Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?



 Politics > Politics-USA > Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Captain Compassion"
Date: 16 Aug 2007 10:23:46 PM
Object: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?
Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?
Posted: Saturday, Aug 11, 2007 - 11:58:03 pm MDT
FRANK MIELE
http://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2007/08/12/columns/columns01.txt
If you wanted to see an example of biased journalism, a good place to
start would be the Aug. 13 cover story in Newsweek about global
warming.
The issue’s cover says “Global Warming Is A Hoax,” but there is an
asterisk, which leads to the statement “Or so claim well-funded
naysayers who still reject the overwhelming evidence of climate
change.”
In other words, Newsweek has an agenda to promote global-warming
hysteria, and they don’t feel any need to give equal time to a point
of view they disagree with. Indeed Newsweek’s author Sharon Begley
denounces global warming skeptics as “deniers,” a term which I think
establishes the pseudo-religious quality of the global warming crusade
as well as anything.

We are indeed reaching the point where “science” has become the
equivalent of religious dogma, and “deniers” of the “received truth”
(from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in this case)
have the same status as the poor saps who dared to tell the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (previously known as the
Inquisition) that church dogma was wrong.
Although “deniers” of the faith of global warming cannot yet be
executed, they can be excommunicated — from the one true church of
government funding for scientific research — and that threat of lost
funding has marginalized skeptics of global warming to the point where
they probably feel a little like Galileo under house arrest.
Newsweek complains that some of the scientists who do not recite the
Catechism of Climate Change, as declared by the Intergovernmental
Panel, have taken what can only be considered 20 pieces of silver from
the ***** of Babylon, also known as ExxonMobil. To quote Newsweek,
“Since the late 1980s, this well-coordinated, well-funded campaign by
contrarian scientists, free-market think tanks and industry has
created a paralyzing fog of doubt around climate change.”
The language is virtually identical to that used by the Catholic
Church to describe the damage done to “true faith” by anyone who dared
to use the lever of science to pry people out from the confines of
ignorance. And just as the Inquisition would try to link heretics to
Satan, so too does the modern inquisition against global-warming
skeptics — for in this day and age there is surely no greater demon
than ExxonMobil, is there?
But for just one moment, let us ask the obvious question: What
difference does it make where I get the money to do my scientific
research, if indeed it is scientific research and not just propaganda?
Obviously no difference at all. The earth is still going to be
revolving around the sun, regardless of who paid for my lunch.
--
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMcharter.net
.

User: "Roger"

Title: Re: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics? 17 Aug 2007 01:28:18 AM
"Captain Compassion" <daranc@NOSPAMcharter.net> wrote in message
news:dv4ac3lvh66rrc4d08g5frmsbvqo2c9bkg@4ax.com...

Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?
Posted: Saturday, Aug 11, 2007 - 11:58:03 pm MDT
FRANK MIELE

From
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0813340861/skepticcom-20/104-6491725-8322313?creative=125581&camp=2321&link_code=as1
From Booklist
Sarich and Miele, both respected academicians, challenge the much-hyped,
popular notion of race as an illusion, or mere social construct. Instead,
they contend that significant human racial differences exist. Those
differences are being increasingly identified and quantified via medical
research and law-enforcement techniques, most notably in DNA testing, which
has led to convictions and acquittals. Inquiries into the genetic influences
behind racial differences in educational achievement and intelligence,
despite inflammatory resistance, are justified by cost-benefit analyses, the
authors contend. Assessing the future of racial politics in the U.S and
internationally, Sarich and Miele offer three scenarios: meritocracy with
race-sensitive safety valves (which they prefer), affirmative action or
quotas, and rising resegregation and ethnopolitics. This is an important
work, despite its conservative inferences, that challenges both the
existence and the value of America's obsession with color blindness. Vernon
Ford

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2007/08/12/columns/columns01.txt

If you wanted to see an example of biased journalism, a good place to
start would be the Aug. 13 cover story in Newsweek about global
warming.

The issue's cover says "Global Warming Is A Hoax," but there is an
asterisk, which leads to the statement "Or so claim well-funded
naysayers who still reject the overwhelming evidence of climate
change."

In other words, Newsweek has an agenda to promote global-warming
hysteria, and they don't feel any need to give equal time to a point
of view they disagree with. Indeed Newsweek's author Sharon Begley
denounces global warming skeptics as "deniers," a term which I think
establishes the pseudo-religious quality of the global warming crusade
as well as anything.

We are indeed reaching the point where "science" has become the
equivalent of religious dogma, and "deniers" of the "received truth"
(from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in this case)
have the same status as the poor saps who dared to tell the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (previously known as the
Inquisition) that church dogma was wrong.

Although "deniers" of the faith of global warming cannot yet be
executed, they can be excommunicated - from the one true church of
government funding for scientific research - and that threat of lost
funding has marginalized skeptics of global warming to the point where
they probably feel a little like Galileo under house arrest.

Newsweek complains that some of the scientists who do not recite the
Catechism of Climate Change, as declared by the Intergovernmental
Panel, have taken what can only be considered 20 pieces of silver from
the ***** of Babylon, also known as ExxonMobil. To quote Newsweek,
"Since the late 1980s, this well-coordinated, well-funded campaign by
contrarian scientists, free-market think tanks and industry has
created a paralyzing fog of doubt around climate change."

The language is virtually identical to that used by the Catholic
Church to describe the damage done to "true faith" by anyone who dared
to use the lever of science to pry people out from the confines of
ignorance. And just as the Inquisition would try to link heretics to
Satan, so too does the modern inquisition against global-warming
skeptics - for in this day and age there is surely no greater demon
than ExxonMobil, is there?

But for just one moment, let us ask the obvious question: What
difference does it make where I get the money to do my scientific
research, if indeed it is scientific research and not just propaganda?
Obviously no difference at all. The earth is still going to be
revolving around the sun, regardless of who paid for my lunch.


--
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius

Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMcharter.net

.

User: "Bret Cahill"

Title: Re: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics? 16 Aug 2007 10:55:39 PM

In other words, Newsweek has an agenda to

save their fannies from the real threat of global warming.
Not too hard to figger out if you have an IQ above single digits.
Bret Cahill
.

User: "kT"

Title: Re: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics? 17 Aug 2007 12:46:24 PM
Captain Compassion wrote:

FRANK MIELE

You mean this Frank Miele?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Miele
Frank Miele is an American journalist and senior editor at Skeptic best
known for his controversial advocacy of hereditarian hypotheses about
race, especially race and intelligence.
All good American fascists get their science from crackpot racists.
--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
.

User: "Kevin Cunningham"

Title: Re: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics? 17 Aug 2007 08:54:06 AM
On Aug 16, 11:23 pm, Captain Compassion <dar...@NOSPAMcharter.net>
wrote:

Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?
Posted: Saturday, Aug 11, 2007 - 11:58:03 pm MDT
FRANK MIELEhttp://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2007/08/12/columns/columns01.txt

If you wanted to see an example of biased journalism, a good place to
start would be the Aug. 13 cover story in Newsweek about global
warming.

The issue's cover says "Global Warming Is A Hoax," but there is an
asterisk, which leads to the statement "Or so claim well-funded
naysayers who still reject the overwhelming evidence of climate
change."

In other words, Newsweek has an agenda to promote global-warming
hysteria, and they don't feel any need to give equal time to a point
of view they disagree with. Indeed Newsweek's author Sharon Begley
denounces global warming skeptics as "deniers," a term which I think
establishes the pseudo-religious quality of the global warming crusade
as well as anything.

What you to gutless to do is post a real paper describing why global
warming is a failure. However to do that you would have to have facts
and you don't have any facts. At all.
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics? 17 Aug 2007 10:28:22 AM
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:54:06 -0700, Kevin Cunningham
<smskjc@mindspring.com> wrote:

On Aug 16, 11:23 pm, Captain Compassion <dar...@NOSPAMcharter.net>
wrote:

Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?
Posted: Saturday, Aug 11, 2007 - 11:58:03 pm MDT
FRANK MIELEhttp://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2007/08/12/columns/columns01.txt

If you wanted to see an example of biased journalism, a good place to
start would be the Aug. 13 cover story in Newsweek about global
warming.

The issue's cover says "Global Warming Is A Hoax," but there is an
asterisk, which leads to the statement "Or so claim well-funded
naysayers who still reject the overwhelming evidence of climate
change."

In other words, Newsweek has an agenda to promote global-warming
hysteria, and they don't feel any need to give equal time to a point
of view they disagree with. Indeed Newsweek's author Sharon Begley
denounces global warming skeptics as "deniers," a term which I think
establishes the pseudo-religious quality of the global warming crusade
as well as anything.


What you to gutless to do is post a real paper describing why global
warming is a failure. However to do that you would have to have facts
and you don't have any facts. At all.

The Captain posts from many sources. Ideas are Ideas regardless of the
source. You either agree or disagree.
--
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMcharter.net
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics? 17 Aug 2007 10:12:22 AM
On Aug 16, 8:23 pm, Captain Compassion <dar...@NOSPAMcharter.net>
wrote:

Hey Newsweek: Why not just call us heretics?
Posted: Saturday, Aug 11, 2007 - 11:58:03 pm MDT
FRANK MIELEhttp://www.dailyinterlake.com/articles/2007/08/12/columns/columns01.txt

Spruce trees are marching to the north pole..
And you are still there shlepping your oil futures.
It's pretty funny.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Sure looks like Ghouliani's melting. Hey, Rudy just say 9/11 and click your heels together.
HEY LIBS, I JUST RECEIVED THE "TAKE BACK AMERICA" THEME SONG
Rummy's defense - HEY MAN - I JUST GIVE ORDERS
Hey, Bennett, Just say you're sorry - and mean it . But that wouldn't be right-wingish.
Hey, Anal Cyst Limbaugh, just some frat boys blowin' off a li'l steam, eh?
Hey gun lovers. Just an invite to join my forum.
Hey, c'mon, the kid was just reading a speech.
Some Republican politicians are just not that bright.
Re: IT'S MIND BOGGLING JUST HOW STUPID LIBERALS ARE!
Ah-nuld's fantasy of a cushy job was just that, a fantasy.
Re: Just Ban The Guns Already!
Re: Good Soldiers in a "Just" War
Re: Just be thankful your mother didn't abort YOU, Teresa!
GEORGE BUSH JUST KILLED MY MARIJUANA PLANT
LOOK at THIS = Republicans Want War = JUST dont want to serve in WAR
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER