911=InsideJob wrote:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6500735333444855002&hl=en

How the key 9/11 myths were implanted

Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented,
specifically:

1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that
permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted
air space without challenge

2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings
#1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition

A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone
acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the
first few hours immediately after the attacks.

Specifically:

1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle
and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were
still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.

2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained
in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers
collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in
shock by what had just taken place.

3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as
such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and
viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges
placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.

How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no
inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks
and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?

Were these stories prepared in advance?

There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice
is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."

Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after
they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for
viewers to analyze them critically.

Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who
immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this
important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have
been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to
exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US
news networks.

http://www.brasschecktv.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfwmXOBmS1U
--
Nil conscire sibi