| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
20 Feb 2007 07:53:21 PM |
| Object: |
"If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?bid=7&pid=167657
02/20/2007
“If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will”
By Katrina vanden Heuvel
According to the Washington Post, Walter Reed Army Medical Center in
the nation's capital has treated one out of every four soldiers
injured in Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701172.html
Over 700 outpatients reside on the hospital grounds or nearby as they
receive continued treatment or await bureaucratic decisions – which
can take 18 months or longer.
They outnumber in-hospital patients by 17 to 1.
In a two-part series, reporters Dana Priest and Anne Hull have done a
great service in rendering a portrait of the sad and horrifying state
of "supporting the troops" when they come home to Walter Reed.
These soldiers suffer from amputations, brain injuries, post traumatic
stress, and other life-changing combat wounds.
They are housed in rooms with "mouse droppings, belly-up cockroaches,
stained carpets, cheap mattresses," as well as rotting floors and
black mold.
"Suicide attempts and unintentional overdoses from prescription drugs
and alcohol, which is sold on post, are [also] part of the narrative
here."
Soldiers with "brain injuries sat for weeks with no appointments and
no help from the staff to arrange them. Many disappeared even longer.
Some simply left for home."
"If Iraq don't kill you, Walter Reed will," said one soldier's wife.
Meanwhile, the army haggles with these servicemen and women over
disability ratings in order to avoid paying benefits.
("They were fit enough for war, but now they are facing teams of Army
doctors scrutinizing their injuries for signs of preexisting
conditions").
One soldier hit in the head by a steel cargo door of an 18-wheeler –
knocked unconscious and cracking several vertebrae – is told that his
intellectual and emotional difficulties are not a result of the head
injury and therefore he isn't entitled to disability.
Only when a congressional staffer intervenes is further testing done
and the diagnosis corrected.
The same thing happens to another soldier with steel rods in his neck
who can only turn his head by rotating his whole body.
The Mologne House– a 200-room hotel on the hospital grounds – has a
full bar but "not one counselor or psychologist assigned there to
assist soldiers and families in crisis – an idea proposed by Walter
Reed social workers but rejected by the military command that runs the
post."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/18/AR2007021801335.html
Records are lost, even patients' identities as soldiers are challenged
and they are forced to produce letters or photos to prove their
service.
After 5 ˝ years of combat, it is clear that real support and
protection for our troops means safely bringing them home and fully
funding their treatment – including mental health care.
The Bush administration, its GOP allies, and the neocons will play an
ugly blame game, pushing the fallacy that those who use the power of
the purse to end this war are endangering troops.
They appear to be more interested in protecting their reputations,
egos and legacies than in protecting troops who are refereeing a
bloody civil war that they were never meant to be engaged in.
It is Congress' constitutional right – and moral imperative – to use
the power of the purse to end Bush's bloody war and protect the troops
from further loss and betrayal by this administration.
_____________________________________________________
I advocate moving the Bush Crime Family into building 18 at Walter
Reed Hospital to be locked up for a period of no less than 5 years.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Karma" |
|
| Title: Re: "If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
20 Feb 2007 11:58:02 PM |
|
|
In article <dg9nt2paiv98bdiuq9tkd8uoql9fh8vfc0@4ax.com>,
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?bid=7&pid=167657
02/20/2007
“If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will”
By Katrina vanden Heuvel
According to the Washington Post, Walter Reed Army Medical Center in
the nation's capital has treated one out of every four soldiers
injured in Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR200702170117
2.html
Over 700 outpatients reside on the hospital grounds or nearby as they
receive continued treatment or await bureaucratic decisions – which
can take 18 months or longer.
They outnumber in-hospital patients by 17 to 1.
In a two-part series, reporters Dana Priest and Anne Hull have done a
great service in rendering a portrait of the sad and horrifying state
of "supporting the troops" when they come home to Walter Reed.
These soldiers suffer from amputations, brain injuries, post traumatic
stress, and other life-changing combat wounds.
They are housed in rooms with "mouse droppings, belly-up cockroaches,
stained carpets, cheap mattresses," as well as rotting floors and
black mold.
"Suicide attempts and unintentional overdoses from prescription drugs
and alcohol, which is sold on post, are [also] part of the narrative
here."
Soldiers with "brain injuries sat for weeks with no appointments and
no help from the staff to arrange them. Many disappeared even longer.
Some simply left for home."
"If Iraq don't kill you, Walter Reed will," said one soldier's wife.
Meanwhile, the army haggles with these servicemen and women over
disability ratings in order to avoid paying benefits.
("They were fit enough for war, but now they are facing teams of Army
doctors scrutinizing their injuries for signs of preexisting
conditions").
One soldier hit in the head by a steel cargo door of an 18-wheeler –
knocked unconscious and cracking several vertebrae – is told that his
intellectual and emotional difficulties are not a result of the head
injury and therefore he isn't entitled to disability.
Only when a congressional staffer intervenes is further testing done
and the diagnosis corrected.
The same thing happens to another soldier with steel rods in his neck
who can only turn his head by rotating his whole body.
The Mologne House– a 200-room hotel on the hospital grounds – has a
full bar but "not one counselor or psychologist assigned there to
assist soldiers and families in crisis – an idea proposed by Walter
Reed social workers but rejected by the military command that runs the
post."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/18/AR200702180133
5.html
Records are lost, even patients' identities as soldiers are challenged
and they are forced to produce letters or photos to prove their
service.
After 5 ˝ years of combat, it is clear that real support and
protection for our troops means safely bringing them home and fully
funding their treatment – including mental health care.
The Bush administration, its GOP allies, and the neocons will play an
ugly blame game, pushing the fallacy that those who use the power of
the purse to end this war are endangering troops.
They appear to be more interested in protecting their reputations,
egos and legacies than in protecting troops who are refereeing a
bloody civil war that they were never meant to be engaged in.
It is Congress' constitutional right – and moral imperative – to use
the power of the purse to end Bush's bloody war and protect the troops
from further loss and betrayal by this administration.
_____________________________________________________
I advocate moving the Bush Crime Family into building 18 at Walter
Reed Hospital to be locked up for a period of no less than 5 years.
Harry
How's that "Surge" going?
Send in da Marines? More is better/
--
Money: What a concept?
.
|
|
|
| User: "z" |
|
| Title: Re: "If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
22 Feb 2007 02:14:39 PM |
|
|
On Feb 21, 12:58 am, Karma <geor...@aol.com> wrote:
How's that "Surge" going?
Send in da Marines? More is better/
Gotta love the Bushies.
"The plan is for a "surge" of troops to stabilize the region."
"The British are pulling their troops out? Aha, a good sign".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sid9" |
|
| Title: Re: "If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
22 Feb 2007 02:41:29 PM |
|
|
z wrote:
On Feb 21, 12:58 am, Karma <geor...@aol.com> wrote:
How's that "Surge" going?
Send in da Marines? More is better/
Gotta love the Bushies.
"The plan is for a "surge" of troops to stabilize the region."
"The British are pulling their troops out? Aha, a good sign".
Cheney declared victory on behalf of the Brits.
He probably doesn't know that Blair has lost
his job over this fiasco.
bush,jr and Cheney should lose their's too and
not let bush,jr string out the bleeding of America]
to be resolved by his successor.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
20 Feb 2007 08:07:12 PM |
|
|
On Feb 20, 5:53 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
VA hspitals have had a bad rap for decades..
The thing is that battlefield trauma procedures have *improved* so
much over the last ten years or so that a lot of soldiers who wouldn't
have made it in previous wars, now do.
The down side is that there are an increased number of wounded with
more extreme injuries that require specialized care. The medical
service is being stressed to provide that care.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Karma Ghia" |
|
| Title: Re: "If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
21 Feb 2007 09:18:30 AM |
|
|
In article <1172023632.599999.72760@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
On Feb 20, 5:53 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
VA hspitals have had a bad rap for decades..
The thing is that battlefield trauma procedures have *improved* so
much over the last ten years or so that a lot of soldiers who wouldn't
have made it in previous wars, now do.
The down side is that there are an increased number of wounded with
more extreme injuries that require specialized care. The medical
service is being stressed to provide that care.
Call me cynical but; to make war more P.C. the numbers of dead have to
be kept down. Americans can lose interest in a war when the costs don't
balance with the "reason"
--
Money: What a concept?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "z" |
|
| Title: Re: "If Iraq Don't Kill You, Walter Reed Will" |
21 Feb 2007 12:21:08 PM |
|
|
On Feb 20, 9:07 pm, wrote:
On Feb 20, 5:53 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
VA hspitals have had a bad rap for decades..
The thing is that battlefield trauma procedures have *improved* so
much over the last ten years or so that a lot of soldiers who wouldn't
have made it in previous wars, now do.
The down side is that there are an increased number of wounded with
more extreme injuries that require specialized care. The medical
service is being stressed to provide that care.
How stressed does it have to be to come up with this *****?
"Dell McLeod's injury was utterly banal. He was in his 10th month of
deployment with the 178th Field Artillery Regiment of the South
Carolina National Guard near the Iraqi border when he was smashed in
the head by a steel cargo door of an 18-wheeler. The hinges of the
door had been tied together with a plastic hamburger-bun bag. Dell was
knocked out cold and cracked several vertebrae.
When Annette learned that he was being shipped to Walter Reed, she
took a leave from her job on the assembly line at Stanley Tools and
packed the car. The Army would pay her $64 a day to help care for her
husband and would let her live with him at Mologne House until he
recovered.
A year later, they are still camped out in the twilight zone. Dogs are
periodically brought in by the Army to search the rooms for contraband
or weapons. When the fire alarm goes off, the amputees who live on the
upper floors are scooped up and carried down the stairwell, while a
brigade of mothers passes down the wheelchairs. One morning Annette
opens her door and is told to stay in the room because a soldier down
the hall has overdosed.
In between, there are picnics at the home of the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff and a charity-funded dinner cruise on the Potomac for
"Today's troops, tomorrow's veterans, always heroes."
..=2E.
Sgt. David Thomas, a gunner with the Tennessee National Guard, spent
his first three months at Walter Reed with no decent clothes; medics
in Samarra had cut off his uniform. Heavily drugged, missing one leg
and suffering from traumatic brain injury, David, 42, was finally told
by a physical therapist to go to the Red Cross office, where he was
given a T-shirt and sweat pants. He was awarded a Purple Heart but had
no underwear.
David tangled with Walter Reed's image machine when he wanted to
attend a ceremony for a fellow amputee, a Mexican national who was
being granted U.S. citizenship by President Bush. A case worker
quizzed him about what he would wear. It was summer, so David said
shorts. The case manager said the media would be there and shorts were
not advisable because the amputees would be seated in the front row.
" 'Are you telling me that I can't go to the ceremony 'cause I'm an
amputee?' " David recalled asking. "She said, 'No, I'm saying you need
to wear pants.' "
David told the case worker, "I'm not ashamed of what I did, and y'all
shouldn't be neither." When the guest list came out for the ceremony,
his name was not on it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/18/AR200702180=
1335.html
Here's where the stress comes from:
Bush budget cuts veterans health care in 2009
Story Highlights=B7 Bush budget assumes cuts in veterans' health care in
2009, 2010
=B7 VA medical care costs have risen yearly for 20 years
=B7 Number of veterans from Iraq, Afghanistan expected to increase 26
percent
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration's budget assumes cuts to
veterans' health care two years from now -- even as badly wounded
troops returning from Iraq could overwhelm the system.
Bush is using the cuts, critics say, to help fulfill his pledge to
balance the budget by 2012. But even administration allies say the
numbers are not real and are being used to make the overall budget
picture look better.
After an increase sought for next year, the Bush budget would turn
current trends on their head. Even though the cost of providing
medical care to veterans has been growing rapidly -- by more than 10
percent in many years -- White House budget documents assume
consecutive cutbacks in 2009 and 2010 and a freeze thereafter.
The proposed cuts are unrealistic in light of recent VA budget trends
-- its medical care budget has risen every year for two decades and 83
percent in the six years since Bush took office -- sowing suspicion
that the White House is simply making them up to make its long-term
deficit figures look better.
"Either the administration is willingly proposing massive cuts in VA
health care," said Rep. Chet Edwards of Texas, chairman of the panel
overseeing the VA's budget. "Or its promise of a balanced budget by
2012 is based on completely unrealistic assumptions."
A spokesman for Larry Craig, R-Idaho, the top Republican on the Senate
Veterans Affairs Committee, called the White House moves another step
in a longtime "budgeting game."
"No one who is knowledgeable about VA budgeting issues anticipates any
cuts to VA funding. None. Zero. Zip," Craig spokesman Jeff Schrade
said.
Edwards said that a more realistic estimate of veterans costs is $16
billion higher than the Bush estimate for 2012.
In fact, even the White House doesn't seem serious about the numbers.
It says the long-term budget numbers don't represent actual
administration policies. Similar cuts assumed in earlier budgets have
been reversed.
The veterans cuts, said White House budget office spokesman Sean
Kevelighan, "don't reflect any policy decisions. We'll revisit them
when we do the (future) budgets."
The number of veterans coming into the VA health care system has been
rising by about 5 percent a year as the number of people returning
from Iraq with illnesses or injuries keep rising. Iraq and Afghanistan
war veterans represent almost 5 percent of the VA's patient caseload,
and many are returning from battle with grievous injuries requiring
costly care, such as traumatic brain injuries.
All told, the VA expects to treat about 5.8 million patients next
year, including 263,000 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan.
The VA has been known to get short-term budget estimates wrong as
well. Two years ago, Congress had to pass an emergency $1.5 billion
infusion for veterans health programs for 2005 and added $2.7 billion
to Bush's request for 2006. The VA underestimated the number of
veterans, including those from Iraq and Afghanistan, who were seeking
care, as well as the cost of treatment and long-term care.
The budget for hospital and medical care for veterans is at $35.6
billion for the current year, and would rise to $39.6 billion in 2008
under Bush's budget. That's about 9 percent. But the budget faces a
cut to $38.8 billion in 2009 and would hover around that level through
2012.
The cuts come even as the number of veterans from the Iraq and
Afghanistan wars is expected to increase 26 percent next year.
In Bush's proposal to balance the budget by 2012, he's assuming that
spending on domestic agency operating budgets will increase by about 1
percent each year.
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/13/vets.budget.ap/index.html
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|