| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Cameron L. Spitzer" |
| Date: |
11 Sep 2006 09:35:56 PM |
| Object: |
GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
Yesterday morning the Green Party of California's General
Assembly adopted a revised immigration plank.
Essentially the following text was adopted by consensus.
There may be some grammar or spelling changes.
There were general concerns about the thing being too long
and detailed. A couple of folks wanted explicit mention
of health care providers being forced to inform on their
patients to the INS. (We oppose that.)
There's no change in the basic position. It's just expanded and
modernized a bit.
Those of you who think the border should
be militarized and walled up, and immigrants punished
for trying to survive, would be more at home in some other party.
Cameron
Delegate to the General Assembly from Santa Clara County.
Immigration plank (under Social Justice and Livable Communities)
In California, discussions of immigration mostly center
on the Latino/a population that moves across the U.S - Mexican
border. Xenophobic responses, that were typified by Proposition 187,
claimed we "are suffering economic hardship by the presence of illegal
aliens..." To the contrary, numerous studies show that
immigrants, both documented and undocumented, contribute greatly to
the U.S. economy. It has been proven that immigrants stimulate local
economies, create jobs, and pay far more in taxes than they receive in
government benefits.
Reactionary allegations are popularized to divert discussions away from
underlying causes of U.S. economic erosion, such as the permanent decline
of labor-intensive jobs and the widening gap between rich and poor.
Both of these conditions are caused by depressed wages and working
conditions; the destruction of governmental protections that keep labor
unions viable; promoting trade agreements such as the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central American Free Trade Agreement
(CAFTA); and the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) which
result in exporting manufacturing jobs. At the same time, global
issues such as deterioration of natural resources and the economic and
social devastation of Third World Nations by the predatory economic
policies of the United States and other developed northern countries,
multinational corporations, WTO, International Monetary Fund (IMF), World
Bank, and international trade agreements such as NAFTA and CAFTA which
serve to drive down commodity prices and to create huge economic debt with
huge interest payments are ignored as contributors to human migration.
The pressure of some 1.3 million Mexican farm families that have been
driven off their land by the combination of NAFTA and the U.S. government
subsidies to agribusiness giants has also contributed to immigration.
Discussions of immigration among politicians are currently limited
to enforcement against undocumented immigrants and building a massive
wall on the U.S-Mexican border, or restarting a guest worker program.
The reactionary response to illegal immigration has resulted in an
effort to thwart the entry of undocumented immigrants by attempting to
deprive them of a living wage; cut them off from medical care, education
and other public services; and deprive them of civil and human rights
guaranteed to all persons residing in the United States.
Building a wall will not stop illegal immigration. People are creative
and will find both legal and illegal means to cross the California-Mexico
or any border. The most effective tool would be to support the creation
of an international labor union establishing enforceable policies
including living wage, good working conditions, health benefits,
disability insurance, and worker's compensation benefits. The Green
Party is opposed to the creation of a Guest Worker Program as it
creates a permanent class of residents who are here for labor, but who
are permanently barred from becoming citizens, voting, and unionizing.
A. The Green Party supports these policies (as advocated
by Cesar Chavez) that seek to integrate, rather than
alienate, immigrant labor: we should acknowledge and
celebrate the influence of diverse cultures in the mosaic
that is the unique California culture
1. International borders should be recognized as area
of bi-national interdependence. International border
areas should be authentic fair-trade zones where
people are free to travel across borders for work,
shopping or recreation.
a. Barrier walls between countries
are ineffective. Thus, walls along the
U.S-Mexican border should be destroyed and
their construction should be halted
b. Reduce the private and public militarization
of U.S.-Mexican border
2. The Green Party supports the creation of a
multinational labor union that establishes consistent
policies in each country which ensure a living wage,
health benefits and safe working conditions.
3. The Green Party supports the principles of 'fair'
trade, rather than 'free' trade. Therefore we
support the renegotiation of: international trade
agreements such as CAFTA and NAFTA and the WTO;
the policies of the IMF, World Bank and other
international banking institutions; and the terms
and conditions of contracts with multinational
corporations; and cancellation of the crushing
international debt for highly indebted poor
countries..
4. All immigrant workers in the U.S., legal or not,
must be subject to U.S. wage, tax and labor laws
including workplace health and safety standards
as well as worker_s compensation, disability and
unemployment insurance benefits. Programs involving
temporary worker status must include the option
of permanent residency for immigrants already in
the U.S.
5. Legalization programs which provide immigrants
with the ability to obtain Permanent Residency status
should provide information on entry outlining the
legalization process timeline and should be fair,
simplified, transparent, affordable, and attainable
by at most 5 years after entry. Immediate and full
legalization should be offered for all working
immigrants and their families currently resident
within the United States.
6. Immigration quotas based on race, class and
ideology should be abandoned for immigration policies
that promote fairness, non-discrimination and family
reunification. The law must allow immigration for
reasons of political exile and refugee status.
7. Laws that exclude Mexicans should be repealed.
B. The Green Party supports policies that restore and
guarantee basic human rights to all persons residing in
the United States. All human rights must apply to all
races and ethnicities equally.
1. We oppose the continuing legislative trend of
reducing and/or denying services that are available
to all other workers.
2. We advocate voting rights for permanent residents,
as was the law prior to World War I.
3. All immigrants, regardless of status, have the
right to receive medical care, education, housing and
access to all available public benefits and services.
4. Interpreters should be available in emergency
rooms, hospitals and health care clinics.
5. All immigrants, regardless of status have the
right to apply for a driver's license without
immigration status notification or restriction.
6. Racial profiling should be ended. The rights of
all races and ethnicities in California should be
all equal human rights.
C. The Green Party supports policies that restore
and guarantee the civil rights provided for under the
Constitution of the United States which specifically
states that the rights apply to all persons residing in
the United States. All civil rights must apply to all
races and ethnicities equally.
1. All immigrants, regardless of status, have 1st
amendment rights of freedom of speech, and the
freedom of assembly and association.
2. For all civil and criminal hearings, all
immigrants have due process rights to be informed of
the charges brought against them, to confront their
accusers, to have competent legal representation
and to have a speedy trial. All immigrants have
the right to free interpreter assistance for all
legal proceedings. These rights must also apply to
the deportation internment and hearing process.
3. The use of force or torture or other means to
compel testimony against themselves, or to obtain
confessions must be banned.
4. All immigrants have the right to be secure in
their houses, and protected against unreasonable
search and seizure.
5. All immigrants must be protected against arbitrary
arrest or detention based on racial or cultural
profiling.
6. All immigrants have the right to be protected
against intimidation by public officials or private
individuals. Enforcement of immigration laws is
the responsibility of the Federal Immigration
and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Requiring
local law enforcement agencies to serve as adjunct
immigration agents of the Federal Immigration and
Custom Enforcement agency must be banned.
.
|
|
| User: "-" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
11 Sep 2006 11:27:16 PM |
|
|
"Cameron L. Spitzer" <spambait@merde.greens.org> wrote:
Yesterday morning the Green Party of California's General
Assembly adopted a revised immigration plank.
Essentially the following text was adopted by consensus.
There may be some grammar or spelling changes.
Which says that you do not have "diversity" within the
Green Party. Your plank was adopted by CONSENSUS.
Those of you who think the border should
be militarized and walled up, and immigrants punished
for trying to survive, would be more at home in some other party.
Hey, bud. At the ballot box there isn't any "party" presence.
... numerous studies show that immigrants, both documented and
undocumented, contribute greatly to the U.S. economy. It has been
proven that immigrants stimulate local economies, create jobs, and
pay far more in taxes than they receive in government benefits.
Like hell. Did those studies factor in the cost of crime, the
cost of welfare, the cost of medicare and medicaid, the cost of
public school education, the cost of remedial education, the cost
of food stamps, the cost of subsidized housing? Please CITE.
Reactionary allegations are popularized to divert discussions away from
underlying causes of U.S. economic erosion, such as the permanent decline
of labor-intensive jobs and the widening gap between rich and poor.
Yes, the "widening gap" is caused by an immigrant voting base
which is voting for politicians who increase the "widening gap."
This is Mexican structure that they import whole-hog into the USA.
----------------------------------------
"MURS radios" <horseshoe7@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Greens are traitorous Commies... the ONLY good they have done
is to split the liberal vote - otherwise Gore would have won in 2000.
Absolutely correct. I'll be exposing those bastards for what they are.
- regards
- jb
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Obrador Rejects Mexico Election Defeat
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=10057
-------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Ladasky" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 01:52:57 AM |
|
|
"Cameron L. Spitzer" <spambait@merde.greens.org> wrote:
Yesterday morning the Green Party of California's General
Assembly adopted a revised immigration plank.
Essentially the following text was adopted by consensus.
There may be some grammar or spelling changes.
It looks pretty solid to me. You folks covered all the major points.
Meanwhile, the White-Power-Or-Die wrote:
Which says that you do not have "diversity" within the
Green Party. Your plank was adopted by CONSENSUS.
You're right about one thing. An anti-racist group like the Green
Party will not have any of your kind sitting at our table. Thus it
will be no problem for an anti-racist platform statement to obtain
Green Party consensus.
But this doesn't mean the Green Party lacks diversity, and you know it.
We promote tolerance. That means that many people can participate in
the Green Party. But NOT everyone -- and there's no contradiction in
this. By definition, the only thing that tolerant people are allowed
to, in fact must, find intolerable, is -- drum roll, please --
INTOLERANCE!
Go away, and form your own political group, as the law allows. You are
not welcome in ours.
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Ladasky Home Solar, Inc.: blowing sunshine up your |
| power grid since March 24, 2005. Fiat lux! |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Uptime Downtime kWh generated kWh consumed |
| 534 days 6.5 hours 10191 10083 |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert not Roberto" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 11:59:19 AM |
|
|
"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1158043977.872017.201260@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
You're right about one thing. An anti-racist group like the Green
Party will not have any of your kind sitting at our table. Thus it
will be no problem for an anti-racist platform statement to obtain
Green Party consensus.
But this doesn't mean the Green Party lacks diversity, and you know it.
We promote tolerance. That means that many people can participate in
the Green Party. But NOT everyone -- and there's no contradiction in
this. By definition, the only thing that tolerant people are allowed
to, in fact must, find intolerable, is -- drum roll, please --
INTOLERANCE!
How tolerant is the Green Party toward conservatives?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cameron L. Spitzer" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 07:01:15 PM |
|
|
In article <HHBNg.396$Ka1.311@news01.roc.ny>, Robert not Roberto wrote:
How tolerant is the Green Party toward conservatives?
"Conservative" is a label which usually refers to a
bundle of attitudes and issue positions, and the people
who advocate them. The particular attitudes and positions
change over time, sometimes rather quickly. Fiscal
responsibility, like not running huge government deficits,
used to be a "conservative" position. Today's conservatives
have doubled the national debt. The cautionary principle
was once considered "conservative." Don't drill holes
in your only rowboat when you don't know how fast they'll
leak and you don't have tools to patch them.
Now it's "conservative" to just deny they'll leak at all.
Because of their ever-changing definitions, Greens avoid
using labels like "conservative." You're welcome to
register Green, attend our business meetings, write for
our publications, etc, whether you consider yourself
"conservative" or not. Nobody will put you down for it.
But if you're advocating things that conflict with the
values we've agreed on, you'll be wasting your time and
ours. It takes a lot of work to change a Green Party
platform plank, and that's on purpose. If you want to
build a fortification along the Mexican border, we'll
tolerate you just fine, but we won't change our platform
for you.
Cameron
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Ladasky" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 12:32:36 PM |
|
|
Robert not Roberto wrote:
"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1158043977.872017.201260@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
You're right about one thing. An anti-racist group like the Green
Party will not have any of your kind sitting at our table. Thus it
will be no problem for an anti-racist platform statement to obtain
Green Party consensus.
But this doesn't mean the Green Party lacks diversity, and you know it.
We promote tolerance. That means that many people can participate in
the Green Party. But NOT everyone -- and there's no contradiction in
this. By definition, the only thing that tolerant people are allowed
to, in fact must, find intolerable, is -- drum roll, please --
INTOLERANCE!
How tolerant is the Green Party toward conservatives?
Conservatives have the same rights to exercise their politics as anyone
else.
Meanwhile, Greens do not have to let conservatives barge into their
internal party affairs any more than Republicans have to allow Greens.
Jazzerciser@hotmail.com is a gate-crasher. It can go be a racist in
some other venue, if it likes, but the Green Party will not accept it
into our organization.
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Ladasky Home Solar, Inc.: blowing sunshine up your |
| power grid since March 24, 2005. Fiat lux! |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Uptime Downtime kWh generated kWh consumed |
| 534 days 6.5 hours 10191 10083 |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert not Roberto" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 01:52:25 PM |
|
|
"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1158082356.128519.98150@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Robert not Roberto wrote:
"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1158043977.872017.201260@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
You're right about one thing. An anti-racist group like the Green
Party will not have any of your kind sitting at our table. Thus it
will be no problem for an anti-racist platform statement to obtain
Green Party consensus.
But this doesn't mean the Green Party lacks diversity, and you know it.
We promote tolerance. That means that many people can participate in
the Green Party. But NOT everyone -- and there's no contradiction in
this. By definition, the only thing that tolerant people are allowed
to, in fact must, find intolerable, is -- drum roll, please --
INTOLERANCE!
How tolerant is the Green Party toward conservatives?
Conservatives have the same rights to exercise their politics as anyone
else.
Meanwhile, Greens do not have to let conservatives barge into their
internal party affairs any more than Republicans have to allow Greens.
You didn't answer the question but then again, maybe you did. You are no
more tolerant of conservatives than liberals who preach tolerance are you?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "-" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 01:15:39 PM |
|
|
Robert not Roberto wrote:
How tolerant is the Green Party toward conservatives?
"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote:
Conservatives have the same rights to exercise their politics as anyone
else.
That's not what "Robert not Roberto" was asking.
Meanwhile, Greens do not have to let conservatives barge into their
internal party affairs any more than Republicans have to allow Greens.
Who has barged into the Green Party "internal affairs"?
Jazzerciser@hotmail.com is a gate-crasher. It can go be a racist in
some other venue, if it likes, but the Green Party will not accept it
into our organization.
Excuse me. I resent the implication. I have never called myself a
racist, nor am I affiliated with racists. I am an advocate of minority
rights, and today the Whites are a minority in the world. They will
become minorities in their own countries as the consequence of
expansionist "mud people" policies promulgated by the Green Party.
Their expansionist "mud people" policies are contemporary racism.
Hardly "gate crashing" to post to an alt.* hierarchy newsgroup.
Examine the language of dehumanization John deploys, referencing
a person with the gender-neutral pronouns "it." But Greens were
so accepting of self-determination w/r/t sex orientation! John is
a hypocrite, one of the worst types, and committing the worst sin.
John doesn't mind dehumanization while he arrogates "anti-racism."
Ultimately, at the end of the day, the civility of discourse will decide.
Still tolerant of "diversity", John?
- regards
- jb
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISRAELI MILITARY OFFICER CONFESSES: "WE USED CLUSTER BOMBS
AND WHITE PHOSPHOROUS AGAINST CIVILIANS IN LEBANON"
FIRED ROCKETS CONTAINING OVER ONE MILLION CLUSTER BOMBLETS
INTO ENTIRE VILLAGES!"
Also fired massive amounts of white phosphorous ammunition with
the expressed purpose being to start fires and destroy entire villages.
The IDF officer says "What we did was monstrous and insane." Yes, it was;
and you did it because you jews are monsters, literally. You are the
genetic spawn of satan and thus must be wiped from the face of this earth.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=cluster+bomb&itemNo=761781
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "-" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 03:09:12 AM |
|
|
jazzerciser@hotmail.com wrote:
Which says that you do not have "diversity" within the
Green Party. Your plank was adopted by CONSENSUS.
"John Ladasky" <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote:
You're right about one thing. An anti-racist group like the Green
Party will not have any of your kind sitting at our table. Thus it
will be no problem for an anti-racist platform statement to obtain
Green Party consensus.
But the Green Party is not anti-racist. The Green Party has
cast itself in favor of the massive Brown Out with Big Brown Turds.
But this doesn't mean the Green Party lacks diversity, and you know it.
NO I don't know it. You say yourself in the last sententence herein:
"Go away, and form your own political group, as the law allows.
You are not welcome in ours." --- John Ladasky
That's the spitting definition of anti-diversity, and intolerance.
We promote tolerance. That means that many people can participate
in the Green Party. But NOT everyone -- and there's no contradiction
in this. By definition, the only thing that tolerant people are allowed
to, in fact must, find intolerable, is -- drum roll, please -- INTOLERANCE!
You find consensus vote reassuring. I find it anti-democratic & fascist.
If you need the definition of intolerance you will find it via consensus.
Go away, and form your own political group, as the law allows.
You are not welcome in ours.
I can assure you, if the California plank spreads further I will
not be voting Green Party. I do not believe that Greens are going
to protect the environment. Indeed, "there is no political solution."
Hypocrisy will just foul the waters, and Greens are walking the plank.
- regards
- jb
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Immigration Reform in 2006?
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst091106.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 01:17:02 PM |
|
|
A Green Party policy position, as reported:
a. Barrier walls between countries
are ineffective. Thus, walls along the
U.S-Mexican border should be destroyed and
their construction should be halted
Open borders promote destructive Global Swarming. - Leif
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Head Bustin Hank" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 07:18:06 AM |
|
|
Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
Yesterday morning the Green Party of California's General
Assembly adopted a revised immigration plank.
Couldn't the all the Fungus People just go to some remote island and
form their utopian society there?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MURS radios" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
11 Sep 2006 10:18:24 PM |
|
|
The Greens are traitorous Commies... the ONLY good they have done is to
split the liberal vote - otherwise Gore would have won in 2000.
- Stewart
San Diego Minutemen
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "RArmant" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 02:35:04 PM |
|
|
What the Green Party favors is open borders protectionism.
Let the cheap labor in but keep the cheap goods out.
This would drive down wages while raising the price level.
Much of the MSM holds this position. This is why the MSM
blames wage depression brought about by immigration on
free trade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Bramscher" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 03:37:22 PM |
|
|
RArmant wrote:
What the Green Party favors is open borders protectionism.
Let the cheap labor in but keep the cheap goods out.
This would drive down wages while raising the price level.
It would have to be coupled with living wage laws here at home to keep
wages high, and severe restrictions on US companies that outsource to
exploit cheaper third world labor & weak environmental laws. Additional
strategies would need to be employed as well.
Unocal building a pipeline in Burma with slave labor isn't a situation
that occurred *despite* our current system. It was a logical byproduct.
The main problem is that national economics (economic cartels) are
exploited by those at the top far more readily, than workers themselves
are able to tap. Want cheaper labor? Outsource your IT department to
India. Want cheaper housing? Move to a small town Saskatchewan. Oh
wait -- you'll lose your job, have to change citizenship, and completely
change your life.
There's an asymmetry there.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GP of Cal revises Immigration plank in its platform |
12 Sep 2006 06:58:33 AM |
|
|
Worthless as the fucking Dems and GOP!
ted
Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
Yesterday morning the Green Party of California's General
Assembly adopted a revised immigration plank.
Essentially the following text was adopted by consensus.
There may be some grammar or spelling changes.
There were general concerns about the thing being too long
and detailed. A couple of folks wanted explicit mention
of health care providers being forced to inform on their
patients to the INS. (We oppose that.)
There's no change in the basic position. It's just expanded and
modernized a bit.
Those of you who think the border should
be militarized and walled up, and immigrants punished
for trying to survive, would be more at home in some other party.
Cameron
Delegate to the General Assembly from Santa Clara County.
Immigration plank (under Social Justice and Livable Communities)
In California, discussions of immigration mostly center
on the Latino/a population that moves across the U.S - Mexican
border. Xenophobic responses, that were typified by Proposition 187,
claimed we "are suffering economic hardship by the presence of illegal
aliens..." To the contrary, numerous studies show that
immigrants, both documented and undocumented, contribute greatly to
the U.S. economy. It has been proven that immigrants stimulate local
economies, create jobs, and pay far more in taxes than they receive in
government benefits.
Reactionary allegations are popularized to divert discussions away from
underlying causes of U.S. economic erosion, such as the permanent decline
of labor-intensive jobs and the widening gap between rich and poor.
Both of these conditions are caused by depressed wages and working
conditions; the destruction of governmental protections that keep labor
unions viable; promoting trade agreements such as the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central American Free Trade Agreement
(CAFTA); and the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) which
result in exporting manufacturing jobs. At the same time, global
issues such as deterioration of natural resources and the economic and
social devastation of Third World Nations by the predatory economic
policies of the United States and other developed northern countries,
multinational corporations, WTO, International Monetary Fund (IMF), World
Bank, and international trade agreements such as NAFTA and CAFTA which
serve to drive down commodity prices and to create huge economic debt with
huge interest payments are ignored as contributors to human migration.
The pressure of some 1.3 million Mexican farm families that have been
driven off their land by the combination of NAFTA and the U.S. government
subsidies to agribusiness giants has also contributed to immigration.
Discussions of immigration among politicians are currently limited
to enforcement against undocumented immigrants and building a massive
wall on the U.S-Mexican border, or restarting a guest worker program.
The reactionary response to illegal immigration has resulted in an
effort to thwart the entry of undocumented immigrants by attempting to
deprive them of a living wage; cut them off from medical care, education
and other public services; and deprive them of civil and human rights
guaranteed to all persons residing in the United States.
Building a wall will not stop illegal immigration. People are creative
and will find both legal and illegal means to cross the California-Mexico
or any border. The most effective tool would be to support the creation
of an international labor union establishing enforceable policies
including living wage, good working conditions, health benefits,
disability insurance, and worker's compensation benefits. The Green
Party is opposed to the creation of a Guest Worker Program as it
creates a permanent class of residents who are here for labor, but who
are permanently barred from becoming citizens, voting, and unionizing.
A. The Green Party supports these policies (as advocated
by Cesar Chavez) that seek to integrate, rather than
alienate, immigrant labor: we should acknowledge and
celebrate the influence of diverse cultures in the mosaic
that is the unique California culture
1. International borders should be recognized as area
of bi-national interdependence. International border
areas should be authentic fair-trade zones where
people are free to travel across borders for work,
shopping or recreation.
a. Barrier walls between countries
are ineffective. Thus, walls along the
U.S-Mexican border should be destroyed and
their construction should be halted
b. Reduce the private and public militarization
of U.S.-Mexican border
2. The Green Party supports the creation of a
multinational labor union that establishes consistent
policies in each country which ensure a living wage,
health benefits and safe working conditions.
3. The Green Party supports the principles of 'fair'
trade, rather than 'free' trade. Therefore we
support the renegotiation of: international trade
agreements such as CAFTA and NAFTA and the WTO;
the policies of the IMF, World Bank and other
international banking institutions; and the terms
and conditions of contracts with multinational
corporations; and cancellation of the crushing
international debt for highly indebted poor
countries..
4. All immigrant workers in the U.S., legal or not,
must be subject to U.S. wage, tax and labor laws
including workplace health and safety standards
as well as worker_s compensation, disability and
unemployment insurance benefits. Programs involving
temporary worker status must include the option
of permanent residency for immigrants already in
the U.S.
5. Legalization programs which provide immigrants
with the ability to obtain Permanent Residency status
should provide information on entry outlining the
legalization process timeline and should be fair,
simplified, transparent, affordable, and attainable
by at most 5 years after entry. Immediate and full
legalization should be offered for all working
immigrants and their families currently resident
within the United States.
6. Immigration quotas based on race, class and
ideology should be abandoned for immigration policies
that promote fairness, non-discrimination and family
reunification. The law must allow immigration for
reasons of political exile and refugee status.
7. Laws that exclude Mexicans should be repealed.
B. The Green Party supports policies that restore and
guarantee basic human rights to all persons residing in
the United States. All human rights must apply to all
races and ethnicities equally.
1. We oppose the continuing legislative trend of
reducing and/or denying services that are available
to all other workers.
2. We advocate voting rights for permanent residents,
as was the law prior to World War I.
3. All immigrants, regardless of status, have the
right to receive medical care, education, housing and
access to all available public benefits and services.
4. Interpreters should be available in emergency
rooms, hospitals and health care clinics.
5. All immigrants, regardless of status have the
right to apply for a driver's license without
immigration status notification or restriction.
6. Racial profiling should be ended. The rights of
all races and ethnicities in California should be
all equal human rights.
C. The Green Party supports policies that restore
and guarantee the civil rights provided for under the
Constitution of the United States which specifically
states that the rights apply to all persons residing in
the United States. All civil rights must apply to all
races and ethnicities equally.
1. All immigrants, regardless of status, have 1st
amendment rights of freedom of speech, and the
freedom of assembly and association.
2. For all civil and criminal hearings, all
immigrants have due process rights to be informed of
the charges brought against them, to confront their
accusers, to have competent legal representation
and to have a speedy trial. All immigrants have
the right to free interpreter assistance for all
legal proceedings. These rights must also apply to
the deportation internment and hearing process.
3. The use of force or torture or other means to
compel testimony against themselves, or to obtain
confessions must be banned.
4. All immigrants have the right to be secure in
their houses, and protected against unreasonable
search and seizure.
5. All immigrants must be protected against arbitrary
arrest or detention based on racial or cultural
profiling.
6. All immigrants have the right to be protected
against intimidation by public officials or private
individuals. Enforcement of immigration laws is
the responsibility of the Federal Immigration
and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Requiring
local law enforcement agencies to serve as adjunct
immigration agents of the Federal Immigration and
Custom Enforcement agency must be banned.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|