Selected Usenet Article
Date: 19 Nov 2003 18:00:16 GMT
Category: Censored by Totalitarian Dictatorship of NWO,
Degeneracy Propagation Department.
Article: 30
[Zionism, Jew, nazi, extremism, fascism, illuminati, NWO, government]
"Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists
have complete control of our government.
For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this
time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these
United States as though they were the absolute monarchs
of this country.
Now you may say that is a very broad statement,
but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep..."
--- Benjamin H. Freedman
[Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful
Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner
of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry
after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the
remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his
considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the
Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.]
Sept 18, 2003
Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst for nearly 30 years,
who worked under Adolph Bush as Director of Central
Intelligence, gave the interview to Amy Goodman
on 'Democracy Now' radio talk show.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4736.htm
This interview is partially reproduced here:
"The Crazies Are Back" ["Crazies" were former CIA officers
who 'disclosed' some of the most horrifying information]:
Bush Sr.'s CIA Briefer Recalls How the First Bush Administration
referred to Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and Cheney.
Former CIA analysts Ray McGovern and David MacMichael accuse
President Bush of waging the Iraq war based on a series of lies,
discuss the unprecedented pressure that VP ***** Cheney put on
the CIA before the invasion and call on CIA analysts and agents
to come forward with information that will reveal the lies of
the Bush administration.
...
RAY MCGOVERN: Well he [Wolfowitz] was promoting the idea
that has now been implemented that we are the single
superpower in the world and that we should act like it.
We've got a lot of weight to throw around, we should throw
it around.
We should assert ourselves in critical areas, like the
Middle East and over the next few years the Project for
New American Century documents very much elucidate
this kind of strategic vision and strategic plan.
It's very much like Mein Kampf.
It's the ideological strategic justification for what
has been happening here.
It's empire, it's how to increase our influence and
not coincidentally, it dovetails expressly with the
strategic objectives of Israel in the Middle East.
We mean to be the sole superpower, dominant superpower
in the world and
Israel is determined to remain the superpower in the Middle East.
And of course if you talk about weapons of mass destruction,
well, check out how many Israel has.
And ask yourself when was the last national intelligence
estimate on Israeli weapons of mass destruction?"
DAVID MACMICHAEL [former CIA analyst]:
"Those were 1981-1983 under Reagan and under William Casey.
In fact I embarked on that job the day Casey came in.
I can assure you that the way in which the National
Intelligence Council and the National Intelligence officers,
the directing officers in there were stacked during the Casey
years, meant that intelligence was designed, and I focused
principally on Central America, the whole Iran Contra thing later,
truthful analysis was not the highest priority there.
The determination was to produce analyses that would support
the previously decided upon policy so for me,
getting back involved with Ray McGovern here and VIPS
dealing with this current situation, its kind of like d?j?
vu all over again. It's a familiar process."
RAY MCGOVERN: And so our latest appeal to intelligence
professionals still working on the inside is,
well let it occur to you now. There are more important
things. And we are not suggesting that they release classified
information.
All they have to do is tell what happened in months before
this war. Tell how bogus information was used, like forgeries,
to deceive Congress. This is a constitutional crisis to deceive
the other branch of government."
RAY MCGOVERN: "Well, it's not clear [who forged the report
about Iraq trying to aquire uranium from Niger].
One asks themselves, Qui bono? Who would profit from this
kind of thing? And a lot of people suggest it was
the Israeli service, Mussad."
RAY MCGOVERN: "The real conspiratorial thing would be,
of course that Mussad would do it in a sloppy way precisely
so that folks like David MacMichael would rule them out as
the author of that."
"Why this is important is the following:
This time last year, the decision had already been made
to go to war. ***** Cheney led off the charge on the
26th of August of last year, when he said among other
things that Iraq was starting to reconstitute its nuclear
program.
Now the next thing they needed to do was persuade Congress
that the situation was serious enough so that Congress
would cede its war making powers to the executive [branch].
What evidence did they have? Well, they looked around.
Zippo. Well we have the aluminum tubes.
The aluminum tubes had already been discounted by
all nuclear scientists and engineers."
"These were tubes that were alleged to be essential
to nuclear processing, the thing that would produce
nuclear weapons material.
If they checked with the Department of Energy specialists,
they would have known right off the bat that these were not
suitable for that purpose.
And now everybody accepts that that was bogus, but it worked.
For those months, it was used in Congress as
evidence they were pursuing a nuclear program.
But since there was a lot of controversy there,
they looked for what else was around.
And somebody said, well, how about those reports that Iraq
was seeking uranium in Niger? We can use that for sure.
And they said, well, the CIA has poured cold water on that.
Yeah, but who is going to know about these doubts?
Well, nobody unless we tell them.
Do we have to tell anyone about this? The UN wants to know
about these reports because they've got word of them,
and we have been putting them off. Well how long can we
put them off? Oh, probably, another couple of months.
What's the problem? We use this, we raise the prospect of a
mushroom cloud, our first evidence that Saddam has his hands
on nuclear weapons might be a mushroom cloud,
used by the President on the 7th of October,
used by Condeleezza Rice on the 8th of October,
used by Victoria Clarke, the Pentagon spokesman on the 9th
of October, on the 11th of October,
Congress votes to give its war making power to the President.
This was effectively used, and I'm sure they said,
what if people find out that this was bogus information
and indeed based on a forgery?
And the answer had to have been, well look, we'll get
Congress to approve it,
we'll have our war,
well win it handly,
the people in Baghdad will welcome us with open arms,
and then who is going to care at that point?
Who is going to care if the case was built on a forgery?"
AMY GOODMAN: "But then the famous 16-word statement in the
State of the Union address, which brings us to one of the
people who is leaving Intelligence. Can you talk about him
and the role that he played?"
RAY MCGOVERN: "Alan Foley? Alan announced just three days ago
that he was leaving, and he was head of the analytic section
that had purview over weapons of mass destruction.
It was he who suggested that those sixteen offending words
not be included in the president's State of the Union address.
He was finally arm twisted into condoning that, with the
assurance that it would be blamed on the British."
"... finally he [Alan Foley] was persuaded that well,
let's blame it on the British.
Let's say, according to a British report.
And Foley said, I suppose that would be alright to blame
it on the British.
Now, they didn't even say 'according to a British report'.
What the President said was 'the British have learned'.
That's a lot different. We are pretty careful with words
in the intelligence community, but that is what the President
said, 'the British have learned that Iraq was seeking uranium
from an African country...
Now, Foley took the fall with that, along with Tenet,
but it was really sort of Tenet saying 'I confess,
she did it'. Because Tenet doesn't write these speeches.
Condeleezza Rice is responsible for that. So what is Tenet
was confessing? He's confessing to being a lousy proofreader.
He didn't read the final draft, and there it was.
We'll use it [report] anyway and we'll pin it on the British
report. I watched the speech. We all watched the speech.
When the President says the British have learned something,
the presumption is the President is telling the truth.
But the President was not telling the truth
and everyone knew that.
And let me add just one other thing, and that is,
Colin Powell brags to this day, very recently he said,
and I quote:
'I spent four days and four nights at CIA headquarters
before I made that speech on Feb the 5th,
pouring over the evidence, making sure that..'
Well, to anyone who knows how the system works,
that is bizarre. The Secretary of State shouldn't be
going out to CIA headquarters to analyze the evidence and
make sure. The evidence by that time, by god, should have
been well analyzed, should have been presented in a document
to which most people agree and footnotes for those who don't
agree, and presented to the Secretary of State in his office
on the 7th floor of the State Department,
and if he had questions, analysts would come down and see him.
The prospect of the Secretary of State and Condeleezza Rice who
joined that group, coming out to the agency and saying
'OK, where are we at now', five days before his major speech
to the UN, is bizarre in the extreme.
All the evidence that was deduced.
Where are the 25,000 liters of anthrax? None of that
information has been borne out in reality.
Let me just say one other thing about that speech.
Among the things he said was that we have learned that Qusay,
Saddam Hussein's son has ordered the removal of prohibited
weapons from the presidential palaces. OK?
Interesting. OK, so we've learned, that's pretty solid
information, it sounds like solid information.
Well, a couple of months later, we find Qusay, right?
Now, if we are interested in finding out where those weapons
of mass destruction are, it would seem to me that someone would
have thought, for god's sake, capture this guy.
He knows where they are. He ordered their removal.
Instead what did they do? They fired ten anti-tank missiles
into Qusay and his brother and a nephew of Qusay.
Not my idea of how you get to the bottom of the story on
weapons of mass destruction."
AMY GOODMAN [interviewer]: We are talking to Ray McGovern
and David MacMichael. They are both former CIA analysts.
Ray McGovern worked under George Bush when he was
Director of Central Intelligence and then briefed him when
he was Vice President, for how long?
RAY MCGOVERN: For about 2-1/2 years. I did the briefings
for four years, but my account in the first two years was
the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Later in March after the war had begun, Ari Fleischer said
weapons of mass destruction is what this war is about,
and we have high confidence that we will find them.
So, there is no de-emphasizing the fact that that was the
casus belli that the administration introduced.
So to suggest now that we are not talking about weapons
of mass destruction, but we are talking about
papers of mass destruction, let me explain.
We don't say weapons of mass destruction anymore.
We say weapons of mass destruction programs.
What does that mean? That means, in a very sinister way,
as David is inclined to point out, Iraq still has nuclear
scientists capable of reconstituting this program.
That means that we will find, or that we will fabricate,
documents showing that they have these plans to start
making these weapons again as soon as the UN inspectors leave.
That is all they have, and to think that the "solid evidence"
that Ari Fleischer cited, and the fact that weapons of mass
destruction is what this thing was all about,
not papers of mass destruction.
This is going to come back to haunt them if, and it's a big if,
if the mainstream press still has the guts to say
'hey we were taken in, and we don't like to be lied to and
on behalf of the American people, we are going to tell
the real story here.'
And the story is that the ostensible justification
for this war was bogus, contrived, it was a lie."
DAVID MACMICHAEL: I think one thing that has to be added
about David Kaye, who is identified as a former member of
UNSCOM, that is the United Nations weapons inspection team
... David Kaye ... was in fact a CIA officer at that time.
One of the reasons the initial inspections process broke down
was because the United States and other member states of the
inspections team began introducing their intelligence officers
into this and in fact as it's been documented,
planting listening devices in the places they were going
for intelligence purposes, not for weapons inspections
purposes.
A second point to remember is the primary task of the
intelligence officer is to recruit agents.
In other words, one could reasonably assume that,
using their cover as weapons inspectors, they were attempting
to recruit Iraqi nationals to serve as intelligence agents.
Naturally the counterintelligence of any country attempts
to block this and it did serve to discredit the initial
inspection process. So that is one thing that is important
to remember about David Kaye's background.
[Freemasonry, nazi, Aryan, Lucifer, satan, 666, KKK,
Illuminati, NWO]
In Daily Appeal, Albert Pike wrote in an editorial
on April 16, 1868:
"With negroes for witnesses and jurors, the
administration of justice becomes a blasphemous
mockery.
...
We would unite every white man in the South,
who is opposed to negro suffrage, into one
great Order of Southern Brotherhood, with an
organization complete, active, vigorous,
in which a few should execute the concentrated
will of all, and whose very existence should be
concealed from all but its members."
[Pike, the founder of KKK, was the leader of the U.S.
Scottish Rite Masonry (who was called the
"Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry,"
the "Prophet of Freemasonry" and the
"greatest Freemason of the nineteenth century."),
and one of the "high priests" of freemasonry.
He became a Convicted War Criminal in a
War Crimes Trial held after the Civil Wars end.
Pike was found guilty of treason and jailed.
He had fled to British Territory in Canada.
Pike only returned to the U.S. after his hand picked
Scottish Rite Succsessor James Richardon 33° got a pardon
for him after making President Andrew Johnson a 33°
Scottish Rite Mason in a ceremony held inside the
White House itself!]
.
|
