gorge bush saved america from kerry when he fluw
his plain into all those buldins on 911 kiling milions
of americans and if kerry gets electred he will fly
more planes into our buldins becus he is a tererest
only gorge bush can save us from kerry the tererest
"GW *AWOL* Chimpzilla" <patriot-for-cash@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NKm3d.12060$wV.11533@attbi_s54...
05:07 PM EST - September 19, 2004
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON
Playing on the fear factor, Vice President ***** Cheney suggested in a
campaign
speech there might be another terrorist attack on the United States if
John
Kerry were in the White House. President Bush's opponents' are raising
their
own worst fears, including the potential for more wars during a second
Bush
term.
"That's fear-mongering," said Joseph Carafano, a 25-year Army veteran and
former
West Point professor who now is an analyst with the conservative Heritage
Foundation.
The rhetoric continued during the weekend. House Speaker Dennis Hastert,
R-Ill.,
speaking at a Saturday night fund-raiser in DeKalb, Ill., said his opinion
is
that the al-Qaida terror network could operate better with Kerry in the
White
House instead of Bush. Kerry's running mate, John Edwards, issued a
statement
Sunday accusing Hastert of using the "politics of fear," which Edwards
said is
a "clear sign of weakness and failed leadership."
With fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq far from over, a Pew Research Center
Poll
found that 51 percent of voters surveyed said they do worry that Bush, if
re-elected, would lead the country into another war.
"The Bush administration is on a crusade to make the world safe for
democracy
and part of that ... is eliminating countries of anti-Western aggression,"
said
Loren Thompson, a military analyst at the Lexington Institute think tank
in
Washington.
"They may not like me to say that on the eve of the election, but that's a
fact," Thompson said. "It's less likely to happen with a Kerry
administration."
Both Bush and Democrat Kerry have said they prefer diplomacy to deal with
Iran
and North Korea, which joined Iraq in "an axis of evil," as described by
the
president.
Under Bush, there is "reason for apprehension" because of his
administration's
"actions and rhetoric" over the past four years, said Ted Galen Carpenter
of
the libertarian Cato Institute.
Carpenter also cited among Bush's conservative supporters a "deep concern
....
and fairly militant attitude" that the United States needs to "do
something"
about Iran, North Korea, Syria and perhaps other governments.
"In some extreme neoconservative circles," there have also been calls for
"coercive measures against Saudi Arabia," Carpenter noted.
Those who think more wars in a second Bush administration are unlikely
point out
that there are not enough U.S. troops, given that the Pentagon already is
struggling to keep up with violence in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Others say the administration has no taste for another war after the
unexpected
difficulties of Iraq, and the bar has been raised for Congress and the
American
public as well. They say Americans will not so easily support another war
after
learning that prewar intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
was
false.
"I really don't think, absent something like an invasion of South Korea
(by
communist rival North Korea), that we could sustain another one," Carafano
said.
If forced into it by such a provocation, the Pentagon could most certainly
do it
by mobilizing more National Guard and Reserve troops and calling on
allies,
Carafano said.
But that would take the armed forces "to the edge," said Carafano, and
would
mean years to reconstitute the military in terms of troops readiness and
resupplying equipment.
Others note that while the Army is stretched extremely thin now, the Air
Force
and Navy are not.
"So the talk that you hear within the conservative community about perhaps
taking strong measures against Iran or North Korea would be feasible if it
were
confined to air strikes," Carpenter said. "Those who are concerned that a
second Bush presidency might go down that path might have some foundation
for
their concerns."
Some fear the United States could provoke a war - even if it did not fire
the
first shot - by focusing on tough talk and actions, rather than
negotiations.
"It's this process of bluster and threat and escalation that could lead to
war,"
said Michael O'Hanlon of the liberal-leaning Brookings Institute. "I don't
want
to say that the chance of war is particularly high, but I think it would
be
higher under Bush than under Kerry."
On North Korea, Kerry favors direct negotiations. Bush has instead
collective
talks involving six countries.
With Iran, some fear any effort to aid anti-government forces could get
the
United States "deeply involved in Iran's internal politics with
unpredictable
consequences," Carpenter said.
http://www.xposed.com/headline_news/90_ds_994679.aspx
--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas -- that says,
fool
me once, shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again."
http://www.diymedia.net/audio/mp3/tdntb-bushwack2.mp3
.
