ePort Sale seen as National Security Threat



 Politics > Politics-USA > ePort Sale seen as National Security Threat

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Tuttles Almanac"
Date: 18 Mar 2006 08:49:31 PM
Object: ePort Sale seen as National Security Threat
Shin-Temasek deal blatantly betrays Thailand's security
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-shin-temasek-deal-blatantly-betrays-thailands-security-/2006/03/18/1470319.htm
I read with utter disbelief, if not dismay, that greed had
triumphed over sound judgement when the Shin enterprises
sold strategic stakes to Temasek, a corporation controlled by
the Singapore government, which has upset the Thai people,
and for good reason too.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong speaks disingenuously of
the sale as "a purely commercial decision". But he knows
full well that the Shin enterprises owned or controlled
strategic assets, such as the monopolistic satellite and
telecommunications networks that are vital to Thailand's
security and defence.
In Singapore, a sale of such strategic assets would be
absolutely unthinkable. For example, no Singaporean,
let alone a foreigner, may buy or own more than a
stipulated number of shares in a newspaper company.
Why' Because of the tactical advantage and strategic
interests of the People's Action Party. Notwithstanding
that the Temasek-Shin transaction is completed, the
Thai parliament could still pass legislation to nullify
the sordid deal on grounds of the strategic interest for
Thai security and defence, and to compel shareholders to
divest their holdings so that they own no more than a
stipulated amount; say, 3 per cent.
Today's friends can be tomorrow's enemies, and vice versa.
Why do you think Singapore acquired squadrons of F-16 combat
aircraft, Apache attack helicopters, and tanks, to name but
three weapons in its vast arsenal' They are not defensive
but offensive weapons.
_______________________________________________
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: "Green-card quota seen as undercutting security"
Re: Billions of bucks for Bush's "Homeland Security" and what have we got? NADA!
Cover-up of incredible lax security at nuclear weapons labs.
U.S. Needs Help Translating Security Threat Documents
New Zealand: protests force release from 'hole' of Algerian jailed as 'security risk'
Social Security
Re: Greenspan says Congress should cut Social Security to keep Bush's tax cuts
~ Security in Iraq Shifts to Private Companies ~
Glad Tidings from the Security Council
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe will track 2004 U.S. election
Karl Rove strives to put fear in hearts of "security" moms
Infighting between Bush security agencies. Georgie makin' ya feel safer yet, folks?
Bush's Social Security scam would cut young workers benefits in half.
Bush Begins Propaganda Campaign In His War Against Our Social Security
Bush's Homeland Security Department spends money on pork instead of security
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER