| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
28 May 2007 08:48:40 AM |
| Object: |
Fighting 'em over there so we...uh...don't have to fight 'em over here |
Fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here,
part one:
Two weeks ago, ***** Morris came up with a brilliant new rationale for
keeping our troops in Iraq indefinitely.
"One of the things, though, that I think the antiwar crowd has not
considered," he said, "is that, if we're putting the Americans right
within their arms' reach, they don't have to come to Wall Street to
kill Americans."
Clever, eh?
By feeding terrorists a steady diet of young American men and women in
the streets of Baghdad, we can sleep safely at night knowing that
they'll never come over here to blow us up.
Unless, of course, those terrorists don't happen to be "furriners" at
all.
According to Raw Story last week:
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Liberty_Univ._student_brings_explosives_to_0522.html
Mark Uhl, a student at Liberty University, was arrested today for
possessing several homemade bombs which he told authorities he made to
disrupt protesters at the funeral of Jerry Falwell.
The 19-year-old student, reportedly had six devices on his person or
in his car when he was arrested.
Some reports say the devices were gasoline-based "napalm" bombs.
Yes, it's a good job we've got all those religious extremists bottled
up in Iraq instead of doing their dirty deeds on U.S. soil.
By EarlG
Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "A Veteran" |
|
| Title: Re: Fighting 'em over there so we...uh...don't have to fight 'em over here |
28 May 2007 09:02:06 AM |
|
|
In article <odnl53tdl5q85929p15ujqt5b9ut9fqcgj@4ax.com>,
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here,
part one:
Two weeks ago, ***** Morris came up with a brilliant new rationale for
keeping our troops in Iraq indefinitely.
"One of the things, though, that I think the antiwar crowd has not
considered," he said, "is that, if we're putting the Americans right
within their arms' reach, they don't have to come to Wall Street to
kill Americans."
Clever, eh?
By feeding terrorists a steady diet of young American men and women in
the streets of Baghdad, we can sleep safely at night knowing that
they'll never come over here to blow us up.
Unless, of course, those terrorists don't happen to be "furriners" at
all.
According to Raw Story last week:
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Liberty_Univ._student_brings_explosives_to_0522.
html
Mark Uhl, a student at Liberty University, was arrested today for
possessing several homemade bombs which he told authorities he made to
disrupt protesters at the funeral of Jerry Falwell.
The 19-year-old student, reportedly had six devices on his person or
in his car when he was arrested.
Some reports say the devices were gasoline-based "napalm" bombs.
Yes, it's a good job we've got all those religious extremists bottled
up in Iraq instead of doing their dirty deeds on U.S. soil.
By EarlG
Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
Hmmm.
don't you love the simplistic "thinking" of the right wing?
--
when you believe the only tool you have is a hammer.
All problems look like nails.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JSM" |
|
| Title: Re: Fighting 'em over there so we...uh...don't have to fight 'em over here |
28 May 2007 09:10:02 AM |
|
|
On May 28, 6:48 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here,
part one:
Two weeks ago, ***** Morris came up with a brilliant new rationale for
keeping our troops in Iraq indefinitely.
"One of the things, though, that I think the antiwar crowd has not
considered," he said, "is that, if we're putting the Americans right
within their arms' reach, they don't have to come to Wall Street to
kill Americans."
Clever, eh?
By feeding terrorists a steady diet of young American men and women in
the streets of Baghdad, we can sleep safely at night knowing that
they'll never come over here to blow us up.
Unless, of course, those terrorists don't happen to be "furriners" at
all.
According to Raw Story last week:http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Liberty_Univ._student_brings_explosives...
Mark Uhl, a student at Liberty University, was arrested today for
possessing several homemade bombs which he told authorities he made to
disrupt protesters at the funeral of Jerry Falwell.
The 19-year-old student, reportedly had six devices on his person or
in his car when he was arrested.
Some reports say the devices were gasoline-based "napalm" bombs.
Yes, it's a good job we've got all those religious extremists bottled
up in Iraq instead of doing their dirty deeds on U.S. soil.
By EarlG
Democratic Undergroundhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
Good post Harry, it is surprising you get any news to your ears having
to pass the sphincter muscle around your neck. Lets see, here is a
test; how many times did the US get hit by terrorists while under the
Clinton administration. Remember, if it happened right he left
office he still gets credit.
ding dong ding dong ding dong, times up. The answer is 5. The
United States was attacked 5 times under the Clinton Administration.
A follow up question Harry, How many people died as a result of the
terrorists attacks. Come on Harry, You know the answer. Hint: it was
in the thousands!!!!!
You would think the Democrats could get a viable candidate to run
against Bush, but they didn't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Fighting 'em over there so we...uh...don't have to fight 'em over here |
28 May 2007 09:33:32 AM |
|
|
"JSM" <ekrubmeg@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180361402.690159.169860@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On May 28, 6:48 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here,
part one:
Two weeks ago, ***** Morris came up with a brilliant new rationale for
keeping our troops in Iraq indefinitely.
"One of the things, though, that I think the antiwar crowd has not
considered," he said, "is that, if we're putting the Americans right
within their arms' reach, they don't have to come to Wall Street to
kill Americans."
Clever, eh?
By feeding terrorists a steady diet of young American men and women in
the streets of Baghdad, we can sleep safely at night knowing that
they'll never come over here to blow us up.
Unless, of course, those terrorists don't happen to be "furriners" at
all.
According to Raw Story last
week:http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Liberty_Univ._student_brings_explosives...
Mark Uhl, a student at Liberty University, was arrested today for
possessing several homemade bombs which he told authorities he made to
disrupt protesters at the funeral of Jerry Falwell.
The 19-year-old student, reportedly had six devices on his person or
in his car when he was arrested.
Some reports say the devices were gasoline-based "napalm" bombs.
Yes, it's a good job we've got all those religious extremists bottled
up in Iraq instead of doing their dirty deeds on U.S. soil.
By EarlG
Democratic Undergroundhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
Good post Harry, it is surprising you get any news to your ears having
to pass the sphincter muscle around your neck. Lets see, here is a
test; how many times did the US get hit by terrorists while under the
Clinton administration. Remember, if it happened right he left
office he still gets credit.
ding dong ding dong ding dong, times up. The answer is 5. The
United States was attacked 5 times under the Clinton Administration.
A follow up question Harry, How many people died as a result of the
terrorists attacks. Come on Harry, You know the answer. Hint: it was
in the thousands!!!!!
You would think the Democrats could get a viable candidate to run
against Bush, but they didn't.
How many thousands died during the Clinton years from terrorist activities?
How many invasions based on lies did we do? If we dems wanna keep up we
have to lie about a bunch of countries and invade one or two.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hol99" |
|
| Title: Re: Fighting 'em over there so we...uh...don't have to fight 'em over here |
28 May 2007 01:22:30 PM |
|
|
"JSM" <ekrubmeg@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180361402.690159.169860@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On May 28, 6:48 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here,
part one:
Two weeks ago, ***** Morris came up with a brilliant new rationale for
keeping our troops in Iraq indefinitely.
"One of the things, though, that I think the antiwar crowd has not
considered," he said, "is that, if we're putting the Americans right
within their arms' reach, they don't have to come to Wall Street to
kill Americans."
Clever, eh?
By feeding terrorists a steady diet of young American men and women in
the streets of Baghdad, we can sleep safely at night knowing that
they'll never come over here to blow us up.
Unless, of course, those terrorists don't happen to be "furriners" at
all.
According to Raw Story last
week:http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Liberty_Univ._student_brings_explosives...
Mark Uhl, a student at Liberty University, was arrested today for
possessing several homemade bombs which he told authorities he made to
disrupt protesters at the funeral of Jerry Falwell.
The 19-year-old student, reportedly had six devices on his person or
in his car when he was arrested.
Some reports say the devices were gasoline-based "napalm" bombs.
Yes, it's a good job we've got all those religious extremists bottled
up in Iraq instead of doing their dirty deeds on U.S. soil.
By EarlG
Democratic Undergroundhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
Good post Harry, it is surprising you get any news to your ears having
to pass the sphincter muscle around your neck. Lets see, here is a
test; how many times did the US get hit by terrorists while under the
Clinton administration. Remember, if it happened right he left
office he still gets credit.
ding dong ding dong ding dong, times up. The answer is 5. The
United States was attacked 5 times under the Clinton Administration.
A follow up question Harry, How many people died as a result of the
terrorists attacks. Come on Harry, You know the answer. Hint: it was
in the thousands!!!!!
You would think the Democrats could get a viable candidate to run
against Bush, but they didn't.
I call *****!!! 9-11 is all on Georgie's watch, no matter how you try to
spin it. And the guys who bombed the WTC the first time, which according to
your logic was GHWB's fault, are in jail. While OBL is still making videos
after all the troops and $$ we've committed to finding him. Clinton might've
sucked, but Dubya has taken suckitude to a new level.
Dave
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Fighting 'em over there so we...uh...don't have to fight 'em over here |
28 May 2007 09:03:26 AM |
|
|
On May 28, 6:48 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here,
part one:
Two weeks ago, ***** Morris came up with a brilliant new rationale for
keeping our troops in Iraq indefinitely.
"One of the things, though, that I think the antiwar crowd has not
considered," he said, "is that, if we're putting the Americans right
within their arms' reach, they don't have to come to Wall Street to
kill Americans."
Clever, eh?
Even more clever for the Demo leadership to support unhindered
corporatist illegal immigration in order to undercut democrat
voter ...
- Standard of living.
- Job availability
- Quality of medical care
- Quality of education
- Housing affordibility
- Increase democrat voter tax burden
- Increase community crime
No siree.. the dem leadership will not be accused of getting in neocon
business' way... no way.. no how. Next stop NAU and beautiful Mud Hut
Village Estates.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
