How to Talk to a Conservative About Social Security (If You Must)



 Politics > Politics-USA > How to Talk to a Conservative About Social Security (If You Must)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 09 Feb 2005 03:40:54 PM
Object: How to Talk to a Conservative About Social Security (If You Must)
http://thinkprogress.org/index.php?p=206#more-206
How to Talk to a Conservative About Social Security (If You Must)
The White House and their deep-pocketed allies have launched a $35
million public relations effort to spread misinformation about
President Bush’s Social Security Privatization scheme.
This fact sheet will arm you with all the facts you’ll need to take
them on.
FISCAL OUTLOOK
CLAIM:
"By the year 2042, the entire system would be exhausted and bankrupt."
[President Bush, 2/2/05]
FACT:
In 2042, enough new money will be coming in to pay between 73-80
percent of promised benefits. Even with this reduction, new retirees
will still receive more money, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than
today’s beneficiaries. [WP, 2/5/05]
CLAIM:
"In the year 2018, for the first time ever, Social Security will pay
out more in benefits than the government collects in payroll taxes."
[President Bush, 12/11/04]
FACT:
"In 14 of the past 47 years, including 1975 to 1983, Social Security
paid out more in benefits than the government collected in payroll."
[MSNBC, 1/14/05]
FACT:
Under Bush’s plan, expenditures will begin to exceed revenues even
earlier, in 2012. [New York Times, 2/4/05]
CLAIM:
"Under the current system, today’s 30-year old worker will face a 27%
benefit cut when he or she reaches normal retirement age." [GOP Guide
to Social Security Reform, 1/27/05]
FACT:
According to the Congressional Budget Office, younger workers would
receive better benefits from Social Security as it exists now, even if
nothing changes, than from President Bush’s private accounts plan.
[EPI, 2/05]
THE PRESIDENT’S PLAN / PRIVATE ACCOUNTS
CLAIM:
"As we fix Social Security, we also have the responsibility to make
the system a better deal for younger workers. And the best way to
reach that goal is through voluntary personal retirement accounts."
[President Bush, 2/2/05]
FACT:
Analysis of the plan so far does not prove the accounts would be a
better deal for anyone not working on Wall Street. Workers who opt for
the private accounts would recover forfeited benefits through their
accounts only "if their investments realized a return equal to or
greater than the 3 percent earned by Treasury bonds currently held by
the Social Security system." But CBO factors out stock market risks to
assume a 3.3 percent rate of return. With 0.3 percent subtracted for
expected administrative costs on the account, "the full amount in a
worker’s account would be reduced dollar for dollar from his Social
Security checks, for a net gain of zero." [WP, 2/4/05]
CLAIM:
"You’ll be able to pass along the money that accumulates in your
personal account, if you wish, to your children or grandchildren."
[President Bush, 2/2/05]
FACT:
Most lower-income workers will be required to purchase government
lifetime annuities, financial instruments that provide a guaranteed
monthly payment for life but that expire at death. Money in these
annuities cannot be passed on to heirs. [NYT, 2/3/05]
CLAIM:
"We must pass reforms that solve the financial problems of Social
Security once and for all." [President Bush, 2/2/05]
FACT:
"A Bush aide, briefing reporters on the condition of anonymity [said]
that the individual accounts would do nothing to solve the system’s
long-term financial problems." The long-term gap in revenue would
"have to be closed through benefit cuts that have yet to be detailed."
[LAT, 2/3/05; WP, 2/5/05]
CLAIM:
"A personal account would be your account, you would own it, and the
government could never take it away." [President Bush, 2/8/05]
FACT:
Bush’s Social Security plan is a far cry from the private ownership
he’s touting, however. For example, instead of private plans that let
Americans control their own investments, there are tight restrictions
on which conservative stocks and bonds the public will be allowed to
buy. And, as the New York Times reports, "the more restrictions there
are, the harder it would be for people to achieve the outsized returns
the administration has generally promoted to sell the public on
private accounts." [NYT, 2/6/05]
CLAIM:
"Best of all, the [private] accounts would be replacing the empty
promises of government with the real assets of ownership." [President
Bush, 2/8/05]
FACT:
Social Security trust funds "hold nothing but U.S. Treasury
securities," recognized as "the safest, most reliable investment
worldwide." [Century Foundation, 1/26/05]
CLAIM:
"The problem that we now face is not one that we can tax our way out
of, for a very simple reason: The costs and the current program are
growing faster than the underlying tax base. So if we were to raise
taxes today to deal with it, and the costs of the program continued to
grow faster than the tax base, then in the future, future generations
would simply have to come back and raise taxes again." [Senior White
House Official, Press Conference, 2/3/05]
FACT:
An alternative proposal by Peter Diamond and Peter Orszag would
resolve Social Security’s funding problems directly and permanently
through modest tax increases. The Congressional Budget Office states
that, "under Diamond-Orszag, the trust fund balance would always be
positive and scheduled benefits would be fully financed." [CBO,
12/22/04]
HISTORY
CLAIM:
"Social Security was a great moral success of the 20th century, and we
must honor its great purposes in this new century." [President Bush,
2/2/05]
FACT:
Conservatives have been trying to gut Social Security since its
inception. Both Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan endorsed
privatization in 1964. In 1983, the Cato Institute laid out a
privatization plan similar to President Bush’s, stating, "We will meet
the next financial crisis in Social Security with a private
alternative ready in the wings." [Miami Herald, 2/7/05]
RHETORIC
CLAIM:
"I think it’s important for people to be open about the truth when it
comes to Social Security." [President Bush, 2/4/05]
FACT:
The Bush administration has lobbied hard for privatization while being
notably closemouthed about the details. [WP, 2/6/05]
FACT:
The Wall Street Journal reports the White House is quietly assembling
a coalition of deep-pocketed allies "that will privately raise $35
million for an advertising and lobbying effort to push the politically
risky measure through Congress." [WSJ, 2/4/05]
CLAIM:
"The role of a President is to confront problems -- not to pass them
on to a future President, future Congress, or a future generation."
[President Bush, 2/4/05]
FACT:
***** Cheney admits trillions of dollars in future borrowing will be
necessary to cover the cost of establishing private accounts. This
deficit would have to be repaid by today’s younger workers. [NYT,
2/6/05]
_____________________________________________________________
Harry
.

User: "MrPepper11"

Title: Re: How to Talk to a Conservative About Social Security (If You Must) 09 Feb 2005 04:02:07 PM
Harry Hope wrote:

http://thinkprogress.org/index.php?p=206#more-206

How to Talk to a Conservative About Social Security (If You Must)

The White House and their deep-pocketed allies have launched a $35
million public relations effort to spread misinformation about
President Bush's Social Security Privatization scheme.

Meanwhile:
South Bend Tribune 2/5/05
RNC asks stations to kill 'false TV ad'
The Republican National Committee is sending letters to local
television stations asking them not to air the MoveOn.org ad because it
is critical of the Bush plan...
Kevin Sargent, vice president and general manager for WSJV-TV, said he
viewed the RNC letter as threatening.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Social Security: It's Even Worse Than You Think
Re: Port Security and GOP Controllers -- If You Do Not Have A Reservation To Bush's Fallout Shelter Tunnel Network Bush considers YOU EXPENDABLE.. and even if you do he might still
Bush Wants to Rob You of Your Social Security Benefits.
Senator Leahy...When Do You Think He'll Get A Security Clearance Again??
Contrary to what the destroyers of Social Security tell you, it works.
Communist Nancy Pelosi Says, "If you're for National Security, you won't play on My Team"
Okay, Inez, How Would You Save Social Security?
Paying off your credit card will make you a Homeland Security threat
GOP and National Security: How’s that working out for you?
Re: Social Security: It's Even Worse Than You Think
New Fears of Security Risks in Diebold Electronic Voting Systems <--- The ONLY POSBILE WAY BUSH CRIME FAMILY CAN STOP IMPEACHMENT - you better believe they are attempting
You Call Yourself A Homeland Security Advisor?
Backlash Against Bush Immigration Proposal Confuses Fear With Security
Senate powder is the least of Congress' security concerns
Re: What is Kerry's plan for fixing the Social Security mess?
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER