"Greg" <terra_tec@hotmail.com> wrote in message

"insurgent0001" <YahooGroup@anti_kerry.com> wrote in message
news:1ggv3vh.mousdj1vblm6mN%YahooGroup@anti_kerry.com...

Greg <terra_tec@hotmail.com> wrote:

"insurgent0001" <YahooGroup@anti_kerry.com> wrote in message
news:1ggum4p.9omqk37txlelN%YahooGroup@anti_kerry.com...

If I told U I'd have 2 kill U <knews4u2chew@yahoo.com> wrote:

The reason all pyramid study ignores this is because those who

dominate

control over who gets access to the pyramids for study have for so

long

insisted that the blocks were cut by hand and moved into place

changing their theories now would be the ruin of their careers :o/

No, the reason all pyramid study ignores this is because the

and

archaeologists/anthros/egyptologists have already gone through and
determined the rock type, source quarries, probable transportation

paths,

etc.

Access to the Pyramids for study is very strictly controlled, even
obsessively so. Researchers who don't obey their rules can loose any
chance for access for 10+ years. It's like being blacklisted in that
field fo study. The reason for this isn't to physically protect the
pyramids, but to protect Pyramid teurism. They limit where researchers
can go and what they can do in detail. Journalists are also strictly
regulated. When Pyramid teurism drops down to next to nothing and

there for years, then we'll see major discoveries :o/

If you understood what has happened in the past, you'd understand the

for controls. And yes, Hawass does control it all with an iron fist.

I'll have to disagree somewhat with what you've said about not

protecting the pyramids - if you've seen some of the proposals for

you'd understand that they would cause irreparable damage. Justifiable?
Maybe. But the basic problem in archaeology is that it's destructive, to

large extent. We know that our techniques and technologies improve with
time, so we always, always need to leave as much as possible untouched.
Capped, entombed, whatever.

From what I remember (I'm not an Egyptologist) they were local

limestones or

other sedimentaries. Which makes sense, local supplies, easier to

relatively light.

If the materials were light the pyramid would not have lasted so long.

Read the word "relatively". As in limestone is relatively lighter than
something harder and much more difficult to quarry, like any of the

or basalts.

The outmost blocks are not necessarily made the same way or the same
materials as the interior blocks.

Sure - they're probably not made the same way. Different keys, loadings

designs. Stands to reason.

You think the entire pyramid was

constructed the exact same way? There have been many different
civilizations controlling the pyramids. I think Pyramid history has

rewritten several times over thousands of years, and the last one is
least likely to be correct, but it is the one certain dominate
researchers have staked their careers.

Of course it's been "rewritten" many times - but would you mind telling

why you think that anyone other than the original builders knows exactly

and how they did things? The one great thing about historical data is

it can be built on by successive generations - which means that the last
most recent one, contrary to your belief, is more likely than not closer

the truth than the preceding accounts.

Until you've dealt with this stuff firsthand, talked with the folks that
deal with it, handled the artifacts, and put some years into it, there's

way you can get a good handle on it. And sure as hell not from some web

dealing with a cave with a lot of pseudo-artifacts.

Greg

Great piece of hypocritical double talk.
You say one thing must happen for one to have knowledge about an
archeological site and then proceed to dismiss out of hand EXACTLY
what someone else has done and published on a website which you say is
required.
Jesus, you are daft.
Perhaps you can explain how 2000 year old compressed volcanic silt
stones found only in Italy with Punic style artwork turned up in
Illinois by the thousands.
Then, try this on for size Mr. Wizard.

http://www.gizapower.com/

<EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote:

That's damn weak evidence for your position. Indeed, it no evidence at
all, but merely the reasons why you speculate.

well, ok, i was implying a lot.

In misc.survivalism insurgent0001 <YahooGroup@anti_kerry.com> wrote:

The outmost blocks are not necessarily made the same way or the same
materials as the interior blocks. You think the entire pyramid was
constructed the exact same way?

my point is, a couple tests on pyramid blocks only proves what those
blocks are made of. If you look at footage from inside and around the
pyramid, there's quite a variety of the color and texture of the blocks.
I think a lot of tests are necessary.

Here is a pic from a shaft that remains untouched by human hands for
4000+ years. Look at the walls, ceiling and floor. Do these look carved
or cast??!

http://server2.cybertarp.com/~perynoid/pyramid_cast.jpg

There have been many different
civilizations controlling the pyramids. I think Pyramid history has

rewritten several times over thousands of years, and the last one is
least likely to be correct, but it is the one certain dominate
researchers have staked their careers.

I was disputing the pictographs which have long been claimed as proof to
how the pyramids were built. The very nature of the pictographs show
self-glorifying and vain leaders obsessed with preserving themselves in
the afterlife - this is exactly the type of leaders who would rewrite
history and erase signs of previous civilization. The Sphinx has a
disproportionately small head which many have insisted had been
re-carved at least once. The nose was actually shot off by a British
artillery unit during World War II, but it's shush-shush today.

possible the original exterior of the pyramids have been covered by
additional blocks as you'd expect from vain leaders.

the smaller, so called practice pyramids came after, as imitation is a
common human behavior throughout history.

But it's impossible to do definitive tests on pyramid blocks because
hands on research is so tightly restricted. It's taken several years to
get permission to drill that one hole in the above picture :o/ and guess
who got to do it? The researchers who did the first robot up the shaft
were given a very limited amount of time.

The best books on the Pyramids was written in the 1960s and early 1970s
:o/ politics took over after that.