On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:06:54 -0500, "johnny@." <johnny@.> wrote:

American Patriot wrote:

Fred Thompson Candidate, his short years (8) in Senate Votes:
pro-Choice, voted against tougher enforcement; supported Feingold
Bill...

1) For abortion (before 1st trimester, i.e. Pro-Choice)
2) Thompson's record on immigration is decidedly mixed.
In the Senate, Thompson voted AGAINST tougher
enforcement of immigration laws. Two votes in
particular will be of concern to immigration
activists:
3) Sen. Thompson, in committee consideration of S.1664
protected businesses from having to pay higher fines
when they are caught hiring illegal aliens
4) The big one during his 8 years in Congress is the
McCain-Feingold bill. Thompson was a huge advocate
of the bill during his time in the Senate and each
year
his support for the legislation would knock around 4%
off his ACU rating. One year, it actually knocked
around
12% off as 3 different votes on Campaign reform were
counted.

I would like to see a McCain Thompson ticket, *IF
Thompson were Pro-Life, and *IF Thompson had
not supported the Visa Overstayers (which was the
status of most of the 9/11 hijackers.)

He is a good actor, he will be elected just like Reagan.

Yup.

Kyajer cracks me up, he just so blatantly transparent, one week he's
such a racist Illegals-lovin' liberal

they would make him the doorman
at San Francisco Gay Latino Bathhouse. Next week he is "American
Patriot" giving us (his fellow republicans

:) sage advice on that
great Conservative McCain.

Kjayer wants y'all Republicans out there to
steer away from that Fred Thompson

character, he might have done
something to assist Illegals is some way.

Kjayer (liberal anti-white
racist slash american patriot) is just like yoo and me and doesn't
like that one bit.

yukkity yuk

It a great usenet mystery why jokers like him seem to honestly believe
that they can fool all of the people all of the time. Or even some of
the time. I tend to chalk it up to either 1) Too many drugs,

or 2) Not
enough drugs.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46600c61$0$16525$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

And lobbied for savings and loan deregulation.

That turned out swell.

He probably will win for that. It would be consistent with the unwritten
policy against the percentage of Americans who are not millionaires.

Economic policy sponsored by actors. Great. I'm sure California's
Governator has a great perspective on the people when he purchases 15,000
boxes of Cigars.

"American Patriot" <kcajyer3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1180645195.810145.270770@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Fred Thompson Candidate, his short years (8) in Senate Votes:
pro-Choice, voted against tougher enforcement; supported Feingold
Bill...

1) For abortion (before 1st trimester, i.e. Pro-Choice)
2) Thompson's record on immigration is decidedly mixed.
In the Senate, Thompson voted AGAINST tougher
enforcement of immigration laws. Two votes in
particular will be of concern to immigration
activists:
3) Sen. Thompson, in committee consideration of S.1664
protected businesses from having to pay higher fines
when they are caught hiring illegal aliens
4) The big one during his 8 years in Congress is the
McCain-Feingold bill. Thompson was a huge advocate
of the bill during his time in the Senate and each
year
his support for the legislation would knock around 4%
off his ACU rating. One year, it actually knocked
around
12% off as 3 different votes on Campaign reform were
counted.

I would like to see a McCain Thompson ticket, *IF
Thompson were Pro-Life, and *IF Thompson had
not supported the Visa Overstayers (which was the
status of most of the 9/11 hijackers.)