| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
08 Feb 2004 09:03:42 PM |
| Object: |
Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
08 Feb 2004 10:24:08 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote or quoted :
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
Smokescreen.
Obviously it has no legal merit whatsoever.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tazmanian Devil" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
12 Feb 2004 08:34:47 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
Hey Dumbass, how many time have you got to be told that Federal Law
prohibits you from suing a sitting President for actions that happened
while he was President?
You really are pathetic harry, not to mention bloody ignorant!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cookie Eater" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
12 Feb 2004 08:45:01 AM |
|
|
"Tazmanian Devil" <myob@biteme.com> wrote in message
news:hq2n205v9ec3593uq4dh3f01mujrphj04h@4ax.com...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
Hey Dumbass, how many time have you got to be told that Federal Law
prohibits you from suing a sitting President for actions that happened
while he was President?
You really are pathetic harry, not to mention bloody ignorant!
That may be so but IMPEACHMENT? Can you spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H-M-E-N-T?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
12 Feb 2004 03:45:54 PM |
|
|
"Cookie Eater" <traviscampbell@powergate.ca> wrote in message news:<c0g3ia$177h13$1@ID-217638.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Tazmanian Devil" <myob@biteme.com> wrote in message
news:hq2n205v9ec3593uq4dh3f01mujrphj04h@4ax.com...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
Hey Dumbass, how many time have you got to be told that Federal Law
prohibits you from suing a sitting President for actions that happened
while he was President?
You really are pathetic harry, not to mention bloody ignorant!
That may be so but IMPEACHMENT? Can you spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H-M-E-N-T?
Spaz is once again completely wrong.
Clinton was sued by Paula Jones while he was still in the WH.
A FEDERAL judge said the lawsuit could still move forward.
Clinton testified in the lawsuit while still president.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tazmanian Devil" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
27 Feb 2004 01:06:26 PM |
|
|
On 12 Feb 2004 13:45:54 -0800, (Tempest)
wrote:
"Cookie Eater" <traviscampbell@powergate.ca> wrote in message news:<c0g3ia$177h13$1@ID-217638.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Tazmanian Devil" <myob@biteme.com> wrote in message
news:hq2n205v9ec3593uq4dh3f01mujrphj04h@4ax.com...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
Hey Dumbass, how many time have you got to be told that Federal Law
prohibits you from suing a sitting President for actions that happened
while he was President?
You really are pathetic harry, not to mention bloody ignorant!
That may be so but IMPEACHMENT? Can you spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H-M-E-N-T?
Spaz is once again completely wrong.
Clinton was sued by Paula Jones while he was still in the WH.
A FEDERAL judge said the lawsuit could still move forward.
Clinton testified in the lawsuit while still president.
Tempest shows what a complete and utter jackass she is. Clinton, while
a sitting president, WAS SUED FOR ACTIONS THAT HAPPENED BEFORE HE
BECAME PRESIDENT, NOT AFTER! That is perfectly legal. Now if he had
done this with jones AFTER he became President, there would not have
been a darn thing she could have done.
What is the matter Tempest? cannot figure out the difference between
before and after? If you would have taken the bloody time to read the
post to harry, you would have seen that I said that a sitting
President CANNOT be sued for actions taken WHILE he was President.
Once again you opened you mouth and shoved your foot in it, all the
time proving what a moronic lying jackass you really are.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
12 Feb 2004 03:43:22 PM |
|
|
"Cookie Eater" <traviscampbell@powergate.ca> wrote in message news:<c0g3ia$177h13$1@ID-217638.news.uni-berlin.de>...
"Tazmanian Devil" <myob@biteme.com> wrote in message
news:hq2n205v9ec3593uq4dh3f01mujrphj04h@4ax.com...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
Hey Dumbass, how many time have you got to be told that Federal Law
prohibits you from suing a sitting President for actions that happened
while he was President?
Another item to add to the Lies Told And Idiotic Statements Made By Spaz list.
Clinton was sued by Jones.
A judge said the lawsuit could go forward while Clinton was in office.
As a "lawyer", you should know this.
You really are pathetic harry, not to mention bloody ignorant!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tazmanian Devil" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, a class action suit against Bush ain't such a bad idea. |
27 Feb 2004 01:06:27 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 06:45:01 -0800, "Cookie Eater"
<traviscampbell@powergate.ca> wrote:
"Tazmanian Devil" <myob@biteme.com> wrote in message
news:hq2n205v9ec3593uq4dh3f01mujrphj04h@4ax.com...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:03:42 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Last week Terri Carlin of Knoxville, TN, filed a proposed class action
lawsuit against Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake for causing her to
"suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury."
Serious injury?
Did her eyes pop out or something?
Carlin is asking for - get this - billions of dollars in "compensatory
and punitive damages."
So I guess to answer the questions of all those pundits who asked last
week "Can it get any lower than this?" is a resounding yes.
Let's just clarify - Carlin was able to sit through several hours of
dogs biting men in the nuts, horses lighting people on fire with their
farts, disgraceful stereotypes of women, vampires, werewolves, the
quality of Mike Ditka's erection, oh, not to mention several dozen men
inflicting grievous bodily harm upon one another - but a quick flash
of boob caused her enough "serious injury" to sue for billions of
dollars?
Good grief - I mean, George W. Bush has caused me to suffer outrage,
anger and embarrassment, not to mention serious injury (that time I
punched the wall during one of his press conferences) but you don't
see me suing him for billions of dollars.
Hang on... that gives me an idea.
Hey Dumbass, how many time have you got to be told that Federal Law
prohibits you from suing a sitting President for actions that happened
while he was President?
You really are pathetic harry, not to mention bloody ignorant!
That may be so but IMPEACHMENT? Can you spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H-M-E-N-T?
Can you spell the words B-E-F-O-R-E and A-F-T-E-R? Clinton was
impeached for lying to a federal judge under oath and for placing the
office of the presidency in a position that threatened the national
security of the United States as he could have been blackmailed for
his actions. That is well under the terms for removal of a sitting
president and constitutional.
Your point was what exactly?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
