Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born

Politics > Politics-USA > Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 1

Topic:	Politics > Politics-USA
User:	""
Date:	03 Jun 2006 07:28:10 PM
Object:	Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born

There is, accordong to research accumulating over the last 10 years, no
significant net economic advantage to the native born in immigrant
receiving nations. Those who benefit are the immgrants themselves and
the the uber rich who can employ people at cheaper rates. Those who
suffer most are the poorest sections of the community who have less
political weight to stop such welfare eroding policies of high
immigration.
http://www.vdare.com/pb/060502_vanderbilt.htm
.

User: "Hans MacBeth"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	03 Jun 2006 07:37:04 PM

<biserilian@yahoo.com> wrote:

There is, accordong to research accumulating over the last 10 years, no
significant net economic advantage to the native born in immigrant
receiving nations

This is according to an anti-immigration website which only presents 1/2 of the
story continuously using lop-sided, cherry picked information in their efforts
to fight immigration in all forms. With a negative birthrate, a nation's
economic growth is dependant on immigration in order to continue expansion,
it's a basic economic concept devoid of political prejudice (unlike the
***** rants published at vdare). You must be one sad, uneducated right
wing gullible moron if you believe the ***** they spew. Your usual racist posts
expose you as a sick, insecure, xenophobic Nazi *****.
Now, ***** *****. Just because you're probably a racist or someone too
lazy to learn a trade or get an education so you ***** about all the immigrants
who take away your broom pushing and taxi cab driving jobs, isn't my fucking
problem.
Imbecile.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 11:40:04 AM

You must be one sad, uneducated right

wing gullible moron if you believe the ***** they spew. Your usual racist posts
expose you as a sick, insecure, xenophobic Nazi *****.

Now, ***** *****. Just because you're probably a racist or someone too
lazy to learn a trade or get an education so you ***** about all the immigrants
who take away your broom pushing and taxi cab driving jobs, isn't my fucking
problem.

Imbecile.>

Nobel Prize for Economics due for this contribution.
.

User: "Theoneinfrontofyou"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	07 Jun 2006 01:01:18 PM

"Hans MacBeth" <hansmacbeth@excite.com> wrote in message
news:44821d8d$0$26877$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...

<biserilian@yahoo.com> wrote:

There is, accordong to research accumulating over the last 10 years, no
significant net economic advantage to the native born in immigrant
receiving nations

This is according to an anti-immigration website which only presents 1/2

of the

story continuously using lop-sided, cherry picked information in their

efforts

to fight immigration in all forms. With a negative birthrate, a nation's
economic growth is dependant on immigration in order to continue

expansion,
Expansion can be obtained through efficiency. Immigration should be
controlled.

it's a basic economic concept devoid of political prejudice (unlike the
***** rants published at vdare). You must be one sad, uneducated

right

wing gullible moron if you believe the ***** they spew. Your usual racist

posts

expose you as a sick, insecure, xenophobic Nazi *****.

He may be uneducated, in which case he can learn. What's your excuse for the
loss of control of your Sewer Mouth? Looks like that will never be cured.
.

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	03 Jun 2006 07:52:48 PM

Hans MacBeth <hansmacbeth@excite.com> wrote in message
news:44821d8d$0$26877$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...

<biserilian@yahoo.com> wrote:

There is, accordong to research accumulating over the last 10 years, no
significant net economic advantage to the native born in immigrant
receiving nations

This is according to an anti-immigration website which only presents 1/2

of the

story continuously using lop-sided, cherry picked information in their

efforts

to fight immigration in all forms. With a negative birthrate, a nation's
economic growth is dependant on immigration in order to continue

expansion,

it's a basic economic concept devoid of political prejudice

Hello *****, most countries have finite borders. This makes life shitty
quickly with irresponsible immigration like in Canada and most other ethnic
european nations. You stupid scum, there is low birthrate because the
people can't afford to live decently in the frozen gulag state of Canada,
and all of Europe. It is because of the corporate exploitation and the
politicians they bribe. Trash like you don't care if your countrymen live
in overcrowded cesspools of cities with all kinds of foreign thugs running
around scraping by just to make rent, as long as you make the money off your
investments and scams. You are truely scum, and I think the clock is
ticking for your kind unless you get your act together. The
globalist/monopoly capitalist experiment is a disaster for the environment
and for people, it is time to end it.
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	05 Jun 2006 04:45:32 AM

Hans MacBeth wrote:

<biserilian@yahoo.com> wrote:

There is, accordong to research accumulating over the last 10 years, no
significant net economic advantage to the native born in immigrant
receiving nations

So you have never heard of productivity?!

devoid of political prejudice

As you are economically illiterate you resort to political prejudice.
Read Phil Mullan's 'The myth of the demographic timebomb: why an ageing
population is not a social problem', and the review of it in The
Actuary.

(unlike the
***** rants published at vdare). You must be one sad, uneducated

Educate yourself instead of advertising your economic illiteracy and
prejudice.

right
wing gullible moron if you believe the ***** they spew. Your usual racist posts
expose you as a sick, insecure, xenophobic Nazi *****.

Now, ***** *****. Just because you're probably a racist or someone too
lazy to learn a trade or get an education so you ***** about all the immigrants
who take away your broom pushing and taxi cab driving jobs, isn't my fucking
problem.

Imbecile.

As you clearly enjoy being an uneducated insecure homogenophobic
(probably) racist, why do you complain about it?
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	03 Jun 2006 08:10:45 PM

Thank you for your ranting for which I grateful as it confirms you as a
person incapable of mustering facts in the service of an argument and
as such you are shown to be just another knee-jerking, unthinking angry
newsgroup zealot.
Hey, but don't lets facts, evidence , empirical research and logic
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/migration-wont-boost-living-standards/2006/05/16/1147545326491.html
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060312-101234-9387r.htm
http://www.vdare.com/pb/060502_vanderbilt.htm
get in the way of a self-serving temper tantrum.
How frustrating it must be for you to be unable to argue, but I guess
you have no choice, given the intellectual constraints under which you
operate, than to rely on name calling as your only avenue for newsgroup
interaction..
SNIP idiocy
.

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	03 Jun 2006 08:01:32 PM

The Usual Anti-Freedom Globalist Punk> wrote in message
news:44821d8d$0$26877$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...

<biserilian@yahoo.com> wrote:

There is, accordong to research accumulating over the last 10 years, no
significant net economic advantage to the native born in immigrant
receiving nations

This is according to an anti-immigration website which only presents 1/2

of the

story continuously using lop-sided, cherry picked information in their

efforts

to fight immigration in all forms. With a negative birthrate, a nation's
economic growth is dependant on immigration in order to continue

expansion,

it's a basic economic concept devoid of political prejudice

Hello *****, most countries have finite borders. This makes life shitty
quickly with irresponsible immigration like in Canada and most other ethnic
european nations. You stupid scum, there is a low birthrate because the
people can't afford to live decently in the frozen gulag state of Canada,
and all of Europe. It is because of the corporate exploitation and the
politicians they bribe. Trash like you don't care if your countrymen live
in overcrowded cesspools of cities with all kinds of foreign thugs running
around scraping by just to make rent, as long as you make the money off your
investments and scams. You are truely scum, and I think the clock is
ticking for your kind unless you get your act together. The
globalist/monopoly capitalist experiment is a disaster for the environment
and for people, it is time to end it.
Nice try changing the reply-to, now I know you are not just scum but also a
devious coward. Actually I'm not suprized.
--
Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere boncentration bamps!
.

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 01:23:39 PM

�rd�g the authoritarian neoliberal who likes to wear his big socialist hat
with the red star
<tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149411171.433132.303360@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Detector wrote:

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com>the authoritarian neoliberal

�Rsedonkey: Great! I've never been called that before! What does it mean?
OMG!!!!! And I thought the uneducated politically naive had made their
homeland here in Canada. I see they have brothers amoung the suicidal
self-hating Europeans like yourself. OK, for your edification here is the
ideology of the globalists, the authoritarian corporate neoliberal ideology
whose adherants laughably think themselves superior to the neocon slime.What
is "Neo-Liberalism"? Psssst... stupid high immigration of any kind of scum
into Europe will be good for "economic growth". That is all you corporate
scum care about, your own scams and investments. Nothing exists beyond your
tiny world with other gibbering idiots who think like you do while you do
anything possible to gain for yourself in the short term. It is a really
psychotic ideology that will bring ruin to Europe unless the pride of our
people comes back.
http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/econ101/neoliberalDefined.html
A Brief Definition
by Elizabeth Martinez and Arnoldo Garc�a
Updated: February 26th, 2000
"Neo-liberalism" is a set of economic policies that have become widespread
during the last 25 years or so. Although the word is rarely heard in the
United States, you can clearly see the effects of neo-liberalism here as the
rich grow richer and the poor grow poorer.
"Liberalism" can refer to political, economic, or even religious ideas. In
the U.S. political liberalism has been a strategy to prevent social
conflict. It is presented to poor and working people as progressive compared
to conservative or Right-wing. Economic liberalism is different.
Conservative politicians who say they hate "liberals" -- meaning the
political type -- have no real problem with economic liberalism, including
neo-liberalism.
"Neo" means we are talking about a new kind of liberalism. So what was the
old kind? The liberal school of economics became famous in Europe when Adam
Smith, a Scottish economist, published a book in 1776 called The Wealth of
Nations. He and others advocated the abolition of government intervention in
economic matters. No restrictions on manufacturing, no barriers to commerce,
no tariffs, he said; free trade was the best way for a nation's economy to
develop. Such ideas were "liberal" in the sense of no controls. This
application of individualism encouraged "free" enterprise," "free"
competition -- which came to mean, free for the capitalists to make huge
profits as they wished.
Economic liberalism prevailed in the United States through the 1800s and
early 1900s. Then the Great Depression of the 1930s led an economist named
John Maynard Keynes to a theory that challenged liberalism as the best
policy for capitalists. He said, in essence, that full employment is
necessary for capitalism to grow and it can be achieved only if governments
and central banks intervene to increase employment. These ideas had much
influence on President Roosevelt's New Deal -- which did improve life for
many people. The belief that government should advance the common good
became widely accepted.
But the capitalist crisis over the last 25 years, with its shrinking profit
rates, inspired the corporate elite to revive economic liberalism. That's
what makes it "neo" or new. Now, with the rapid globalization of the
capitalist economy, we are seeing neo-liberalism on a global scale.
A memorable definition of this process came from Subcomandante Marcos at the
Zapatista-sponsored Encuentro Intercontinental por la Humanidad y contra el
Neo-liberalismo (Inter-continental Encounter for Humanity and Against
Neo-liberalism) of August 1996 in Chiapas when he said: "what the Right
offers is to turn the world into one big mall where they can buy Indians
here, women there ..." and he might have added, children, immigrants,
workers or even a whole country like Mexico."
The main points of neo-liberalism include:
1. THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private
enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter
how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade
and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and
eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle.
No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital,
goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an
unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will
ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and
"trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very
much.
2. CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and
health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of
roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's
role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for
business.
3. DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could
diminish profits, including protecting the environment and safety on the
job.
4. PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to
private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll
highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although
usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed,
privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in
a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.
5. ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and
replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people
in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and
social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as
"lazy."
Around the world, neo-liberalism has been imposed by powerful financial
institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and
the Inter-American Development Bank. It is raging all over Latin America.
The first clear example of neo-liberalism at work came in Chile (with thanks
to University of Chicago economist Milton Friedman), after the CIA-supported
coup against the popularly elected Allende regime in 1973. Other countries
followed, with some of the worst effects in Mexico where wages declined 40
to 50% in the first year of NAFTA while the cost of living rose by 80%. Over
20,000 small and medium businesses have failed and more than 1,000
state-owned enterprises have been privatized in Mexico. As one scholar said,
"Neo-liberalism means the neo-colonization of Latin America."
In the United States neo-liberalism is destroying welfare programs;
attacking the rights of labor (including all immigrant workers); and cutting
back social programs. The Republican "Contract" on America is pure
neo-liberalism. Its supporters are working hard to deny protection to
children, youth, women, the planet itself -- and trying to trick us into
acceptance by saying this will "get government off my back." The
beneficiaries of neo-liberalism are a minority of the world's people. For
the vast majority it brings even more suffering than before: suffering
without the small, hard-won gains of the last 60 years, suffering without
end.
Elizabeth Martinez is a longtime civil rights activist and author of several
books, including "500 Years of Chicano History in Photographs." Arnoldo
Garc�a is a member of the Oakland-based Comite Emiliano Zapata, affiliated
to the National Commission for Democracy in Mexico. Both writers attended
the Intercontinental Encounter for Humanity and against Neo-liberalism, held
July 27 -August 3,1996, in La Realidad, Chiapas.
--
Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere boncentration bamps!
.

User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?1nJk9mc=?="
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 06:54:20 PM

Detector wrote:

=D6rd=F6g the authoritarian neoliberal who likes to wear his big socialis=

t hat

with the red star

I do not insist on a star. And for all I care it can be skull and
crossbones. And my favourite colour is marine. But I do follow an
idiologie that should enable society to deal with problem cases like
you and your racist ilk.
What you fail to appreciate is that I do not participate in the world
wide postmodernist ideological confusion and chaos. Marx or Lenin might
be outdated on their modelling of society's predicted path but almost
all of their assessments and observations about the present and the
past still hold true. Your neo-whatever geniuses have not put any dent
in them. Nor did any racist who in all likelyhood never would either.

=E4Rsedonkey:

Is a fitting description for you.

OMG!!!!! And I thought the uneducated politically naive had made their
homeland here in Canada. I see they have brothers amoung the suicidal
self-hating Europeans like yourself.

Talking through your arse again, do you. You are yet to qualify what
makes you an authority on Europe. Reading cherry picked literature and
media?
I can talk for non-English Europeans because I am one. But I am also an
Australian so I certainly have a wider horizon than you do!
You see what happens when you start out with false assumptions about
your opponents and on top of it keep repeating the same mistake again
and again?
OK, for your edification here is the

ideology of the globalists, the authoritarian corporate neoliberal ideolo=

gy
Nice. Not that it has any relevance to me, mind you!
You seem to be a qualified copy and paster. You must excell in
something!

whose adherants laughably think themselves superior to the neocon slime.W=

hat

is "Neo-Liberalism"? Psssst... stupid high immigration of any kind of sc=

into Europe will be good for "economic growth". That is all you corporate
scum care about, your own scams and investments. Nothing exists beyond yo=

tiny world with other gibbering idiots who think like you do while you do
anything possible to gain for yourself in the short term. It is a really
psychotic ideology that will bring ruin to Europe unless the pride of our
people comes back.

There is no pride in fascism nor in racism. No pride in xenophobia nor
in ethnic bigotry nor in chauvinism.
And time can not be stopped either.
You should educate yourself in dialectic thinking.

http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/econ101/neoliberalDefined.html
A Brief Definition

by Elizabeth Martinez and Arnoldo Garc=EDa
Updated: February 26th, 2000

"Neo-liberalism" is a set of economic policies that have become widespread
during the last 25 years or so.

I am not disputing this article. I use different methodology of
describing the same thing. Therefore my emphasis and conclusions are
different.
But basically I regard contemporary capitalism as a complete failure in
solving humanities long term problems.
I do not see you offering any sane alternatives either.
=D6rd=F6g
Either the neocons go or civilisation does!
.

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 09:12:51 PM

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149465260.626435.266210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Detector wrote:

�rd�g the authoritarian neoliberal who likes to wear his big socialist hat
with the red star

I do not insist on a star. And for all I care it can be skull and
crossbones.
----->Fitting for you neoliberal corporate pirates.
And my favourite colour is marine. But I do follow an
idiologie that should enable society to deal with problem cases like
you and your racist ilk.
----->Yeah thought control! But you can't legislate the truth, it stays the
same no matter how much you grunt and defacate!
What you fail to appreciate is that I do not participate in the world
wide postmodernist ideological confusion and chaos.
----->I already noticed you were rather brain dead!
Marx or Lenin might
be outdated on their modelling of society's predicted path but almost
all of their assessments and observations about the present and the
past still hold true. Your neo-whatever geniuses have not put any dent
in them.
----->Yes as long as the ideology and methodology is authoritarian, you are
all for it! You sociopaths will have to be put in your place by the people,
you seem unsucceptable to reason!
Nor did any racist who in all likelyhood never would either.
---->You devious mealy-mouthed twit, you aren't fooling anyone. Enjoy the
high unemployment, overcrowding, crime, and lack of housing -- oh wait I
forgot you plutocrats don't have to deal with the consequences of your
irresponsible immigration policies, you just like to figure out ways to grab
cash out of peoples' hands.
--
Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere boncentration bamps!
.

User: "�bermensche"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 07:13:18 PM

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote:

OMG!!!!! And I thought the uneducated politically naive had made their
homeland here in Canada. I see they have brothers amoung the suicidal
self-hating Europeans like yourself.

Talking through your arse again, do you. You are yet to qualify what
makes you an authority on Europe. Reading cherry picked literature and
media?

The majority of posters in can.politics regard "Detector" and nothing more but
a mentally disturbed racist and a conspiracy kook. He's a first class whack-
job who resides in our bozo bins.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 09:26:59 PM

�bermensche <ubermensche6454@uyolca.com> wrote in message
news:448369e6$0$26889$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote:

OMG!!!!! And I thought the uneducated politically naive had made

their

homeland here in Canada. I see they have brothers amoung the suicidal
self-hating Europeans like yourself.

Talking through your arse again, do you. You are yet to qualify what
makes you an authority on Europe. Reading cherry picked literature and
media?

The majority of posters in can.politics regard "Detector" and nothing more

but

a mentally disturbed racist and a conspiracy kook. He's a first class

whack-

job who resides in our bozo bins.

Translation: "Waaah! I'm going to go sit in my corner in the dark!"
Enjoy your bozo bin with you neoliberal buddy.
--
Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere boncentration bamps!
.

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 01:58:49 PM

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149411483.038116.100350@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
biserilian@yahoo.com wrote:

How frustrating it must be for you to be unable to argue,

.....with a racists fascistoid extremist nobody.?
Actually it is not frustrating... The frustration is all on your side.
Every word you utter in Usenet show that quite well.
----->Wow ArseDonkey you are such a brilliant Politburu defender! Just use
the word 'racist' and you don't have to counter any arguments.
I mean it should be easy for someone of your stature and brilliance to
counter the "racists fascistoid extremist nobody", yet you fail to do so.
Why is that?
Maybe you should try harder, you know do something new for a change like
using the hardware between your ears instead of your canned responses!
Come on ArseDonkey the truth is on your side, let's see you shine the light
of your wisdom upon us! You do have the truth on your side, no?
--
Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere boncentration bamps!
Either the neocons and neolibs go or civilisation does!
.

User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?1nJk9mc=?="
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 07:14:00 PM

Detector wrote:

=D6rd=F6g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149411483.038116.100350@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
biserilian@yahoo.com wrote:

How frustrating it must be for you to be unable to argue,

....with a racists fascistoid extremist nobody.?

Actually it is not frustrating... The frustration is all on your side.
Every word you utter in Usenet show that quite well.

----->Wow ArseDonkey you are such a brilliant Politburu defender! Just u=

the word 'racist' and you don't have to counter any arguments.

What has politburo got to do with anything? It has nothing to do with
Marxism.
Racist is a very descriptive word for that particular poster. The
definition of that word is widely available on the Internet. I do not
need to waste time here describing exactly the same thing. You take
exception to that word because atb least partially it implicates you
as well.

I mean it should be easy for someone of your stature and brilliance to
counter the "racists fascistoid extremist nobody", yet you fail to do so.
Why is that?

I see no reason to counter my own words. That is your job as my
opponent; if you can. I'll bet that point to point you can't.

Maybe you should try harder, you know do something new for a change like
using the hardware between your ears instead of your canned responses!
Come on ArseDonkey the truth is on your side, let's see you shine the lig=

of your wisdom upon us! You do have the truth on your side, no?

User: "Detector"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 09:45:59 PM

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149466440.231082.205350@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Detector wrote:

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149411483.038116.100350@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
biserilian@yahoo.com wrote:

How frustrating it must be for you to be unable to argue,

use

the word 'racist' and you don't have to counter any arguments.

I mean it should be easy for someone of your stature and brilliance to
counter the "racists fascistoid extremist nobody", yet you fail to do so.
Why is that?

I see no reason to counter my own words. That is your job as my
opponent; if you can. I'll bet that point to point you can't.

light

of your wisdom upon us! You do have the truth on your side, no?

You use a hell of a lot of empty sentences to describe what? Nothing?
BTW you keep picking on my sign. A very stupid habit that goes into the
face of Netiquette and a civilised debate.
But since you insist!
So how about you elaborating on your sign. Do you propagate that
revisionist crap about the non-exsistence of concentration camps in the
Third Reich? Come clean! Are you a neo-nazi? Would not surprise me at
all!
---->"Facts, evidence , empirical research and logic", are racist to you
neoliberal plutocrats and tyrants! You just use that word as a club to bash
your opponents and you're not fooling anybody. When some facts disagree
with you you're quick with the intimidation. Why won't you answer whether
it is better to encourage birth rates of your own people or to have massive
amounts of foreigners brought in? Do you live in a black or Islamic
neighourhood? You neoliberals think you can take your cash and somehow that
makes it OK... but once more I ask you: Do you think the borders of ethnic
European nations are infinite? If not how do you justify this other than
for your own greedy short term gain that brings massive problems to the
average person trying to get a job or rent a home in the multicultural
cities?
--
Oi don't loike the sound of these 'ere boncentration bamps!
.

User: "�bermensche"
Title: Re: Immigration is of no economic advantage to native born	04 Jun 2006 07:15:54 PM

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Detector wrote:

�rd�g <tz81qm802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1149411483.038116.100350@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
biserilian@yahoo.com wrote:

How frustrating it must be for you to be unable to argue,

What has politburo got to do with anything? It has nothing to do with
Marxism.

Racist is a very descriptive word for that particular poster. The
definition of that word is widely available on the Internet. I do not
need to waste time here describing exactly the same thing. You take
exception to that word because atb least partially it implicates you
as well.

I mean it should be easy for someone of your stature and brilliance to
counter the "racists fascistoid extremist nobody", yet you fail to do so.
Why is that?

I see no reason to counter my own words. That is your job as my
opponent; if you can. I'll bet that point to point you can't.

He's a neo-nazi, and a conspiracy kook. A complete and utter nutcase who lives
in an alternate reality.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.

Page 1 of 1

Post reply

Federal Gov't report says 90% of Hispanics are NATIVE AMERICAN BLOOD"
John Kerry said he had a plan to increase every Native American's income ...
kerry scores with Native Americans...
Jewish woman, a Bay Area native, heads NRA
Daschle Asks Native American Not to Run Against Him
Goddamit - Stop calling injuns NATIVE AMERICANS
White nations have no native white medical personnel.
Full Blood Native American President Benito Juarez

DENVER - A 20-year government effort to restore the population of an endangered native trout in Colorado has made little progress because biologists have been stocking some of the waterways with the wrong fish, a new study says. (Wasn't Bill Jefferso
Re: Native Americans Say Mexicans Have "The Right To Be Anywhere On This Continent"
Native Americans returning home to worse than what they left in Iraq.
Bush receives new Native American name.
DISCUSS FUTURE NATIVE AMERICAN PROSPERITY
Fantastically dumb b**** Cameron Diaz carries Mao bag in Peru. Native furious
Change The Name { Native American Culture Deserves Our Respect }

NEWER

pg.3585 pg.2749 pg.2106 pg.1612 pg.1232 pg.940 pg.716 pg.544 pg.412 pg.311 pg.234 pg.175 pg.130 pg.96 pg.70 pg.50 pg.35 pg.24 pg.16 pg.10 pg.6 pg.3 pg.1

OLDER