| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"bd4u" |
| Date: |
12 Jan 2004 04:37:42 PM |
| Object: |
Fascism on the rise.. |
In preparation for world domination. People are being denied
their most basic human rights. When Sun Myung Moon takes
over the world. The New World Order will play right into Moon's
hands.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3390177.stm
GW Bush is already a catalyst for Moon, with the *faith based initiative*
Moon has planned for the USA. You heard me right, it's all part of
Sun Myung Moon's plans.
Go figure..
.
|
|
| User: "LeftLunatics" |
|
| Title: Re: Fascism on the rise.. |
12 Jan 2004 05:15:20 PM |
|
|
"bd4u" <bd4u@ntelos.net> wrote in message
news:9c9cb882a2842ec39b70e5365bf7b114@news.teranews.com...
In preparation for world domination. People are being denied
their most basic human rights. When Sun Myung Moon takes
over the world. The New World Order will play right into Moon's
hands.
You sound insane.
I assume you vote Democrat, yes?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bd4u" |
|
| Title: Re: Fascism on the rise.. |
12 Jan 2004 04:47:31 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:37:42 GMT, bd4u <bd4u@ntelos.net> wrote:
In preparation for world domination. People are being denied
their most basic human rights. When Sun Myung Moon takes
over the world. The New World Order will play right into Moon's
hands.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3390177.stm
GW Bush is already a catalyst for Moon, with the *faith based initiative*
Moon has planned for the USA. You heard me right, it's all part of
Sun Myung Moon's plans.
Fascism is extremist Right Wing politics, the following
report sheds on the subject much light..
http://www.americanpolitics.com/20030728Baker.html
bd4u
.
|
|
|
| User: "LeftLunatics" |
|
| Title: Re: Fascism on the rise.. |
12 Jan 2004 05:15:20 PM |
|
|
"bd4u" <bd4u@ntelos.net> wrote in message
news:a49e91a12038404e1d975ced1fdbdcab@news.teranews.com...
Fascism is extremist Right Wing politics, the following
report sheds on the subject much light..
[report snipped]
Yet Dean (the Demmie frontrunner) now trails Bush badly.
Apparently the Democrat Party is composed of a bunch of Totally Incompetant
Loons, to put it nicely.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james" |
|
| Title: Dean? Not Clark? Strange. |
12 Jan 2004 05:47:07 PM |
|
|
In article <cUFMb.36229$na.27287@attbi_s04>,
LeftLunatics <VoteDemmie-HelpDestroyAmerica@Dean.com> wrote:
"bd4u" <bd4u@ntelos.net> wrote in message
news:a49e91a12038404e1d975ced1fdbdcab@news.teranews.com...
Yet Dean (the Demmie frontrunner) now trails Bush badly.
Apparently the Democrat Party is composed of a bunch of Totally Incompetant
Loons, to put it nicely.
I don't understand why all the focus is on Dean, when the same party has
Clark. I know dyed-in-the-wool democrats who will vote for Bush just to
keep Dean out of there. And I'm surprised we don't have Republicans
ignoring the party distinctions and supporting Clark, just on the basis
of his military experience (of which George has none). Seems like even
the most conservative hawks ought to like the idea of getting a General
in the whitehouse?
Then, if it's just a popularity race, how does a man with the recessive
genes, the most non-mediagenic charisma I can remember seeing on a
candidate, how does he get this far anyway?
Nothing about this adds up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. N" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean? Not Clark? Strange. |
12 Jan 2004 06:07:44 PM |
|
|
"james" <fishbowl@conservatory.com> wrote in message
news:%lGMb.2810$A74.219@fed1read02...
I don't understand why all the focus is on Dean, when the same party has
Clark.
Because Dean would make a better President, and has been spreading a message
that resonates with the American people. Clark, while a good man, does not
have the same strength, commitment, or vision as Dean.
--
-My Real Name
.
|
|
|
| User: "LeftLunatics" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean? Not Clark? Strange. |
12 Jan 2004 06:31:03 PM |
|
|
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:11358fd5ead48f010a6c1ca12b6fdfcf@news.teranews.com...
"james" <fishbowl@conservatory.com> wrote in message
news:%lGMb.2810$A74.219@fed1read02...
I don't understand why all the focus is on Dean, when the same party has
Clark.
Because Dean would make a better President, and has been spreading a
message
that resonates with the American people.
Yeah, in fact it "resonates" so well that he now trails Bush by about 22
points in a head-to-head matchup.
You Democrats are nuts.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean? Not Clark? Strange. |
13 Jan 2004 06:38:07 PM |
|
|
LeftLunatics wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:11358fd5ead48f010a6c1ca12b6fdfcf@news.teranews.com...
"james" <fishbowl@conservatory.com> wrote in message
news:%lGMb.2810$A74.219@fed1read02...
I don't understand why all the focus is on Dean, when the same party has
Clark.
Because Dean would make a better President, and has been spreading a
message
that resonates with the American people.
Yeah, in fact it "resonates" so well that he now trails Bush by about 22
points in a head-to-head matchup.
You Democrats are nuts.
........just wait sunny, Iraq will explode and the tide will turn when
the bodybags start flowing home.
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Dean? Not Clark? Strange. |
13 Jan 2004 06:37:04 PM |
|
|
james wrote:
In article <cUFMb.36229$na.27287@attbi_s04>,
LeftLunatics <VoteDemmie-HelpDestroyAmerica@Dean.com> wrote:
"bd4u" <bd4u@ntelos.net> wrote in message
news:a49e91a12038404e1d975ced1fdbdcab@news.teranews.com...
Yet Dean (the Demmie frontrunner) now trails Bush badly.
Apparently the Democrat Party is composed of a bunch of Totally Incompetant
Loons, to put it nicely.
I don't understand why all the focus is on Dean, when the same party has
Clark. I know dyed-in-the-wool democrats who will vote for Bush just to
keep Dean out of there. And I'm surprised we don't have Republicans
ignoring the party distinctions and supporting Clark, just on the basis
of his military experience (of which George has none). Seems like even
the most conservative hawks ought to like the idea of getting a General
in the whitehouse?
Then, if it's just a popularity race, how does a man with the recessive
genes, the most non-mediagenic charisma I can remember seeing on a
candidate, how does he get this far anyway?
Nothing about this adds up.
sure it does Corp $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ -
buy the pResidency!
simple really - and it worked.
--
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project
conventional power against his neighbours."
- Colin Powell February 24 2001
"We have been successful for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continue to be successful."
"He threatens not the United States."
"But I also thought that we had pretty
much removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'But what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking out and suddenly showing up one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell February 26 2001
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
