| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Paul J. Berg" |
| Date: |
19 Jan 2007 10:55:14 AM |
| Object: |
Drug Testing for Legislators |
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
Krieger's not messing around. Refusing to take the test would be
regarded as an admission that the official has taken a controlled
substance illegally, under House Bill 2306. Anyone who fails the test
would be given the choice of getting treatment or seeing the results
made public.
Krieger says he decided to go forward with his proposal after listening
to fellow legislators' pious talk about winching down on ethics rules
and banning gifts from lobbyists. What's worse, he asks, accepting an
$11 plaque from an interest group or passing laws while schwacked?
"It seems to me," Krieger says, "that state officials should be more
than willing to stand up and say, 'When I'm doing the people's business,
I'm doing it with a clear mind and not under the influence of any drug.'
"
A former state police trooper, Krieger says he doesn't have any insider
information about politicians toking in the restrooms or snorting in
their offices. He says it's more about accountability and fairness.
Thousands of workers in Oregon must submit to drug tests to get hired or
keep their jobs.
Furthermore, he spent quite a bit of time during the last session
working on a set of anti-meth bills. He learned enough about the drug to
know that people you would never suspect can get caught in its addictive
spiral.
"To imply that we're above it all is ridiculous," Krieger says.
In past decades, alcoholism was a big problem among legislators, he
says. More recently -- and more to the point -- former Rep. Kelley
Wirth, D-Corvallis, had to resign in 2005 after she was arrested for
having a small amount of methamphetamine in her car.
Wirth eventually pleaded guilty to drug possession. Krieger says that's
not why he offered his bill but says a willingness by elected officials
to undergo drug testing could help boost their sagging credibility in
the eyes of the public.
So, given all that, what are the chances of the bill going anywhere?
Somewhere between zero and absolute zero.
The bill has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. Rep. Greg
Macpherson, D-Lake Oswego, takes a dim view of it. The Legislature is
aiming for an end-of-June adjournment and needs to use its time
"pragmatically," he says.
"If there's some evidence that the chief justice or the state treasurer
is taking a controlled substance, then we can look at whether this is a
good solution,"
Macpherson said. "We should focus our time on real issues, not invented
or imagined ones."
Reaction among those to whom the bill would apply was muted. Gov. Ted
Kulongoski's spokeswoman said the governor would be "interested to hear
the floor debate" on the bill. Secretary of State Bill Bradbury said
through a spokeswoman that he has no opinion on the bill but would
comply if it became law.
"I'm OK with being tested," said Susan Castillo, state schools
superintendent. "My question would be, why?"
------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
19 Jan 2007 07:34:35 PM |
|
|
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
Krieger's not messing around. Refusing to take the test would be
regarded as an admission that the official has taken a controlled
substance illegally, under House Bill 2306. Anyone who fails the test
would be given the choice of getting treatment or seeing the results
made public.
I might just refuse to take the test and deny smoking any weed.
Who cares what a bill says is an "admission"? An "admission" is when you
admit something, not when you sack up and refuse an onerous and intrusive
order.
Curt
.
|
|
|
| User: "Skip Elliott Bowman" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
22 Jan 2007 11:00:37 AM |
|
|
"Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote in message
news:12r2rvom3510e18@corp.supernews.com...
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
Krieger's not messing around. Refusing to take the test would be
regarded as an admission that the official has taken a controlled
substance illegally, under House Bill 2306. Anyone who fails the test
would be given the choice of getting treatment or seeing the results
made public.
I might just refuse to take the test and deny smoking any weed.
Who cares what a bill says is an "admission"? An "admission" is when you
admit something, not when you sack up and refuse an onerous and intrusive
order.
Curt
If my memory serves me correctly, refusing a Breathalyzer test means an
automatic 90-day suspension of your driving privileges. The state calls
that refusal an admission.
As long as we're on the subject, I wonder how much support that bill would
get if they included alcohol testing. Hey, he did say "any drug" and sippin'
whiskey is a controlled substance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
22 Jan 2007 07:49:24 PM |
|
|
"Skip Elliott Bowman" <skipster@teleport.com> wrote in message
news:V46th.17268$X72.15524@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote in message
news:12r2rvom3510e18@corp.supernews.com...
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
Krieger's not messing around. Refusing to take the test would be
regarded as an admission that the official has taken a controlled
substance illegally, under House Bill 2306. Anyone who fails the test
would be given the choice of getting treatment or seeing the results
made public.
I might just refuse to take the test and deny smoking any weed.
Who cares what a bill says is an "admission"? An "admission" is when you
admit something, not when you sack up and refuse an onerous and
intrusive
order.
Curt
If my memory serves me correctly, refusing a Breathalyzer test means an
automatic 90-day suspension of your driving privileges. The state calls
that refusal an admission.
Yeah, but I don't see a 90day suspension of an Elected Leader's voting
responsibilities. For pot smoking or whatever. That way lieth all sorts of
weird government.
Curt
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Scratch" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
20 Jan 2007 08:54:16 AM |
|
|
Curt wrote:
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
Krieger's not messing around. Refusing to take the test would be
regarded as an admission that the official has taken a controlled
substance illegally, under House Bill 2306. Anyone who fails the test
would be given the choice of getting treatment or seeing the results
made public.
I might just refuse to take the test and deny smoking any weed.
Start today curt, why wait?
LOL :)
--
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a
nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
http://www.highvolumemedia.com/thebullhorn/WarOnTerror/ClintonsFailures/
\"POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE
CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON\"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ermine Todd III" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
20 Jan 2007 12:03:15 PM |
|
|
"Larry (Scratch)" <Scratch@Tigard.OR.com> wrote in message
news:vLednVQZZMGHsC_YnZ2dnUVZ_tvinZ2d@comcast.com...
Curt wrote:
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
Krieger's not messing around. Refusing to take the test would be
regarded as an admission that the official has taken a controlled
substance illegally, under House Bill 2306. Anyone who fails the test
would be given the choice of getting treatment or seeing the results
made public.
I might just refuse to take the test and deny smoking any weed.
Start today curt, why wait?
LOL :)
So how much are you smoking "Scratch"?
--
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a
nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan: an adulterous, hypocritical, lying,
treasonous enemy of democracy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
19 Jan 2007 02:12:42 PM |
|
|
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
I love that idea!!! Take it National.
One problem. Will the testing also detect if Democrats have been smoking
*****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
19 Jan 2007 07:32:36 PM |
|
|
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_C9sh.171$M11.120@trnddc07...
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
I love that idea!!! Take it National.
One problem. Will the testing also detect if Democrats have been smoking
*****?
Wonder if Foley would have voted for that kind of testing?
Curt
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
22 Jan 2007 10:57:11 AM |
|
|
"Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote in message
news:12r2rvo1uflrn17@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_C9sh.171$M11.120@trnddc07...
"Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:8100-45B0F7F2-81@storefull-3238.bay.webtv.net...
From The (Portland) Oregonian - Friday, January 19, 2007
The question comes up every two years when the Oregon Legislature gets
down to business: "What are those people smokin'?"
Rhetorical? Maybe not. At least one lawmaker wants an answer. And not
just about his House and Senate colleagues.
Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, has introduced a bill that would
require twice-yearly drug testing for all legislators as well as the
governor, state treasurer, secretary of state and all other statewide
elected officials -- even the chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
I love that idea!!! Take it National.
One problem. Will the testing also detect if Democrats have been smoking
*****?
Wonder if Foley would have voted for that kind of testing?
Of course he would have! He was the Undercover ***** Lover!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
19 Jan 2007 03:02:50 PM |
|
|
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_C9sh.171$M11.120@trnddc07...
I love that idea!!! Take it National.
One problem. Will the testing also detect if Democrats have been smoking
*****?
You need to sharpen your crayon.
1) There's no prohibition against homosexuality in Washington.
2) Shouldn't they be testing Republicans, ie Foley?
-c
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
19 Jan 2007 05:12:03 PM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12r2cg61f1kuseb@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_C9sh.171$M11.120@trnddc07...
I love that idea!!! Take it National.
One problem. Will the testing also detect if Democrats have been smoking
*****?
You need to sharpen your crayon.
1) There's no prohibition against homosexuality in Washington.
As voters we should know who the fags and lesbians are.
2) Shouldn't they be testing Republicans, ie Foley?
Test 'em all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
19 Jan 2007 07:50:20 PM |
|
|
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7fcsh.347$U81.182@trnddc06...
You need to sharpen your crayon.
1) There's no prohibition against homosexuality in Washington.
As voters we should know who the fags and lesbians are.
Not really. See, the Taliban doesn't rule here. You should take that Al
Queda ***** to Afghanistan so you can be disposed up like a good little
jihadist.
2) Shouldn't they be testing Republicans, ie Foley?
Test 'em all.
You didn't say test 'em all. You said test the Democrats. Are you hoping
we'd forget?
-c
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
22 Jan 2007 10:54:19 AM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12r2tb89h7q1fd0@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7fcsh.347$U81.182@trnddc06...
You need to sharpen your crayon.
1) There's no prohibition against homosexuality in Washington.
As voters we should know who the fags and lesbians are.
Not really. See, the Taliban doesn't rule here. You should take that Al
Queda ***** to Afghanistan so you can be disposed up like a good little
jihadist.
Yep, we should know who the fags and lesbians are.
2) Shouldn't they be testing Republicans, ie Foley?
Test 'em all.
You didn't say test 'em all. You said test the Democrats. Are you hoping
we'd forget?
I was just hoping you'd stop sucking ***** long enough to read.
I said: "I love that idea!!! Take it National. One problem. Will the
testing also detect if Democrats have been smoking *****?"
And this is proof of why we need to know of our legislators are fags, like
you, because they get themselves so *****-crazed they can't even read. We
don't need fags as legislators.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Baxter" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
22 Jan 2007 02:03:32 PM |
|
|
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%_5th.200$dN2.49@trnddc07...
And this is proof of why we need to know of our legislators are fags, like
you, because they get themselves so *****-crazed they can't even read. We
don't need fags as legislators.
Why? So that you can make money off it? That's the usual Bluenose
motivation - make something illegal so you can extort both the suppliers and
the users.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
23 Jan 2007 01:39:49 PM |
|
|
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rar9ob30t3c14@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%_5th.200$dN2.49@trnddc07...
And this is proof of why we need to know of our legislators are fags,
like
you, because they get themselves so *****-crazed they can't even read. We
don't need fags as legislators.
Why? So that you can make money off it? That's the usual Bluenose
motivation - make something illegal so you can extort both the suppliers
and
the users.
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of way
trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
I mean, I don't need any advertising. I don't need any product development.
Don't need training or user manuals. Don't need customer service. I don't
need warehousing or distribution. Don't need packaging. I don't need to be
concerned with sales tax.
Yep, you're onto something here.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
23 Jan 2007 01:54:52 PM |
|
|
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of way
trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
You're gonna need a lawyer.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
It's not all surprising to note that you consider pimps "brilliant." But
you're still gonna need a lawyer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 09:49:03 AM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rcq0i78s6itf5@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of
way trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
You're gonna need a lawyer.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
It's not all surprising to note that you consider pimps "brilliant." But
you're still gonna need a lawyer.
My lawyer IS a pimp!
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 03:26:15 PM |
|
|
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:PdLth.2594$R65.20@trnddc01...
My lawyer IS a pimp!
*****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 04:36:30 PM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rfjnv1d5qg37e@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:PdLth.2594$R65.20@trnddc01...
My lawyer IS a pimp!
*****.
Fertheluvagawd, Chris. Killfile him already! AAAAARRRGH!
Patriot, go back to your Jeff Stryker collection and leave us alone.
Curt
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 05:08:08 PM |
|
|
"Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote in message
news:12rfn4dj6eemad5@corp.supernews.com...
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rfjnv1d5qg37e@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:PdLth.2594$R65.20@trnddc01...
My lawyer IS a pimp!
*****.
Fertheluvagawd, Chris. Killfile him already! AAAAARRRGH!
Patriot, go back to your Jeff Stryker collection and leave us alone.
Curt, please tell everyone who Jeff Stryker is and how you are so familiar
with him?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
26 Jan 2007 05:36:50 PM |
|
|
"Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote in message
news:12rfn4dj6eemad5@corp.supernews.com...
My lawyer IS a pimp!
*****.
Fertheluvagawd, Chris. Killfile him already! AAAAARRRGH!
I'm having too much fun.
It's kinda like shooting trap. The trajectory is predictable and pigeons
taste like *****, but they're fun to shoot anyway.
-c
okay, okay...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lobby Dosser" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
26 Jan 2007 07:09:42 PM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote:
"Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote in message
news:12rfn4dj6eemad5@corp.supernews.com...
My lawyer IS a pimp!
*****.
Fertheluvagawd, Chris. Killfile him already! AAAAARRRGH!
I'm having too much fun.
It's kinda like shooting trap. The trajectory is predictable and
pigeons taste like *****, but they're fun to shoot anyway.
-c
okay, okay...
Yer not supposed to Eat the clay targets!!! And if yer dog is bringing them
back it's as crazy as you!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Baxter" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 10:08:24 AM |
|
|
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:PdLth.2594$R65.20@trnddc01...
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rcq0i78s6itf5@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of
way trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
You're gonna need a lawyer.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
It's not all surprising to note that you consider pimps "brilliant."
But
you're still gonna need a lawyer.
My lawyer IS a pimp!
That's because you're a *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Scratch" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 10:49:09 PM |
|
|
Patriot Games wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rcq0i78s6itf5@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of
way trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
You're gonna need a lawyer.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
It's not all surprising to note that you consider pimps "brilliant." But
you're still gonna need a lawyer.
My lawyer IS a pimp!
Nifong??
--
"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a
nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
http://www.highvolumemedia.com/thebullhorn/WarOnTerror/ClintonsFailures/
\"POLITICIANS & DIAPERS NEED TO BE
CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON\"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Shatzer" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 12:42:40 PM |
|
|
Patriot Games wrote:
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rcq0i78s6itf5@corp.supernews.com...
triot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of
way trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
You're gonna need a lawyer.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
It's not all surprising to note that you consider pimps "brilliant." But
you're still gonna need a lawyer.
My lawyer IS a pimp!
Then I'd suggest you consider switching attorneys.
Peace and justice,
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 01:54:17 PM |
|
|
"Bill Shatzer" <bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XKKdnXzDFpc9NSrYnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@comcast.com...
My lawyer IS a pimp!
Then I'd suggest you consider switching attorneys.
Peace and justice,
That's what I'm talking about. I should switch to an actual pimp then I
could a PIECE and some justice!
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 02:28:55 PM |
|
|
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JPOth.2640$R65.193@trnddc01...
That's what I'm talking about. I should switch to an actual pimp then I
could a PIECE and some justice!
That speaks volumes about your morality, freak.
-c
Starting to smell like troll in here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 03:58:46 PM |
|
|
"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:12rfgcfa1fsoc0f@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JPOth.2640$R65.193@trnddc01...
That's what I'm talking about. I should switch to an actual pimp then I
could a PIECE and some justice!
That speaks volumes about your morality, freak.
Starting to smell like troll in here.
It might be your deoderant?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Baxter" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
23 Jan 2007 02:06:32 PM |
|
|
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rar9ob30t3c14@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%_5th.200$dN2.49@trnddc07...
And this is proof of why we need to know of our legislators are fags,
like
you, because they get themselves so *****-crazed they can't even read.
We
don't need fags as legislators.
Why? So that you can make money off it? That's the usual Bluenose
motivation - make something illegal so you can extort both the suppliers
and
the users.
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of way
trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
I mean, I don't need any advertising. I don't need any product
development.
Don't need training or user manuals. Don't need customer service. I
don't
need warehousing or distribution. Don't need packaging. I don't need to
be
concerned with sales tax.
Yep, you're onto something here.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
Nope. Your idea only *looks* "brilliant" because you're retarded.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patriot Games" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 09:51:15 AM |
|
|
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rcqooqgoj8o8a@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rar9ob30t3c14@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%_5th.200$dN2.49@trnddc07...
And this is proof of why we need to know of our legislators are fags,
like
you, because they get themselves so *****-crazed they can't even read.
We
don't need fags as legislators.
Why? So that you can make money off it? That's the usual Bluenose
motivation - make something illegal so you can extort both the
suppliers
and
the users.
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of
way
trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
I mean, I don't need any advertising. I don't need any product
development.
Don't need training or user manuals. Don't need customer service. I
don't
need warehousing or distribution. Don't need packaging. I don't need to
be
concerned with sales tax.
Yep, you're onto something here.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
Nope. Your idea only *looks* "brilliant" because you're retarded.
Baxter: Sucking cocks like they were nutritious when America needs help.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Baxter" |
|
| Title: Re: Drug Testing for Legislators |
24 Jan 2007 10:08:50 AM |
|
|
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:TfLth.2595$R65.92@trnddc01...
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rcqooqgoj8o8a@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9wtth.5046$QE6.2565@trnddc02...
"Baxter" <lbax02.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:12rar9ob30t3c14@corp.supernews.com...
"Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%_5th.200$dN2.49@trnddc07...
And this is proof of why we need to know of our legislators are
fags,
like
you, because they get themselves so *****-crazed they can't even
read.
We
don't need fags as legislators.
Why? So that you can make money off it? That's the usual Bluenose
motivation - make something illegal so you can extort both the
suppliers
and
the users.
I'm sitting here both perplexed and challenged in a motivating kind of
way
trying to figure out how I can make money extorting fags!!
It is a brilliant idea.....
I mean, I don't need any advertising. I don't need any product
development.
Don't need training or user manuals. Don't need customer service. I
don't
need warehousing or distribution. Don't need packaging. I don't need
to
be
concerned with sales tax.
Yep, you're onto something here.
Oh wait! Somebody already figured it out - its called PIMPING.
Nope. Your idea only *looks* "brilliant" because you're retarded.
Baxter: Sucking cocks like they were nutritious when America needs help.
And a boring ***** at that.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
