| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
| Date: |
25 Jan 2008 09:56:17 PM |
| Object: |
Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
McCain did this whole thing 8 years ago (the primaries) and lost.
However, his delegate wins got him here, today.
The point. Huckabee has already won Iowa, won half of S.C. and will
win over 300 delegates February 5th. Even if McCain wins this
election, Huck will be back.
Indeed, consider the two options if McCain wins.
First, McCain wins the nomination but loses the election, since the
public was faced with a Democrat on the Democrat ticket and a Democrat
on the Republican ticket and chose the named Democrat by straight
party voting. This could be especially true if evangelical Christian
GOP voters feel ignored and choose to just stay home.
Second, McCain wins the nomination AND the election (unlikely). He
runs a leftist GOP administration, and conservative Republicans get
fed up with it. (think early 1900's GOP) The next term they swing
back to the conservative person they know...i.e. Huckabee.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
| User: "Mr4701" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
25 Jan 2008 10:13:53 PM |
|
|
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as a VP
candidate!
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:95c92cb0-2fb5-4ef5-97c3-d1c9b90ad3a3@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
McCain did this whole thing 8 years ago (the primaries) and lost.
However, his delegate wins got him here, today.
The point. Huckabee has already won Iowa, won half of S.C. and will
win over 300 delegates February 5th. Even if McCain wins this
election, Huck will be back.
Indeed, consider the two options if McCain wins.
First, McCain wins the nomination but loses the election, since the
public was faced with a Democrat on the Democrat ticket and a Democrat
on the Republican ticket and chose the named Democrat by straight
party voting. This could be especially true if evangelical Christian
GOP voters feel ignored and choose to just stay home.
Second, McCain wins the nomination AND the election (unlikely). He
runs a leftist GOP administration, and conservative Republicans get
fed up with it. (think early 1900's GOP) The next term they swing
back to the conservative person they know...i.e. Huckabee.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Henrik V Blunck" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 02:46:04 AM |
|
|
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExists@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as a =
VP
candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
-- =
Sincere regards
Henrik Blunck - Dianalund - Denmark
Earning Money Online? =3D=3D=3D> http://www.tjenfritid.dk/blog
More on Hillary =3D=3D=3D> http://www.blunck.dk/politics/clinton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr4701" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 02:55:39 AM |
|
|
"Henrik V Blunck" <henrik@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExists@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as a VP
candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid9" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 08:19:59 AM |
|
|
Mr4701 wrote:
"Henrik V Blunck" <henrik@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExists@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as
a VP candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 08:33:34 AM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 8:19 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mr4701 wrote:
"Henrik V Blunck" <hen...@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExi...@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as
a VP candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents
Actually, I think the evangelicals staying home (instead of voting)
would decide it for the Democrats real quick, wouldn't you say?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid9" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 08:39:45 AM |
|
|
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:19 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mr4701 wrote:
"Henrik V Blunck" <hen...@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExi...@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as
a VP candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents
Actually, I think the evangelicals staying home (instead of voting)
would decide it for the Democrats real quick, wouldn't you say?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 09:51:09 AM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 8:39 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:19 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mr4701 wrote:
"Henrik V Blunck" <hen...@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExi...@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as
a VP candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents
Actually, I think the evangelicals staying home (instead of voting)
would decide it for the Democrats real quick, wouldn't you say?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Wrong.
You really think that the GOP can win the election without the
evangelical vote? Have you SEEN the support Huckabee is getting in
the polls? Or, are you going to say Huckabee's support extends
outside evangelicals?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid9" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 09:59:58 AM |
|
|
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:39 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:19 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mr4701 wrote:
"Henrik V Blunck" <hen...@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExi...@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him
as a VP candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents
Actually, I think the evangelicals staying home (instead of voting)
would decide it for the Democrats real quick, wouldn't you say?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Wrong.
You really think that the GOP can win the election without the
evangelical vote? Have you SEEN the support Huckabee is getting in
the polls? Or, are you going to say Huckabee's support extends
outside evangelicals?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Don't put words in my mouth.
What I said, I said above.
Repeated here for those who didn't read it:
"Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents"
I believe independent voters
have already decided that
they will not vote Republican
without regard to who Republicans
nominate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
27 Jan 2008 01:24:32 PM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 9:59 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:39 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:19 am, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mr4701 wrote:
"Henrik V Blunck" <hen...@blunck.dk> wrote in message
news:op.t5i3y2xsn1el4e@macintosh.local...
Den 26.01.2008 kl. 05:13 skrev Mr4701 <NoExi...@Earth.net>:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him
as a VP candidate!
Crystal ball guesswork? ;-)
I like to call it common sense.
Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents
Actually, I think the evangelicals staying home (instead of voting)
would decide it for the Democrats real quick, wouldn't you say?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Wrong.
You really think that the GOP can win the election without the
evangelical vote? Have you SEEN the support Huckabee is getting in
the polls? Or, are you going to say Huckabee's support extends
outside evangelicals?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Don't put words in my mouth.
What I said, I said above.
Repeated here for those who didn't read it:
"Correct, because the election
will be decided by independentts
rather than by Republicans or Democrats.
I don't believe Huckabee has
any appeal for independents"
I believe independent voters
have already decided that
they will not vote Republican
without regard to who Republicans
nominate.
Answer the question. Do you think the GOP can win the election
without the evangelical vote?
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 10:44:47 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:13:53 GMT, "Mr4701" <NoExists@Earth.net> wrote:
Huckabee does not have a shot in hell. No one will even pick him as a VP
candidate!
I thought about saying about the same thing you did. And then I
remembered that Bush was elected - twice - and thought the better of
it.
WB Yeats
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:95c92cb0-2fb5-4ef5-97c3-d1c9b90ad3a3@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
McCain did this whole thing 8 years ago (the primaries) and lost.
However, his delegate wins got him here, today.
The point. Huckabee has already won Iowa, won half of S.C. and will
win over 300 delegates February 5th. Even if McCain wins this
election, Huck will be back.
Indeed, consider the two options if McCain wins.
First, McCain wins the nomination but loses the election, since the
public was faced with a Democrat on the Democrat ticket and a Democrat
on the Republican ticket and chose the named Democrat by straight
party voting. This could be especially true if evangelical Christian
GOP voters feel ignored and choose to just stay home.
Second, McCain wins the nomination AND the election (unlikely). He
runs a leftist GOP administration, and conservative Republicans get
fed up with it. (think early 1900's GOP) The next term they swing
back to the conservative person they know...i.e. Huckabee.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kickin Ass and Takin Names" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
25 Jan 2008 10:05:09 PM |
|
|
On Jan 25, 10:56=A0pm, Wide Eyed in Wonder <kand...@hotmail.com> wrote:
McCain did this whole thing 8 years ago (the primaries) and lost.
However, his delegate wins got him here, today.
The point. =A0Huckabee has already won Iowa, won half of S.C. and will
win over 300 delegates February 5th. =A0Even if McCain wins this
election, Huck will be back.
Indeed, consider the two options if McCain wins.
First, McCain wins the nomination but loses the election, since the
public was faced with a Democrat on the Democrat ticket and a Democrat
on the Republican ticket and chose the named Democrat by straight
party voting. =A0This could be especially true if evangelical Christian
GOP voters feel ignored and choose to just stay home.
Second, McCain wins the nomination AND the election (unlikely). =A0He
runs a leftist GOP administration, and conservative Republicans get
fed up with it. =A0(think early 1900's GOP) =A0The next term they swing
back to the conservative person they know...i.e. Huckabee.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Rightwing Republicans are not conservatives. They are radical
reactionaries who seek to return this nation to the 19th century,
maybe even worse. They had their day, their day is gone. There'll be
no resurgence -- oh, they'll hang on to a few useless backwater places
like SC, AL, MS, E TN, and a occasional county here and there --
they'll gather 'round the TV and watch Benny Hinn and Pat Robertson
and they'll shell out to here Hickabee travel around and tell them
what should have been, but, it's over.
Heh, heh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 08:32:25 AM |
|
|
On Jan 25, 10:05 pm, "Kickin' ***** and Takin' Names"
<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 25, 10:56 pm, Wide Eyed in Wonder <kand...@hotmail.com> wrote:
McCain did this whole thing 8 years ago (the primaries) and lost.
However, his delegate wins got him here, today.
The point. Huckabee has already won Iowa, won half of S.C. and will
win over 300 delegates February 5th. Even if McCain wins this
election, Huck will be back.
Indeed, consider the two options if McCain wins.
First, McCain wins the nomination but loses the election, since the
public was faced with a Democrat on the Democrat ticket and a Democrat
on the Republican ticket and chose the named Democrat by straight
party voting. This could be especially true if evangelical Christian
GOP voters feel ignored and choose to just stay home.
Second, McCain wins the nomination AND the election (unlikely). He
runs a leftist GOP administration, and conservative Republicans get
fed up with it. (think early 1900's GOP) The next term they swing
back to the conservative person they know...i.e. Huckabee.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Rightwing Republicans are not conservatives. They are radical
reactionaries who seek to return this nation to the 19th century,
maybe even worse. They had their day, their day is gone. There'll be
no resurgence -- oh, they'll hang on to a few useless backwater places
like SC, AL, MS, E TN, and a occasional county here and there --
they'll gather 'round the TV and watch Benny Hinn and Pat Robertson
and they'll shell out to here Hickabee travel around and tell them
what should have been, but, it's over.
Heh, heh.
You have the most Bible touting evangelical candidate out there right
now, Huckabee. He is winning primaries (a FIRST for evangelicals).
You are going to tell me that their day is over? Looks to me like it
is dawning.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 01:04:22 PM |
|
|
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <writingken@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bebd2b4b-8ede-4ad8-ad63-704c65173370@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
You have the most Bible touting evangelical candidate out there right
now, Huckabee. He is winning primaries (a FIRST for evangelicals).
Correction: he's won _one_ primary.
You are going to tell me that their day is over? Looks to me like it
is dawning.
In your bible-banging wet dreams, but I hope you're right. A Huckabee
nomination would virtually guarantee a Democratic win in November.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 05:14:02 PM |
|
|
On 26 Jan., 20:04, "Dennis Kemmerer" <d...@suespammers.org> wrote:
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <writing...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:bebd2b4b=
-8ede-4ad8-ad63-704c65173370@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
You have the most Bible touting evangelical candidate out there right
now, Huckabee. =A0He is winning primaries (a FIRST for evangelicals).
Correction: he's won _one_ primary.
You are going to tell me that their day is over? =A0Looks to me like it
is dawning.
In your bible-banging wet dreams, but I hope you're right. A Huckabee
nomination would virtually guarantee a Democratic win in November.
Although, I have to admit that the idea of "President Huckabee" is
quite funny!
The USA is already the laughing stock of the entire planet, thanks to
the illiterate coke addict awol moron; with Huckabee, this would
continue for another solid 4 years...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 06:35:38 PM |
|
|
<parsifal222@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:72028a82-84d1-4baf-ba5f-6e1b012f40b6@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On 26 Jan., 20:04, "Dennis Kemmerer" <d...@suespammers.org> wrote:
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <writing...@yahoo.com> wrote in
messagenews:bebd2b4b-8ede-4ad8-ad63-704c65173370@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
You have the most Bible touting evangelical candidate out there right
now, Huckabee. He is winning primaries (a FIRST for evangelicals).
Correction: he's won _one_ primary.
You are going to tell me that their day is over? Looks to me like it
is dawning.
In your bible-banging wet dreams, but I hope you're right. A Huckabee
nomination would virtually guarantee a Democratic win in November.
Although, I have to admit that the idea of "President Huckabee" is
quite funny!
The USA is already the laughing stock of the entire planet, thanks to
the illiterate coke addict awol moron; with Huckabee, this would
continue for another solid 4 years...
I agree, it would be a hoot watching Huckabee learn the concepts he seems to
have missed in his PoliSci 101 class when he tries to 'amend the
Constitution to include the word of the living god.'
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
27 Jan 2008 03:25:02 PM |
|
|
On 27 Jan., 01:35, "Dennis Kemmerer" <d...@suespammers.org> wrote:
<parsifal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:72028a82-84d1-4baf-ba5f-6e1b012f40b6@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On 26 Jan., 20:04, "Dennis Kemmerer" <d...@suespammers.org> wrote:
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <writing...@yahoo.com> wrote in
messagenews:bebd2b4b-8ede-4ad8-ad63-704c65173370@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
You have the most Bible touting evangelical candidate out there right
now, Huckabee. He is winning primaries (a FIRST for evangelicals).
Correction: he's won _one_ primary.
You are going to tell me that their day is over? Looks to me like it
is dawning.
In your bible-banging wet dreams, but I hope you're right. A Huckabee
nomination would virtually guarantee a Democratic win in November.
Although, I have to admit that the idea of "President Huckabee" is
quite funny!
The USA is already the laughing stock of the entire planet, thanks to
the illiterate coke addict awol moron; with Huckabee, this would
continue for another solid 4 years...
I agree, it would be a hoot watching Huckabee learn the concepts he seems to
have missed in his PoliSci 101 class when he tries to 'amend the
Constitution to include the word of the living god.'-
Yup! That'd be another step in the direction of Yemen... a good
example of democracy as we all know!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kickin Ass and Takin Names" |
|
| Title: Re: Huckabee Now or Later (even if he loses, he wins) |
26 Jan 2008 05:38:48 PM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 9:32=A0am, Wide-Eyed, Slack-Jawed, Mouth-Breathing in
Ignorance <writing...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 25, 10:05 pm, "Kickin' ***** and Takin' Names"
<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 25, 10:56 pm, Wide Eyed in Wonder <kand...@hotmail.com> wrote:
McCain did this whole thing 8 years ago (the primaries) and lost.
However, his delegate wins got him here, today.
The point. =A0Huckabee has already won Iowa, won half of S.C. and will=
win over 300 delegates February 5th. =A0Even if McCain wins this
election, Huck will be back.
Indeed, consider the two options if McCain wins.
First, McCain wins the nomination but loses the election, since the
public was faced with a Democrat on the Democrat ticket and a Democrat=
on the Republican ticket and chose the named Democrat by straight
party voting. =A0This could be especially true if evangelical Christia=
n
GOP voters feel ignored and choose to just stay home.
Second, McCain wins the nomination AND the election (unlikely). =A0He
runs a leftist GOP administration, and conservative Republicans get
fed up with it. =A0(think early 1900's GOP) =A0The next term they swin=
g
back to the conservative person they know...i.e. Huckabee.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com
Rightwing Republicans are not conservatives. =A0They are radical
reactionaries who seek to return this nation to the 19th century,
maybe even worse. =A0They had their day, their day is gone. =A0There'll =
be
no resurgence -- oh, they'll hang on to a few useless backwater places
like SC, AL, MS, E TN, and a occasional county here and there --
they'll gather 'round the TV and watch Benny Hinn and Pat Robertson
and they'll shell out to here Hickabee travel around and tell them
what should have been, =A0but, =A0it's over.
Heh, heh.
You have the most Bible touting evangelical candidate out there right
now, Huckabee. =A0He is winning primaries (a FIRST for evangelicals).
You are going to tell me that their day is over? =A0Looks to me like it
is dawning.
Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No, he is not "winning primaries." He won the Iowa caucus -- in which
a small portion of the state's voters participated. John Edwards, who
finished third among the Democrats in Iowa, had more votes than
Hickabee.
Hickabee placed a weak third in SC and may be third in FL, but that,
too will be weak. He may pick up a win in one or two southern states
but the South is pretty much irrelevant.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
