| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Noahs Dove" |
| Date: |
08 Apr 2007 11:27:14 AM |
| Object: |
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX |
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an
international consortium.
http://911scholars.org/
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished
experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer,
Wayne Madsen,John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow,
have concluded that senior government officials have covered up
crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.
They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars
for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their
own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation
about critical events in New York and Washington, DC
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by
elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into
supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned
absent "another Pearl Harbor."
They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating
itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an
unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or
wishful thinking.
They are encouraging news services around the world to secure
scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to
verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they
believe, require extraordinary measures.
If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history
would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators
would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this
nation from ever greater abuse.
They hope this might include The New York Times, which in their
opinion has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expected from
our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses.
It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies
leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American
people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might
compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth
about one of the great turning-point events of modern history.
Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has
brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their
knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or
dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen
Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan
brought this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which
they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for
suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden
are not genuine.
They have found the government's own investigation to be severely
flawed .The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was
directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the
NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush
supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly
be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.
They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with
omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin
has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions .The official report, for example, entirely ignores the
collapse of WTC7,a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes,
was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the
attack.
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and
scholars find profoundly troubling:
In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise
buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or
since 9/11,so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is
this possible?
The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged
"hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet
according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How
is this possible?
Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings
were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the
impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito
netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this
possible?
Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700=B0F, the temperature of
jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800=B0F under optimal conditions, and
UL certified the steel used to 2,000=B0F for six hours, the buildings
cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this
possible?
Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in
the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very
close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this
possible?
Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking
four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage
to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this
possible?
Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at
the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young
officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the
Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to
shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight
93,which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris
scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is
scattered overran area of about eight square miles. How is this
possible?
A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on
9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and
distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is
this possible?
The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating
the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and
yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no
one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How
is this possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled
demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and
virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings.
While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down
into their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude
that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which
has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of
"creating our own reality."
.
|
|
| User: "Al Dykes" |
|
| Title: Re: EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX |
08 Apr 2007 03:19:41 PM |
|
|
In article <1176049634.114277.25160@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Noah's Dove <noahdove7@lightspeed.ca> wrote:
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an
international consortium.
http://911scholars.org/
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished
experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer,
Wayne Madsen,John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow,
have concluded that senior government officials have covered up
crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.
What are these "experts" experts in, and does each of them stick
within their area of expetise?
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Dykes" |
|
| Title: Re: EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX |
08 Apr 2007 03:15:41 PM |
|
|
In article <1176049634.114277.25160@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Noah's Dove <noahdove7@lightspeed.ca> wrote:
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by an
international consortium.
http://911scholars.org/
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished
experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer,
Wayne Madsen,John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow,
have concluded that senior government officials have covered up
crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.
They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars
for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their
own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation
about critical events in New York and Washington, DC
Do any of these people speak within their area of expertise?
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX |
09 Apr 2007 10:48:07 PM |
|
|
(Al Dykes) wrote:
In article <1176049634.114277.25160@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Noah's Dove <noahdove7@lightspeed.ca> wrote:
EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
<laugh!>
Do any of these people speak within their area of expertise?
No, though they _do_ drag in people like Richard "Hot Tub" Boylan, an
insane Christian flying saucer "expert" who was caught inplanting false
memories of alien abduction into his patient's minds and who lost his
license to practice for getting naked with his patients in hot tubs.
That's the type of "911 scholar" that these insane flying saucer
kooks have going for them.
---
Why doesn't Alex Jones ever bring up Xenu in his 9/11 Movement?
Is he one of them? Always in the right place at the right time
and never mentions the aliens. Hmm. Everyone but Xenu.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
