| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Jim Alder" |
| Date: |
14 Jan 2005 02:42:38 AM |
| Object: |
Failed science |
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons
that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly
declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among
troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to
morale, the proposal says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true
= - = - = - = - =
Actually this particular project was scrapped due to the danger of an
accidental spill in this country, which would convert dramatic numbers of
people to the Democratic Party.
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
| User: "Johnny Lately" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 08:52:49 AM |
|
|
"Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95DE25AE5AAjimaldersssnetcom@216.196.97.142...
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
Ann Coulter - Street trash, coke *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Alder" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 12:02:59 PM |
|
|
"Johnny Lately" <johnnylately@johnnylately.net> wrote in
news:7tRFd.2744$OL6.749@fe06.lga:
"Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95DE25AE5AAjimaldersssnetcom@216.196.97.142...
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
Ann Coulter - Street trash, coke *****.
"Johnny Lately" - hatefilled, brain-damaged pusbag *****.
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tcarr" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 07:12:09 PM |
|
|
Johnny opined...
"Ann Coulter - Street trash, coke *****."
==========
Johnny Lately opined on 1-12-05
"Bush should at least resign and let Congress appoint Colin Poweel to
replace
his stupid traitorous *****.
====== Apparently little Johnny never read the 25th ammendment to the
US Constitution
T.Carr
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Alder" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 08:36:31 PM |
|
|
"tcarr" <tcarr13398@aol.com> wrote in
news:1105751529.067918.54330@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Johnny opined...
"Ann Coulter - Street trash, coke *****."
==========
Johnny Lately opined on 1-12-05
"Bush should at least resign and let Congress appoint Colin Poweel to
replace his stupid traitorous *****.
====== Apparently little Johnny never read the 25th ammendment to the
US Constitution
I think you could safely end that sentence after five words.
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tcarr" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 07:13:43 PM |
|
|
Johnny opined...
"Ann Coulter - Street trash, coke *****."
==========
Johnny Lately opined on 1-12-05
"Bush should at least resign and let Congress appoint Colin Poweel to
replace
his stupid traitorous *****.
====== Apparently little Johnny never read the 25th ammendment to the
US Constitution
T.Carr
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "A Brick in the Wall" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 06:40:49 AM |
|
|
"Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95DE25AE5AAjimaldersssnetcom@216.196.97.142...
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons
that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly
declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour
among
troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to
morale, the proposal says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true
= - = - = - = - =
Actually this particular project was scrapped due to the danger of an
accidental spill in this country, which would convert dramatic numbers of
people to the Democratic Party.
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
Remind us -- how much has been spent on the Star Wars failures?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Alder" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 12:05:05 PM |
|
|
"A Brick in the Wall" <NoSpam@NoThanks.com> wrote in
news:41e7bd3d$1_4@newsfeed.slurp.net:
"Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95DE25AE5AAjimaldersssnetcom@216.196.97.142...
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical
weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops,
newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour
among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal"
blow to morale, the proposal says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true
= - = - = - = - =
Actually this particular project was scrapped due to the
danger of an accidental spill in this country, which would
convert dramatic numbers of people to the Democratic Party.
Remind us -- how much has been spent on the Star Wars failures?
So what exactly DO pineapples sell for in Hawaii?
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven L." |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 03:53:10 PM |
|
|
Jim Alder wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons
that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly
declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other.
That chemical would probably be the greatest commercial spin-off of
military technology since the Internet.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Alder" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 04:52:13 PM |
|
|
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in
news:abXFd.6512$KJ2.5601@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical
weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops,
newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other.
That chemical would probably be the greatest commercial spin-off of
military technology since the Internet.
It would certainly sell huge in San Francisco. The story didn't say that
it worked with both sexes. Actually, either way it would probably sell huge
anywhere just for entertainment purposes. Wouldn't you love to roll such a
grenade into the House of Representatives, a Klan meeting or a WWF event?
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven L." |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 05:23:18 PM |
|
|
Jim Alder wrote:
"Steven L." < > wrote in
news:abXFd.6512$KJ2.5601@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical
weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops,
newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other.
That chemical would probably be the greatest commercial spin-off of
military technology since the Internet.
It would certainly sell huge in San Francisco. The story didn't say that
it worked with both sexes.
Doesn't need to.
There are a lot of women out there who look like Madeline Albright and
who would love to have fifty studs lusting after them.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Alder" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 06:55:09 PM |
|
|
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in
news:GvYFd.6927$C52.5012@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in
news:abXFd.6512$KJ2.5601@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical
weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops,
newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other.
That chemical would probably be the greatest commercial spin-off of
military technology since the Internet.
It would certainly sell huge in San Francisco. The story didn't say
that it worked with both sexes.
Doesn't need to.
There are a lot of women out there who look like Madeline Albright and
who would love to have fifty studs lusting after them.
Yeah, I ugess if they looked like Albright, that would probably pass for
homosexual attraction. <g>
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven L." |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 05:22:24 PM |
|
|
Jim Alder wrote:
"Steven L." < > wrote in
news:abXFd.6512$KJ2.5601@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical
weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops,
newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other.
That chemical would probably be the greatest commercial spin-off of
military technology since the Internet.
It would certainly sell huge in San Francisco. The story didn't say that
it worked with both sexes. Actually, either way it would probably sell huge
anywhere just for entertainment purposes. Wouldn't you love to roll such a
grenade into the House of Representatives, a Klan meeting or a WWF event?
Might be able to develop a new reality-TV show around it too.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Alder" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 06:55:36 PM |
|
|
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in
news:QuYFd.6926$C52.2445@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in
news:abXFd.6512$KJ2.5601@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:
Jim Alder wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical
weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops,
newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other.
That chemical would probably be the greatest commercial spin-off of
military technology since the Internet.
It would certainly sell huge in San Francisco. The story didn't say
that
it worked with both sexes. Actually, either way it would probably sell
huge anywhere just for entertainment purposes. Wouldn't you love to
roll such a grenade into the House of Representatives, a Klan meeting
or a WWF event?
Might be able to develop a new reality-TV show around it too.
In that case, let's forget the whole thing.
--
"'The American President' - In this movie, Michael Douglas plays Bill
Clinton as Clinton would like to be - handsome, thin,courageous, liberal
and widowed." - Ann Coulter in "How to Talk to a Liberal"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Northern Storm" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 03:39:48 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:42:38 -0600, Jim Alder <jimalder@ssnet.com>
wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons
that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly
declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among
troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to
morale, the proposal says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true
= - = - = - = - =
Sounds like a project bush the lying turd's pentagon would consider.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Captain Compassion" |
|
| Title: Re: Failed science |
14 Jan 2005 09:54:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:39:48 -0800, Northern Storm
<forgetit@nospam.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:42:38 -0600, Jim Alder <jimalder@ssnet.com>
wrote:
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.
THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons
that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly
declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an
"aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually
irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among
troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to
morale, the proposal says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true
= - = - = - = - =
Sounds like a project bush the lying turd's pentagon would consider.
"The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton,
Ohio, date from 1994". More like Clinton then Bush I would think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Why would I listen to losers?" -- Arnold Schwarzenegger
"Long term commitment in relationships is only necessary because it takes
so damn long to raise children. Marriage may well be some kind of trick
to keep the males around beyond sexual satiation." -- Captain Compassion
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
res0mp8t@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
