Which group pushes for legalizing Marijuana....Liberals.
Which group fights restrictions on alcohol...liberals.
Which group fights for drugging kids in school...liberals.
Liberals are drugging up their own members so they won't realize how
moronic their position is, and, then, they claim the GOP is sheep for
bucking the liberal trend. I think I know how to fix America. Let's
import more coffee and hold some drug interventions.
http://beingone.20m.com/providence.html
.
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
20 Apr 2004 11:26:59 AM |
|
|
"K C" <writingken@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e88a6c8b.0404200632.7a884d3d@posting.google.com...
Which group pushes for legalizing Marijuana....Liberals.
What's wrong with decriminalizing pot?
Which group fights restrictions on alcohol...liberals.
Gopt a citation?
Didn't think so.
Which group fights for drugging kids in school...liberals.
What the ***** are you talking about? Are there teachers who are giving kids
pot and alcohol?
Do you know what you talking about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robyn Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
20 Apr 2004 04:03:40 PM |
|
|
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nbchc.3477$gH6.3336@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"K C" <writingken@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e88a6c8b.0404200632.7a884d3d@posting.google.com...
Which group pushes for legalizing Marijuana....Liberals.
What's wrong with decriminalizing pot?
Which group fights restrictions on alcohol...liberals.
Gopt a citation?
Didn't think so.
Which group fights for drugging kids in school...liberals.
What the ***** are you talking about? Are there teachers who are giving
kids
pot and alcohol?
Do you know what you talking about?
If she did, it would be a first!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
20 Apr 2004 02:57:36 PM |
|
|
(K C) wrote:
Which group pushes for legalizing Marijuana....Liberals.
Which group fights restrictions on alcohol...liberals.
Which group fights for drugging kids in school...liberals.
You have a strange idea of what "liberals" are.
The people who drug kids in school fall into one category: parents.
No kid can take any drugs at school unless the parent buys a
prescription and the parent signs a form giving permission and the
parent brings the medicine to school.
Liberals are drugging up their own members so they won't realize how
moronic their position is, and, then, they claim the GOP is sheep for
bucking the liberal trend.
I don't see any trends except for mindless (you qualify) right-wing
ditto-heads posting more and more unsupported nonsense on the
education forums of Usenet.
Someday you'll learn what a cite is.
I think I know how to fix America. Let's import more coffee
Caffeine is a drug. Are you supporting drugging kids at school? You
must be a "liberal".
and hold some drug interventions.
Yep. You want to intervene in the schools using a drug. I guess that
is "drug intervention".
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
21 Apr 2004 08:49:33 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
writingken@yahoo.com (K C) wrote:
Which group pushes for legalizing Marijuana....Liberals.
Which group fights restrictions on alcohol...liberals.
Which group fights for drugging kids in school...liberals.
You have a strange idea of what "liberals" are.
Translation: "anyone who disagrees with me has 'strange ideas'."
The people who drug kids in school fall into one category: parents.
No kid can take any drugs at school unless the parent buys a
prescription and the parent signs a form giving permission and the
parent brings the medicine to school.
The question was... "Which group fights for drugging kids in school".
You will not find "liberals" being pro-home schooling since they can't
force them to take drugs at home.
Liberals are drugging up their own members so they won't realize how
moronic their position is, and, then, they claim the GOP is sheep for
bucking the liberal trend.
I don't see any trends except for mindless (you qualify) right-wing
ditto-heads posting more and more unsupported nonsense on the
education forums of Usenet.
Translation: "anyone who disagrees with me is 'mindless'."
Someday you'll learn what a cite is.
I think I know how to fix America. Let's import more coffee
Caffeine is a drug. Are you supporting drugging kids at school? You
must be a "liberal".
Lies are a drug and liberals are addicted to them.
Jd
"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness
for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and
sweet for bitter! Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the
flame consumeth the chaff, so their root shall be as rottenness, and
their blossom shall go up as dust: because they have cast away the law
of the Lord of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of
Israel." (Isaiah 5:20,24)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
21 Apr 2004 09:51:54 PM |
|
|
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
The people who drug kids in school fall into one category: parents.
No kid can take any drugs at school unless the parent buys a
prescription and the parent signs a form giving permission and the
parent brings the medicine to school.
The question was... "Which group fights for drugging kids in school".
The answer is: parents.
No other group fights for drugging kids in school.
You will not find "liberals" being pro-home schooling since they can't
force them to take drugs at home.
Parents who want to force their kids to take drugs can do so
homeschooling somewhat easier than at a public or private school
(where they usually have to sign a medication release and deliver the
medication personally). This is true whether the parents are liberal
or conservative.
Someday you'll learn what a cite is.
I think I know how to fix America. Let's import more coffee
Caffeine is a drug. Are you supporting drugging kids at school? You
must be a "liberal".
Lies are a drug and liberals are addicted to them.
So you are a liberal then?
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
21 Apr 2004 11:16:46 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
The people who drug kids in school fall into one category: parents.
No kid can take any drugs at school unless the parent buys a
prescription and the parent signs a form giving permission and the
parent brings the medicine to school.
The question was... "Which group fights for drugging kids in school".
The answer is: parents.
No other group fights for drugging kids in school.
You will not find "liberals" being pro-home schooling since they can't
force them to take drugs at home.
Parents who want to force their kids to take drugs can do so
homeschooling somewhat easier than at a public or private school
(where they usually have to sign a medication release and deliver the
medication personally). This is true whether the parents are liberal
or conservative.
Someday you'll learn what a cite is.
I think I know how to fix America. Let's import more coffee
Caffeine is a drug. Are you supporting drugging kids at school? You
must be a "liberal".
Lies are a drug and liberals are addicted to them.
So you are a liberal then?
lojbab
Bob, liberals want the entire population of the earth to be subject to
the UN's version of planned parenthood, so you can't see the forrest
for the trees.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
22 Apr 2004 05:08:02 AM |
|
|
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Bob, liberals want the entire population of the earth to be subject to
the UN's version of planned parenthood, so you can't see the forrest
for the trees.
Cite, please, that ANY "liberal" wants this.
Since I don't want any such thing, I clearly am not a liberal.
I am fully capable of telling a long dead racist civil war traitor
from a tree.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
22 Apr 2004 06:20:36 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Bob, liberals want the entire population of the earth to be subject to
the UN's version of planned parenthood, so you can't see the forrest
for the trees.
Cite, please, that ANY "liberal" wants this.
Since I don't want any such thing, I clearly am not a liberal.
I am fully capable of telling a long dead racist civil war traitor
from a tree.
lojbab
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
22 Apr 2004 06:30:32 PM |
|
|
In article <e9og80thtmmgk8rqcsor82b5f0ivq7mo2v@4ax.com> Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> writes:
<
<Bob LeChevalier wrote:
<
<>Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
<>>Bob, liberals want the entire population of the earth to be subject to
<>>the UN's version of planned parenthood, so you can't see the forrest
<>>for the trees.
<>
<>Cite, please, that ANY "liberal" wants this.
<>
<>Since I don't want any such thing, I clearly am not a liberal.
<>
<>I am fully capable of telling a long dead racist civil war traitor
<>from a tree.
<>
<>lojbab
<
<How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
<the existence of races?
The same way you can determine that someone is psychotic, even
though the flying purple tentacled ichor-oozing Soviet Britney
Spears clones they see tormenting them don't exist either.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
22 Apr 2004 09:13:35 PM |
|
|
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
The civil war general in question was a slave trader and helped found
the KKK, not to mention leading the massacre of surrendered black
soldiers at Fort Pillow (which makes him a war criminal to boot).
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
23 Apr 2004 11:13:37 AM |
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ihatekerie Sosumi" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
23 Apr 2004 11:52:18 AM |
|
|
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:4bbic.244$oN1.58@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
Correct.
Another example: many people habitually discriminate against rapists. They
are not "racists" for doing that, however.
Liberals appear to be drugged, they can't debate intelligently. Their
command of various words, such as "racist", is poor. And they lie a lot,
and worship those who are habitual liars, such as Bill Clinton.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
26 Apr 2004 10:37:36 PM |
|
|
Ihatekerie Sosumi wrote:
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:4bbic.244$oN1.58@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
Correct.
Another example: many people habitually discriminate against rapists. They
are not "racists" for doing that, however.
Liberals appear to be drugged, they can't debate intelligently. Their
command of various words, such as "racist", is poor. And they lie a lot,
and worship those who are habitual liars, such as Bill Clinton.
Spot on dude. Most of them are no doubt on meds.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joni Rathbun" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
26 Apr 2004 11:24:19 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
Ihatekerie Sosumi wrote:
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:4bbic.244$oN1.58@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
Correct.
Another example: many people habitually discriminate against rapists. They
are not "racists" for doing that, however.
Liberals appear to be drugged, they can't debate intelligently. Their
command of various words, such as "racist", is poor. And they lie a lot,
and worship those who are habitual liars, such as Bill Clinton.
Spot on dude. Most of them are no doubt on meds.
No, anyone too out of it to figure out that the Kerrys have nothing to
do with the ketchup company is the one who appears to be on meds. What
email hoax mailing list did you get that one on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
27 Apr 2004 12:59:23 AM |
|
|
Joni Rathbun wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
Ihatekerie Sosumi wrote:
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:4bbic.244$oN1.58@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
Correct.
Another example: many people habitually discriminate against rapists. They
are not "racists" for doing that, however.
Liberals appear to be drugged, they can't debate intelligently. Their
command of various words, such as "racist", is poor. And they lie a lot,
and worship those who are habitual liars, such as Bill Clinton.
Spot on dude. Most of them are no doubt on meds.
No, anyone too out of it to figure out that the Kerrys have nothing to
do with the ketchup company is the one who appears to be on meds. What
email hoax mailing list did you get that one on?
We have a private e-mail network you pagans aren't privy to.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joni Rathbun" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
27 Apr 2004 07:34:43 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
Joni Rathbun wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
Ihatekerie Sosumi wrote:
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:4bbic.244$oN1.58@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
Correct.
Another example: many people habitually discriminate against rapists. They
are not "racists" for doing that, however.
Liberals appear to be drugged, they can't debate intelligently. Their
command of various words, such as "racist", is poor. And they lie a lot,
and worship those who are habitual liars, such as Bill Clinton.
Spot on dude. Most of them are no doubt on meds.
No, anyone too out of it to figure out that the Kerrys have nothing to
do with the ketchup company is the one who appears to be on meds. What
email hoax mailing list did you get that one on?
We have a private e-mail network you pagans aren't privy to.
So lying is a routine thing for you. INteresting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
27 Apr 2004 10:01:55 PM |
|
|
Joni Rathbun wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
Joni Rathbun wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
Ihatekerie Sosumi wrote:
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:4bbic.244$oN1.58@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:ofug80hqpm8o482hgfdotg46vhstqat853@4ax.com...
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
How can you determine who is a "racist" since you don't acknowledge
the existence of races?
The same way that an atheist can identify a theist even though they
don't acknowledge the existence of gods.
racist:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and
capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent
superiority of a particular race
One who has that belief is a racist.
Also:
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
One who habitually practices prejudice and/or discrimination is a
racist.
This is incorrect. Many people habitually
discriminate against people that smell bad.
They are not racists.
Correct.
Another example: many people habitually discriminate against rapists. They
are not "racists" for doing that, however.
Liberals appear to be drugged, they can't debate intelligently. Their
command of various words, such as "racist", is poor. And they lie a lot,
and worship those who are habitual liars, such as Bill Clinton.
Spot on dude. Most of them are no doubt on meds.
No, anyone too out of it to figure out that the Kerrys have nothing to
do with the ketchup company is the one who appears to be on meds. What
email hoax mailing list did you get that one on?
We have a private e-mail network you pagans aren't privy to.
So lying is a routine thing for you. INteresting.
For discussion purposes, let's say I am indeed lying. Considering the
fact that quite a few folks these days commit the act of sodomy on a
regular basis, why would you be upset over a little white lie or two?
Why would you consider a possible little "white lie" to be an
abomination but a real abomination like sodomy to be OK? You wouldn't
be trying to assume the power needed to re-define the moral code of
our culture would you?
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
28 Apr 2004 12:13:20 PM |
|
|
In article <6kov80deu7ohmu4gdp1bgqp87fhb1gml6l@4ax.com> Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> writes:
<
<Joni Rathbun wrote:
<
<>
<>On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jd wrote:
<>
<>> Joni Rathbun wrote:
<>>
<>> >>
<>> >
<>> >No, anyone too out of it to figure out that the Kerrys have nothing to
<>> >do with the ketchup company is the one who appears to be on meds. What
<>> >email hoax mailing list did you get that one on?
<>> >
<>>
<>> We have a private e-mail network you pagans aren't privy to.
<>>
<>
<>So lying is a routine thing for you. INteresting.
<>
<
<For discussion purposes, let's say I am indeed lying. Considering the
<fact that quite a few folks these days commit the act of sodomy on a
<regular basis, why would you be upset over a little white lie or two?
How about: because lying is destructive both personally and socially,
whereas sodomy is morally neutral.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
28 Apr 2004 04:38:42 AM |
|
|
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
So lying is a routine thing for you. INteresting.
For discussion purposes, let's say I am indeed lying. Considering the
fact that quite a few folks these days commit the act of sodomy on a
regular basis, why would you be upset over a little white lie or two?
What makes this lie a "white" one? Your race?
Why would you consider a possible little "white lie" to be an
abomination but a real abomination like sodomy to be OK? You wouldn't
be trying to assume the power needed to re-define the moral code of
our culture would you?
Are you saying that lying, which violates the commandment about
bearing false witness is a lesser sin than sodomy, which is not
mentioned in the big Ten C? For someone who at times claims to
worship the 10C enough to want them in the Alabama court house, you
don't seem to show them much respect.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
01 May 2004 08:56:36 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
So lying is a routine thing for you. INteresting.
For discussion purposes, let's say I am indeed lying. Considering the
fact that quite a few folks these days commit the act of sodomy on a
regular basis, why would you be upset over a little white lie or two?
What makes this lie a "white" one? Your race?
Why would you consider a possible little "white lie" to be an
abomination but a real abomination like sodomy to be OK? You wouldn't
be trying to assume the power needed to re-define the moral code of
our culture would you?
Are you saying that lying, which violates the commandment about
bearing false witness is a lesser sin than sodomy, which is not
mentioned in the big Ten C? For someone who at times claims to
worship the 10C enough to want them in the Alabama court house, you
don't seem to show them much respect.
lojbab
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief. We don't want to get to far into Christian teachings
among all these atheists and xChristian pagans here. They would be
sure to mock you and I even more than they already are if we do.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
01 May 2004 10:17:04 PM |
|
|
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Why would you consider a possible little "white lie" to be an
abomination but a real abomination like sodomy to be OK? You wouldn't
be trying to assume the power needed to re-define the moral code of
our culture would you?
Are you saying that lying, which violates the commandment about
bearing false witness is a lesser sin than sodomy, which is not
mentioned in the big Ten C? For someone who at times claims to
worship the 10C enough to want them in the Alabama court house, you
don't seem to show them much respect.
lojbab
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in
running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord
among brethren.
Proverbs 12:17 He that speaketh truth sheweth forth righteousness: but
a false witness deceit.
Proverbs 14:5 A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness
will utter lies.
Proverbs 19:5 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.
Proverbs 19:9 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall perish.
Brief enough?
We don't want to get to far into Christian teachings
among all these atheists and xChristian pagans here. They would be
sure to mock you and I even more than they already are if we do.
They generally do not mock me, because I respect their disbelief.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 11:03:14 AM |
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 03:33:39 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
One would have to ask God. Then, if He answers, one would know the
answer.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 09:03:32 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
Exactly.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 11:30:02 PM |
|
|
Jd <Igo.B4u@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Bob wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
Exactly.
Exactly what?
Is that lie a violation of the 10 commandments? Yes.
Will God punish that lie? That is up to God and not you or me.
We'd better consider the lie quite justified in order to take the
responsibility for violating God's commandment. But our judgement in
the matter is not His judgement.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 11:33:08 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:03:14 -0500, Bob wrote
(in article <KW8lc.40280$7a5.4269@bignews6.bellsouth.net>):
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
Which god?
++gray/
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 11:46:19 AM |
|
|
"Gray Shockley" <gray-87a@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BCBA8CF4001D907310F72A40@news.giganews.com...
On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:03:14 -0500, Bob wrote
(in article <KW8lc.40280$7a5.4269@bignews6.bellsouth.net>):
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
Which god?
The God that was being discussed in
this thread.
++gray/
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 09:03:32 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
"Gray Shockley" <gray-87a@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BCBA8CF4001D907310F72A40@news.giganews.com...
On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:03:14 -0500, Bob wrote
(in article <KW8lc.40280$7a5.4269@bignews6.bellsouth.net>):
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:sqp890lqti5uaudcp2qu8snvkafi9vgmg1@4ax.com...
What makes you think that all lies are a violation of the 10
Commandments?
Please be brief.
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
Which god?
The God that was being discussed in
this thread.
Good answer. I see you are already keen to the ways of these guys.
They will try to mock you to death if you ain't careful.
Jd
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 01:28:38 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:46:19 -0500, Bob wrote:
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
Which god?
The God that was being discussed in
this thread.
++gray/
No god was being discussed in this thread until you asked the above musical
question (in case your attention span is giving you more problems, let me
quote your "introduction of a god" sentence:
--------------------------------------------------------
Would God punish the following lie ?
--------------------------------------------------------
Now - as far as I can tell - please find where I am incorrect - you brought
in this god, manufactured out of whole cloth and either
(1) made a boo-boo, (2) lied.
I think I may see where you made your mistake (unless I'm wrong and a god was
mentioned before you introduced this god thangie).
In the original message ( <e88a6c8b.0404200632.7a884d3d@posting.google.com>)
that started this thread, the poster, the Internet Victim and Martyr, Junior
Class, KblankC stated:
--------------------------------------------------------
Liberals are drugging up their own members so they won't realize how
moronic their position is, and, then, they claim the GOP is sheep for
bucking the liberal trend. I think I know how to fix America. Let's
import more coffee and hold some drug interventions.
--------------------------------------------------------
So your mistake, of course, would be a natural one for you (if you are indeed
somewhat like your on-line persona). And that would, of course, be confusing
"GOP" with "god".
That happens to a lot of people who also think that George W Bush's last name
is "God". Heck, it happens with a lot of other people who think his last name
is "Damn".
Gray Shockley
--------------------------------------------------------
Remember that boy Bush is some kinda Yankee.
A person living in France during World War II
was hiding a Jew in his attic. The German SS
knocks on his door. He answers the door and
the SS officer asks him if there are any Jews
in his house. He says "no".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Drugged Liberals |
02 May 2004 02:46:06 PM |
|
|
"Gray Shockley" <gray@87a@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
news:xredndjSCsRKoAjdRVn-hw@giganews.com...
On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:46:19 -0500, Bob wrote:
Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand
with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Would God punish the following lie ?
Which god?
The God that was being discussed in
this thread.
++gray/
No god was being discussed in this thread until you asked the above musical
question (in case your attention span is giving you more problems, let me
quote your "introduction of a god" sentence:
What book to you think the Exodus quote is
taken from?
<irrelevent BS snipped>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
