<knews4u2chew@yahoo.com>
Dear Subscriber,
I spend almost as much time correcting misconceptions about the
"punchline"
here as I do explaining my actual conclusions.
the forms, the desire to lower one's own liability, etc. None of those
issues is what these messages are about, but any and all of those
EVERYTHING you know, think, or believe about taxes
(even if you think you already agree with me), and try to objectively
consider some evidence I will be putting in front of you. Once you
decide on your "verdict," I will thank you for your time and attention,
and
you can go back to believing whatever you want.
It sounds simple, but it's not. acquire not just a "belief," but a
Sincerely,
Larken Rose
larken@taxableincome.net.tax.scams
http://www.861.info.tax.scams
larken - please focus on your upcoming kiddy porn trial and not the
internet tax scams, the child porn will get you more jail time than any
tax scam
hale
http://www.quatlosers.com
Larken Rose
When a scam gets rolling, all sorts of human cockroaches come out of
the woodwork to try to cash in. This is the perfect description of
Larken Rose, a scammer come lately to the world of tax protesting Not
being smart enough to come up with any unique theory of his own, Larken
has simply latched on to the "861" or "Income Can't Be
Defined" arguments that end up with the conclusion that only
foreigners are required to pay income tax. taxableincome.net 861.info
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
The claim is that the Internal Revenue Code does not apply to most of
the income of citizens of the United States because the only
definitions of "sources of income" apply only to nonresident aliens and
foreign corporations. (See I.R.C. section 861 and its regulations.)
This argument is completely contrary to the express language of the
Internal Revenue Code and its regulations.
http://www.fraudsandscams.com
.
|
