Gonzo testimony contradicts White House



 Politics > Politics-USA > Gonzo testimony contradicts White House

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 10 May 2007 11:38:58 AM
Object: Gonzo testimony contradicts White House
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Gonzales_contradicts_White_House_on_Presidents_0510.html
Thursday May 10, 2007
Gonzales testimony contradicts White House, revealing new Bush
'conversation' over US attorney firings
Michael Roston
Weeks after the White House ruled out the involvement of President
George W. Bush in any discussions on the firing of 8 US Attorneys,
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said on Thursday morning that the
President had discussed the matter with advisers in an October 2006
meeting.
"I've now been made aware of the fact that there was a conversation
with the President that basically mentioned the same thing in October
of 2006," the Attorney General said while answering a question from
Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA).
"The same thing" referred to voter fraud cases in three US Attorneys'
districts, which Gonzales earlier acknowledged had been raised by Karl
Rove in a meeting "sometime in the Fall of 2006."
Gonzales' statement varied from remarks by White House spokespersons
that the President had not been involved in any discussions of firing
US Attorneys.
"I have said on the record for several weeks now that there is no
indication that the President knew about any of the ongoing
discussions over the two years, nor did he see a list or a plan before
it was carried out," said White House Deputy Press Secretary Dana
Perino on March 27, 2006.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/03/20070327-4.html
Furthermore, in a March 21 press briefing, White House Press Secretary
Tony Snow had been asked about a Nov. 15, 2006 e-mail from former
Gonzales chief of staff D. Kyle Sampson to former White House Counsel
Harriet Miers asking "Who will determine whether this requires the
President's attention?"
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/03/20070321-4.html
Snow was then asked "did the President have to sign off on this?"
referring to the firing of the Attorneys, to which he responded, "The
President has no recollection of this ever being raised with him."
A reporter later clarified, "Just to follow, did you say, again for
the record, that the President has no recollection of ever being asked
about any of this?"
Snow answered, "Yes, the removal – yes, that is correct."
RAW STORY was awaiting a reply from the White House at press time on
whether or not they agreed that Gonzales' remark contradicted earlier
White House statements.
___________________________________________________
Weird stuff, eh?
Harry
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Report contradicts big oil execs testimony denying a White House meeting.
Republican White House contradicts McClellan.
Account of Broad Shiite Revolt Contradicts Bush White House Stand
Bush embassy complains about Australian ***** house called "The White House"
Re: Bush White House desperately tries to end what it calls a "frenzy"
Gallup/CNN/USA Today: Less than half of US would vote to return Bush to White House
'Hubris in the White House'
A Vengeful Bush White House? Revealing the names of CIA operatives is a felony.
Coverup of Bush White House treason continues
Bush White House admits it lied about Iraq trip plane incident
George Dubya found caught in a dirt-tunnel hideout, 20 feet beneath the White House
Bush White House fascists enjoy playing judge and jury
No wonder Osama wants Bush in the White House.
Al Qaeda CIA Agent Beheaded In Iraq Due to White House Leak
# Graham Book: Inquiry into 9/11, Saudi Ties Blocked -- the White House blocked efforts to investigate
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER