning they shot her father, her husband and her
brother. Then they went right out. From fear the woman remained in the
house with the dead bodies. In the evening other soldiers came, who took
her and her children and brought them out of the city. Those are only
two of many tragedies in Falluja."
(http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=423)
Is going from house to house killing all the males terrorism?
I think so.
No. Go look up the definition of terrorism.
Fallujah was war against a main Baathist and historic crime centre and
staging point for foreign al Qaeda fighters in which all citizens who
wished were allowed to move out to a prepared tent city before
operations commenced.
So that's ok then.
Yes. I found it quite quaint that the two adversaries accepted the
gesture, never mind that Zarqawi and co snuck out in the guise of women
etc before battle commenced. The insurgents mostly stayed in the city to
have a crack at the Yanks in the belief they couldn't handle hand to
hand... they were wrong and they died.
For some reason, the insurgents forgot about the Philippines Moros.
JC
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Dooley" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 04:18:33 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:41:08 +1200, John Cawston
<rewarewa@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <V2kTf.10498$dy4.6015@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
ecreipt@bigpond.net.au writes...
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism is that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as everything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or does not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a nation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.html
Hmm, so this classical leaderless organisation is somehow a nation too.
The author seems a little confused.
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
Certainly there are extremists within Islam, just as there are within
Christianity. Yet today it is trendy to condemn Muslims as a group
because of a few fanatics within their ranks, yet turn a blind eye
toward similar problems within Christianity.
Only a few years ago a close relative of mine decided not to visit her
father's grave. The reason for that decision was because her father was
buried in a certain section of the graveyard. Members of a religious
sectarian paramilitary kept a watch on that part of the graveyard and
anyone foolhardy enough to venture into it carrying flowers, or stopping
to pray near a grave, could expect snipers to fire on them.
Christian sectarian violence is openly celebrated in Northern Ireland.
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/murcask.html
but don't get the idea it is all one-sided:
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/smural2.jpg
Yet we don't seem to see the same level of condemnation of this from
many who focus on Muslim extremism.
I wonder whi (te) that may be?
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Wot! All of it?
--
Brian Dooley
Wellington New Zealand
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Cawston" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 05:30:30 AM |
|
|
Brian Dooley wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:41:08 +1200, John Cawston
<rewarewa@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <V2kTf.10498$dy4.6015@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
ecreipt@bigpond.net.au writes...
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism is that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as everything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or does not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a nation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.html
Hmm, so this classical leaderless organisation is somehow a nation too.
The author seems a little confused.
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
Certainly there are extremists within Islam, just as there are within
Christianity. Yet today it is trendy to condemn Muslims as a group
because of a few fanatics within their ranks, yet turn a blind eye
toward similar problems within Christianity.
Only a few years ago a close relative of mine decided not to visit her
father's grave. The reason for that decision was because her father was
buried in a certain section of the graveyard. Members of a religious
sectarian paramilitary kept a watch on that part of the graveyard and
anyone foolhardy enough to venture into it carrying flowers, or stopping
to pray near a grave, could expect snipers to fire on them.
Christian sectarian violence is openly celebrated in Northern Ireland.
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/murcask.html
but don't get the idea it is all one-sided:
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/smural2.jpg
Yet we don't seem to see the same level of condemnation of this from
many who focus on Muslim extremism.
I wonder whi (te) that may be?
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Wot! All of it?
Absolutely not. Western terrorism is much, much worse and vastly more
widespread. But Islam kills and injures vastly more people. But at
least these are only ordinary Muslims.. not human beings.
JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sue Bilstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 01:59:38 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:30:30 +1200, John Cawston <rewarewa@ihug.co.nz>
wrote:
Brian Dooley wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:41:08 +1200, John Cawston
<rewarewa@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Wot! All of it?
Absolutely not. Western terrorism is much, much worse and vastly more
widespread. But Islam kills and injures vastly more people. But at
least these are only ordinary Muslims.. not human beings.
Irony alert, Brian - here John is mocking the views of those who call
the Iraqi terrorists "freedom fighters".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Dooley" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 04:19:46 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:41:08 +1200, John Cawston
<rewarewa@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
David Moss wrote:
In article <V2kTf.10498$dy4.6015@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
ecreipt@bigpond.net.au writes...
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism is that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as everything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or does not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a nation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.html
Hmm, so this classical leaderless organisation is somehow a nation too.
The author seems a little confused.
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
Certainly there are extremists within Islam, just as there are within
Christianity. Yet today it is trendy to condemn Muslims as a group
because of a few fanatics within their ranks, yet turn a blind eye
toward similar problems within Christianity.
Only a few years ago a close relative of mine decided not to visit her
father's grave. The reason for that decision was because her father was
buried in a certain section of the graveyard. Members of a religious
sectarian paramilitary kept a watch on that part of the graveyard and
anyone foolhardy enough to venture into it carrying flowers, or stopping
to pray near a grave, could expect snipers to fire on them.
Christian sectarian violence is openly celebrated in Northern Ireland.
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/murcask.html
but don't get the idea it is all one-sided:
http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/smural2.jpg
Yet we don't seem to see the same level of condemnation of this from
many who focus on Muslim extremism.
I wonder whi (te) that may be?
Probably because the vast amount of terrorism is committed by Muslims.
Wot! All of it?
--
Brian Dooley
Wellington New Zealand
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Troy Cox" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 07:17:13 PM |
|
|
David Moss wrote:
[snip]
I wonder whi (te) that may be?
What exactly are you alluding to here, David?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Toad" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 07:57:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 01:10:47 GMT, David Moss
<q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote:
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
...
Interesting and "convenient" definition there -- lacking any mention
of the religious group's ACTUAL beliefs and actions as it does.
Under that definition one automatically becomes a "bigot" if one
despises the Aztecs for the ritual cannibalism that they practiced
on a near industrial scale, and for their innumerable human sacrifices
to their "gods".
If that's your definition of bigotry, feel free to accuse us of it.
Toad-Beneath-the-Harrow
-------------------------------------------
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest."
- Thomas Paine
-------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Moss" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 08:25:55 PM |
|
|
In article <6b2s125mi8ek3qfn0noeemte6ko96nba8b@4ax.com>,
the.toad@trashcanistan.ca writes...
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 01:10:47 GMT, David Moss
<q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote:
If you type "Define: religious bigotry" int Google you get the following
response:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
...
Interesting and "convenient" definition there -- lacking any mention
of the religious group's ACTUAL beliefs and actions as it does.
If you start to focus on specifics you lose the generality of the
definition. Religious bigotry is not confined to any specific religion
or practice.
Under that definition one automatically becomes a "bigot" if one
despises the Aztecs for the ritual cannibalism that they practiced
on a near industrial scale, and for their innumerable human sacrifices
to their "gods".
Perhaps someone who despises ritual cannibalism but treats all Aztecs as
individuals is not a bigot.
If that's your definition of bigotry, feel free to accuse us of it.
Thank you for your gracious dispensation, but I would have anyway.
--
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Toad" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 09:30:34 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:25:55 GMT, David Moss
<q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
...
Interesting and "convenient" definition there -- lacking any mention
of the religious group's ACTUAL beliefs and actions as it does.
If you start to focus on specifics you lose the generality of the
definition. Religious bigotry is not confined to any specific religion
or practice.
...
No, no, no! It's the truth or falsity of the accusations against
the group that determines what is bigotry and what is not.
Those who do evil or advocate evil SHOULD be despised -- and
that's not bigotry.
Those who don't do evil and don't advocate evil SHOULD NOT
be despised. To do so, WOULD be bigotry.
Toad-Beneath-the-Harrow
-------------------------------------------------------
DEATH OF A POET
"We carried Ka'b's head and brought it to Muhammad
during the night. We saluted him as he stood praying
and told him that we had slain Allah's enemy. When he
came out to us we cast [Ka'b] Ashraf's head before his
feet. The Prophet praised Allah that the poet had been
assassinated and complimented us for the good work we
had done in Allah's Cause. ... and there was no Jew in
Medina who did not fear for his life."
Tabari VII:97 quoted on page 378 of Craig Winn's
"Prophet of Doom: Islam's Terrorist Dogma In
Muhammad's Own Words"
-------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 09:58:58 PM |
|
|
The Toad wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:25:55 GMT, David Moss
<q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
...
Interesting and "convenient" definition there -- lacking any mention
of the religious group's ACTUAL beliefs and actions as it does.
If you start to focus on specifics you lose the generality of the
definition. Religious bigotry is not confined to any specific religion
or practice.
...
No, no, no! It's the truth or falsity of the accusations against
the group that determines what is bigotry and what is not.
Those who do evil or advocate evil SHOULD be despised -- and
that's not bigotry.
Those who don't do evil and don't advocate evil SHOULD NOT
be despised. To do so, WOULD be bigotry.
Toad-Beneath-the-Harrow
-------------------------------------------------------
DEATH OF A POET
"We carried Ka'b's head and brought it to Muhammad
during the night. We saluted him as he stood praying
and told him that we had slain Allah's enemy. When he
came out to us we cast [Ka'b] Ashraf's head before his
feet. The Prophet praised Allah that the poet had been
assassinated and complimented us for the good work we
had done in Allah's Cause. ... and there was no Jew in
Medina who did not fear for his life."
Tabari VII:97 quoted on page 378 of Craig Winn's
"Prophet of Doom: Islam's Terrorist Dogma In
Muhammad's Own Words"
-------------------------------------------------------
I see. I guess that means you will now start condemning Christans and
Jews over:
"4 And the LORD said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and
hang them up before the LORD against the sun, that the fierce anger of
the LORD may be turned away from Israel.
5 And Moses said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men
that were joined unto Baalpeor. "
(From Numbers 25, The Bible, King James Version)
After all, if being happy about beheadings is to be condemned, all
three of these religions stand condemned together. hich is appropriate
I suppose because they all prefess to have the same God.
DM
Personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "Troy Cox" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 10:29:56 PM |
|
|
wrote:
The Toad wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:25:55 GMT, David Moss
<q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
...
Interesting and "convenient" definition there -- lacking any mention
of the religious group's ACTUAL beliefs and actions as it does.
If you start to focus on specifics you lose the generality of the
definition. Religious bigotry is not confined to any specific religion
or practice.
...
No, no, no! It's the truth or falsity of the accusations against
the group that determines what is bigotry and what is not.
Those who do evil or advocate evil SHOULD be despised -- and
that's not bigotry.
Those who don't do evil and don't advocate evil SHOULD NOT
be despised. To do so, WOULD be bigotry.
Toad-Beneath-the-Harrow
-------------------------------------------------------
DEATH OF A POET
"We carried Ka'b's head and brought it to Muhammad
during the night. We saluted him as he stood praying
and told him that we had slain Allah's enemy. When he
came out to us we cast [Ka'b] Ashraf's head before his
feet. The Prophet praised Allah that the poet had been
assassinated and complimented us for the good work we
had done in Allah's Cause. ... and there was no Jew in
Medina who did not fear for his life."
Tabari VII:97 quoted on page 378 of Craig Winn's
"Prophet of Doom: Islam's Terrorist Dogma In
Muhammad's Own Words"
-------------------------------------------------------
I see. I guess that means you will now start condemning Christans and
Jews over:
"4 And the LORD said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and
hang them up before the LORD against the sun, that the fierce anger of
the LORD may be turned away from Israel.
5 And Moses said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men
that were joined unto Baalpeor. "
(From Numbers 25, The Bible, King James Version)
After all, if being happy about beheadings is to be condemned, all
three of these religions stand condemned together. hich is appropriate
I suppose because they all prefess to have the same God.
DM
Personal opinion only
This is missing the bigger picture here: why, in 2006, are Muslims as a
group, the only group in a religious sense, struggling with modernity,
in a way that Christians, Jews and others aren't? Why is democracy so
rare in the Muslim world? Why is a free press so rare? Why is it so
that these enlightened modern institutions -- so commonplace in the
Christian/Jewish world -- seemingly cannot flower in the Muslim world?
We need to ask these questions without reflexive accusations of racism
or bigotry.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 11:13:11 PM |
|
|
Troy Cox wrote:
d-m...@adfa.edu.au wrote:
The Toad wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:25:55 GMT, David Moss
<q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote:
"Religious bigotry is prejudice or discrimination against one or all
members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of
their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes."
...
Interesting and "convenient" definition there -- lacking any mention
of the religious group's ACTUAL beliefs and actions as it does.
If you start to focus on specifics you lose the generality of the
definition. Religious bigotry is not confined to any specific religion
or practice.
...
No, no, no! It's the truth or falsity of the accusations against
the group that determines what is bigotry and what is not.
Those who do evil or advocate evil SHOULD be despised -- and
that's not bigotry.
Those who don't do evil and don't advocate evil SHOULD NOT
be despised. To do so, WOULD be bigotry.
Toad-Beneath-the-Harrow
-------------------------------------------------------
DEATH OF A POET
"We carried Ka'b's head and brought it to Muhammad
during the night. We saluted him as he stood praying
and told him that we had slain Allah's enemy. When he
came out to us we cast [Ka'b] Ashraf's head before his
feet. The Prophet praised Allah that the poet had been
assassinated and complimented us for the good work we
had done in Allah's Cause. ... and there was no Jew in
Medina who did not fear for his life."
Tabari VII:97 quoted on page 378 of Craig Winn's
"Prophet of Doom: Islam's Terrorist Dogma In
Muhammad's Own Words"
-------------------------------------------------------
I see. I guess that means you will now start condemning Christans and
Jews over:
"4 And the LORD said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and
hang them up before the LORD against the sun, that the fierce anger of
the LORD may be turned away from Israel.
5 And Moses said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men
that were joined unto Baalpeor. "
(From Numbers 25, The Bible, King James Version)
After all, if being happy about beheadings is to be condemned, all
three of these religions stand condemned together. hich is appropriate
I suppose because they all prefess to have the same God.
DM
Personal opinion only
This is missing the bigger picture here: why, in 2006, are Muslims as a
group, the only group in a religious sense, struggling with modernity,
in a way that Christians, Jews and others aren't?
Do you really think Christians and Jews are not struggling with the
concept of democracy? For instance, Australia attacked Iraq despite the
fact 70% of the population vehemently opposed the attack.
If you are looking for a reason why the Middle East has difficulty
moving toward democracy perhaps an examination of foreign interference
from "democratic" countries would be helpful.
We have just seen the secular democracy of Iraq destroyed by invasion.
Previously we say a secular democracy in Iran toppled, helped by US
interference. The elected government was replaced by the Shah of Iran,
who was later toppled by a popular uprising that installed an Islamic
theocracy.
Why is democracy so
rare in the Muslim world? Why is a free press so rare?
Free press is rare throughout the world. Do you really thing the press
we see in Australia and in the USA is "free"? If so, why do we have to
rely on the Internet to see coverage of US atrocities in Iraq?
Why is it so
that these enlightened modern institutions -- so commonplace in the
Christian/Jewish world -- seemingly cannot flower in the Muslim world?
We need to ask these questions without reflexive accusations of racism
or bigotry.
Perhaps we should also consider why we thing democracy is good while
theocracy, monarchy and despotism are bad?
On the ABC late last night a guest summed it up nicely by saying:
"In Australia we elect a Prime Minister to be our dictator for 3 years"
This is true. Between elections we have little or no control over what
our elected leaders do. Even at election time we have little say in who
our elected leaders will be. The people contesting the election are
preselected by political parties. But members of those political
parties have little say over who is preselected, tht is determined by
an even smaller club of elites on the preselection panel. Yet we call
this a democratic system, declare it to be good and therefore all other
systems to be bad.
DM
personal opinion only
.
|
|
|
| User: "Troy Cox" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
20 Mar 2006 04:25:55 PM |
|
|
wrote:
[snip]
Do you really think Christians and Jews are not struggling with the
concept of democracy? For instance, Australia attacked Iraq despite the
fact 70% of the population vehemently opposed the attack.
Democracy doesn't mean referenda are conducted on every single policy
decision. It means we choose the party that governs us for an agreed
term. We appoint our decision makers based on our assessment of their
policies. That doesn't mean we'll necessarily agree with every decision
they take (even though I did, and still do agree with the Iraq War; I
don't agree, for example, with the decision to exempt food from GST).
If you are suggesting that the citizenry should be required to tick a
box on every single policy choice, let me suggest that it would not be
achievable time-wise or cost-wise.
If you are looking for a reason why the Middle East has difficulty
moving toward democracy perhaps an examination of foreign interference
from "democratic" countries would be helpful.
We have just seen the secular democracy of Iraq destroyed by invasion.
Rubbish. There was no "democracy" in Iraq during the Hussein years. He
was a brutal dictator who did whatever was necessary to hang on to
power.
Previously we say a secular democracy in Iran toppled, helped by US
interference. The elected government was replaced by the Shah of Iran,
who was later toppled by a popular uprising that installed an Islamic
theocracy.
There is more truth in that but can you say the same for Libya, Egypt,
Syria, Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia -- the list goes on. Surely
"foreign interference" is the exception not the rule.
[snip]
Free press is rare throughout the world. Do you really thing the press
we see in Australia and in the USA is "free"? If so, why do we have to
rely on the Internet to see coverage of US atrocities in Iraq?
You didn't need to go to the Internet to see pictures of "US
atrocities". Many pictures of the atrocities in Abu Grahib (sp?) were
published in Australian newspapers such as The Age. If you are
asserting that the press here is not free, please give the name or
names of the individuals or organizations who are censoring the
nation's editors from publishing what they want to publish.
[snip]
Perhaps we should also consider why we thing democracy is good while
theocracy, monarchy and despotism are bad?
We don't need to ask that -- the millions of exiles who flee
totalitarian regimes, coming to Western countries to start new lives,
have already voted with their feet. Note that when people going looking
for a better life, they transit from dicatorships to democracies and
not vice versa. And don't reply by conceding this and then telling me
my argument is rendered invalid because we lock them up in detention
centres.
On the ABC late last night a guest summed it up nicely by saying:
"In Australia we elect a Prime Minister to be our dictator for 3 years"
So, when Barnaby Joyce crosses the floor -- as he did on two occasions
-- scuttling bits of Howard's legislative agenda, why didn't he end up
in jail? Or why wasn't he forced into exile? Why aren't malcontents
like you being rounded up for criticising the "dictator"?
This is true. Between elections we have little or no control over what
our elected leaders do. Even at election time we have little say in who
our elected leaders will be. The people contesting the election are
preselected by political parties.
Except that we are free to form our own political parties. You and I
can run for Parliament. Who is stopping us?
But members of those political
parties have little say over who is preselected, tht is determined by
an even smaller club of elites on the preselection panel. Yet we call
this a democratic system, declare it to be good and therefore all other
systems to be bad.
We don't need to declare other systems to be bad. The Muslim immigrants
who have decided to make this wide, brown, sunburnt land their home
didn't come here for no reason at all. The one million people -- yes,
one *million* -- who move to the USA every year don't go there to kill
time. It's an acknowledgment that the Western system works better and
fosters happier lives. There are reasons behind such decisions. Maybe
you should talk to some immigrants some day and ask them why they came
here?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Laudahn" |
|
| Title: Re: Dr. Wafa Sultan...bless her |
19 Mar 2006 03:56:15 PM |
|
|
Stan Pierce schrieb:
This is why war is inevitable with them. There can be no compromise.
Compromise is Dhimmitude.
"What is so dangerous about this sort of Islamic intellectual terrorism i=
s that
it's not only carried out against Muslims who criticize Islam from within=
, but
also against every human being on earth who dares to talk about Islam. A =
person
who criticizes Islam can no longer feel secure no matter where they live.
Ironically, there are no known boundaries to what offends Muslims as ever=
ything
can agitate them! It is not easy for a westerner to know what does or doe=
s not
satisfy them! There is no one governing Islamic entity that can be spoken=
to,
not even two or three! Every bearded person is an authority! They are a n=
ation
that consists mostly of illiterates vulgar and demagogues where one idiot=
can
mobilize millions of them by using a few emotional words".
http://www.annaqed.com/english/attack/a_call_to_the_worlds_intellectuals.=
html
Agreed. I allowed myself to spread your message to (always language
area meant, not nation) scandinavians, germans, dutch and french.
--
=2E)
Unter blinden ist der ein=E4ugige k=F6nig.
http://worldimprover.net/
islam-info: http://www.historyofjihad.org/ - WICHTIG / IMPORTANT
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|