How dare the CIA request a probe of criminal allegations against the Bush White House



 Politics > Politics-USA > How dare the CIA request a probe of criminal allegations against the Bush White House

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 27 Sep 2003 06:17:46 AM
Object: How dare the CIA request a probe of criminal allegations against the Bush White House
From MSNBC, 9/26/03:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/937524.asp?0cv=CB10&cp1=1
CIA seeks probe of White House

Agency asks Justice to investigate leak of employee’s identity

EXCLUSIVE
MSNBC AND NBC NEWS

WASHINGTON --
The CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegations
that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity of
one of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman’s
husband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush’s
since-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uranium
from Africa, NBC News has learned.

THE FORMER ENVOY, Joseph Wilson, who was acting ambassador to Iraq
before the first Gulf War, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 to
investigate a British intelligence report that Iraq sought to buy
uranium there.
Although Wilson discredited the report, Bush cited it in his State of
the Union address in January among the evidence he said justified
military action in Iraq.
The administration has since had to repudiate the claim.
CIA Director George Tenet said the 16-word sentence should not have
been included in Bush’s Jan. 28 speech and publicly accepted
responsibility for allowing it to remain in the president’s text.
Wilson published an article in July alleging, however, that the White
House recklessly made the charge knowing it was false.
"We spend billions of dollars on intelligence," Wilson wrote.
"But we end up putting something in the State of the Union address,
something we got from another intelligence agency, something we cannot
independently verify, in an area of Africa where the British have no
on-the-ground presence."

WHITE HOUSE DENIALS
The next week, columnist Robert Novak published an article in which he
revealed that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was a covert CIA operative
specializing in weapons of mass destruction.
"Two senior administration officials told me Wilson’s wife suggested
sending him to Niger to investigate," Novak wrote.
The White House has denied being Novak’s source, whom he has refused
to identify.
But Wilson has said other reporters have told him White House
officials leaked Plame’s identity.
NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell reported Friday night that the CIA has asked
the Justice Department to investigate whether White House officials
blew Plame’s cover in retaliation against Wilson.
Revealing the identities of covert officials is a violation of two
laws, the National Agents’ Identity Act and the Unauthorized Release
of Classified Information Act.

ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE CLAIM
When the Niger claim first arose, in February 2002, the CIA sent
Wilson to Africa to investigate.
He reported finding no credible evidence that Iraq was seeking uranium
from Niger.
The CIA’s doubts about the uranium claim were reported through routine
intelligence traffic throughout the government, U.S. intelligence
officials said.
Those doubts were also reported to the British.
The Niger report included a notation that it was unconfirmed when it
was published in the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, the
classified summary of intelligence on Iraq’s weapons programs.

The CIA had the Niger claim removed from at least two speeches before
they were given:
Bush’s October address on the Iraqi threat, and a speech by U.N.
Ambassador John Negroponte.
As the State of the Union address was being written, CIA officials
protested over how the alleged uranium connection was being portrayed,
so the administration changed it to attribute it to the British, who
had made the assertion in a Sept. 24 dossier.

_________________________________________________________
How d'ya like that. The un-American CIA not supporting the
right-wingers presidunce. It's treason.
Harry
.

User: ""

Title: Re: How dare the CIA request a probe of criminal allegations against the Bush White House 27 Sep 2003 09:20:00 AM
Harry, you little political creep, what has this lie got to do with
economics?
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:iesanvk8e8lbfp5ikva8q9p355vt002c8n@4ax.com...


From MSNBC, 9/26/03:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/937524.asp?0cv=CB10&cp1=1

CIA seeks probe of White House

Agency asks Justice to investigate leak of employee's identity

EXCLUSIVE
MSNBC AND NBC NEWS

WASHINGTON --

The CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegations
that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity of
one of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman's
husband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush's
since-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uranium
from Africa, NBC News has learned.

THE FORMER ENVOY, Joseph Wilson, who was acting ambassador to Iraq
before the first Gulf War, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 to
investigate a British intelligence report that Iraq sought to buy
uranium there.

Although Wilson discredited the report, Bush cited it in his State of
the Union address in January among the evidence he said justified
military action in Iraq.

The administration has since had to repudiate the claim.

CIA Director George Tenet said the 16-word sentence should not have
been included in Bush's Jan. 28 speech and publicly accepted
responsibility for allowing it to remain in the president's text.

Wilson published an article in July alleging, however, that the White
House recklessly made the charge knowing it was false.

"We spend billions of dollars on intelligence," Wilson wrote.

"But we end up putting something in the State of the Union address,
something we got from another intelligence agency, something we cannot
independently verify, in an area of Africa where the British have no
on-the-ground presence."

WHITE HOUSE DENIALS

The next week, columnist Robert Novak published an article in which he
revealed that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, was a covert CIA operative
specializing in weapons of mass destruction.

"Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested
sending him to Niger to investigate," Novak wrote.

The White House has denied being Novak's source, whom he has refused
to identify.

But Wilson has said other reporters have told him White House
officials leaked Plame's identity.

NBC News' Andrea Mitchell reported Friday night that the CIA has asked
the Justice Department to investigate whether White House officials
blew Plame's cover in retaliation against Wilson.

Revealing the identities of covert officials is a violation of two
laws, the National Agents' Identity Act and the Unauthorized Release
of Classified Information Act.

ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE CLAIM

When the Niger claim first arose, in February 2002, the CIA sent
Wilson to Africa to investigate.

He reported finding no credible evidence that Iraq was seeking uranium
from Niger.

The CIA's doubts about the uranium claim were reported through routine
intelligence traffic throughout the government, U.S. intelligence
officials said.

Those doubts were also reported to the British.

The Niger report included a notation that it was unconfirmed when it
was published in the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, the
classified summary of intelligence on Iraq's weapons programs.

The CIA had the Niger claim removed from at least two speeches before
they were given:

Bush's October address on the Iraqi threat, and a speech by U.N.
Ambassador John Negroponte.

As the State of the Union address was being written, CIA officials
protested over how the alleged uranium connection was being portrayed,
so the administration changed it to attribute it to the British, who
had made the assertion in a Sept. 24 dossier.

_________________________________________________________

How d'ya like that. The un-American CIA not supporting the
right-wingers presidunce. It's treason.

Harry

.
User: "Steve Hiner"

Title: Re: How dare the CIA request a probe of criminal allegations against the Bush White House 27 Sep 2003 11:32:00 AM
<nshinede@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:k0hdb.17869$KJ5.10603@fe2.columbus.rr.com...

Harry, you little political creep, what has this lie got to do with
economics?

--
Another fascist right-wing looney tune that exemplifies the old adage, "it is better to
keep ones mouth shut and be thought an idiot, than to open it and leave no doubt"!

"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:iesanvk8e8lbfp5ikva8q9p355vt002c8n@4ax.com...


From MSNBC, 9/26/03:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/937524.asp?0cv=CB10&cp1=1

CIA seeks probe of White House

Agency asks Justice to investigate leak of employee's identity

EXCLUSIVE
MSNBC AND NBC NEWS

WASHINGTON --

The CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegations
that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity of
one of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman's
husband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush's
since-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uranium
from Africa, NBC News has learned.

THE FORMER ENVOY, Joseph Wilson, who was acting ambassador to Iraq
before the first Gulf War, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 to
investigate a British intelligence report that Iraq sought to buy
uranium there.

Although Wilson discredited the report, Bush cited it in his State of
the Union address in January among the evidence he said justified
military action in Iraq.

The administration has since had to repudiate the claim.

CIA Director George Tenet said the 16-word sentence should not have
been included in Bush's Jan. 28 speech and publicly accepted
responsibility for allowing it to remain in the president's text.

Wilson published an article in July alleging, however, that the White
House recklessly made the charge knowing it was false.

"We spend billions of dollars on intelligence," Wilson wrote.

"But we end up putting something in the State of the Union address,
something we got from another intelligence agency, something we cannot
independently verify, in an area of Africa where the British have no
on-the-ground presence."

WHITE HOUSE DENIALS

The next week, columnist Robert Novak published an article in which he
revealed that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, was a covert CIA operative
specializing in weapons of mass destruction.

"Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested
sending him to Niger to investigate," Novak wrote.

The White House has denied being Novak's source, whom he has refused
to identify.

But Wilson has said other reporters have told him White House
officials leaked Plame's identity.

NBC News' Andrea Mitchell reported Friday night that the CIA has asked
the Justice Department to investigate whether White House officials
blew Plame's cover in retaliation against Wilson.

Revealing the identities of covert officials is a violation of two
laws, the National Agents' Identity Act and the Unauthorized Release
of Classified Information Act.

ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE CLAIM

When the Niger claim first arose, in February 2002, the CIA sent
Wilson to Africa to investigate.

He reported finding no credible evidence that Iraq was seeking uranium
from Niger.

The CIA's doubts about the uranium claim were reported through routine
intelligence traffic throughout the government, U.S. intelligence
officials said.

Those doubts were also reported to the British.

The Niger report included a notation that it was unconfirmed when it
was published in the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, the
classified summary of intelligence on Iraq's weapons programs.

The CIA had the Niger claim removed from at least two speeches before
they were given:

Bush's October address on the Iraqi threat, and a speech by U.N.
Ambassador John Negroponte.

As the State of the Union address was being written, CIA officials
protested over how the alleged uranium connection was being portrayed,
so the administration changed it to attribute it to the British, who
had made the assertion in a Sept. 24 dossier.

_________________________________________________________

How d'ya like that. The un-American CIA not supporting the
right-wingers presidunce. It's treason.

Harry




.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
UK unions want probe against outsourcing
Probe Urged Of Allegations Against Bush's FDA
Bush's high crimes against the nation
Massive 29% swing Against Blair in first post-Iraq election!
Re: This War is NOT Against Terrorists
Re: US Plans to Provoke Next War Against Syria
U.S. offensive against Cuba, Venezuela gets a hand from big-business daily
Lawsuit filed against John Ashcroft for outing an intelligence asset.
Charge against GCHQ whistleblower dropped
Europeans against Bush
~ IRAQ UNITES AGAINST IMPERIAL OCCUPATION - BUSH LOSES GULF WAR II ~
On 9/11 and the campaign against terror:
***** Cheney Expected to Be the Mastur Debater against Edwards!
Cheney mired in claims of bribery and corruption against his former company in four countries
Powell leads lobbying against controlling potential chemical threats to humans
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER