GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november



 Politics > Politics-USA > GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE"
Date: 17 Aug 2006 02:38:09 PM
Object: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november
Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."
So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.
.

User: "Arizona Bushwhacker"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:05:09 PM
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rfg9e25horlrbs85jlahq5okc3k976sb3b@4ax.com...

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.

That wouldn't surprise me.
Of course if there was another terrorist
attack on America before the election
FOX News will be the first to demand
that Bush seize dictatorial powers and
cancel all elections until the never-ending
war on terror is over.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:29:23 PM
Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:

"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rfg9e25horlrbs85jlahq5okc3k976sb3b@4ax.com...

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.



That wouldn't surprise me.

Of course if there was another terrorist
attack on America before the election
FOX News will be the first to demand
that Bush seize dictatorial powers and
cancel all elections until the never-ending
war on terror is over.

I was told before the last election that it might very well be the last
one. That dubya would find a way to stay in office as dictator. I
thought that was nuts but then maybe that person who told me that was
right
.
User: "Errol"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 19 Aug 2006 04:37:33 AM
wrote:


I was told before the last election that it might very well be the last
one. That dubya would find a way to stay in office as dictator. I
thought that was nuts but then maybe that person who told me that was
right

I can see W declaring something along the lines of "A State of
Emergency" in which he will "suspend" the constitution.
--
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the
military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties
or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an
alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge
industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods
and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
- Eisenhower Farewell Speech, 1961
.
User: "RonB"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 19 Aug 2006 04:41:20 AM
On Sat 19 Aug 2006 03:37:33a, Errol <none@nowherereally.net>, wrote:

I can see W declaring something along the lines of "A State of
Emergency" in which he will "suspend" the constitution.

Why bother when you can just ignore it?
--
RonB
"There's a story there...somewhere"
.


User: "jimpgh2002"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 07:22:17 PM
On 17 Aug 2006 13:29:23 -0700,
wrote:


Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:

"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rfg9e25horlrbs85jlahq5okc3k976sb3b@4ax.com...

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.



That wouldn't surprise me.

Of course if there was another terrorist
attack on America before the election
FOX News will be the first to demand
that Bush seize dictatorial powers and
cancel all elections until the never-ending
war on terror is over.


I was told before the last election that it might very well be the last
one. That dubya would find a way to stay in office as dictator. I
thought that was nuts but then maybe that person who told me that was
right

Or maybe you're an idiot, like that other person.
.


User: "Transition Zone"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 02:22:52 AM
Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:

"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rfg9e25horlrbs85jlahq5okc3k976sb3b@4ax.com...

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.


That wouldn't surprise me.

Of course if there was another terrorist
attack on America before the election
FOX News will be the first to demand
that Bush seize dictatorial powers and
cancel all elections until the never-ending
war on terror is over.

Whereby other countries would then stoke on a Coup which would most
certainly seal final once-and for-all imprisonment of these cronies.
.

User: "jimpgh2002"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 07:23:00 PM
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:05:09 -0700, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
<ArizonaBushwhacker@cox.net> wrote:


"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rfg9e25horlrbs85jlahq5okc3k976sb3b@4ax.com...

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.



That wouldn't surprise me.

That's because you're not very bright.

Of course if there was another terrorist
attack on America before the election
FOX News will be the first to demand
that Bush seize dictatorial powers and
cancel all elections until the never-ending
war on terror is over.

Sure, just like they did right after 9/11.
.

User: "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 10:09:03 PM
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:05:09 -0700, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
<ArizonaBushwhacker@cox.net> wrote:


"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rfg9e25horlrbs85jlahq5okc3k976sb3b@4ax.com...

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.



That wouldn't surprise me.

Of course if there was another terrorist
attack on America before the election
FOX News will be the first to demand
that Bush seize dictatorial powers and
cancel all elections until the never-ending
war on terror is over.

I thought of that too. The public is perhaps wising up and may
respond to another terror attack by accusing the govt of doing it just
like 9-11. The the repubs would have no choice but to cancel the
elections. Either way the country is in for a rough next few months.
.


User: "jimpgh2002"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 07:21:29 PM
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:09 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.

What is guaranteed is that you will continue to make idiotic
posts.
.
User: "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 10:10:04 PM
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:21:29 GMT, jimpgh2002 <pmojh@xxnospamxx.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:09 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.


What is guaranteed is that you will continue to make idiotic
posts.

HAHAHA. Translation - you know i'm right and thus can only respond
with childish namecalling.
.
User: "jimpgh2002"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 11:17:10 PM
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:10:04 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:21:29 GMT, jimpgh2002 <pmojh@xxnospamxx.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:09 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.


What is guaranteed is that you will continue to make idiotic
posts.


HAHAHA. Translation - you know i'm right and thus can only respond
with childish namecalling.

Except that I didn't call you any names. Thus, your response
proved my point was correct.
.
User: "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 10:12:26 AM
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:17:10 GMT, jimpgh2002 <pmojh@xxnospamxx.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:10:04 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:21:29 GMT, jimpgh2002 <pmojh@xxnospamxx.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:09 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.


What is guaranteed is that you will continue to make idiotic
posts.


HAHAHA. Translation - you know i'm right and thus can only respond
with childish namecalling.


Except that I didn't call you any names. Thus, your response
proved my point was correct.

You can't even read your own posts cause you called me an idiot.
.
User: "jimpgh2002"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 12:44:56 PM
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:12:26 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:17:10 GMT, jimpgh2002 <pmojh@xxnospamxx.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:10:04 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:21:29 GMT, jimpgh2002 <pmojh@xxnospamxx.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:09 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.


What is guaranteed is that you will continue to make idiotic
posts.


HAHAHA. Translation - you know i'm right and thus can only respond
with childish namecalling.


Except that I didn't call you any names. Thus, your response
proved my point was correct.


You can't even read your own posts cause you called me an idiot.

No, I didn't, I said that you would continue to make idiotic
posts...and once again you have shown that I was correct.
.


User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 12:03:09 AM
One of the few nice things about Israel and American Zionists STAGING
9-11 as a 'New Pearl Harbor' to 'help' Americans think ONLY Israel's
enemies are the things America should fight against, is that when the
Bushies LIE THEIR FUCKING ASSES OFF about 'Huh? What? Israel involved
in 9-11? Controlled Demolition?? How silly...."
LOL
Pull my other leg, ***** munch.
There are not very many certanties.
One thing that is certain, that if you are a regular.
You HAVE HEARD ABOUT ISRAEL BEING INVOLVED IN 9-11...
EVERY DAY
Did I mention EVERY day yet?
Notice how I said every?
Oh, sure. You have done the SAME badly-acted horseshit EVERY DAY, about
how the whole issue was a silly one time thing. Sure. We agree on that.
The average 'I hate 9-11 conspiracy kooks!' ***** around here has
posted.. what? 75? 150? posts about it? Yeah. So apart from the 150
times you pretended you had not heard about Israel being involved in
9-11, I guess everyone is fooled.
As to why Israel would be involved in 9-11. That ALONE proves what a
BAD LIAR you are. You have to be a real bad liar to run the hustle of,
you can't imagine why Israel would do something like that.
You mean apart from 9-11 (if it was not known to be an inside job by
Zionists) was supposed to be the GREATEST OPPORTUNITY IN THE HISTORY OF
ISRAEL.
America, the so-called last superpower, is for the next what? TWO
DECADES??? America the last super power will sacrifice all its wealth,
people, and reputation, for the next generation fighting ISRAEL'S
ENEMIES, expanding Israel, empowering Israel, and removing ALL ALL ALL
Israel's enemies, at ZERO COST TO ISRAEL, and you tell me you can't
imagine how Israel might get ahead by it?
Next you will tell me you never heard 'false flag' before.
Israel does them all the time.
Has been CAUGHT multiple times.
Was caught AGAIN on 9-11.
So, here is a clue, dumbshit. Upgrade your bad acting.
You have heard about Israel being involved in 9-11 for a VERY LONG
TIME.
You should get tired of pretending it is a new thing. You have
PRETENDED it was a new issue about 150 times now. When do you admit you
have heard all about it? after your official 1,000th denial?
check the numbers. MOST PEOPLE know 9-11 was an inside job.
the MINORITY OF KOOKS WITH A CONSPIRACY THEORY, have a BIN LADEN
conspiracy theory.
The FACTS point at THERMATE controlled demolition,
If all these ISRAELIS and Zionist Jews DIED in the WTC.... NAME THEM
FOR US.
Yes, I know you will write PAGES AND PAGES saying how they all died. We
know that.
Skip all that work.
JUST THE NAMES WILL DO.
We can all google those names.
What amazing 'luck' all the Israelis walked out before the 'attack'.
If you want lame *****. look to your own defense.
Germans chased around jews a couple generations ago before we were
born..... so..... that means Israel is always good and right and
innocent.
Wow.
What a well thought out argument that is.
.




User: "JHM"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 05:27:50 PM
What a nasty partisanship-warped mind you have, sir! Don't you see
how Neocomrade Dr. Rice and Little Brother and the Big Management Party
are only always labourin' to attain Peace For Everybody and not some
covert advantage for themselves?
Tusk, tusk!
.
User: "Transition Zone"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 02:26:36 AM
JHM wrote:

What a nasty partisanship-warped mind you have, sir! Don't you see
how Neocomrade Dr. Rice and Little Brother and the Big Management Party
are only always labourin' to attain Peace For Everybody and not some
covert advantage for themselves?

The more the bush crowd stages terror attacks, the greater the chance
they'll slip-up and screw-it up (like cons usually do).
I'm sure they'll finally get caught - and probably with plenty of mob
justice to spare.
.


User: "Grendel"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:04:01 PM
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

Republicans are set to lose both houses of congress and that would
mean impeachment and conviction for bush and then criminal indictment
for him and his cronies. Not that democrats want to impeach bush -
they are just as corrupt as ever. But the public would demand they
impeach and dems would no longer be able to say "we're powerless - the
GOP controls congress."

So the repubs will stage another attack in the hopes of mustering
support and this one will make 9-11 look like a mud-fight.

Perfect maneuvering for liberals. They're attempting to cover all
bases.
Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho). The other half will claim that Bush isn't doing enough to stop
terrorism, as if he were, he would have found that plot that is out
there. They will all claim that it is America's fault that 'they
don't like us'.
Scenario 2: There is a terrorist attack thwarted and terrorist
arrested.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim that it was Republican plot to
make Bush look good so he can take away our freedoms (they won't NAME
those freedoms, tho). The other half will claim that Bush isn't
doing enough to stop terrorism. They will all claim that it is
America's fault that 'they don't like us'.
Scenario 3: There is a successful terrorist attack on a major U.S.
city.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim it was a Republican plot to make
Bush look good so he can take away our freedoms (they won't NAME
those freedoms, tho). The other half will claim that Bush isn't
doing enough to stop terrorism. They will all claim that it is
America's fault that 'they don't like us'.
Yol Bolsun,
Grendel.
"We're amused by you libs and dims. It's kinda like watching the
chimps at the zoo. You know there's a limited amount of intelligence
there, they're cute and they're fun to watch, but you know they'll
never quite make evolutionary leap."
.
User: "Arizona Bushwhacker"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:32:21 PM
"Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1155845041.010238.172490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho).

How about my right to expect that the
government obtain a lawful warrant before
they wiretap my phone?
Oops...
I forgot, the fucking republicans hate
that right!
There is NOTHING in the Bill of
Rights that ANY republican supports!
Not a single damn thing!
.
User: "Lloyd King"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:24:07 PM
"Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBushwhacker@cox.net> wrote in message
news:234Fg.7315$Mz3.6812@fed1read07...


"Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1155845041.010238.172490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho).



How about my right to expect that the
government obtain a lawful warrant before
they wiretap my phone?

Oops...
I forgot, the fucking republicans hate
that right!

There is NOTHING in the Bill of
Rights that ANY republican supports!
Not a single damn thing!

Except, of course, in the 2nd Amendment.
.
User: "Arizona Bushwhacker"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:52:57 PM
"Lloyd King" <lloydking@kinglloydcom.com> wrote in message
news:12e9k3813e3hm15@corp.supernews.com...


"Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBushwhacker@cox.net> wrote in message
news:234Fg.7315$Mz3.6812@fed1read07...


"Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1155845041.010238.172490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho).



How about my right to expect that the
government obtain a lawful warrant before
they wiretap my phone?

Oops...
I forgot, the fucking republicans hate
that right!

There is NOTHING in the Bill of
Rights that ANY republican supports!
Not a single damn thing!


Except, of course, in the 2nd Amendment.

Republicans do not support the Second Amendment.
Buy a gun and pay your sales taxes on it.
Then use nothing other than your own skill
and ability to modify that weapon.
Let Bush know how you modified that firearm.
Then clock how long it takes for Bush and
the republicans to place you behind bars
for using your ingenuity to upgrade your
own property that you paid taxes on.
Republicans do not support the Second Amendment.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 03:57:47 PM
Israel is flushing itself down the toilet.
The Israelis DID dance with glee when they (Israel) blew up the WTC
buildings then declared - , "ALL enemies of Israel are now the problem
of America. Israel has no enemies anymore. America has them."
Would they do it again?
Here is this thread.
Everyone who knows ANYTHING about politics already knows it is 100%
certain they plan on doing it again. They planned on doing it again
before their strong of huge failures had taken them to the brink of the
end of their shitty little terrorist nation.
The only thing holding off the next false flag attack is that the whole
planet ALREADY heard it was coming and are talking about it daily.
"What will Israel and the American ZIONISTS neo-cons BLOW UP in America
this time to lie to the public and try and keep their coup of America
and forming the 'New World Order' world government of Zionism."
Israel has never been more hated.
HATED
and all they got?????
calling you an anti-semite.
"You want to KILL ALL JEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for trying to stop Israel
from blowing up things in AMerica. You hate AMerica and freedom for
stopping Israel from blowing up the America and the whole world in
their TYPICAL kike warmongering."
What has been proven since 9-11???
That Hitler was CORRECT and the Zionist 'rewrite version' of WW2 is ALL
propaganda lies.
The filth Jews in the past said they needed 30 days to exploit their
terror attacks.
In Sept or Oct the Zionazis will bomb America again, and the Israel-1st
TRAITOR Americans will flood back in here screaming "Let's bomb
IRAN!!!!!!"
(Yes, you see, part of Zionazis being so incompotent, that they ALREADY
told everyone WHO they plan on pinning the false flag attack on. They
want to backstab Iran based on lies [exactly like they did to Iraq AND
LOST])
Sad little traitor Neo-con assholes. All you got is yelling
'conspiracy' and 'anti-semite'
No LOYAL American will betray America like you do just because of your
idiot name calling.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 04:10:17 PM
wrote:

Israel is flushing itself down the toilet.
The Israelis DID dance with glee when they (Israel) blew up the WTC
buildings then declared - , "ALL enemies of Israel are now the problem
of America. Israel has no enemies anymore. America has them."

Would they do it again?

Here is this thread.

Everyone who knows ANYTHING about politics already knows it is 100%
certain they plan on doing it again. They planned on doing it again
before their strong of huge failures had taken them to the brink of the
end of their shitty little terrorist nation.

The only thing holding off the next false flag attack is that the whole
planet ALREADY heard it was coming and are talking about it daily.

"What will Israel and the American ZIONISTS neo-cons BLOW UP in America
this time to lie to the public and try and keep their coup of America
and forming the 'New World Order' world government of Zionism."

Israel has never been more hated.

HATED

and all they got?????

calling you an anti-semite.

"You want to KILL ALL JEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for trying to stop Israel
from blowing up things in AMerica. You hate AMerica and freedom for
stopping Israel from blowing up the America and the whole world in
their TYPICAL kike warmongering."

What has been proven since 9-11???

That Hitler was CORRECT and the Zionist 'rewrite version' of WW2 is ALL
propaganda lies.

The filth Jews in the past said they needed 30 days to exploit their
terror attacks.

In Sept or Oct the Zionazis will bomb America again, and the Israel-1st
TRAITOR Americans will flood back in here screaming "Let's bomb
IRAN!!!!!!"

(Yes, you see, part of Zionazis being so incompotent, that they ALREADY
told everyone WHO they plan on pinning the false flag attack on. They
want to backstab Iran based on lies [exactly like they did to Iraq AND
LOST])

Sad little traitor Neo-con assholes. All you got is yelling
'conspiracy' and 'anti-semite'
No LOYAL American will betray America like you do just because of your
idiot name calling.

Right, Israel blew up the WTC. Ok and you no doubt can prove this or
am I to assume you are just stating a pack of anti bush lies. I didn't
vote for bush myself but I am not stupid enough to believe Israel
pulled off 9/11
.



User: "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 10:11:10 PM
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:24:07 -0500, "Lloyd King"
<lloydking@kinglloydcom.com> wrote:


"Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBushwhacker@cox.net> wrote in message
news:234Fg.7315$Mz3.6812@fed1read07...


"Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1155845041.010238.172490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho).



How about my right to expect that the
government obtain a lawful warrant before
they wiretap my phone?

Oops...
I forgot, the fucking republicans hate
that right!

There is NOTHING in the Bill of
Rights that ANY republican supports!
Not a single damn thing!


Except, of course, in the 2nd Amendment.

Maybe some repubs support the 2A but not bush and his gang of
neo-cons.
.


User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 04:07:16 PM
Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:

"Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1155845041.010238.172490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho).



How about my right to expect that the
government obtain a lawful warrant before
they wiretap my phone?

Oops...
I forgot, the fucking republicans hate
that right!

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Well, if you're calling the Middle East, using public utilities, then
you can 'reasonably' expect to be tapped. I find it entirely
reasonable. Looking at the situation in the world today, our
government would be grossly negligent if it DIDN'T keep track of
international communications.
And if you think it was just under BUSH that this occurred, then you're
a fucking idiot.
You don't want to get tapped, set up your own network.

There is NOTHING in the Bill of
Rights that ANY republican supports!
Not a single damn thing!

For brevity's sake, let's just take the first ten:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
*Hmmm, I support this one. Seems like it works pretty well.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed.
*Hmmm, I support this one, too. Even though liberal idiots claim that,
while 'the people' in every other amendment means everyone, 'the
people' in Amendment II does not.
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without
the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be
prescribed by law.
*Hmmm, I support this one. Don't see where it's been abused.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
*Hmmm, I support this one. See above.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in
actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use,
without just compensation.
*Hmmm, I support this one (pattern forming here). I try to plead my
Fifth Amendment rights whenever my wife is mad at me.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district
wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have
been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature
and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his
favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
*Hmmm, I support this one, too, although I feel the justice system
needs to be straightened out.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no
fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
*Hmmm, don't see a problem here.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor
cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
*Hmmm, don't see a problem here.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
*Sounds REALLY cool.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states
respectively, or to the people.
I REALLY support this one..Although I think 'the people' don't get the
power's they need.
Obviously, you have been proven wrong. I am a Republican (which makes
me ANY Republican) and I support pretty much everything that's IN the
Bill of Rights.
Also, obviuosly, you're a fucking idiot.
Yol Bolsun,
Grendel.
"We're amused by you libs and dims. It's kinda like watching the
chimps at the zoo. You know there's a limited amount of intelligence
there, they're cute and they're fun to watch, but you know they'll
never quite make evolutionary leap."
.
User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 12:59:00 PM
wrote:

Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no
fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

*Hmmm, don't see a problem here.

I wonder what $20 adjusted for a couple centuries of inflation
would come to?
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.

User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 04:14:20 PM
wrote:

Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:

"Grendel" <

> wrote in message
news:1155845041.010238.172490@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho).



How about my right to expect that the
government obtain a lawful warrant before
they wiretap my phone?

Oops...
I forgot, the fucking republicans hate
that right!



Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Well, if you're calling the Middle East, using public utilities, then
you can 'reasonably' expect to be tapped. I find it entirely
reasonable. Looking at the situation in the world today, our
government would be grossly negligent if it DIDN'T keep track of
international communications.

And if you think it was just under BUSH that this occurred, then you're
a fucking idiot.

You don't want to get tapped, set up your own network.

There is NOTHING in the Bill of
Rights that ANY republican supports!
Not a single damn thing!


For brevity's sake, let's just take the first ten:

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

*Hmmm, I support this one. Seems like it works pretty well.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed.

*Hmmm, I support this one, too. Even though liberal idiots claim that,
while 'the people' in every other amendment means everyone, 'the
people' in Amendment II does not.

Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without
the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be
prescribed by law.

*Hmmm, I support this one. Don't see where it's been abused.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

*Hmmm, I support this one. See above.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in
actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use,
without just compensation.

*Hmmm, I support this one (pattern forming here). I try to plead my
Fifth Amendment rights whenever my wife is mad at me.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district
wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have
been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature
and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his
favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

*Hmmm, I support this one, too, although I feel the justice system
needs to be straightened out.

Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no
fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

*Hmmm, don't see a problem here.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor
cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

*Hmmm, don't see a problem here.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

*Sounds REALLY cool.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states
respectively, or to the people.

I REALLY support this one..Although I think 'the people' don't get the
power's they need.

Obviously, you have been proven wrong. I am a Republican (which makes
me ANY Republican) and I support pretty much everything that's IN the
Bill of Rights.

Also, obviuosly, you're a fucking idiot.

Yol Bolsun,
Grendel.

I had to laugh at this one even though I am a Demorcrat. I don't
believe it either Yol. Some posters are just complete idiots who
believe anything. It is scary to think they walk around and look
rational.


"We're amused by you libs and dims. It's kinda like watching the
chimps at the zoo. You know there's a limited amount of intelligence
there, they're cute and they're fun to watch, but you know they'll
never quite make evolutionary leap."

.



User: "Trampdad"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 04:04:21 PM
Grendel wrote:

Perfect maneuvering for liberals. They're attempting to cover all
bases.

Scenario 1: There are no terrorist attacks or word of such.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim there IS no danger; Bush is
scaring us to take away our freedoms (they won't NAME those freedoms,
tho). The other half will claim that Bush isn't doing enough to stop
terrorism, as if he were, he would have found that plot that is out
there. They will all claim that it is America's fault that 'they
don't like us'.

Scenario 2: There is a terrorist attack thwarted and terrorist
arrested.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim that it was Republican plot to
make Bush look good so he can take away our freedoms (they won't NAME
those freedoms, tho). The other half will claim that Bush isn't
doing enough to stop terrorism. They will all claim that it is
America's fault that 'they don't like us'.


Scenario 3: There is a successful terrorist attack on a major U.S.
city.
Liberal propaganda: Half will claim it was a Republican plot to make
Bush look good so he can take away our freedoms (they won't NAME
those freedoms, tho). The other half will claim that Bush isn't
doing enough to stop terrorism. They will all claim that it is
America's fault that 'they don't like us'.

Yol Bolsun,
Grendel.

I just want to know what the story from you "fight them there so we
don't have to fight them here" idiots will be once such an attack
happens.
.

User: "laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 17 Aug 2006 10:06:16 PM
On 17 Aug 2006 13:04:01 -0700, "Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net>
wrote:


"We're amused by you libs and dims. It's kinda like watching the
chimps at the zoo. You know there's a limited amount of intelligence
there, they're cute and they're fun to watch, but you know they'll
never quite make evolutionary leap."

Hey moron. You voted for a certifiable psycho who lied america into
war so don't call other people stupid.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 04:32:07 PM
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

On 17 Aug 2006 13:04:01 -0700, "Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net>
wrote:


"We're amused by you libs and dims. It's kinda like watching the
chimps at the zoo. You know there's a limited amount of intelligence
there, they're cute and they're fun to watch, but you know they'll
never quite make evolutionary leap."


Hey moron. You voted for a certifiable psycho who lied america into
war so don't call other people stupid.

That's right, he is a dumb ***** deluxe. He voted for Bush who then
collaborated with the Israelis to pull of 9/11 so he would be able to
attack Iraq and finish his daddies war. Anybody with a fucking brain
knows that. He intends to stay in the White House and will do this by
federalizing the Nationa Guard and putting soldiers on every corner.
Just say Heil fucking Bush, and goosestep down the street
.
User: "Bob"

Title: Re: GUARANTEED - Huge terror attack pre november 18 Aug 2006 04:37:31 PM
<hopafreight@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155936727.370083.5710@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...


laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

On 17 Aug 2006 13:04:01 -0700, "Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net>
wrote:


"We're amused by you libs and dims. It's kinda like watching the
chimps at the zoo. You know there's a limited amount of intelligence
there, they're cute and they're fun to watch, but you know they'll
never quite make evolutionary leap."


Hey moron. You voted for a certifiable psycho who lied america into
war so don't call other people stupid.


That's right, he is a dumb ***** deluxe. He voted for Bush who then
collaborated with the Israelis to pull of 9/11 so he would be able to
attack Iraq and finish his daddies war. Anybody with a fucking brain
knows that. He intends to stay in the White House and will do this by
federalizing the Nationa Guard and putting soldiers on every corner.
Just say Heil fucking Bush, and goosestep down the street

When everything is quiet, and you're not
typing or talking, do you happen to hear
the theme from the Twilight Zone?
.





  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
Re: Condo Rice is a HUGE improvement over her predecessor
Re: Kerry's HUGE Problem
October 25 Huge anti-war rallye planned in DC and SF
BPO: Huge scope in credit card sector
Huge pro-democracy demonstration in Hong Kong
huge pro-marriage anti-gay response in Michigan
Halliburton Gets Huge Fine -- No Prison Term for Cheney
Kerry losing HUGE among the undecided voters!!
Bush's promise to reduce the huge budget deficit? Uh, Uh. Ain't gonna happen.
Huge Errors in Bush No-Fly List, Bans Over 20,000
Huge explosion destroys Iraq oil pipeline
the Christian Evangelicals gave Bush the HUGE margin of victory
Bush's second-term agenda to make already huge federal deficits explode
huge numbers of voting irregularities in heavily-Democrat precincts
Third Columnist Implicated with Payola Charges. The Tip of a (Huge?) Iceberg.
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER