| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DGVREIMAN" |
| Date: |
05 Mar 2006 10:24:29 PM |
| Object: |
Honor-Duty-Country |
Honor - Duty- Country.
As a former Vietnam era Senior NCO I would like to remind all USA
commissioned officers of their Honor-Duty-Country oath and
obligation to our nation. And, as often as I kicked some junior
officers in the ***** (0-3 down) to get the ***** up during a base
or fire base attack in Vietnam, I would also like to remind those
that achieved that commissioned rank to continue to abide by
their oaths and their honor code. If they do, then they will have
me as an ally, but if they do not, then they will have me and
mine as an adversary. There are no other choices. We are one
Gentlemen, that is if you do your duty.
That means no more working for brokers or mutual funds that are
designed to cheat our military servicemen out of their
investments and pay, and no more lies to the press to sell books.
Those that do such are harming our soldiers - those very soldiers
that you swore to protect and to serve. I know it is hard after
you retire, but shuck it up Gentlemen, you cannot betray all that
you stood for just because you don't really know the next time
for chow. Your entire life depends upon you maintaining your
honor, and your integrity that you swore to follow long ago.
Allow no feather merchant company to exploit our troopers again.
Never be a part of some scheme to make money off of our vets.
If you need money that bad then email me - I don't have much but
I will stake any honorable officer to a job or a loan - anytime.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
| User: "9 cats r enuf" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
06 Mar 2006 02:05:57 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
Honor - Duty- Country.
HDC died out during Vietnam. Today it's far worse. FAR FAR WORSE in fact!
Exercpts from the International Forecaster Newsletter:
http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/
Train Wreck of the Week
By Bob Chapman
March 5 2006
The quagmire that is Iraq and Afghanistan continues unabated
in its loss of money and lives. Congress will approve another
$120 billion request and Mr. Bush's $40 billion war will have
become a $440 billion war and occupation with no end in sight.
The building of four large airbases around Baghdad can
only lead to the conclusion that America plans to be in Iraq
for decades to come - a perpetual financial drain on our economy.
There is a $600 billion embassy complex being built in
Baghdad's green zone. We are sure that is not for temporary occupancy.
Rep. Jack Murtha has been saying for sometime that Iraq is not
about terrorism; it is about civil war." The bloody events as of
late have proven his assessment all too true. Jack is unusual
for a politician. He's a truth seeker and a truth teller.
Congressman Jack Murtha has been giving us the facts, the truth.
The flipside of that is George and the neocons know for sure
they have brought democracy to Iraq. Democracy like
terrorism is a cover for all the other real reasons we are there.
Even Jack Murtha doesn't get that because he is inside the box.
America is now in the midst of a civil war in Iraq and our
military is stuck in the middle of it. The civil war is the
result of rigging Iraq's "democratic elections." The Association
of Muslim Scholars, a hard line Sunni group, blamed
America for worsening conditions in Iraq and they are right.
Hundreds of thousands of Muslims across the country
are chanting, "no to the occupation," and they are right in
doing so.
This has made us less safe in America because it could
motivate Muslims to retaliate against us in the US and
they have every right to do so. How would you feel if
you were an Iraqi and your country and people were
being torn apart, and you had done nothing wrong?
Our troops are in a crossfire and we have helped recruit
even more Islamic combatants. History resonates with the
enmity and violence between Muslim sects, and our
American youth are losing their lives and limbs trying to
sort out these centuries of ancient hatreds. Many politicians
in both parties want out of Iraq and Afghanistan, but are
afraid of bringing up the issue because *45% of dumb
Americans* still are convinced it is a good idea to be there.
(*emphasis added*)
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Bush Was Brilliant (Was Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
06 Mar 2006 08:38:39 PM |
|
|
"9 cats r enuf" <wwwww3456@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2971c$440ca431$d1cc571a$6706@snip.allthenewsgroups.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
Honor - Duty- Country.
HDC died out during Vietnam. Today it's far worse. FAR FAR
WORSE in fact!
Exercpts from the International Forecaster Newsletter:
http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/
Train Wreck of the Week
By Bob Chapman
March 5 2006
The quagmire that is Iraq and Afghanistan continues unabated
in its loss of money and lives. Congress will approve another
$120 billion request and Mr. Bush's $40 billion war will have
become a $440 billion war and occupation with no end in sight.
The building of four large airbases around Baghdad can
only lead to the conclusion that America plans to be in Iraq
for decades to come - a perpetual financial drain on our
economy.
There is a $600 billion embassy complex being built in
Baghdad's green zone. We are sure that is not for temporary
occupancy.
Doug Says: Keeping some of our forces in Iraq permanently is a
very good idea. We no longer can house them in Saudi Arabia, and
we need a permanent troop presence in the Middle East to protect
the Gulf and the flow of oil. In respect to the war on terror,
if we were not fighting the goons in Iraq we would be fighting
them in Afghanistan while they trained and were financed and
armed by Saddam. Saddam was training and financing a terrorist
army, and our war on terror would have been much harder if we had
not first removed Saddam and replaced him with an ally.
Bush, Blair and Howard should be congratulated for their
foresight and tactics in respect to this war. Only a complete
idiot would claim that had we not taken out Saddam that
terrorists would not be infiltrating into Afghanistan the same as
they have infiltrated into Iraq. Iraq was the better choice for
the war on terror battlefield that was sure to come after 911 -
at least we are not fighting the Iraqis, Saddam, his oil money,
AND the radical Muslim goons! Bush was brilliant - that is from
a strict military point of view.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush Was Brilliant (Was Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
07 Mar 2006 03:12:55 PM |
|
|
Bush was brilliant -
talk about a classic OXYMORON having these two words within 10 miles of
oen another
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lee Philips" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
05 Mar 2006 11:01:46 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message news:0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
Honor - Duty- Country.
Tell it to WWII vets, since that was the last time our military
was engaged in a noble fight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seawolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
06 Mar 2006 12:51:28 AM |
|
|
"Lee Philips" <Lee_slamspam_Philips@mpinet.net> wrote in message
news:_mPOf.211$k75.33@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
Honor - Duty- Country.
Tell it to WWII vets, since that was the last time our military
was engaged in a noble fight
Yeah, and if you believe that crap, I've got some ocean front property in
Arizona for sale cheap!
It must suck to be as ignorant as you are.....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
07 Mar 2006 03:09:42 PM |
|
|
Lee Philips wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message news:0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
Honor - Duty- Country.
Tell it to WWII vets, since that was the last time our military
was engaged in a noble fight.
CORRECT
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ivan Gowch" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
06 Mar 2006 02:19:29 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:01:46 GMT, "Lee Philips"
<Lee_slamspam_Philips@mpinet.net> wrote:
==>"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message news:0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
==>> Honor - Duty- Country.
==>
==>Tell it to WWII vets, since that was the last time our military
==>was engaged in a noble fight.
You got that absolutely right.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
07 Mar 2006 11:17:56 AM |
|
|
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-67A7B9.19591005032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <0aWdnfv6O9jhJJbZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
Honor - Duty- Country.
As a former Vietnam era Senior NCO I would like to remind all
USA
commissioned officers of their Honor-Duty-Country oath and
obligation to our nation. And, as often as I kicked some
junior
officers in the ***** (0-3 down) to get the ***** up during a
base
or fire base attack in Vietnam, I would also like to remind
those
that achieved that commissioned rank to continue to abide by
their oaths and their honor code. If they do, then they will
have
me as an ally, but if they do not, then they will have me and
mine as an adversary. There are no other choices. We are one
Gentlemen, that is if you do your duty.
That means no more working for brokers or mutual funds that
are
designed to cheat our military servicemen out of their
investments and pay, and no more lies to the press to sell
books.
Those that do such are harming our soldiers - those very
soldiers
that you swore to protect and to serve. I know it is hard
after
you retire, but shuck it up Gentlemen, you cannot betray all
that
you stood for just because you don't really know the next time
for chow. Your entire life depends upon you maintaining your
honor, and your integrity that you swore to follow long ago.
Allow no feather merchant company to exploit our troopers
again.
Never be a part of some scheme to make money off of our vets.
If you need money that bad then email me - I don't have much
but
I will stake any honorable officer to a job or a loan -
anytime.
Doug Grant (Tm)
First of all, it's Duty - Honor - Country. Like the term
"butter
bar" everyone in the Army knows the concept of "Duty - Honor -
Country."
Get the order right before you go spouting off about it. The
title of
this thread just shows how incredibly ignorant you are.
Doug Says: I was not quoting the precise West Point motto moron.
I emphaized the word "Honor" first as it was germane to my post -
you really do have a reading comprehension problem now don't you?
And in Vietnam, a Butter Bar was a Platoon leader, not always a
2nd Lt and often was a NCO ("B.B.") was the actual slang -
offsetting L.T.) (In Vietnam a "Brown Bar" was a 2nd Lt - at
least it was when I was there). So we are not talking about back
in Ft. Benning, we were talking about in Vietnam, in my unit,
during the Tet Offensive, and NOT guarding some lonely border
years after the 1968 Tet offensive like you claim you did. Your
claim to know all slang and words used by all Veterans of the
Vietnam war, in units you never served in, during times you were
still back in the states, is beyond your normal "I am a mind
reader" bull - it just confirms the reason for your nickname
"Psycho."
Obviously the concept of Duty - Honor - Country didn't play
a
significant role in your brief career. Where do you now get
the
impudence to lecture your betters. Yes, betters! Better than
you can
ever hope to be. Not only do they outrank you, but they were
able to
meet the criteria for commissioning -- criteria that you
miserably
failed to meet.
Doug Says: Duh, moron, I was offered the opportunity to apply
for a direct Reserve Commission and decided against doing so. I
still have the letter around here somewhere. I was offered that
opportunity if I would elect to take the French mission and not
return to OCS. And if you believe those commissioned officers
that were recently caught selling con man investment deals to our
present vets fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, are my "betters"
then you really do deserve your nickname of "Psycho." Moreover,
you do not make SFC E-7 in six years in the US Army by not being
honorable, and a damn good soldier as well. (Not to mention
the fact that it is hard for me to believe anyone was "my better"
or anyone else's "better" just becuase they sat on four inches of
chair in the mess hall, completed a few leadership problems, and
went to school for a few weeks, and spit shined their floors- all
of which I did very well I might add.)
You never kicked any commissioned officer's *****. No real
NCO would
ever boast of having done so. Your publicly available military
records
indicate any time served in combat. You had your chance. You
preferred not to take it.
Doug Says: You have been caught lying about this issue now, what
is it, 20 times or so? Of course I served in Combat, and of
course my records prove that fact. Yet you fail to prove your
military claims with any records whatsoever - based upon your
lack of knowledge about the issues surrounding combat units in
the 25th Infantry Division (we both know the unit I was assigned
to (the Wolfhounds) did not have *any* slots for any Personnel
Sergeants - or any other Administrative duties that I was
qualified to perform. The Wolfhounds only wanted NCO's with
past Infantryman MOS's so they could perform those combat
duties - and of course you are also hiding the fact that when I
first went to Vietnam I also held a Combat Infantryman's MOS -
but then facts always did confuse you Psycho Dai. Moreover, I
have dressed down, advised, screamed at, directed, confronted,
and rousted out of their hootches many Junior officers when I
was in the US Army (and one Major that was drunk on duty). You
clearly were never assigned to an Infantry Unit during the
Vietnam war. The NCO's run those units Dum Dum. We are not
talking about border guard duty Dai Dumbass like you claim was
your duty in Vietnam, we are talking about the 25th Infantry
Division, during the 1968 Tet Offensive when 2nd Lt.'s were
coming in scared to death right out of OCS - they were kids, and
nothing more. If they were smart and listened to their NCO's we
were nice to them - if not - we kicked their little buts out of
sight of the men.
Moreover, I would like to point out that making this false
statement of fact that I was never in combat in Vietnam is a lie
and represents malicious libel. Typical Dai Dippy post, lies,
distortions, fabrications and more lies, distortions and
fabrications. If you continue with this libel you will get an
opportunity to prove it in a court of law. I have warned you
several times to stop the libel and lies. My patience is wearing
thin.
I know you are a phony. You know you are a phony. We
agree on
that. Your extensive usenet posting history confirms it. That
upsets
you. You are just going to have to live with it.
-Dai Uy sends
Doug Says: No Dai Dimpo - they only thing we both know is that
you are am unethical liar, distorter, forger of FBI documents,
poster of private VA information, libeler, malicious libeler,
cyberstalking, smear merchant that uses lies and false
accusations, and in my opinion a downright unethical idiot. I
never lie, (not knowingly anyway) and I have offered you the
opportunity dozens of times to take this issue to a court of law
and you duck and run - so who's the "phony" again? It sounds
like you are the one afraid of an impartial legal arena not me.
Also stop trying to hide the posts that prove you are a liar and
a smear merchant by claiming "net etiquette." Net etiquette" is
allowing people to choose which posts they want to read or
ignore. There is no rule that everyone must read every post in
every NG moron, and there certainly is no vote to make you the
censor of USENET - especially when all you want to censor is when
you are proved a liar and smear merchant.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"You cannot claim you love the horde but hate Attila!"
© Copyright 2006 by DGVReiman
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pepperoni" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
07 Mar 2006 12:10:56 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:e6CdnXbB8IWiXZDZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
Hey, Dug-h. Tell us again about murdering the priests. Was that part of
the "Honor", or part of the "Duty"?
I can understand your being denied reenlistment. Was it because of your
lying, self-serving nature, or perhaps to save you from a murder
prosecution? At any rate, it was for the good of the service, as was your
discharge from the Marines.
You are a compulsive serial liar,. Your "stuff" is weak.
Pepperoni
.
|
|
|
| User: "Red Jacket Red" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
08 Mar 2006 07:32:04 AM |
|
|
"Pepperoni" <undeliverableaddy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lqSdnf2OcMAyUZDZnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:e6CdnXbB8IWiXZDZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
Hey, Dug-h. Tell us again about murdering the priests. Was that part
of
the "Honor", or part of the "Duty"?
No, that's Jones and Nuns Pepperoni, Nuns !
With an occasional Duck.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pepperoni" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
08 Mar 2006 08:59:24 AM |
|
|
Hey, Dug-h. Tell us again about murdering the priests. Was that part
of
the "Honor", or part of the "Duty"?
No, that's Jones and Nuns Pepperoni, Nuns !
With an occasional Duck.
Well, at least Jones has the sense to rape them *before* killing them.
(because they are no fun if you kill them first)
Dug-h just gives an evil grin as penguin juice runs down his chin. (no
*pequin* jokes, please)
Do you figure Doogie raped the priests before he killed them? I wonder if
he eats the ones he rapes??? This leads to some great secondary questions;
which wine, the burgundy or the rose'??? (fava beans or asparagus??)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yaketyak" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
08 Mar 2006 04:39:28 PM |
|
|
I thought he was raping the nuns and priests..?
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:32:04 -0800, "Red Jacket" <Red Jacket@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Pepperoni" <undeliverableaddy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lqSdnf2OcMAyUZDZnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:e6CdnXbB8IWiXZDZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
Hey, Dug-h. Tell us again about murdering the priests. Was that part
of
the "Honor", or part of the "Duty"?
No, that's Jones and Nuns Pepperoni, Nuns !
With an occasional Duck.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Red Jacket Red" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
08 Mar 2006 08:15:55 PM |
|
|
Damn Jones, he never could get rape pillage and
burn in the proper order.
As a knife wielding guerrilla leader he fails.
"Yaketyak" <Yaketak@dontcomeback.gov> wrote in message
news:a8nu02lqtgmbk7u8l7g0ggkmm2e7a9sijf@4ax.com...
I thought he was raping the nuns and priests..?
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:32:04 -0800, "Red Jacket" <Red Jacket@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Pepperoni" <undeliverableaddy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lqSdnf2OcMAyUZDZnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:e6CdnXbB8IWiXZDZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
Hey, Dug-h. Tell us again about murdering the priests. Was that
part
of
the "Honor", or part of the "Duty"?
No, that's Jones and Nuns Pepperoni, Nuns !
With an occasional Duck.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
21 Mar 2006 12:08:01 AM |
|
|
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-0911ED.10511907032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <e6CdnXbB8IWiXZDZ4p2dnA@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-67A7B9.19591005032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
As a former Vietnam era Senior NCO I would like to
remind all
USA
commissioned officers of their Honor-Duty-Country oath and
obligation to our nation. And, as often as I kicked some
junior
officers in the ***** (0-3 down) to get the ***** up during a
base
or fire base attack in Vietnam, I would also like to remind
those
that achieved that commissioned rank to continue to abide by
their oaths and their honor code. If they do, then they will
have
me as an ally, but if they do not, then they will have me and
mine as an adversary. There are no other choices. We are one
Gentlemen, that is if you do your duty.
That means no more working for brokers or mutual funds that
are
designed to cheat our military servicemen out of their
investments and pay, and no more lies to the press to sell
books.
Those that do such are harming our soldiers - those very
soldiers
that you swore to protect and to serve. I know it is hard
after
you retire, but shuck it up Gentlemen, you cannot betray all
that
you stood for just because you don't really know the next time
for chow. Your entire life depends upon you maintaining your
honor, and your integrity that you swore to follow long ago.
Allow no feather merchant company to exploit our troopers
again.
Never be a part of some scheme to make money off of our vets.
If you need money that bad then email me - I don't have much
but
I will stake any honorable officer to a job or a loan -
anytime.
If they were smart and listened to their NCO's we
were nice to them - if not - we kicked their little buts out
of
sight of the men.
Doug Says: I was not quoting the precise West Point motto moron.
I emphaized the word "Honor" first as it was germane to my post -
you really do have a reading comprehension problem now don't you?
And in Vietnam, a Butter Bar was a Platoon leader, not always a
2nd Lt and often was a NCO ("B.B.") was the actual slang -
offsetting L.T.) (In Vietnam a "Brown Bar" was a 2nd Lt - at
least it was when I was there). So we are not talking about back
in Ft. Benning, we were talking about in Vietnam, in my unit,
during the Tet Offensive, and NOT guarding some lonely border
years after the 1968 Tet offensive like you claim you did. Your
claim to know all slang and words used by all Veterans of the
Vietnam war, in units you never served in, during times you were
still back in the states, is beyond your normal "I am a mind
reader" bull - it just confirms the reason for your nickname
"Psycho."
-
Moreover, I would like to point out that making this false
statement of fact that I was never in combat in Vietnam is a
lie
and represents malicious libel.
I base my opinion upon your official military records.
Your
official military records do not indicate that you were ever in
combat.
Mine indicate that I was.
Doug Says: You know that is a lie. My official military records
prove irrefutably that I was in combat. Stop the libel. Your
unethical attempts to smear me with lies and defamation are
obvious. Moreover, you also refuse to reveal your military
records so who knows what they reveal. But if they indicate you
were assigned to a combat rifle company during the Tet offensive
of 1968, they certainly would prove you were in combat - like
mine does.
Doug Says: You have been caught lying about this issue now, what
is it, 20 times or so? Of course I served in Combat, and of
course my records prove that fact. Yet you fail to prove your
military claims with any records whatsoever - based upon your
lack of knowledge about the issues surrounding combat units in
the 25th Infantry Division (we both know the unit I was assigned
to (the Wolfhounds) did not have *any* slots for any Personnel
Sergeants - or any other Administrative duties that I was
qualified to perform. The Wolfhounds only wanted NCO's with
past Infantryman MOS's so they could perform those combat
duties - and of course you are also hiding the fact that when I
first went to Vietnam I also held a Combat Infantryman's MOS -
but then facts always did confuse you Psycho Dai. Moreover, I
have dressed down, advised, screamed at, directed, confronted,
and rousted out of their hootches many Junior officers when I
was in the US Army (and one Major that was drunk on duty). You
clearly were never assigned to an Infantry Unit during the
Vietnam war. The NCO's run those units Dum Dum. We are not
talking about border guard duty Dai Dumbass like you claim was
your duty in Vietnam, we are talking about the 25th Infantry
Division, during the 1968 Tet Offensive when 2nd Lt.'s were
coming in scared to death right out of OCS - they were kids, and
nothing more. If they were smart and listened to their NCO's we
were nice to them - if not - we kicked their little buts out of
sight of the men.
Moreover, I would like to point out that making this false
statement of fact that I was never in combat in Vietnam is a lie
and represents malicious libel. Typical Dai Dippy post, lies,
distortions, fabrications and more lies, distortions and
fabrications. If you continue with this libel you will get an
opportunity to prove it in a court of law. I have warned you
several times to stop the libel and lies. My patience is wearing
thin.
- - - - - [dougshit deleted] - - - - -
Typical Dai Dippy post, lies,
distortions, fabrications and more lies, distortions and
fabrications. If you continue with this libel you will get an
opportunity to prove it in a court of law. I have warned you
several times to stop the libel and lies. My patience is
wearing
thin.
Doug, it all boils down to this simple fact:
I know you are a phony. You know you are a phony.
Doug Says: It boils down to this simple fact. I know you are a
liar and you know you are a liar. There is nothing phony about
my service in Vietnam or elsewhere and you know it. Your "Tick
Tock" records blew up in your phony face, and proved you the
liar and smear merchant we have all come to know you are.
What is phony is the lies, distortions, libel, fraud, forgeries,
and general defamation you continue to post about me in spite of
all the official records and documents that have been revealed
that prove you the smear merchant and unethical fraud merchant we
know you are. You have lost all credibility due to your
dogmatic lies and obvious fraud and distortions; you even
admitted to posting forged FBI documents about me, and admitted
to fraudulently and falsely claiming that I was a "child
molester." So your true colors have been revealed, and they
certainly are something to be ashamed of. No wonder you do not
understand Honor-Duty-Country. And boy was the US Army lucky to
get rid of you. I would hate to think of people as unethical as
you still around in the US Army - you would get your entire unit
massacred.
Doug Says: No Dai Dimpo - they only thing we both know is that
you are am unethical liar, distorter, forger of FBI documents,
poster of private VA information, libeler, malicious libeler,
cyberstalking, smear merchant that uses lies and false
accusations, and in my opinion a downright unethical idiot. I
never lie, (not knowingly anyway) and I have offered you the
opportunity dozens of times to take this issue to a court of law
and you duck and run - so who's the "phony" again? It sounds
like you are the one afraid of an impartial legal arena not me.
Also stop trying to hide the posts that prove you are a liar and
a smear merchant by claiming "net etiquette." Net etiquette" is
allowing people to choose which posts they want to read or
ignore. There is no rule that everyone must read every post in
every NG moron, and there certainly is no vote to make you the
censor of USENET - especially when all you want to censor is when
you are proved a liar and smear merchant.
Doug Grant (Tm)
- - - - - [more dougshit deleted] - - - - -
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pepperoni" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
21 Mar 2006 01:22:42 AM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:2cedndfeccCmBYLZRVn-og@comcast.com...
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-0911ED.10511907032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <e6CdnXbB8IWiXZDZ4p2dnA@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-67A7B9.19591005032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
As a former Vietnam era Senior NCO I would like to remind all
USA
commissioned officers of their Honor-Duty-Country oath and
obligation to our nation. And, as often as I kicked some
junior
officers in the ***** (0-3 down) to get the ***** up during a
base
or fire base attack in Vietnam, I would also like to remind
those
that achieved that commissioned rank to continue to abide by
their oaths and their honor code. If they do, then they will
have
me as an ally, but if they do not, then they will have me and
mine as an adversary. There are no other choices. We are one
Gentlemen, that is if you do your duty.
That means no more working for brokers or mutual funds that
are
designed to cheat our military servicemen out of their
investments and pay, and no more lies to the press to sell
books.
Those that do such are harming our soldiers - those very
soldiers
that you swore to protect and to serve. I know it is hard
after
you retire, but shuck it up Gentlemen, you cannot betray all
that
you stood for just because you don't really know the next time
for chow. Your entire life depends upon you maintaining your
honor, and your integrity that you swore to follow long ago.
Allow no feather merchant company to exploit our troopers
again.
Never be a part of some scheme to make money off of our vets.
If you need money that bad then email me - I don't have much
but
I will stake any honorable officer to a job or a loan -
anytime.
If they were smart and listened to their NCO's we
were nice to them - if not - we kicked their little buts out of
sight of the men.
Doug Says: I was not quoting the precise West Point motto moron.
I emphaized the word "Honor" first as it was germane to my post -
you really do have a reading comprehension problem now don't you?
And in Vietnam, a Butter Bar was a Platoon leader, not always a
2nd Lt and often was a NCO ("B.B.") was the actual slang -
offsetting L.T.) (In Vietnam a "Brown Bar" was a 2nd Lt - at
least it was when I was there). So we are not talking about back
in Ft. Benning, we were talking about in Vietnam, in my unit,
during the Tet Offensive, and NOT guarding some lonely border
years after the 1968 Tet offensive like you claim you did. Your
claim to know all slang and words used by all Veterans of the
Vietnam war, in units you never served in, during times you were
still back in the states, is beyond your normal "I am a mind
reader" bull - it just confirms the reason for your nickname
"Psycho."
It is funny that noone else bics <sic> your lingo. looie2 s were rare. 3
months they got silver and went to bother someone else. You had to restrain
'em in combat. Once they learned that Chief-O' Smoke was in charge, things
went better. First Shirt pretended to be in charge to take the load off
Chief O'Smoke. You kind of potty-train the looie2 to stay in the radio
shack lest he seek his destiny and take others. So we had second loos for
battery commanders. Dumber than a box of rocks and dangerous.
-
Moreover, I would like to point out that making this false
statement of fact that I was never in combat in Vietnam is a lie
and represents malicious libel.
I base my opinion upon your official military records. Your
official military records do not indicate that you were ever in combat.
Mine indicate that I was.
Doug Says: You know that is a lie. My official military records prove
irrefutably that I was in combat. Stop the libel. Your unethical
attempts to smear me with lies and defamation are obvious. Moreover, you
also refuse to reveal your military records so who knows what they reveal.
But if they indicate you were assigned to a combat rifle company during
the Tet offensive of 1968, they certainly would prove you were in combat -
like mine does.
Doug Says: You have been caught lying about this issue now, what
is it, 20 times or so? Of course I served in Combat, and of
course my records prove that fact. Yet you fail to prove your
military claims with any records whatsoever - based upon your
lack of knowledge about the issues surrounding combat units in
the 25th Infantry Division (we both know the unit I was assigned
to (the Wolfhounds) did not have *any* slots for any Personnel
Sergeants - or any other Administrative duties that I was
qualified to perform. The Wolfhounds only wanted NCO's with
past Infantryman MOS's so they could perform those combat
duties - and of course you are also hiding the fact that when I
first went to Vietnam I also held a Combat Infantryman's MOS -
but then facts always did confuse you Psycho Dai. Moreover, I
have dressed down, advised, screamed at, directed, confronted,
and rousted out of their hootches many Junior officers when I
was in the US Army (and one Major that was drunk on duty
You
clearly were never assigned to an Infantry Unit during the
Vietnam war. The NCO's run those units Dum Dum. We are not
talking about border guard duty Dai Dumbass like you claim was
your duty in Vietnam, we are talking about the 25th Infantry
Division, during the 1968 Tet Offensive when 2nd Lt.'s were
coming in scared to death right out of OCS - they were kids, and
nothing more. If they were smart and listened to their NCO's we
were nice to them - if not - we kicked their little buts out of
sight of the men.
Moreover, I would like to point out that making this false
statement of fact that I was never in combat in Vietnam is a lie
and represents malicious libel.
Well, you drew hazard pay, and it was scary and loud when a couple rockets
hit the airfield on a 100 square mile compound. Of course the road home
was rough and dangerous after a night of card games and hard party. If you
were in country, you were "in combat".
If you had the energy to play cards all night, it means you didn't do doodly
all day, and you won't get anything done tomorrow either. A half dozen
nights playing cards burns 18 days of usefull labor in a war zone. You were
no efficiency expert. I figure 10 days R&R, maybe an extra 10 for being
available in the ahem... rear to fill a manifest. 30 days for extending,
another 10 days for an authorised R&R, and a few days in country 15
months in country and you've burned 90 days fookin' around.
No, it was the stories of outrageous exploits that were suspect. All the
phonys that come through here see the same lame movies and your stories just
seemed familiar,
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Honor-Duty-Country |
21 Mar 2006 04:05:00 PM |
|
|
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-B38BF6.10451421032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <2cedndfeccCmBYLZRVn-og@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
The Wolfhounds only wanted NCO's with
past Infantryman MOS's so they could perform those combat
duties - and of course you are also hiding the fact that when
I
first went to Vietnam I also held a Combat Infantryman's MOS -
but then facts always did confuse you Psycho Dai.
Here are the facts Doug: http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
Doug Says: Your web site you posted does not work. If it really
exists,then allow me to enter it, if it does not exist then
please stop lying about it.
Your publicly available military records reveal that you
entered
the United States Army in 1962 with an MOS of 111.1 (the
equivalent of
11B-Rifleman). Your records further reflect that the MOS was
withdrawn
in April 1965 -- nearly three years before your arrival in Viet
Nam as a
personnel sergeant. Special Orders Number 63, Hqs US Army
Ordnance
Center and School, Aberdeen Proving Ground, dated 2 April
1965 -
withdrew the Secondary Infantry MOS of 111.10 under the
authority of
AR611-203. Distribution on the orders indicate that you
received 5
copies of this order in addition to the one going into your
personnel
file.
Doug Says: Yep - so what? My records also prove that I was
assigned to a combat rifle company, in a combat battalion, in a
combat Brigade, none of which had any slots nor positions for a
Personnel Sergeant, during the 1968 Tet offensive, of which I
received the Tet Offensive Campaign Star and two Tet
Counteroffensive Campaign stars, and my CO of my combat rifle
Company rated my efficiency as "Excellent" for that assignment.
When I arrived in the 25th ID it did not need Personnel
Sergeants, it needed infantry qualified NCO's - and since I once
was a Marine, and since I held a combat rifleman's MOS for years,
and since I almost completed Infantry OCS at Ft. Benning, (within
3 weeks) and since I had the 2nd best score with my weapon in my
entire battalion (and then only by one miss) I was asked, as were
many, many others to volunteer for combat duty. The 25th had a
standing letter asking for such volunteers at that time. I
volunteered, and, as my records also clearly prove, I was sent to
complete an RVN Combat Course which was exclusively provided to
Combat NCO's and Combat Commissioned Officers!
Only a complete and utter moron, or Psycho, would try to claim
that a NCO assigned to the Wolfhounds, to a rifle company, to a
rifle platoon, in the middle of the 1968 Tet Offensive, in the
25th Id, was performing Personnel Sergeant duties in a rifle
platoon! Especially immediately after he completed a RVN combat
course of instruction! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That is so
completely goofy it is analogous to claiming someone was assigned
to an attack Submarine to run a personnel office in the
Submarine!
We all know that rifle companies, and rifle platoons, do not have
Personnel Offices located within them Dai WEE WEE! Your claim
they do, is about the dumbest, idiotic, most ridiculous claim I
have heard from you yet. Do you realize how completely idiotic
you sound trying to claim that Personnel Sergeants operated out
of rifle company's and platoons? NO ONE that was ever in the US
Army would be that stupid.
I know you missed the Tet offensive, but many different MOS's
found themselves in combat duty during that time if they were
assigned to an infantry unit like I was - even if it was manning
a bunker line or volunteering for combat. Your claim that
somehow, I was the only NCO in the history of the 25th Infantry
division during the 1968 Tet offensive that never pulled any
combat duty is about as ridiculous and moronic as it comes. And
more you make such idiotic claims the more the readers realize
just how pathetic and ridiculous your claims really are.
Moreover, I
have dressed down, advised, screamed at, directed, confronted,
and rousted out of their hootches many Junior officers when I
was in the US Army (and one Major that was drunk on duty).
You
clearly were never assigned to an Infantry Unit during the
Vietnam war. The NCO's run those units Dum Dum. We are not
talking about border guard duty Dai Dumbass like you claim was
your duty in Vietnam, we are talking about the 25th Infantry
Division, during the 1968 Tet Offensive when 2nd Lt.'s were
coming in scared to death right out of OCS - they were kids,
and
nothing more. If they were smart and listened to their NCO's
we
were nice to them - if not - we kicked their little buts out
of
sight of the men.
Bull *****. Everyone of them were better than you as
evidenced by
the simple fact that they completed OCS, and you immediately
washed out.
Doug Says: I never washed out of anything.
Your records indicate that you were assigned to US Army
Infantry
School - Officer Candidate School to report April 24, 1966 -
Class 13-66
(Special Orders No. 3, US Army Ordnance Center and School - 5
January
1966. You never completed OCS and was subsequently reassigned
to 256th
Signal Co, APO NY 09122 - MOS 71J20, SP5 E5 - Report Date 19
July 1966
(Special Orders No 140, Hqs The Student Brigade, USAIS, Ft
Benning -
dated June 16, 1966.
Doug Says: I left OCS on an emergency leave Dum Dum - that is
hardly washing out. Stop lying. I elected to take the France
assignment instead of returning to a new OCS class. Note that my
assignment to France was from Ft. Benning, so if I washed out
what the hell was I doing back in Benning? I was waiting for
another OCS class when I was offered the assignment to France and
a promotion, and a promise I could apply for a direct commission.
So an assignment to France, and an instant promotion to Staff
Sergeant means I "washed out?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA
Your own ***** is starting to fly back into your face Dai
Dimwit. Please provide the orders that allowed me to leave OCS -
No? Of course you are hiding them because you know I left OCS on
emergency leave and not because I "washed out" like your
malicious libel is trying to claim. Amazing, first you post
forged FBI documents about me, fraudulently claim I was never
even in Vietnam, fraudulently claim I am a child molesters, and
now you are even lying about my emergency leave from OCS. Your
lack of ethics and veracity can only mean you must be off of your
pathetic meds once again. Your smear merchant defamation pattern
is obvious to us all.
There is nothing your records to indicate that you were
ever a
platoon sergeant.
Your DA Form-20 lists the following awards and decorations:
Good
Conduct Medal, Army Commendation Medal, National Defense
Service Medal,
Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, 2 Overseas
Service Bars,
Expeditionary Medal, Expert rifle badge. There is no mention
of combat,
valor, or even meritorious achievement against a hostile force.
Doug Says: Medals never meant much to or others in my platoon I
never said I was a hero moron - I was a grunt for the time I was
a grunt, and I do not know anyone at that time that was pandering
for medals, we were too damn busy trying to stay alive. Your
claim that you must have a medal as proof you were in combat is
about the 2nd most idiotic and ridiculous claim I have ever
heard. I noticed you conveniently failed to mention what those
campaign stars were for - Tet Offensive and Tet Counteroffensive
Phase V and Phase IV - now how the hell did I earn those campaign
stars while serving in a rifle platoon in the wolfhounds if I
never saw any combat? That would be impossible moron. You also
forgot to mention my assignment to Company D, 1/27th Infantry,
25th Infantry Division. So are you taking my military records
out of context so you can distort their meaning along with all
your other unethical lies and distortions? Of course, nothing is
new here - you are still using fraud, forgeries, and lies to
defame me simply because I proved you are a liar and an unethical
smear merchant.
Moreover, you are lying about my records not showing I was a
Platoon Sergeant. According to you I was assigned to Company D,
1/27th Infantry, 25th ID. That unit is a *rifle* company, and it
*only has* rifle platoons, and I clearly had to be assigned to a
Platoon in that company if I was assigned to that company! Rifle
Companies do not have units outside of platoons you screaming
moron!
Moreover, I would like to point out that making this false
statement of fact that I was never in combat in Vietnam is a
lie
and represents malicious libel. Typical Dai Dippy post, lies,
distortions, fabrications and more lies, distortions and
fabrications. If you continue with this libel you will get an
opportunity to prove it in a court of law. I have warned you
several times to stop the libel and lies. My patience is
wearing
thin.
Are you threatening to sue me?
Doug Says: Yes. Of course. The only question now is how far
you will go with your fraud and malicious libel? If you
continue, I will name you in a lawsuit. Count on it. I do not
want to sue you as you clearly have nothing, are clearly a very
disturbed veteran, but if you continue to libel me you will give
me little choice. Moreover, do not expect me to stop defending
myself from your obvious lies and malicious libel on these
newgroups. I will post the truth about you in response to your
lies each time - and if you like looking like a complete
unethical idiot, that is fine with me.
Are you threatening to institute an multi agency
investigation of
me?
Doug Says: There is already an investigation underway.
- - - - - [dougshit deleted] - - - - -
Doug, it all boils down to this simple fact:
I know you are a phony. You know you are a phony.
Doug Says: It boils down to this simple fact. I know you are
a
liar and you know you are a liar. There is nothing phony
about
my service in Vietnam or elsewhere and you know it. Your
"Tick
Tock" records blew up in your phony face, and proved you the
liar and smear merchant we have all come to know you are.
See URL: http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
Doug Says: Posting fake URL's means nothing to anyone Dai
Dimwad. You have proved yourself a liar and a libeler, and an
unethical one at that. We all can see what you are, and frankly,
anyone that ever served in Vietnam should be completely ashamed
that you were ever a Reserve Junior Commissioned Officer in the
US Army. In my opinion you are a discredit to your service,
rank and to all Vietnam vets. Your lies and distortions are
obvious, child-like, and seem to revolve around some kind of
megalomaniac ego that prevents you from admitting you have a
serious pathological lying problem. Perhaps you want me to
expose you for what you are? Perhaps that is why you insist on
making a complete and utter fool out of yourself by posting your
ridiculous claims that we all know are false? Who knows what is
wrong with you, but one thing is for sure, there is something
*seriously* wrong with your ethics.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Doug Grant (Tm)
- - - - - [more dougshit deleted] - - - - -
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- Not for Psychos |
22 Mar 2006 08:26:57 PM |
|
|
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-94D9C9.16235021032006@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com...
In article <K--dnZLNMvYZ5b3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-B38BF6.10451421032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <2cedndfeccCmBYLZRVn-og@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
The Wolfhounds only wanted NCO's with
past Infantryman MOS's so they could perform those combat
duties - and of course you are also hiding the fact that
when
I
first went to Vietnam I also held a Combat Infantryman's
MOS -
but then facts always did confuse you Psycho Dai.
Here are the facts Doug: http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
Doug Says: Your web site you posted does not work.
Stop your idiotic lying. Has anyone other than you been
unable to
access the site? I gave you the "TinyURL" because you have
proven
yourself incapable of handling broken URLs. Here's the
complete URL:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/
Doug Says: Psycho Dai, you and I both know you are lying. The
Tiny URL does not work, and the long URL does not work. If you
are posting information about me but are afraid to allow me to
access it that only proves irrefutably you are up to your fraud
and forgeries, or at least distortions once again.
If it really
exists,then allow me to enter it, if it does not exist then
please stop lying about it.
The comments below were extracted from :
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/ or
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
is there any portion that you think is incorrect?
Doug Says: Considering the URL does not work, that is a question
that only can be asked by a fraud merchant. You are posting
non-existing URL's and we both know it. No one in their right
mind would be stupid enough to use information received via a
FOIA for the purpose of defamation, that would be a classic
example of asking for such information under fraudulent purposes.
Your publicly available military records reveal that you
entered
the United States Army in 1962 with an MOS of 111.1 (the
equivalent of
11B-Rifleman). Your records further reflect that the MOS
was
withdrawn
in April 1965 -- nearly three years before your arrival in
Viet
Nam as a
personnel sergeant. Special Orders Number 63, Hqs US Army
Ordnance
Center and School, Aberdeen Proving Ground, dated 2 April
1965 -
withdrew the Secondary Infantry MOS of 111.10 under the
authority of
AR611-203. Distribution on the orders indicate that you
received 5
copies of this order in addition to the one going into your
personnel
file.
Doug Says: Yep - so what?
So what? They contradict your statement that you when you
first
went to Vietnam you also held a Combat Infantryman's MOS. You
lied.
Doug Says: *****. I was the one that admitted that mistake
long before you clowns ever even mentioned it. All your
information above proves is that I held a combat Infantryman's
MOS for years, just like I said I did.
My records also prove that I was
assigned to a combat rifle company, in a combat battalion, in
a
combat Brigade, none of which had any slots nor positions for
a
Personnel Sergeant, during the 1968 Tet offensive, of which I
received the Tet Offensive Campaign Star and two Tet
Counteroffensive Campaign stars,
Everyone in country during those periods was awarded those
same
campaign stars. Being in country is not what I mean by "being
in
combat." It is fairly well established that only somewhere
around
fifteen percent of Viet Nam veterans actually participated in
combat.
The other eighty-five percent served in their support.
Doug Says: Duh, moron, if you are assigned to a rifle company,
in a rifle battalion, in a rifle Platoon, during the 1968 Tet
Offensive, in the 25th Infantry Division, you are not "in
support!" Now if you disagree name anyone that was. You and I
and anyone in the US Army knows that Rifle Companies do not have
"Personnel Sergeants" in them. Yet you admit I was assigned to a
combat rifle company - and the regulations say that in order to
earn those Campaign stars, ie; the Tet Offensive Start, the Tet
Counter Offensive Star Phase IV, and the Tet Counter Offensive
Start Phase V, you had to *participate* in those campaigns! And
you are lying when you claim that everyone in-country during
those periods were assigned those campaign stars- that is
absolute *****. Moreover, my records show that I attended a
RVN Combat Training Course, and that course was held exclusively
for "Combat NCO's or Combat Commissioned Officers." Only a
complete smear merchant Psycho moron, that claims he was once in
the US Army, could claim that all that means I was *never* in
Combat like you are lying about.
If you are ashamed of your time in Vietnam that is your problem,
but please stop lying about what other people did - your lies and
idiotic false claims are glaring and about as unethical as it
gets.
and my CO of my combat rifle
Company rated my efficiency as "Excellent" for that
assignment.
Did he indicate that you served in combat?
Doug Says: Are you really that dense? By your own admission I
was assigned at the time to a Rifle Company, in a Rifle Platoon
in the Wolfhounds during the 1968 Tet Offensive. What the hell
do you think the mission of a rifle company in the 25th Infantry
Division is, especially during the Tet offensive! Conducting a
Personnel Office??? BWHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHSHSHSHAHAHSHS.
Considering the Wolfhounds does not have ANY Personnel Sergeants,
or Disbursement NCO,s especially in a rifle Company and Platoon,
then what else was I qualified do to based upon my military
history! Combat Infantry NCO! And that is the only thing I, and
every other single member of the Wolfhounds was doing at the
time. You and I both know that there are NO administrative types
in a rifle platoon!
You seem to be bent on making a complete and utter fool out of
yourself in respect to this issue, and that is why I make sure
the people on alt.military reads your incredible lies and
unethical false accusations - I have already received email from
people in the 25th that are laughing their ***** off about you- no
wonder your friends nicknamed you "Psycho."
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pepperoni" |
|
| Title: Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- Not for Psychos |
22 Mar 2006 10:10:53 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:UvGdnab0du31mr_Z4p2dnA@comcast.com...
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/ or http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
is there any portion that you think is incorrect?
Doug Says: Considering the URL does not work, that is a question that
only can be asked by a fraud merchant. You are posting non-existing URL's
and we both know it. No one in their right mind would be stupid enough to
use information received via a FOIA for the purpose of defamation, that
would be a classic example of asking for such information under fraudulent
purposes.
**********************
Is anyone else having a problem? I can get in. Maybe its the huge number
of hits from international newsgroup readers. (overwhelming the servers.)
Oh, Duh-g, there is an idiot trap there for sure. .some type faces don't
type FATUOUS well. <check your caps lock>
**********************
Doug Says: Are you really that dense? By your own admission I was
assigned at the time to a Rifle Company, in a Rifle Platoon in the
Wolfhounds during the 1968 Tet Offensive. What the hell do you think the
mission of a rifle company in the 25th Infantry Division is, especially
during the Tet offensive! Conducting a Personnel Office???
BWHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHSHSHSHAHAHSHS.
Considering the Wolfhounds does not have ANY Personnel Sergeants, or
Disbursement NCO,s especially in a rifle Company and Platoon, then what
else was I qualified do to based upon my military history! Combat
Infantry NCO! And that is the only thing I, and every other single member
of the Wolfhounds was doing at the time. You and I both know that there
are NO administrative types in a rifle platoon!
You seem to be bent on making a complete and utter fool out of yourself in
respect to this issue, and that is why I make sure the people on
alt.military reads your incredible lies and unethical false accusations -
I have already received email from people in the 25th that are laughing
their ***** off about you- no wonder your friends nicknamed you "Psycho."
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- Not for Psychos |
23 Mar 2006 04:33:54 PM |
|
|
"Pepperoni" <undeliverableaddy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ZrSdnZwa5o1Sgr_ZnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@comcast.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:UvGdnab0du31mr_Z4p2dnA@comcast.com...
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/ or
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
is there any portion that you think is incorrect?
Doug Says: Considering the URL does not work, that is a
question that only can be asked by a fraud merchant. You are
posting non-existing URL's and we both know it. No one in
their right mind would be stupid enough to use information
received via a FOIA for the purpose of defamation, that would
be a classic example of asking for such information under
fraudulent purposes.
Doug Says: Are you really that dense? By your own admission
I was assigned at the time to a Rifle Company, in a Rifle
Platoon in the Wolfhounds during the 1968 Tet Offensive. What
the hell do you think the mission of a rifle company in the
25th Infantry Division is, especially during the Tet
offensive! Conducting a Personnel Office???
BWHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHSHSHSHAHAHSHS.
Considering the Wolfhounds does not have ANY Personnel
Sergeants, or Disbursement NCO,s especially in a rifle Company
and Platoon, then what else was I qualified do to based upon
my military history! Combat Infantry NCO! And that is the
only thing I, and every other single member of the Wolfhounds
was doing at the time. You and I both know that there are NO
administrative types in a rifle platoon!
You seem to be bent on making a complete and utter fool out of
yourself in respect to this issue, and that is why I make sure
the people on alt.military reads your incredible lies and
unethical false accusations - I have already received email
from people in the 25th that are laughing their ***** off about
you- no wonder your friends nicknamed you "Psycho."
Doug Grant (Tm)
**********************
Is anyone else having a problem? I can get in. Maybe its the
huge number of hits from international newsgroup readers.
(overwhelming the servers.)
Oh, Duh-g, there is an idiot trap there for sure. .some type
faces don't type FATUOUS well. <check your caps lock>
**********************
Doug Says: Strange, Dai Dummy, er, "Pepperoni" the web site in
question is denied me with a message that I am not authorized
to enter. So let me get this straight. You are saying that
information gleaned from a FOIA request about me is still being
used on a web site? That is very strange since that web site has
denied my access, yet you claim it is about me? Only fraud
merchants or idiots would do that. Posting information about
someone but not allowing that person to refute any false
statements, fraud, distortions, libel, forgeries and of course,
cherry picked out of context information from a FOIA request, and
then inviting people to lie, distort and defame based upon a web
site posting is clear and unmistakable cyberstalking and
cyberharassment, not to mention filing fraudulent FOIA requests
(commercial FOIA requests cost much more than individidual FOIA
requests and if the person that is posting FOIA information on a
web site did not tell the US Army he/she was requesting that
information for "commercial or nefarious purposes" that is
fraud.) . Moreover, I am not ever asked for a password - just
"you are not authorized to enter this web site" when I click on
the URL. No password. But if you are confirming that someone is
using information they received from a FOIA request on me on some
web site, then I will take the appropriate action against the
owner(s) and advertisers that exist on that web site. I assume
Lycos is the host of that web site? Is that correct?
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pepperoni" |
|
| Title: Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- Not for Psychos |
23 Mar 2006 04:55:17 PM |
|
|
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
**********************
Is anyone else having a problem? I can get in. Maybe its the huge
number of hits from international newsgroup readers. (overwhelming the
servers.)
Oh, Duh-g, there is an idiot trap there for sure. .some type faces don't
type FATUOUS well. <check your caps lock>
**********************
Doug Says: Strange, Dai Dummy, er, "Pepperoni" the web site in question
is denied me with a message that I am not authorized to enter. So let me
get this straight. You are saying that information gleaned from a FOIA
request about me is still being used on a web site? That is very strange
since that web site has denied my access, yet you claim it is about me?
Only fraud merchants or idiots would do that. Posting information about
someone but not allowing that person to refute any false statements,
fraud, distortions, libel, forgeries and of course, cherry picked out of
context information from a FOIA request, and then inviting people to lie,
distort and defame based upon a web site posting is clear and unmistakable
cyberstalking and cyberharassment, not to mention filing fraudulent FOIA
requests (commercial FOIA requests cost much more than individidual FOIA
requests and if the person that is posting FOIA information on a web site
did not tell the US Army he/she was requesting that information for
"commercial or nefarious purposes" that is fraud.) . Moreover, I am
not ever asked for a password - just "you are not authorized to enter this
web site" when I click on the URL. No password. But if you are
confirming that someone is using information they received from a FOIA
request on me on some web site, then I will take the appropriate action
against the owner(s) and advertisers that exist on that web site. I
assume Lycos is the host of that web site? Is that correct?
Doug Grant (Tm)
If you are too stoopid to leave the password blank and hit "enter" , and
lack the patience to wait for the huge page to load, I can't help you.
R ecords indicate that you were issued copies. Any questions or comment
should be directed to the author of the web site.
15 months is "how many" tours, Duh-g???
Pepperoni
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Wolfhounds and Personnel Offices (Was Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- the truth is the truth |
24 Mar 2006 04:22:45 PM |
|
|
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-A0965D.16152923032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <UvGdnab0du31mr_Z4p2dnA@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-94D9C9.16235021032006@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com...
Doug Says: Psycho Dai, you and I both know you are lying.
The
Tiny URL does not work, and the long URL does not work. If
you
are posting information about me but are afraid to allow me to
access it that only proves irrefutably you are up to your
fraud
and forgeries, or at least distortions once again.
As several others have indicated, both the full URL and the
reduced
one work. They work for me, and they work for everyone else.
Stop
pretending that you are unable to open the site. No one with
your
extensive posting history can possibly be that incompetent and
computer
illiterate in this day and age.
The comments below were extracted from :
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/ or
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
is there any portion that you think is incorrect?
Doug Says: Since you are afraid to allow me access to those
sites, I will say right now they must be riddled with your
typical fraud and forgeries, but unless I can review what is
there I cannot know for sure. I certainly cannot take your word
for anything. You have lied so many times I believe you have
some kind of pathological problem. And I seriously doubt if
anyone is stupid enough to maintain a web site about me that is
being used for the exclusive purpose of cyberharassment and
cyberstalking, which are both criminal acts in my state. If you
claim otherwise, please state the owner of that web site you keep
referencing to assist your lies, fraud, unethical out of context
and lies you keep posting about my military service. That is if
that web site really exists. Also, please provide any names of
advertisements or products being displayed or sold on that web
site - that is unless you are afraid me exposing your lies some
more? If people are actually using excerpts of an FOIA request
on me in such a defaming and distorted way, like you are doing
here, for the clear purpose of lying about my military service
and defaming me, then I need to know that so I can take the
appropriate legal action. So are you going to allow me access to
your alleged site, or keep hiding the truth from the readers like
you usually do?
If it is the truth, what difference does it make where the
information comes from? If I get it from a easily accessed
website, if
the tooth fairy whispered it in my ear, or if it came to me in
a vision,
it is the truth and you know it is. Are you saying that the
information
below is untrue?
Doug Says: First, we all know what you post is not the truth.
You post lies, distortions, fraud, forgeries, false accusations,
and you are lying about what is contained in my publicly
available records. Only a complete and utter moron or smear
merchant would claim that a person assigned to combat rifle
company in a straight leg 25th Infantry Division, in a combat
platoon, during the 1968 Tet Offensive and received the 1968 Tet
Counter Tet Offensives Phase IV and Phase V campaign stars, and
had an "Excellent" efficiency rating from his CO in that unit for
that period, which you have admitted I received, was assigned to
that rifle company and platoon to perform "personnel Sergeant
duties" ESPECIALLY when we all know that unit never had any need,
slots, positions nor "Personnel Duties" to fulfill nor to provide
ever in its entire Vietnam history!
So you have been caught lying about the Wolfhounds, and anyone
that was ever in the Wolfhounds will tell you Dai Dumbass that
"there were no Personnel Offices" in the Wolfhounds in Vietnam in
1968, not on a platoon level, not on a company level, not on a
Battalion level and not even on a Brigade level. The ONLY people
that were assigned to those units (regardless of their primary
MOS) were assigned for a single purpose, and that purpose was
somehow related to combat infantryman duties. Anyone ever in the
US Army Infantry will confirm precisely what I have said, as many
have already judging from the email I have received laughing
about your incredible stupidity in respect to the US Army.
Now if you want to continue to claim that the Wolfhounds ran
Personnel Offices, then I will be glad to contact OPO and ask
them if that is true. (I invite anyone else to also contact OPO
in Washington and ask them - if they say the Wolfhounds ran
personnel offices in 1968 in Vietnam, I will eat my hat, bay at
the moon, and never post on the internet again). However, the
last time I contacted them (OPO) about one of Dai Dimwit's goofy
claims they laughed so hard at his idiotic claim that people with
secondary MOS's of 11B were entitled to the CIB, I don't know
how I can stop them from laughing harder about your more recent
line of utter lies and nonsense that "the Wolfhounds in Vietnam
ran Personnel Offices!"
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Giggle - Gulp - are you really *that* stupid???
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
You also avoided mentioning that I received RVN Combat Training
that was exclusively delivered to Combat NCO's and Commissioned
Officers. That course completion entry is located on my DD 214
and you know it - but you hid it. Why? Because it would add
evidence to mountains of evidence that you are liar and a fraud
merchant in respect to your goofy claim that I was assigned to
the Wolfhounds to run a Personnel Office, and I needed
specialized combat training to do so! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -
Especially when we all know the unit I was assigned to after that
combat training (which my publicly available records prove) did
not ever operate ANY personnel, finance or any other
administrative offices that I was qualified to run whatsoever!
You also hid the fact that my records show that I received the
Expeditionary Medal for service in Vietnam long before my 1968
Tour - and the *only* way to get that medal was to encounter
combat or be in a position that combat was expected or was
imminent.
Your goofy idea that all US Army Soldiers always work in their
primary or secondary MOS is absolute nonsense. Anyone in the US
Army will tell you different. Do you actually believe that NCO's
assigned to Infantry Divisions are not required to pull Sergeant
of the Guard on a Bunker Line, or Reactionary Force patrols?
Even if I was never assigned to the Wolfhounds (which I was) I
*still* would have seen combat at Cu Chi, Dau Dieng or Tay Ninh
with the 25th Infantry Division during Tet of 1968. If you
disagree find me ONE NCO that was there at that time (except for
medical or religious) that did not experience combat. I won't
hold my breath because we both know none exist.
More proof that your claim all soldiers always perform in the
primary MOS or Secondary MOS is my time as a Station Commander
for a Recruiting Office. Does my records show that I had a
Recruiter's MOS? No of course not. But I was performing those
duties for almost a full year! And you have admitted I held
that assignment and duties. So you have proved yourself a liar
on this issue alone.
You draw conclusions about what my records state, and you cherry
pick information out of context for the purpose of trying to hide
your embarrassment that you have been caught lying about me for
months. Fess up Dai Dipwad, you have been caught lying - try to
take your embarrassment like a man for once. Of course I was in
Vietnam, contrary to your claims, and of course I was in combat,
also contrary to your claims, and of course I was an SFC E-7 also
contrary to your claims. How many times more are you going to
lie about this issue? Anyone with any knowledge of the US Army
knows you are lying Dai Dustbrain - you are making a complete and
total fool out of yourself.
However, if you want to continue to claim that the Wolfhounds ran
Personnel Offices in the 25th Infantry Division in Vietnam, then
you might as well howl that President Bush directed the 911
attacks, because such claims would be equally idiotic - but if
you want to be an idiot that is entirely up to you.....I cannot
make you stop from being stupid - it is up to your attendant to
up your meds, not me.
Moreover, Grunts do not pander for medals. Guys that want medals
for combat are not well liked, and in many cases their
"individual actions" to try and garner a "medal" get other
members of their platoon killed. Combat is a team effort. If
you were ever in combat you would have known that. There is no
room for hero wannabes - and enlisted men are not handed medals
just for showing up like many Commissioned officers were in
Vietnam. I know some junior officers that experienced a single
moment of combat when they were hit with shrapnel from a 122 -
and they received their Purple Hearts AND a Bronze Star to boot -
I guess because they could not run fast enough to the bunker
entitled them to that Bronze Star. Officers that received medals
just because they happened to get wounded during an enemy attack
were all too common in Vietnam. (That is not to take away from
Enlisted men that earned their medals by helping to save their
wounded or attacking the teeth of an ambush and thereby saving
his squad or platoon, or even falling on a live grenade, I
consider those acts well worth a medal or two).
Further, we all know that Military records NEVER show or provide
"platoon" assignments, and your claim that my records do not
prove I was assigned to a platoon is just more of your fraud and
goofy lies. In fact, everyone knows that when you are assigned
to a rifle company you MUST be assigned to a Platoon - are you
now going to claim that Rifle Companies in the 25th Infantry
Division were not composed of Platoons and Squads?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Are you sure you
were ever in the US Army, or are you just some dumb kid using
someone else's name? Anyone that is so stupid they do not know
that a rifle company is composed of Platoons cannot possibly be a
real veteran - not unless he also happens to be a complete and
utter moron.
Lets Review what this unethical moron that calls himself Dai Uy
is claiming:
1. The Wolfhounds, during the 1968 Tet offensive in Vietnam, ran
"Personnel Offices." BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
2. RVN Combat Training in Vietnam was provided to NCO's so they
could run "Personnel Offices!" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
3. That combat Rifle Company's in the 25th Infantry Division in
Vietnam were not composed of "Platoons." (He must believe they
were Brownie Scout troops or something)
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
4. That US Army Personnel never perform any duties outside of
their Primary or Secondary MOS's -BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAH - Apparently
this alleged "junior reserve officer" has never heard of "Bunker
Line Duty" Fire Base Guard - Reactionary Force Patrols..,
etc...BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
5. That everyone that was ever in combat had to receive a medal
for valor. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
6. That Soldiers with secondary MOS's of infantry are entitled
to the CIB. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
7. That Vietnam never held any of our POW's back after the war.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
I could go on and on with proof of Dai Dork's lies, , but it is
clear to me at least that this Dai ***** moron is either a
complete and total phony and fraud, or he is an unethical lying
smear merchant that has been caught conning the readers of this
newsgroup. In either case he has about as much credibility as
Hanoi John Kerry. But then he really seems to like making a
complete and total fool out of himself lying about other vets -
so he might be actually worse than Hanoi John Kerry, if that is
possible. Whatever this Dai Dumbbut or whomever he is, he
certainly is not very knowledgeable about the US Army.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pepperoni" |
|
| Title: Re: Wolfhounds and Personnel Offices (Was Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- the truth is the truth |
24 Mar 2006 04:52:45 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:IIidnaEabOC67LnZRVn-hg@comcast.com...
The comments below were extracted from :
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/ or
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
is there any portion that you think is incorrect?
Doug Says: Since you are afraid to allow me access to those sites, I will
say right now they must be riddled with your typical fraud and forgeries,
but unless I can review what is there I cannot know for sure.
Would you like me to copy the HTML and mail it too you?
Just drag the file to your browser window.
It would only take a minute. (???)
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: Wolfhounds and Personnel Offices (Was Re: "Duty - Honor - Country" -- the truth is the truth |
24 Mar 2006 10:03:48 PM |
|
|
Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-A0965D.16152923032006@news-lb-01.socal.rr.com...
In article <UvGdnab0du31mr_Z4p2dnA@comcast.com>,
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote:
"Dai Uy" <Dai-Uy@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Dai-Uy-94D9C9.16235021032006@news-lb-02.socal.rr.com...
Doug Says: Psycho Dai, you and I both know you are lying. The
Tiny URL does not work, and the long URL does not work. If
you
are posting information about me but are afraid to allow me to
access it that only proves irrefutably you are up to your
fraud
and forgeries, or at least distortions once again.
As several others have indicated, both the full URL and the
reduced
one work. They work for me, and they work for everyone else.
Stop
pretending that you are unable to open the site. No one with
your
extensive posting history can possibly be that incompetent and
computer
illiterate in this day and age.
The comments below were extracted from :
http://members.lycos.co.uk/thetangledweb/ or
http://tinyurl.com/lpfxb
is there any portion that you think is incorrect?
Doug Says: Since you are afraid to allow me access to those
sites, I will say right now they must be riddled with your
typical fraud and forgeries, but unless I can review what is
there I cannot know for sure. I certainly cannot take your word
for anything. You have lied so many times I believe you have
some kind of pathological problem. And I seriously doubt if
anyone is stupid enough to maintain a web site about me that is
being used for the exclusive purpose of cyberharassment and
cyberstalking, which are both criminal acts in my state. If you
claim otherwise, please state the owner of that web site you keep
referencing to assist your lies, fraud, unethical out of context
and lies you keep posting about my military service. That is if
that web site really exists. Also, please provide any names of
advertisements or products being displayed or sold on that web
site - that is unless you are afraid me exposing your lies some
more? If people are actually using excerpts of an FOIA request
on me in such a defaming and distorted way, like you are doing
here, for the clear purpose of lying about my military service
and defaming me, then I need to know that so I can take the
appropriate legal action. So are you going to allow me access to
your alleged site, or keep hiding the truth from the readers like
you usually do?
If it is the truth, what difference does it make where the
information comes from? If I get it from a easily accessed
website, if
the tooth fairy whispered it in my ear, or if it came to me in
a vision,
it is the truth and you know it is. Are you saying that the
information
below is untrue?
Doug Says: First, we all know what you post is not the truth.
You post lies, distortions, fraud, forgeries, false accusations,
and you are lying about what is contained in my publicly
available records. Only a complete and utter moron or smear
merchant would claim that a person assigned to combat rifle
company in a straight leg 25th Infantry Division, in a combat
platoon, during the 1968 Tet Offensive and received the 1968 Tet
Counter Tet Offensives Phase IV and Phase V campaign stars, and
had an "Excellent" efficiency rating from his CO in that unit for
that period, which you have admitted I received, was assigned to
that rifle company and platoon to perform "personnel Sergeant
duties" ESPECIALLY when we all know that unit never had any need,
slots, positions nor "Personnel Duties" to fulfill nor to provide
ever in its entire Vietnam history!
So you have been caught lying about the Wolfhounds, and anyone
that was ever in the Wolfhounds will tell you Dai Dumbass that
"there were no Personnel Offices" in the Wolfhounds in Vietnam in
1968, not on a platoon level, not on a company level, not on a
Battalion level and not even on a Brigade level. The ONLY people
that were assigned to those units (regardless of their primary
MOS) were assigned for a single purpose, and that purpose was
somehow related to combat infantryman duties. Anyone ever in the
US Army Infantry will confirm precisely what I have said, as many
have already judging from the email I have received laughing
about your incredible stupidity in respect to the US Army.
Now if you want to continue to claim that the Wolfhounds ran
Personnel Offices, then I will be glad to contact OPO and ask
them if that is true. (I invite anyone else to also contact OPO
in Washington and ask them - if they say the Wolfhounds ran
personnel offices in 1968 in Vietnam, I will eat my hat, bay at
the moon, and never post on the internet again). However, the
last time I contacted them (OPO) about one of Dai Dimwit's goofy
claims they laughed so hard at his idiotic claim that people with
secondary MOS's of 11B were entitled to the CIB, I don't know
how I can stop them from laughing harder about your more recent
line of utter lies and nonsense that "the Wolfhounds in Vietnam
ran Personnel Offices!"
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Giggle - Gulp - are you really *that* stupid???
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
You also avoided mentioning that I received RVN Combat Training
that was exclusively delivered to Combat NCO's and Commissioned
Officers. That course completion entr | | | | | | | |
