| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Seethis Pass" |
| Date: |
05 Dec 2006 12:25:54 PM |
| Object: |
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
No. You haven't.
Here's yet another government confiscated and hidden video not showing
it.
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Here is the Long awaited confiscated film from the Doubletree Hotel
across from the Pentagon.
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/fbi-releases-footage-of-911-crash-at-pentagon
Make an excuse for them.
I can't think of one.
.
|
|
| User: "Bob Eld" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
05 Dec 2006 02:22:44 PM |
|
|
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
No. You haven't.
Here's yet another government confiscated and hidden video not showing
it.
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Here is the Long awaited confiscated film from the Doubletree Hotel
across from the Pentagon.
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/fbi-releases-footage-of-911-crash-at-pen
tagon
Make an excuse for them.
I can't think of one.
BS...There is a film that shows a blurry tail section going by but keep in
mind that an object going 500 mph a few hundred feet away is hardly any more
visible than a bullet is. At 500mph, the plane travels more than 30 feet in
the time of one picture frame and thus is totally blurred out. It's absurd
to think you could see it clearly without high speed stop motion photography
which is obviously not use in surveilance cameras. Furthermore, airplane
aluminum and components were laying all over the place at the site for
anybody who cares to notice. There were many photos of this stuff. CNN
showed them at the time and at several times since. Quit with the conspiracy
bull ***** already, there is no need for such crap.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tocador Dana" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 08:58:48 AM |
|
|
"Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:oykdh.2674$hI.999@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
No. You haven't.
Here's yet another government confiscated and hidden video not showing
it.
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Here is the Long awaited confiscated film from the Doubletree Hotel
across from the Pentagon.
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/fbi-releases-footage-of-911-crash-at-pen
tagon
Make an excuse for them.
I can't think of one.
BS...There is a film that shows a blurry tail section going by but keep in
mind that an object going 500 mph a few hundred feet away is hardly any
more
visible than a bullet is. At 500mph, the plane travels more than 30 feet
in
the time of one picture frame and thus is totally blurred out.
Really? Those planes hitting the towers sure came out pretty clear on
standard video recorders....
It's absurd
to think you could see it clearly without high speed stop motion
photography
which is obviously not use in surveilance cameras. Furthermore, airplane
aluminum and components were laying all over the place at the site for
anybody who cares to notice. There were many photos of this stuff. CNN
showed them at the time and at several times since. Quit with the
conspiracy
bull ***** already, there is no need for such crap.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Seethis Pass" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
05 Dec 2006 08:47:43 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:22:44 GMT, "Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com>
wrote:
BS...There is a film that shows a blurry tail section going by
Cite.
Your argument about the ability to film the crash is erroneous
although it has been used extensively.
At the base of the south tower in New York a video aimed upward from
the ground had no problem recording at least a few clear frames of
United flight 175 hitting the building from a Much closer perspective
than that at the Pentagon.
Here, I'll use one of your fellow debunkers to slap you down.
That's the best use for them.
http://www.911review.com/errors/phantom/st_impact.html
If all of the video had been released in a timely fashion with a
sense of our common tragic experience being shared it wouldn't smell
so strongly. Having to fight for 5 years to see nothing in particular
smacks of manipulation.
No verifiable parts belonging to flight 77 were found.
It would be a simple task to match at least one serial number to shut
us the hell up.
That has Not been done.
The five or so identifiable parts that have been seen could have been
carried in under peoples arms. Only a single scrap of sheet metal has
any veracity at all as a piece of flight 77
It was displayed prominently, front and center, as in a photo op.but
it was absent in earlier photographs of the scene.
Here is a link that shows the debris Not being there earlier in the
day.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/killtown/pentanium.htm
And another.
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html
Due to the undue secrecy and coverup fever coming from the bush
administration and their extremely nefarious acts in all they have
done, there must be extraordinary backing for their ill supported
claims of what happened on 9/11.
The fact is that no pilot claims he could have made the maneuver that
flight 77 did to hit the building.
Quite a few say it couldn't be done, a 767 in a spiral trajectory
ending in a ground level perfect target strike after having evaded all
of the ground clutter .
The later a given photograph was made at the Pentagon on 9/11 the
more debris is all over the lawn. Early photographs show none at all.
Whatever the truth is, the government has shown a very strong need to
keep it hidden. The videos were confiscated within a few short minutes
after the crash. Preplanning? at the Citgo station Vasquez the
attendant told National Geographic that the FBI took his video within
just a few minutes. I'm uh, impressed.
No cars were blown around the expressway in front of the Pentagon.
No turbulence?
Pick a reason.
This 767 aircraft, the one seen here,
http://tinyurl.com/m48w8
flying extraordinarily low, as pictured, at 400 plus Mph. created no
turbulence
or
it was a smaller craft
Huge aircraft at high speed a few feet off the ground create
turbulence. However no evidence or reports of heavy turbulence exist.
No marks were made on the building or on the ground by the 9 foot tall
multi ton engines under the wings.
The wings hit between some 6 feet above the ground, so where did the
engines hit? They incredibly never touched the ground and made no mark
on the building although the lighter more fragile wings did.
No hint of the tail section was found anywhere at all unless you count
a few undefined pixels on the five frame Pentagon security camera film
which shows nothing useful.
________________________
Buy the Weigh,
Which one can disappear instantly, a 767 or a missile?
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/killtown/pentanium_files/fireball_shot.jpg
AND lastly.
and most importantly
Pay No attention ! to that man behind the curtain.
http://tinyurl.com/yynu45
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletreefilm. |
06 Dec 2006 09:35:22 AM |
|
|
Seethis Pass wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:22:44 GMT, "Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com>
wrote:
BS...There is a film that shows a blurry tail section going by
Cite.
Your argument about the ability to film the crash is erroneous
although it has been used extensively.
At the base of the south tower in New York a video aimed upward from
the ground had no problem recording at least a few clear frames of
United flight 175 hitting the building from a Much closer perspective
than that at the Pentagon.
Here, I'll use one of your fellow debunkers to slap you down.
That's the best use for them.
http://www.911review.com/errors/phantom/st_impact.html
If all of the video had been released in a timely fashion with a
sense of our common tragic experience being shared it wouldn't smell
so strongly. Having to fight for 5 years to see nothing in particular
smacks of manipulation.
No verifiable parts belonging to flight 77 were found.
It would be a simple task to match at least one serial number to shut
us the hell up.
That has Not been done.
Actually, it has, which only proves that you're lying about it shutting
you up.
The five or so identifiable parts that have been seen could have been
carried in under peoples arms. Only a single scrap of sheet metal has
any veracity at all as a piece of flight 77
Sheet metal, landing gear, engines, seats, luggage, electronics, remains
of passengers & crew, eyewitnesses.
It was displayed prominently, front and center, as in a photo op.but
it was absent in earlier photographs of the scene.
Here is a link that shows the debris Not being there earlier in the
day.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/killtown/pentanium.htm
That's from the other side of the lot.
And another.
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html
Taken well after the fact.
Due to the undue secrecy and coverup fever coming from the bush
administration and their extremely nefarious acts in all they have
done, there must be extraordinary backing for their ill supported
claims of what happened on 9/11.
The fact is that no pilot claims he could have made the maneuver that
flight 77 did to hit the building.
Liar
"There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he
could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it" - Marcel
Bernard, Chief Flight Instructor, Freeway Airport. (he's the guy who
refused to rent Hanjour a Cessna)
Quite a few say it couldn't be done, a 767 in a spiral trajectory
ending in a ground level perfect target strike after having evaded all
of the ground clutter .
No one but the conspiracist claims it couldn't be done.
The later a given photograph was made at the Pentagon on 9/11 the
more debris is all over the lawn. Early photographs show none at all.
You have it backwards, Inspector Holmes.
Whatever the truth is, the government has shown a very strong need to
keep it hidden. The videos were confiscated within a few short minutes
after the crash. Preplanning? at the Citgo station Vasquez the
attendant told National Geographic that the FBI took his video within
just a few minutes. I'm uh, impressed.
No cars were blown around the expressway in front of the Pentagon.
No turbulence?
Pick a reason.
This 767 aircraft, the one seen here,
http://tinyurl.com/m48w8
flying extraordinarily low, as pictured, at 400 plus Mph. created no
turbulence
or
it was a smaller craft
Or, traveling at a high rate of speed, the turbulence created was not
enough to blow around cars moving at a high rate of speed.
http://members.shaw.ca/freedomsix/pics/pole1b.jpg
Huge aircraft at high speed a few feet off the ground create
turbulence. However no evidence or reports of heavy turbulence exist.
No marks were made on the building or on the ground by the 9 foot tall
multi ton engines under the wings.
The building was marked.
The wings hit between some 6 feet above the ground, so where did the
engines hit? They incredibly never touched the ground and made no mark
on the building although the lighter more fragile wings did.
No hint of the tail section was found anywhere at all unless you count
a few undefined pixels on the five frame Pentagon security camera film
which shows nothing useful.
Why would think the tail would be found intact when the rest of the
aircraft disintegrated on impact?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seethis Pass" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 06:34:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:35:22 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sheet metal, landing gear, engines, seats, luggage, electronics, remains
of passengers & crew, eyewitnesses.
seats, luggage,
cite.
engine landing gear, parts don't match.
serial number or something?
remains of passengers,and crew claimed,but unsupported by anything
but government say so.
Sheet metal, stage prop.showed up late wasn't there immediately after
the crash.
Electronics, match to aircraft please.
Eyewitnesses reported a wild variety of things that did not happen.
What about the impossibility of a 767 being the cause of the damage?
Where did the engines hit, vandar, upside your head?
Show me a mark made by the multi ton engines and show exactly where
they touched down.
Nowhere at the pentagon.
What happened to the tail section vandar?
It doesn't seem to have hit the building either.
No mark, no evidence of it existing.
It was totally missing while the fireball was still round.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/killtown/pentanium_files/fireball_shot.jpg
How did a 767 fly through those cable spools without moving them
vandar?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletreefilm. |
07 Dec 2006 11:27:39 AM |
|
|
Seethis Pass wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:35:22 GMT, Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sheet metal, landing gear, engines, seats, luggage, electronics, remains
of passengers & crew, eyewitnesses.
seats, luggage,
cite.
engine landing gear, parts don't match.
Yes they do. Every single identifiable aircraft part and piece found in
the ruins is a perfect match not only for a 757, but specifically for
American Airlines flight 77.
serial number or something?
remains of passengers,and crew claimed,but unsupported by anything
but government say so.
Supported by every piece of evidence. There is no evidence to support
anything but.
Sheet metal, stage prop.showed up late wasn't there immediately after
the crash.
Yes it was.
Electronics, match to aircraft please.
Is that a question?
Eyewitnesses reported a wild variety of things that did not happen.
Most eyewitnesses reported exactly what they saw: A commerical airliner
crash into the Pentagon.
What about the impossibility of a 767 being the cause of the damage?
There is no such impossibility.
Where did the engines hit, vandar, upside your head?
They hit a reinforced concrete wall.
Show me a mark made by the multi ton engines and show exactly where
they touched down.
Nowhere at the pentagon.
http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200030-1.jpg
http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/jpg/size600/P200032-1.jpg
What happened to the tail section vandar?
It disintegrated with the rest of the plane.
It doesn't seem to have hit the building either.
No mark, no evidence of it existing.
It was totally missing while the fireball was still round.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/killtown/pentanium_files/fireball_shot.jpg
That pic was taken well after the impact.
How did a 767 fly through those cable spools without moving them
vandar?
What makes you think they weren't moved?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
05 Dec 2006 08:33:47 PM |
|
|
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
Yep.
No. You haven't.
Here's yet another government confiscated and hidden video not showing
it.
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Of the other side of the building. lol
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 09:12:37 AM |
|
|
"c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
Yep.
It's a conspiracy, man!
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Of the other side of the building. lol
They've been waiting 50 years to get a look at the aliens in Roswell. }:-}
---
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2998511003310284029&q=the+bridge
Movie about what it's like inside Scientology. Get before the
Scientology crime syndicate has its criminal lawyers remove it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ctyguy" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 09:41:39 AM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:12ndnh49hi5qcae@corp.supernews.com...
"c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
Yep.
It's a conspiracy, man!
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Of the other side of the building. lol
They've been waiting 50 years to get a look at the aliens in
oswell. }:-}
---
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2998511003310284029&q=the+bridge
Movie about what it's like inside Scientology. Get before the
Scientology crime syndicate has its criminal lawyers remove it.
Christians and Catholics have been suspected of drinking blood and partaking
of Jesus's body in a ritual called communion, Satanic IMO YUK!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seethis Pass" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 06:38:28 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:41:39 GMT, "ctyguy" <ctyguy@hotcoolmail.com>
wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@skeptictank.org> wrote in message
news:12ndnh49hi5qcae@corp.supernews.com...
"c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
Yep.
It's a conspiracy, man!
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Of the other side of the building. lol
They've been waiting 50 years to get a look at the aliens in
oswell. }:-}
---
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2998511003310284029&q=the+bridge
Movie about what it's like inside Scientology. Get before the
Scientology crime syndicate has its criminal lawyers remove it.
Christians and Catholics have been suspected of drinking blood and partaking
of Jesus's body in a ritual called communion, Satanic IMO YUK!
All occult fantasies are pretty backwards.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Seethis Pass" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 06:37:28 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:12:37 GMT, (Fredric L.
Rice) wrote:
"c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
Yep.
It's a conspiracy, man!
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Of the other side of the building. lol
They've been waiting 50 years to get a look at the aliens in Roswell. }:-}
---
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2998511003310284029&q=the+bridge
Movie about what it's like inside Scientology. Get before the
Scientology crime syndicate has its criminal lawyers remove it.
Did you and Condi have a good time ?
Whats it like dating your sister?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 08:11:16 PM |
|
|
Seethis Pass <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:12:37 GMT, (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
"c-bee1" <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote:
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
Yep.
It's a conspiracy, man!
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Of the other side of the building. lol
They've been waiting 50 years to get a look at the aliens in Roswell. }:-}
Did you and Condi have a good time ?
Whats it like dating your sister?
LOL! Man, your fantasies extend beyond flying saucers. That's a plus.
---
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2998511003310284029&q=the+bridge
Movie about what it's like inside Scientology. Get before the
Scientology crime syndicate has its criminal lawyers remove it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
05 Dec 2006 05:13:03 PM |
|
|
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
No. You haven't.
Here's yet another government confiscated and hidden video not showing
it.
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Here is the Long awaited confiscated film from the Doubletree Hotel
across from the Pentagon.
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/fbi-releases-footage-of-911-crash-at-pentagon
Make an excuse for them.
I can't think of one.
I'm trying to find a good excuse for YOU.
I can't think of a good one, either.
Have a nice day,
Ken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seethis Pass" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
05 Dec 2006 08:48:57 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:13:03 -0600, "Ken"
<Leftists@Useful_Idiot_Savants.com> wrote:
Have a nice day,
Ken
Thank you,
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet? Here's the Doubletree film. |
06 Dec 2006 06:35:09 AM |
|
|
The 911 Truth Movement is a conspiracy against America.
"Seethis Pass" <notanewguy@maxivision.com> wrote in message
news:kincptsus2a5cb4u3jhdm35nd0ocolc8qu@4ax.com...
Have you seen flight 77 hit the Pentagon yet?
No. You haven't.
Here's yet another government confiscated and hidden video not showing
it.
The difference is that we had to fight the government for 5 years in
order to get to see this film.
Here is the Long awaited confiscated film from the Doubletree Hotel
across from the Pentagon.
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/fbi-releases-footage-of-911-crash-at-pentagon
Make an excuse for them.
I can't think of one.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
