| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
21 Mar 2006 09:35:56 PM |
| Object: |
Hellen Thomas Receives an Old Fashion Spanking From President Bush |
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
LN
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm
Tue Mar 21 2006 14:40:12 ET
Helen Thomas, who in January grumbled that President Bush was a "coward" for
not calling on her at a press conference, today was granted a question for
the first time in several years. The doyenne of the White House press corps,
who once called Bush the worst president in U.S. history, seized her chance
with gusto, essentially debating Bush instead of questioning him. Here's the
transcript:
THE PRESIDENT: Helen. After that brilliant performance at the Grid Iron, I
am -- (laughter.)
Q You're going to be sorry. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, then, let me take it back. (Laughter.)
Q I'd like to ask you, Mr. President, your decision to invade Iraq has
caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of Americans
and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, has turned
out not to be true. My question is, why did you really want to go to war?
From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your Cabinet -- your
Cabinet officers, intelligence people, and so forth -- what was your real
reason? You have said it wasn't oil -- quest for oil, it hasn't been Israel,
or anything else. What was it?
THE PRESIDENT: I think your premise -- in all due respect to your question
and to you as a lifelong journalist -- is that -- I didn't want war. To
assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect --
Q Everything --
THE PRESIDENT: Hold on for a second, please.
Q -- everything I've heard --
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me, excuse me. No President wants war. Everything you
may have heard is that, but it's just simply not true. My attitude about the
defense of this country changed on September the 11th. We -- when we got
attacked, I vowed then and there to use every asset at my disposal to
protect the American people. Our foreign policy changed on that day, Helen.
You know, we used to think we were secure because of oceans and previous
diplomacy. But we realized on September the 11th, 2001, that killers could
destroy innocent life. And I'm never going to forget it. And I'm never going
to forget the vow I made to the American people that we will do everything
in our power to protect our people.
Part of that meant to make sure that we didn't allow people to provide safe
haven to an enemy. And that's why I went into Iraq -- hold on for a
second --
Q They didn't do anything to you, or to our country.
THE PRESIDENT: Look -- excuse me for a second, please. Excuse me for a
second. They did. The Taliban provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That's where
al Qaeda trained --
Q I'm talking about Iraq --
THE PRESIDENT: Helen, excuse me. That's where -- Afghanistan provided safe
haven for al Qaeda. That's where they trained. That's where they plotted.
That's where they planned the attacks that killed thousands of innocent
Americans.
I also saw a threat in Iraq. I was hoping to solve this problem
diplomatically. That's why I went to the Security Council; that's why it was
important to pass 1441, which was unanimously passed. And the world said,
disarm, disclose, or face serious consequences --
Q -- go to war --
THE PRESIDENT: -- and therefore, we worked with the world, we worked to make
sure that Saddam Hussein heard the message of the world. And when he chose
to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the difficult
decision to make to remove him. And we did, and the world is safer for it.
Q Thank you, sir. Secretary Rumsfeld -- (laughter.)
Q Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: You're welcome. (Laughter.) I didn't really regret it. I kind
of semi-regretted it. (Laughter.)
Q -- have a debate.
THE PRESIDENT: That's right. Anyway, your performance at the Grid Iron was
just brilliant -- unlike Holland's, was a little weak, but -- (laughter.)
.
|
|
| User: " Malto" |
|
| Title: Hellen Thomas reams that dope Bush a new ***** |
21 Mar 2006 10:34:34 PM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:wC3Uf.3905$tN3.205@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Helen Thomas, who in January grumbled that President Bush was a "coward"
She's right, of course.
The doyenne of the White House press corps,
who once called Bush the worst president in U.S. history
She's right again.
My(Thomas') question is, why did you really want to go to war?
To which Bush responded: " because the Taliban were harboring the 9/11
plotters."
LOL! What an incompetant fuckup.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tazmanian Devil" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Receives an Old Fashion Spanking From President Bush |
21 Mar 2006 10:19:21 PM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:wC3Uf.3905$tN3.205@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Bush hit an old lady? How typical. And how typical of you to applaud it.
You contribute to Usenet what Danny Bonnaduce has contributed to American
culture.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Receives an Old Fashion Spanking From President Bush |
21 Mar 2006 10:29:54 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:19:21 -0500, "Tazmanian Devil"
<myob@biteme.com> wrote:
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:wC3Uf.3905$tN3.205@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Bush hit an old lady? How typical. And how typical of you to applaud it.
The "old lady" dishes it out, so she has to be able to take it
as well. Either that or she should retire.
You contribute to Usenet what Danny Bonnaduce has contributed to American
culture.
I'm telling Mrs. Partridge what you said about her #2 son.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Receives an Old Fashion Spanking From President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 07:13:33 AM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:gotUf.511$kp3.467@fe04.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:zsoUf.46540$2O6.8049@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:TMcUf.2760$hC2.1544@fe05.lga...
Ducking direct questions and talking over someone doesn't constitute
giving
them "an old fashion spanking."
So you're pissed that he pulled a Helen on Helen!
No, are you competent?
So is this your notion of substantive dialog?
I said nothing of the sort and am not
going to allow you to claim otherwise because you are not capable
of defending what was actually said.
Bush not allowing Helen to interupt him while attemtping to answer her
question is exactly how she disrespectfully conducts herself in the press
room and usually gets away with it. I happy that it bothers you that Bush
didn't allow her to disrespect him this way nor disrupt his response.
Bwhahahahaahahahahaha...
Your maturity is shining through again.
You too will take your own medicine whether you like it or not lib!
As far as how partisan she is, did you ever listen
to her when Clinton was President?
Yeh her questions were geared more to protect the Ex-Liar N Chief!
Provide an example. Her questions to Bush were directed at bush
and his failing administration. Again you are trying to spin this, or
otherwise
simply cannot comprehend straight text.
You're so partisanly ignorant, you can't grasp the lack of objectiveity in
your own response above. It indeed very clearly eclipse your subjective
mentality....
Some people take their jobs seriously and
she asks hard hitting questions, in my opinion often over the top and
insulting.
Some do, but not Helen. SHe can't she past her own hatred for Bush which
also feed her partisan agenda. She's so partisan (evidently you too),
that neither of you can discern the lack of objectivity in her
questions...
Her job is to ask hard hitting questions in order to get answers that
Americans
want to know. Gannon was hired to stroke bush's *****, not Hellen Thomas.
Here's a hard-hitting question for you lib: why do you go to the county jail
every Friday and blow all the inmates? Why not blow those in the state pen
too?
However I don't believe she is partisan as similar treatment scans the
spectrum when she is speaking.
The blind partisan defends the blind.... How surprising....
The ingorant and defenseless spinning the facts, how surprising...
Take your bloody kicked ***** back to your cave now and ask someone to show
you so you can lick those wounds you fail to recognize you just received.
LN
LN
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:wC3Uf.3905$tN3.205@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
LN
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm
Tue Mar 21 2006 14:40:12 ET
Helen Thomas, who in January grumbled that President Bush was a
"coward" for not calling on her at a press conference, today was
granted a question for the first time in several years. The doyenne of
the White House press corps, who once called Bush the worst president
in U.S. history, seized her chance with gusto, essentially debating
Bush instead of questioning him. Here's the transcript:
THE PRESIDENT: Helen. After that brilliant performance at the Grid
Iron, I am -- (laughter.)
Q You're going to be sorry. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, then, let me take it back. (Laughter.)
Q I'd like to ask you, Mr. President, your decision to invade Iraq has
caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of
Americans and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at
least, has turned out not to be true. My question is, why did you
really want to go to war? From the moment you stepped into the White
House, from your Cabinet -- your Cabinet officers, intelligence people,
and so forth -- what was your real reason? You have said it wasn't
oil -- quest for oil, it hasn't been Israel, or anything else. What was
it?
THE PRESIDENT: I think your premise -- in all due respect to your
question and to you as a lifelong journalist -- is that -- I didn't
want war. To assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due
respect --
Q Everything --
THE PRESIDENT: Hold on for a second, please.
Q -- everything I've heard --
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me, excuse me. No President wants war. Everything
you may have heard is that, but it's just simply not true. My attitude
about the defense of this country changed on September the 11th. We --
when we got attacked, I vowed then and there to use every asset at my
disposal to protect the American people. Our foreign policy changed on
that day, Helen. You know, we used to think we were secure because of
oceans and previous diplomacy. But we realized on September the 11th,
2001, that killers could destroy innocent life. And I'm never going to
forget it. And I'm never going to forget the vow I made to the American
people that we will do everything in our power to protect our people.
Part of that meant to make sure that we didn't allow people to provide
safe haven to an enemy. And that's why I went into Iraq -- hold on for
a second --
Q They didn't do anything to you, or to our country.
THE PRESIDENT: Look -- excuse me for a second, please. Excuse me for a
second. They did. The Taliban provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That's
where al Qaeda trained --
Q I'm talking about Iraq --
THE PRESIDENT: Helen, excuse me. That's where -- Afghanistan provided
safe haven for al Qaeda. That's where they trained. That's where they
plotted. That's where they planned the attacks that killed thousands of
innocent Americans.
I also saw a threat in Iraq. I was hoping to solve this problem
diplomatically. That's why I went to the Security Council; that's why
it was important to pass 1441, which was unanimously passed. And the
world said, disarm, disclose, or face serious consequences --
Q -- go to war --
THE PRESIDENT: -- and therefore, we worked with the world, we worked to
make sure that Saddam Hussein heard the message of the world. And when
he chose to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had
the difficult decision to make to remove him. And we did, and the world
is safer for it.
Q Thank you, sir. Secretary Rumsfeld -- (laughter.)
Q Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: You're welcome. (Laughter.) I didn't really regret it. I
kind of semi-regretted it. (Laughter.)
Q -- have a debate.
THE PRESIDENT: That's right. Anyway, your performance at the Grid Iron
was just brilliant -- unlike Holland's, was a little weak, but --
(laughter.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Receives an Old Fashion Spanking From President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 09:13:57 PM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:78CUf.21$eU.3@fe05.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:1axUf.41267$_S7.39107@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:gotUf.511$kp3.467@fe04.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:zsoUf.46540$2O6.8049@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:TMcUf.2760$hC2.1544@fe05.lga...
Ducking direct questions and talking over someone doesn't constitute
giving
them "an old fashion spanking."
So you're pissed that he pulled a Helen on Helen!
No, are you competent?
So is this your notion of substantive dialog?
No, but dialog'UE' requires that two or more parties attempt
to find common ground or a solution. You made a comment that
I was pissed after I wrote and you removed that Hellen was not
given an "old fashion spanking" therefore at that point dialogUE
became impossible.
I gave several examples which you are ignoring. Plus, it's obvious that you
rarely watch the WHote House Press corp in action, and more specifically hte
liberal socialist icon Helen. This is basically the first first Bush has had
to be a bit rude which is typically their role to him. Just the fact that
Helen thinks she can disrespect Bush by constantly interupting and talking
over him with demands that he asnwer insane loaded questions.
So your inability to understand or recognize simple facts is your problem
and I call a spade a spade. Too bad for you that upsets you!
I said nothing of the sort and am not
going to allow you to claim otherwise because you are not capable
of defending what was actually said.
Bush not allowing Helen to interupt him while attemtping to answer her
question is exactly how she disrespectfully conducts herself in the press
room and usually gets away with it. I happy that it bothers you that Bush
didn't allow her to disrespect him this way nor disrupt his response.
Bwhahahahaahahahahaha...
Your maturity is shining through again.
You too will take your own medicine whether you like it or not lib!
How old are you dumbfuck? I know kids 11 years old with far more maturity
than resorting to name calling to avoid dealing with the issues.
I question your ability to judge the maturity level of an 11-year old much
less an adult. Besides, this is Usenet, so get off your condenscending high
horse and you might not get kicked like the fool you are so far being.....
As far as how partisan she is, did you ever listen
to her when Clinton was President?
Yeh her questions were geared more to protect the Ex-Liar N Chief!
Provide an example. Her questions to Bush were directed at bush
and his failing administration. Again you are trying to spin this, or
otherwise
simply cannot comprehend straight text.
You're so partisanly ignorant, you can't grasp the lack of objectiveity
in your own response above. It indeed very clearly eclipse your
subjective mentality....
I am anti-Bush, not partisan (to a politcal party) and not ignorant.
However
I can spell objectivity without difficulty,
How are you at spelling "political" or do you usually spell it "politcal"?
There's your glass house lib!
recognize that eclipse should be
eclispes
and realize that you have again failed to respond to ANY of my original
post
because it is YOU who's ignorant.
Some people take their jobs seriously and
she asks hard hitting questions, in my opinion often over the top and
insulting.
Some do, but not Helen. SHe can't she past her own hatred for Bush
which also feed her partisan agenda. She's so partisan (evidently you
too), that neither of you can discern the lack of objectivity in her
questions...
Her job is to ask hard hitting questions in order to get answers that
Americans
want to know. Gannon was hired to stroke bush's *****, not Hellen Thomas.
Here's a hard-hitting question for you lib: why do you go to the county
jail every Friday and blow all the inmates? Why not blow those in the
state pen too?
That is not a "hard-hitting" question but rather an adolescent attempted
insult
from a emotionally inferior boy who apparently has homosexual
tendencies/fantasies.
Well at least now you have something to compare Helen's question to....
However I don't believe she is partisan as similar treatment scans the
spectrum when she is speaking.
The blind partisan defends the blind.... How surprising....
The ingorant and defenseless spinning the facts, how surprising...
Take your bloody kicked ***** back to your cave now and ask someone to show
you so you can lick those wounds you fail to recognize you just received.
We've been through this "kicked *****" crap before ***** and if memory
serves me
correctly once you recognized I was serious you quickly abandoned the
thread?
You can continue to add childish insults below each of my statements but
that does
not constitute an ***** kicking as you have failed to disprove any of my
points,
As you have failed to substancly address any cogent point I have made, so
back at cha lib!
answer
any of my questions or even make sense.
You making sense would be a marked improvement on your part. Still, I won't
hold my breath....
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Receives an Old Fashion Spanking From President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 07:17:24 AM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:gRQUf.1435$Ho.1303@fe07.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:VtJUf.59019$Jd.44356@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:78CUf.21$eU.3@fe05.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:1axUf.41267$_S7.39107@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:gotUf.511$kp3.467@fe04.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:zsoUf.46540$2O6.8049@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:TMcUf.2760$hC2.1544@fe05.lga...
Ducking direct questions and talking over someone doesn't constitute
giving
them "an old fashion spanking."
So you're pissed that he pulled a Helen on Helen!
No, are you competent?
So is this your notion of substantive dialog?
No, but dialog'UE' requires that two or more parties attempt
to find common ground or a solution. You made a comment that
I was pissed after I wrote and you removed that Hellen was not
given an "old fashion spanking" therefore at that point dialogUE
became impossible.
I gave several examples which you are ignoring. Plus, it's obvious that
you rarely watch the WHote House Press corp in action, and more
specifically hte liberal socialist icon Helen. This is basically the
first first Bush has had to be a bit rude which is typically their role
to him. Just the fact that Helen thinks she can disrespect Bush by
constantly interupting and talking over him with demands that he asnwer
insane loaded questions.
I gave several which you also ignroed. You are correct about my rarely
watching
White House press corp in action, at least recently because I do not
believe most
of what is said during the briefings. Hellen is rude but as I said it is
her job to be and
No it's not, especially to the President. it may be her job to ask tough
questions, but that's not Helen. She prefers asking loaded gotcha questions
to which (usually) her premise is flawed. In the case under discussion, it
certainly was...
president bush's inability to articulate sentences, extended pauses during
sentences,
constantly stoping so he can premeditate what he will say next and to
search for the
proper wording makes it very difficult for anyone to know when he has
finished speaking
or when he is just trying to buy some time. Besides Reagan and justifiably
due to his illness
I cannot recall ever seeing another US President have so much difficulty
speaking.
Notwithstanding your tangent to the subject-matter, I cannot recall ever
seeing a press corp who think they have the right to disrespect the
President by rudely interupting him.....
So your inability to understand or recognize simple facts is your problem
and I call a spade a spade. Too bad for you that upsets you!
I call a spade a spade too, and a moron a moron as you have seen.
It doesn't upset me at all, that is the purpose of forums such as this
one.
I said nothing of the sort and am not
going to allow you to claim otherwise because you are not capable
of defending what was actually said.
Bush not allowing Helen to interupt him while attemtping to answer her
question is exactly how she disrespectfully conducts herself in the
press room and usually gets away with it. I happy that it bothers you
that Bush didn't allow her to disrespect him this way nor disrupt his
response.
Bwhahahahaahahahahaha...
Your maturity is shining through again.
You too will take your own medicine whether you like it or not lib!
How old are you dumbfuck? I know kids 11 years old with far more
maturity
than resorting to name calling to avoid dealing with the issues.
I question your ability to judge the maturity level of an 11-year old
much less an adult. Besides, this is Usenet, so get off your
condenscending high horse and you might not get kicked like the fool you
are so far being.....
You "question" my ability in a feeble attempt to hide your own inability.
Again moron, I have no idea what you are trying to say because your
fragmented
inproperly formed sentence makes no sense what so ever; "get of your
condescending
high horse and you might not get kicked like the fool you are so far
being...."????
I believe you are an alcoholic and/or drug addict because your posts are
sometimes
legible and other times appear to be written by a 9 year old.
Think what you will. it's a free country, so far!
As far as how partisan she is, did you ever listen
to her when Clinton was President?
Yeh her questions were geared more to protect the Ex-Liar N Chief!
Provide an example. Her questions to Bush were directed at bush
and his failing administration. Again you are trying to spin this, or
otherwise
simply cannot comprehend straight text.
You're so partisanly ignorant, you can't grasp the lack of objectiveity
in your own response above. It indeed very clearly eclipse your
subjective mentality....
I am anti-Bush, not partisan (to a politcal party) and not ignorant.
However
I can spell objectivity without difficulty,
How are you at spelling "political" or do you usually spell it
"politcal"?
There's your glass house lib!
recognize that eclipse should be
eclispes
and realize that you have again failed to respond to ANY of my original
post
because it is YOU who's ignorant.
Some people take their jobs seriously and
she asks hard hitting questions, in my opinion often over the top
and insulting.
Some do, but not Helen. SHe can't she past her own hatred for Bush
which also feed her partisan agenda. She's so partisan (evidently you
too), that neither of you can discern the lack of objectivity in her
questions...
Her job is to ask hard hitting questions in order to get answers that
Americans
want to know. Gannon was hired to stroke bush's *****, not Hellen
Thomas.
Here's a hard-hitting question for you lib: why do you go to the county
jail every Friday and blow all the inmates? Why not blow those in the
state pen too?
That is not a "hard-hitting" question but rather an adolescent attempted
insult
from a emotionally inferior boy who apparently has homosexual
tendencies/fantasies.
Well at least now you have something to compare Helen's question to....
correct, you and Hellen will for ever remain synonymous to me.
Oh I'm so impressed..... NOT!
However I don't believe she is partisan as similar treatment scans
the spectrum when she is speaking.
The blind partisan defends the blind.... How surprising....
The ingorant and defenseless spinning the facts, how surprising...
Take your bloody kicked ***** back to your cave now and ask someone to
show you so you can lick those wounds you fail to recognize you just
received.
We've been through this "kicked *****" crap before ***** and if memory
serves me
correctly once you recognized I was serious you quickly abandoned the
thread?
You can continue to add childish insults below each of my statements but
that does
not constitute an ***** kicking as you have failed to disprove any of my
points,
As you have failed to substancly address any cogent point I have made, so
back at cha lib!
answer
any of my questions or even make sense.
You making sense would be a marked improvement on your part. Still, I
won't hold my breath....
If should decide to hold your breath, please don't stop.
"If should decide to...." and you have the audacity to throw rocks from a
glass house again eh? How liberal of you!
LN
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
22 Mar 2006 12:36:27 AM |
|
|
wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have to answer
otherwise!
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm
Tue Mar 21 2006 14:40:12 ET
Helen Thomas, who in January grumbled that President Bush was a "coward" for
not calling on her at a press conference, today was granted a question for
the first time in several years. The doyenne of the White House press corps,
who once called Bush the worst president in U.S. history, seized her chance
with gusto, essentially debating Bush instead of questioning him. Here's the
transcript:
THE PRESIDENT: Helen. After that brilliant performance at the Grid Iron, I
am -- (laughter.)
Q You're going to be sorry. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, then, let me take it back. (Laughter.)
Q I'd like to ask you, Mr. President, your decision to invade Iraq has
caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of Americans
and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, has turned
out not to be true. My question is, why did you really want to go to war?
From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your Cabinet -- your
Cabinet officers, intelligence people, and so forth -- what was your real
reason? You have said it wasn't oil -- quest for oil, it hasn't been Israel,
or anything else. What was it?
THE PRESIDENT: I think your premise -- in all due respect to your question
and to you as a lifelong journalist -- is that -- I didn't want war. To
assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect --
Q Everything --
THE PRESIDENT: Hold on for a second, please.
Q -- everything I've heard --
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me, excuse me. No President wants war. Everything you
may have heard is that, but it's just simply not true. My attitude about the
defense of this country changed on September the 11th. We -- when we got
attacked, I vowed then and there to use every asset at my disposal to
protect the American people. Our foreign policy changed on that day, Helen.
You know, we used to think we were secure because of oceans and previous
diplomacy. But we realized on September the 11th, 2001, that killers could
destroy innocent life. And I'm never going to forget it. And I'm never going
to forget the vow I made to the American people that we will do everything
in our power to protect our people.
Part of that meant to make sure that we didn't allow people to provide safe
haven to an enemy. And that's why I went into Iraq -- hold on for a
second --
Q They didn't do anything to you, or to our country.
THE PRESIDENT: Look -- excuse me for a second, please. Excuse me for a
second. They did. The Taliban provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That's where
al Qaeda trained --
Q I'm talking about Iraq --
THE PRESIDENT: Helen, excuse me. That's where -- Afghanistan provided safe
haven for al Qaeda. That's where they trained. That's where they plotted.
That's where they planned the attacks that killed thousands of innocent
Americans.
I also saw a threat in Iraq. I was hoping to solve this problem
diplomatically. That's why I went to the Security Council; that's why it was
important to pass 1441, which was unanimously passed. And the world said,
disarm, disclose, or face serious consequences --
Q -- go to war --
THE PRESIDENT: -- and therefore, we worked with the world, we worked to make
sure that Saddam Hussein heard the message of the world. And when he chose
to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the difficult
decision to make to remove him. And we did, and the world is safer for it.
Q Thank you, sir. Secretary Rumsfeld -- (laughter.)
Q Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: You're welcome. (Laughter.) I didn't really regret it. I kind
of semi-regretted it. (Laughter.)
Q -- have a debate.
THE PRESIDENT: That's right. Anyway, your performance at the Grid Iron was
just brilliant -- unlike Holland's, was a little weak, but -- (laughter.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
22 Mar 2006 07:06:37 AM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have to
answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm
Tue Mar 21 2006 14:40:12 ET
Helen Thomas, who in January grumbled that President Bush was a "coward"
for
not calling on her at a press conference, today was granted a question
for
the first time in several years. The doyenne of the White House press
corps,
who once called Bush the worst president in U.S. history, seized her
chance
with gusto, essentially debating Bush instead of questioning him. Here's
the
transcript:
THE PRESIDENT: Helen. After that brilliant performance at the Grid Iron,
I
am -- (laughter.)
Q You're going to be sorry. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, then, let me take it back. (Laughter.)
Q I'd like to ask you, Mr. President, your decision to invade Iraq has
caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of
Americans
and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, has
turned
out not to be true. My question is, why did you really want to go to war?
From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your Cabinet --
your
Cabinet officers, intelligence people, and so forth -- what was your real
reason? You have said it wasn't oil -- quest for oil, it hasn't been
Israel,
or anything else. What was it?
THE PRESIDENT: I think your premise -- in all due respect to your
question
and to you as a lifelong journalist -- is that -- I didn't want war. To
assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect --
Q Everything --
THE PRESIDENT: Hold on for a second, please.
Q -- everything I've heard --
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me, excuse me. No President wants war. Everything
you
may have heard is that, but it's just simply not true. My attitude about
the
defense of this country changed on September the 11th. We -- when we got
attacked, I vowed then and there to use every asset at my disposal to
protect the American people. Our foreign policy changed on that day,
Helen.
You know, we used to think we were secure because of oceans and previous
diplomacy. But we realized on September the 11th, 2001, that killers
could
destroy innocent life. And I'm never going to forget it. And I'm never
going
to forget the vow I made to the American people that we will do
everything
in our power to protect our people.
Part of that meant to make sure that we didn't allow people to provide
safe
haven to an enemy. And that's why I went into Iraq -- hold on for a
second --
Q They didn't do anything to you, or to our country.
THE PRESIDENT: Look -- excuse me for a second, please. Excuse me for a
second. They did. The Taliban provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That's
where
al Qaeda trained --
Q I'm talking about Iraq --
THE PRESIDENT: Helen, excuse me. That's where -- Afghanistan provided
safe
haven for al Qaeda. That's where they trained. That's where they plotted.
That's where they planned the attacks that killed thousands of innocent
Americans.
I also saw a threat in Iraq. I was hoping to solve this problem
diplomatically. That's why I went to the Security Council; that's why it
was
important to pass 1441, which was unanimously passed. And the world said,
disarm, disclose, or face serious consequences --
Q -- go to war --
THE PRESIDENT: -- and therefore, we worked with the world, we worked to
make
sure that Saddam Hussein heard the message of the world. And when he
chose
to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the
difficult
decision to make to remove him. And we did, and the world is safer for
it.
Q Thank you, sir. Secretary Rumsfeld -- (laughter.)
Q Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: You're welcome. (Laughter.) I didn't really regret it. I
kind
of semi-regretted it. (Laughter.)
Q -- have a debate.
THE PRESIDENT: That's right. Anyway, your performance at the Grid Iron
was
just brilliant -- unlike Holland's, was a little weak, but -- (laughter.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
22 Mar 2006 08:26:41 AM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have to
answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the question
posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual but not a Bush
win either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
22 Mar 2006 09:14:29 PM |
|
|
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:B8dUf.16195$S25.11039@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have to
answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the
question posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual but
not a Bush win either.
He did answer you maggot liar. You just filter out the truth and refuse to
hear except what you want to hear....
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "DKat" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 12:04:48 AM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:pooUf.46536$2O6.24917@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:B8dUf.16195$S25.11039@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have to
answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the
question posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual but
not a Bush win either.
He did answer you maggot liar. You just filter out the truth and refuse to
hear except what you want to hear....
LN
No I listened to it over and over and he did NOT answer. He used the same
old diversions that he has being using from day one AND did NOT answer the
question. The first thing he did is change the subject to 911 and then
started talking about Afghanistan as if it were Iraq.
Lies and BIG LIES. By the by - his big one that he is telling again is that
Saddam kicked the inspectors out of Iraq. He didn't. Bush told them that
if the did not leave immediately that they would be bombed.
DKat
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 06:55:40 AM |
|
|
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4UqUf.14275$%d.4004@tornado.socal.rr.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:pooUf.46536$2O6.24917@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:B8dUf.16195$S25.11039@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme
Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have
to answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the
question posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual but
not a Bush win either.
He did answer you maggot liar. You just filter out the truth and refuse
to hear except what you want to hear....
LN
No I listened to it over and over and he did NOT answer. He used the same
old diversions that he has being using from day one AND did NOT answer the
question. The first thing he did is change the subject to 911 and then
started talking about Afghanistan as if it were Iraq.
I can't help your mental disability.
Lies and BIG LIES. By the by - his big one that he is telling again is
that Saddam kicked the inspectors out of Iraq. He didn't. Bush told them
that if the did not leave immediately that they would be bombed.
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998 during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
LN
DKat
.
|
|
|
| User: "SteveL" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 10:52:32 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998 during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
As expected, the rightard lies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 08:49:52 PM |
|
|
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998 during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
I suppose your moral equivlency argument is Saddam NOT letting inspectors is
indeed DIFFERENT form kickinjg them out...
Go for it, but when arguing with liberals in the not too distant past, they
relented this point but were instead arguing that KKKlintoon was neither at
fault nor could have prevented it...
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
I suppose you were in grade school back then and don't know any better nor
can recall since the most important thing to ya back then was picking bugers
from your nose and eating them before your ho mama caught cha....
As expected, the rightard lies.
Think what you will, you're the fuking liar!
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "DKat" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 11:46:01 PM |
|
|
AGAIN - The inspectors were told that they had to leave Iraq or risk being
bombed. The inspectors were in Iraq doing their job when they were forced
out by the Bush folks. The inspectors were not satisfied entirely with the
pace of things but they made it quite clear that they were making progress
and that the inspections were working. There is no way to twist things to
say that Saddam made the inspectors leave because he didn't.
Bush et al were making ridiculous demands such as insisting that the records
of weapons be translated into English overnight when there were not enough
translators to do so (it didn't help that they kicked most of their
translators out of the military for being gay). They were claiming that the
arms were being moved around in trucks. This proved not to be the case.
The Bushettes rushed into war because it was becoming clearer and clearer
that Iraq was not a threat and they could not have that happen given that
their reasons for going to war had nothing to do with the danger of Iraq.
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:k7JUf.59011$Jd.1575@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
I suppose your moral equivlency argument is Saddam NOT letting inspectors
is indeed DIFFERENT form kickinjg them out...
Go for it, but when arguing with liberals in the not too distant past,
they relented this point but were instead arguing that KKKlintoon was
neither at fault nor could have prevented it...
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
I suppose you were in grade school back then and don't know any better nor
can recall since the most important thing to ya back then was picking
bugers from your nose and eating them before your ho mama caught cha....
As expected, the rightard lies.
Think what you will, you're the fuking liar!
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 06:53:16 AM |
|
|
You're a Fuking idiot. My reference goes to 1998? or somewhere in that
time-frame when KKKlintoon was in office. Obviously you were too young to
remember!
LN
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tILUf.14352$%d.6105@tornado.socal.rr.com...
AGAIN - The inspectors were told that they had to leave Iraq or risk being
bombed. The inspectors were in Iraq doing their job when they were forced
out by the Bush folks. The inspectors were not satisfied entirely with
the pace of things but they made it quite clear that they were making
progress and that the inspections were working. There is no way to twist
things to say that Saddam made the inspectors leave because he didn't.
Bush et al were making ridiculous demands such as insisting that the
records of weapons be translated into English overnight when there were
not enough translators to do so (it didn't help that they kicked most of
their translators out of the military for being gay). They were claiming
that the arms were being moved around in trucks. This proved not to be
the case. The Bushettes rushed into war because it was becoming clearer
and clearer that Iraq was not a threat and they could not have that happen
given that their reasons for going to war had nothing to do with the
danger of Iraq.
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:k7JUf.59011$Jd.1575@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
I suppose your moral equivlency argument is Saddam NOT letting inspectors
is indeed DIFFERENT form kickinjg them out...
Go for it, but when arguing with liberals in the not too distant past,
they relented this point but were instead arguing that KKKlintoon was
neither at fault nor could have prevented it...
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
I suppose you were in grade school back then and don't know any better
nor can recall since the most important thing to ya back then was picking
bugers from your nose and eating them before your ho mama caught cha....
As expected, the rightard lies.
Think what you will, you're the fuking liar!
LN
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SteveL" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 02:28:16 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:49:52 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998 during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
I suppose your moral equivlency argument is Saddam NOT letting inspectors is
indeed DIFFERENT form kickinjg them out...
Er. Yes. Our deliberate withdrawal of the inspectors so they wouldn't
get hurt in our forthcoming bombing campaign is indeed fundamentally
DIFFERENT from claiming Saddam kicked them out.
The "moral equivalency" argument is yours. (yet more Right Wing
projection).
If *our* ordering the inspectors out of Iraq is morally equivalent to
Saddam's doing so (since he brought it on himself through his lack of
cooperation), then I guess our subsequent bombing was Saddam's fault
as well, since he brought it on himself too.
What next from you? A claim that Saddam bombed his own country?
Go for it
Thank you.
, but when arguing with liberals in the not too distant past, they
relented this point but were instead arguing that KKKlintoon was neither at
fault nor could have prevented it...
I don't care about Clinton. And I doubt anyone agreed that Saddam
"kicked the inspectors out".
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
I suppose you were in grade school back then and don't know any better nor
can recall since the most important thing to ya back then was picking bugers
from your nose and eating them before your ho mama caught cha....
That's what you got in the place of rational truthful argument, liar?
What a loon.
As expected, the rightard lies.
Think what you will, you're the fuking liar!
Gotta love that Right Wing Projection.
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 06:54:39 AM |
|
|
Think 1998 lib, when KKKLintoon was in office. Or were you still suckling
your maw's tit?
LN
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:cdednS0rP7M8ML7ZRVnyvw@giganews.com...
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:49:52 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
I suppose your moral equivlency argument is Saddam NOT letting inspectors
is
indeed DIFFERENT form kickinjg them out...
Er. Yes. Our deliberate withdrawal of the inspectors so they wouldn't
get hurt in our forthcoming bombing campaign is indeed fundamentally
DIFFERENT from claiming Saddam kicked them out.
The "moral equivalency" argument is yours. (yet more Right Wing
projection).
If *our* ordering the inspectors out of Iraq is morally equivalent to
Saddam's doing so (since he brought it on himself through his lack of
cooperation), then I guess our subsequent bombing was Saddam's fault
as well, since he brought it on himself too.
What next from you? A claim that Saddam bombed his own country?
Go for it
Thank you.
, but when arguing with liberals in the not too distant past, they
relented this point but were instead arguing that KKKlintoon was neither
at
fault nor could have prevented it...
I don't care about Clinton. And I doubt anyone agreed that Saddam
"kicked the inspectors out".
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
I suppose you were in grade school back then and don't know any better nor
can recall since the most important thing to ya back then was picking
bugers
from your nose and eating them before your ho mama caught cha....
That's what you got in the place of rational truthful argument, liar?
What a loon.
As expected, the rightard lies.
Think what you will, you're the fuking liar!
Gotta love that Right Wing Projection.
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "SteveL" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 08:18:23 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:54:39 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Think 1998 lib, when KKKLintoon was in office.
Yep Clinton was in office when the US and UK withdrew the inspectors
from Iraq.
What's that got to do with your lie that Saddam kicked them out?
Loon.
Or were you still suckling
your maw's tit?
No. It was *your* mom's tit.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 08:58:09 PM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:DgCUf.23$eU.4@fe05.lga...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
As expected, the rightard lies.
Just ignore needham (LN), he is a typical republican spin machine
wanna-be.
It is simply impossible for him to be capable of using newsgroups yet be
unable
to comprehend his native language. His only goal is chaos, everyone knows
his
opinions have zero credibility.
Opinions and arguments on Usenet are only as credible as the premised
evidence presented to back up asserted conclusions. So far you've produced
nothing to justify your extremist partisan views, so you're batting zero so
far.
But go ahead and hold your head high. Along with being liars, cheats and
arrogant assholes, most liberals on Usenet are narcissist elitist asses who
think they are above the fray just because of what they say, not because
they can back it up!
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 02:54:05 AM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:5fJUf.59015$Jd.10286@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:DgCUf.23$eU.4@fe05.lga...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
As expected, the rightard lies.
Just ignore needham (LN), he is a typical republican spin machine
wanna-be.
It is simply impossible for him to be capable of using newsgroups yet be
unable
to comprehend his native language. His only goal is chaos, everyone
knows
his
opinions have zero credibility.
Opinions and arguments on Usenet are only as credible as the premised
evidence presented to back up asserted conclusions. So far you've produced
nothing to justify your extremist partisan views, so you're batting zero
so
far.
But go ahead and hold your head high. Along with being liars, cheats and
arrogant assholes, most liberals on Usenet are narcissist elitist asses
who
think they are above the fray just because of what they say, not because
they can back it up!
LN
Your post describes you except for the word "liberals".
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 06:51:12 AM |
|
|
In other words lib, I HIT BULLS EYE!
You're welcome!
BWHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH.....
LN
"Roy Blankenship" <biasbros@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:NsOUf.7492$%m4.5012@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:5fJUf.59015$Jd.10286@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:DgCUf.23$eU.4@fe05.lga...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out
for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
As expected, the rightard lies.
Just ignore needham (LN), he is a typical republican spin machine
wanna-be.
It is simply impossible for him to be capable of using newsgroups yet
be
unable
to comprehend his native language. His only goal is chaos, everyone
knows
his
opinions have zero credibility.
Opinions and arguments on Usenet are only as credible as the premised
evidence presented to back up asserted conclusions. So far you've
produced
nothing to justify your extremist partisan views, so you're batting zero
so
far.
But go ahead and hold your head high. Along with being liars, cheats and
arrogant assholes, most liberals on Usenet are narcissist elitist asses
who
think they are above the fray just because of what they say, not because
they can back it up!
LN
Your post describes you except for the word "liberals".
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DKat" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 11:48:21 PM |
|
|
My, my - aren't you good at calling names and saying nothing. Do you have
any facts? Do you have any coherent thoughts to share?
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:5fJUf.59015$Jd.10286@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:DgCUf.23$eU.4@fe05.lga...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
As expected, the rightard lies.
Just ignore needham (LN), he is a typical republican spin machine
wanna-be.
It is simply impossible for him to be capable of using newsgroups yet be
unable
to comprehend his native language. His only goal is chaos, everyone knows
his
opinions have zero credibility.
Opinions and arguments on Usenet are only as credible as the premised
evidence presented to back up asserted conclusions. So far you've produced
nothing to justify your extremist partisan views, so you're batting zero
so far.
But go ahead and hold your head high. Along with being liars, cheats and
arrogant assholes, most liberals on Usenet are narcissist elitist asses
who think they are above the fray just because of what they say, not
because they can back it up!
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Helen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 06:49:39 AM |
|
|
"DKat" <dkatspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FKLUf.9433$WK1.6629@tornado.socal.rr.com...
My, my - aren't you good at calling names and saying nothing.
If that's what you gater from my post, thank a liberal because that's where
I learned this tactic.
Do you have any facts?
Did you see the original post in this thread? it's cite? along with the
included incendiary rhetorical comment?
Do you have any coherent thoughts to share?
I speak to the audience which responds to my post. In my experieince, most
of the liberal persuasion prefer sound bite flaming BS. How about you?
LN
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:5fJUf.59015$Jd.10286@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:DgCUf.23$eU.4@fe05.lga...
"SteveL" <stevelon@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:eridnR_CqJPJT7_ZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:40 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Now You make your mental disability all too obvious. It was in 1998
during
the weakling KKKlintoon regime when Saddam kicked the inspector out for
over
5-years dumbass.
Here, try to digest this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1853860.stm
So Liar, where in there does it say that Saddam kicked the inspectors
out?
It reports Bush CLAIMING that Saddam kicked the inspectors out but
then the story rebutted that claim with the fact that UNSCOM "was
withdrawn in 1998 ahead of a bombing campaign by the US and the UK"
As expected, the rightard lies.
Just ignore needham (LN), he is a typical republican spin machine
wanna-be.
It is simply impossible for him to be capable of using newsgroups yet be
unable
to comprehend his native language. His only goal is chaos, everyone
knows his
opinions have zero credibility.
Opinions and arguments on Usenet are only as credible as the premised
evidence presented to back up asserted conclusions. So far you've
produced nothing to justify your extremist partisan views, so you're
batting zero so far.
But go ahead and hold your head high. Along with being liars, cheats and
arrogant assholes, most liberals on Usenet are narcissist elitist asses
who think they are above the fray just because of what they say, not
because they can back it up!
LN
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 06:59:56 AM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:eqtUf.512$kp3.88@fe04.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:pooUf.46536$2O6.24917@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:B8dUf.16195$S25.11039@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme
Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have
to answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the
question posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual but
not a Bush win either.
He did answer you maggot liar. You just filter out the truth and refuse
to hear except what you want to hear....
LN
Responding to you is pointless.... if not for your "bwahahahaha..'s" and
your spin
you would have absolutely nothing to post.
Quit your whining lib. Those tactics are merely utilized for the more insane
responses such as yours. But while you're on your soap-box, you might want
to explain why you avoid substantive discussion. Oh that's right, you're
liberal!!
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
23 Mar 2006 08:59:10 PM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:0dCUf.22$eU.17@fe05.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:gZwUf.41263$_S7.3249@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:eqtUf.512$kp3.88@fe04.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:pooUf.46536$2O6.24917@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:B8dUf.16195$S25.11039@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme
Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually have
to answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the
question posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual
but not a Bush win either.
He did answer you maggot liar. You just filter out the truth and refuse
to hear except what you want to hear....
LN
Responding to you is pointless.... if not for your "bwahahahaha..'s" and
your spin
you would have absolutely nothing to post.
Quit your whining lib. Those tactics are merely utilized for the more
insane responses such as yours. But while you're on your soap-box, you
might want to explain why you avoid substantive discussion. Oh that's
right, you're liberal!!
LN
I'm not whining moron. I have not avoided substantive discussion, I
attempted
it and you replied with insults, misspellings and gibberish. Therefore
substantive
discussion is impossible as stated in my previous post to you.
Thanks for proving my point lib.....
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 07:08:20 AM |
|
|
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:JTQUf.1443$Ho.447@fe07.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:2gJUf.59016$Jd.25999@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:0dCUf.22$eU.17@fe05.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:gZwUf.41263$_S7.3249@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"axk" <DontBother@Invalid.com> wrote in message
news:eqtUf.512$kp3.88@fe04.lga...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:pooUf.46536$2O6.24917@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:B8dUf.16195$S25.11039@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:xZbUf.49282$F_3.16246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4420F06B.D78CEEB0@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
It's about High Time that old bitty be exposed for the Extreme
Liberal
Partisan she is!
Coward Chimpoleon wouldn't stop interrupting! He might actually
have to answer
otherwise!
You mean he out-Helen Thomas, HELEN THOMAS!
I LOVE IT!!
BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
LN
Lets get back to the initial point. The Bushster didn't answer the
question posed by Ms. Thomas. Didn't answer. Not all that unusual
but not a Bush win either.
He did answer you maggot liar. You just filter out the truth and
refuse to hear except what you want to hear....
LN
Responding to you is pointless.... if not for your "bwahahahaha..'s"
and your spin
you would have absolutely nothing to post.
Quit your whining lib. Those tactics are merely utilized for the more
insane responses such as yours. But while you're on your soap-box, you
might want to explain why you avoid substantive discussion. Oh that's
right, you're liberal!!
LN
I'm not whining moron. I have not avoided substantive discussion, I
attempted
it and you replied with insults, misspellings and gibberish. Therefore
substantive
discussion is impossible as stated in my previous post to you.
Thanks for proving my point lib.....
Do you feel if someone gets annoyed and tired of wasting their time
with you therefore leaving you the final post that you are then somehow
a victorious debator? Thought so. Thank you for proving my point, moron.
Do you really think (not feel as usual) that Usenet is a viable forum for
intellectual dialog & debate? I don't! Further, do you see here on Usenet an
abundance of respect between opposing posters when debating a topic? I
don't. Have you had 10-year plus experience on Usenet during which you've
attempted over & over again to engage mutual dialog for which there exist
some self-imposed standards of acknowledging facts, logic & reasoning?
Probably not, but that forum doesn't exist here.
So if you really think you're in the big leagues here, don't delude
yourself. This forum is just another bar-room gathering of intellectual
morons (mostly liberals at that) who don't want dialog, but do want
reinforcement of their preconceived political notions....
LN
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: Hellen Thomas Dishes an Old Fashion Spanking To President Bush |
24 Mar 2006 10:23:30 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
| | | |
