| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"T Jr Hardman" |
| Date: |
14 May 2006 07:03:48 PM |
| Object: |
[IMMIGRATION REFORM] Re: Where is the debate? |
wrote:
Our politicians will wait until after the November elections to debate
this issue. [ ... ]
Our politicians will resolve this issue in a way that is viewed
favorably by the majority of active American voters, before the
election, or they will be voted out of office.
They will be voted out of office if they attempt to defer it until after
the elections, as "stallers". We the People notice this sort of crap and
we're damned sick of it. On this issue we categorically refuse to
tolerate it.
Or, the politicians will choose to pass this despicable capitulation
bill before the Senate. They will be voted out of office.
It's remotely possible that something will emerge from the Conference
Committee which will be palatable to the active American voter. If so,
President Bush will almost certainly veto it unless it is passed with
enough votes to pre-emptively override the veto. Any Congressmember in
either house who fails to vote towards a pre-emptive veto override will
not be returned to office, no matter their activities or votes on any
other issue whatsoever. We the People will have this issue resolved, and
resolved the way we like it, or there will be a housecleaning greater
than the one seen in 1994. We will, simply stated, leave no incumbent
unseated.
"It is far better to have an inexperienced government composed entirely
of frightened freshmen who have seen the blood running in the halls, and
who are willing to do what the voters demand, than to have a government
composed of distinguished elder statesmen of consummate competence who
ignore the will of the People."
--
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool
than to speak foolishness and remove all doubt.
--Aesop
.
|
|
| User: "Graphic Queen" |
|
| Title: Re: [IMMIGRATION REFORM] Re: Where is the debate? |
14 May 2006 08:08:26 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 14 May 2006 20:03:48 -0400, T Jr Hardman
<blockspam_thardman@thomashardman.com> wrote:
jimj122680@yahoo.com wrote:
Our politicians will wait until after the November elections to debate
this issue. [ ... ]
Our politicians will resolve this issue in a way that is viewed
favorably by the majority of active American voters, before the
election, or they will be voted out of office.
Want to bet?
They will be voted out of office if they attempt to defer it until after
the elections, as "stallers". We the People notice this sort of crap and
we're damned sick of it. On this issue we categorically refuse to
tolerate it.
Or, the politicians will choose to pass this despicable capitulation
bill before the Senate. They will be voted out of office.
It's remotely possible that something will emerge from the Conference
Committee which will be palatable to the active American voter. If so,
President Bush will almost certainly veto it unless it is passed with
enough votes to pre-emptively override the veto. Any Congressmember in
either house who fails to vote towards a pre-emptive veto override will
not be returned to office, no matter their activities or votes on any
other issue whatsoever. We the People will have this issue resolved, and
resolved the way we like it, or there will be a housecleaning greater
than the one seen in 1994. We will, simply stated, leave no incumbent
unseated.
"It is far better to have an inexperienced government composed entirely
of frightened freshmen who have seen the blood running in the halls, and
who are willing to do what the voters demand, than to have a government
composed of distinguished elder statesmen of consummate competence who
ignore the will of the People."
--
"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an
American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else,
for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.
But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...
There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also,
isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red
flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign
flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English
language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
~~Theodore Roosevelt, 1919
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: [IMMIGRATION REFORM] Re: Where is the debate? |
15 May 2006 03:42:56 AM |
|
|
Po Repubicans - who elevated this immigration issue to the fore anyway?
It was probably Rove, who was trying to find a wedge issue for the
Democrats, and to divert attention away from the war and his illegal
activities (such as outing Plame).
But, it backfired on them.
Po Po Republicans.
Now, it's a can't win issue for them come November - especially with
Bush in the White House, who firmly believes in amnesty and immigrant
rights.
T Jr Hardman wrote:
jimj122680@yahoo.com wrote:
Our politicians will wait until after the November elections to debate
this issue. [ ... ]
Our politicians will resolve this issue in a way that is viewed
favorably by the majority of active American voters, before the
election, or they will be voted out of office.
They will be voted out of office if they attempt to defer it until after
the elections, as "stallers". We the People notice this sort of crap and
we're damned sick of it. On this issue we categorically refuse to
tolerate it.
Or, the politicians will choose to pass this despicable capitulation
bill before the Senate. They will be voted out of office.
It's remotely possible that something will emerge from the Conference
Committee which will be palatable to the active American voter. If so,
President Bush will almost certainly veto it unless it is passed with
enough votes to pre-emptively override the veto. Any Congressmember in
either house who fails to vote towards a pre-emptive veto override will
not be returned to office, no matter their activities or votes on any
other issue whatsoever. We the People will have this issue resolved, and
resolved the way we like it, or there will be a housecleaning greater
than the one seen in 1994. We will, simply stated, leave no incumbent
unseated.
"It is far better to have an inexperienced government composed entirely
of frightened freshmen who have seen the blood running in the halls, and
who are willing to do what the voters demand, than to have a government
composed of distinguished elder statesmen of consummate competence who
ignore the will of the People."
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
