IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA



 Politics > Politics-USA > IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: ""
Date: 18 May 2007 08:39:11 PM
Object: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA
Imperial White Racism in America
by Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
Aefauldlie, (Scots for Sincerely)
Auld Bob Peffers
Racism, the ideology that came into full flower as a justification for
European conquest of most of the planet, is now headquartered in the
United States.
There could be no justification for George Bush's aggressions, without
the underlying assumptions of racial superiority. Bush has committed
multiple crimes against peace, a capital Nuremburg offense for which a
number of Nazis were hanged. He is a war criminal, many times over.
However, he will never be prosecuted in the United States, because of
the pervasive ideology of imperialism, which is racist at its very
core: it dehumanizes the victims.
Race is, indeed, a construction, a very convenient one when you want
to take someone else's property, or kill them, or enslave them. It is
this construct that animates the American debate about foreign policy,
or even domestic policy when it comes to the so-called "illegal
immigrants" or "illegal aliens" of one kind or another in the United
States of America.
But it is deadly. It swarms countries, and consumes cities. The Iraqi
city of Fallujah was flattened, with
its main hospital the first target. Three hundred thousand people are
now refugees in their own country, because of US actions, and an
unknown number are dead. That is a war crime, but is not seen as such
by many members of the US public, who are under the sway of the
ideology of imperial racism. Fortunately, not all Americans are racial
imperialists and there are many good and decent people in the United
States of America (both white and non-white) alike who work hard to
fight against American racial imperialism. The death of an entire city
does not matter to them, because there were no real people there.
Racism does more than color the situation, it defines it. How do you
kill a city and call it victory? Why is this celebrated as a benchmark
of "progress"? Is the assumption that the white man's triumph is,
inherently, progress?
Of course it is. That's what imperial racism is all about. There are
"enemies" and "others" who are not "Western", a euphemism for "non-
white", the construct they keep making up every time they want to
steal something. Their motives are well understood by everyone who is
not a racial imperialist. Everyone, that is, except the many (white)
Americans, who eat this crap up. However, as aforementioned this by no
means implies that all white Americans are racial imperialists, but it
quite sadly just appear to be the mentality of the mostly white
dominated Republican Party of George W. Bush. The uniform reaction of
the American corporate media to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision that
something resembling the rule of law must prevail at Guantanamo Bay
and other U.S. installations, has been to frame the issue in domestic
political terms. The Bush administration had been politically
tarnished, was the conclusion: not that it had violated international
law, and was in fact an outlaw among nations. The situation has been
framed as one of domestic political peril for Republicans, maybe in
November, but not how the U.S. gets along with the rest of the world.
This is the mentality of mass murderers. But then, you can only murder
real people. Imperialism kills
non-people. That's the nature of the beast. It can only act that way.
American racism and imperialism are quite clearly the same thing.
My voice gets heard in large part because I am a white male holds a
professional job with status. In most settings, I speak with the
assumption that people not only will listen, but will take me
seriously. I speak with the assumption that my motives will not be
challenged; I can rely on the perception of me as a neutral authority,
someone whose observations can be trusted.
Every time I open my mouth, I draw on, and in some ways reinforce, my
own white privilege, which is in large part tied to race.
.

User: "bob"

Title: Re: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA 19 May 2007 07:40:38 AM
<rpeffers1936@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1179538750.988084.306260@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

Imperial White Racism in America
by Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
Aefauldlie, (Scots for Sincerely)
Auld Bob Peffers

Racism, the ideology that came into full flower as a justification for
European conquest of most of the planet, is now headquartered in the
United States.

Actually it is religion, but don't let facts stand in YOUR way.


There could be no justification for George Bush's aggressions, without

Try money as Bush's prime objective. It 'fit's in' much more nicely.

the underlying assumptions of racial superiority. Bush has committed
multiple crimes against peace, a capital Nuremburg offense for which a
number of Nazis were hanged. He is a war criminal, many times over.
However, he will never be prosecuted in the United States, because of
the pervasive ideology of imperialism, which is racist at its very
core: it dehumanizes the victims.

Race is, indeed, a construction, a very convenient one when you want
to take someone else's property, or kill them, or enslave them. It is
this construct that animates the American debate about foreign policy,
or even domestic policy when it comes to the so-called "illegal
immigrants" or "illegal aliens" of one kind or another in the United
States of America.

Raceism strirs the pot to obscure the real reason from the idiot masses like
you.


But it is deadly. It swarms countries, and consumes cities. The Iraqi
city of Fallujah was flattened, with
its main hospital the first target. Three hundred thousand people are
now refugees in their own country, because of US actions, and an
unknown number are dead. That is a war crime, but is not seen as such
by many members of the US public, who are under the sway of the
ideology of imperial racism. Fortunately, not all Americans are racial
imperialists and there are many good and decent people in the United
States of America (both white and non-white) alike who work hard to
fight against American racial imperialism. The death of an entire city
does not matter to them, because there were no real people there.
Racism does more than color the situation, it defines it. How do you
kill a city and call it victory? Why is this celebrated as a benchmark
of "progress"? Is the assumption that the white man's triumph is,
inherently, progress?

No, it's called "Don't ***** with the USA". But the present 'leadership' of
the USA has no balls and is busy stealing your money (while you are off in
another direction, yelling "racism")
<rest of crap deleted>
.

User: "Me"

Title: Re: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA 18 May 2007 10:10:21 PM
On 18 May 2007 18:39:11 -0700,
wrote:

Imperial White Racism in America
by Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
Aefauldlie, (Scots for Sincerely)
Auld Bob Peffers

Racism, the ideology that came into full flower as a justification for
European conquest of most of the planet, is now headquartered in the
United States.

There could be no justification for George Bush's aggressions, without
the underlying assumptions of racial superiority. Bush has committed
multiple crimes against peace, a capital Nuremburg offense for which a
number of Nazis were hanged. He is a war criminal, many times over.
However, he will never be prosecuted in the United States, because of
the pervasive ideology of imperialism, which is racist at its very
core: it dehumanizes the victims.

Race is, indeed, a construction, a very convenient one when you want
to take someone else's property, or kill them, or enslave them. It is
this construct that animates the American debate about foreign policy,
or even domestic policy when it comes to the so-called "illegal
immigrants" or "illegal aliens" of one kind or another in the United
States of America.

But it is deadly. It swarms countries, and consumes cities. The Iraqi
city of Fallujah was flattened, with
its main hospital the first target. Three hundred thousand people are
now refugees in their own country, because of US actions, and an
unknown number are dead. That is a war crime, but is not seen as such
by many members of the US public, who are under the sway of the
ideology of imperial racism. Fortunately, not all Americans are racial
imperialists and there are many good and decent people in the United
States of America (both white and non-white) alike who work hard to
fight against American racial imperialism. The death of an entire city
does not matter to them, because there were no real people there.
Racism does more than color the situation, it defines it. How do you
kill a city and call it victory? Why is this celebrated as a benchmark
of "progress"? Is the assumption that the white man's triumph is,
inherently, progress?

Of course it is. That's what imperial racism is all about. There are
"enemies" and "others" who are not "Western", a euphemism for "non-
white", the construct they keep making up every time they want to
steal something. Their motives are well understood by everyone who is
not a racial imperialist. Everyone, that is, except the many (white)
Americans, who eat this crap up. However, as aforementioned this by no
means implies that all white Americans are racial imperialists, but it
quite sadly just appear to be the mentality of the mostly white
dominated Republican Party of George W. Bush. The uniform reaction of
the American corporate media to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision that
something resembling the rule of law must prevail at Guantanamo Bay
and other U.S. installations, has been to frame the issue in domestic
political terms. The Bush administration had been politically
tarnished, was the conclusion: not that it had violated international
law, and was in fact an outlaw among nations. The situation has been
framed as one of domestic political peril for Republicans, maybe in
November, but not how the U.S. gets along with the rest of the world.

This is the mentality of mass murderers. But then, you can only murder
real people. Imperialism kills
non-people. That's the nature of the beast. It can only act that way.
American racism and imperialism are quite clearly the same thing.

My voice gets heard in large part because I am a white male holds a
professional job with status. In most settings, I speak with the
assumption that people not only will listen, but will take me
seriously. I speak with the assumption that my motives will not be
challenged; I can rely on the perception of me as a neutral authority,
someone whose observations can be trusted.

Every time I open my mouth, I draw on, and in some ways reinforce, my
own white privilege, which is in large part tied to race.

You should get on your knees and thank God that you're White instead
of some filthy Arab camel fukker, midget beaner, or boot-lipped low-IQ
*****. But maybe you're not White. Maybe you're a commie Jew
trouble-maker trying to harm the White race.
Oops, sorry. I guess "commie", "Jew", and "trouble-maker" is
redundant.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.

User: ""

Title: Re: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA 18 May 2007 09:25:38 PM
On May 18, 6:39 pm,
wrote:

Imperial White Racism in America
by Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
Aefauldlie, (Scots for Sincerely)
Auld Bob Peffers

Racism, the ideology that came into full flower as a justification for
European conquest of most of the planet, is now headquartered in the
United States.

Wrong.
Globalism is 'anti-white' (since you are implying that the US is
'white')
And enormous numbers of headquarters are moving out of the US - along
with their industries therebye 'disempowering' and 'discriminating
against' the 'white people' of the US.
Furthermore, the globalist neocons are engaging in racial
discrimination in workplaces - hiring foreign nationals instead of
'white' Americans.
Think about it...
.
User: "Ramon F Herrera"

Title: Re: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA 19 May 2007 02:02:24 AM
On May 18, 9:25 pm,
wrote:

On May 18, 6:39 pm,

wrote:

Imperial White Racism in America
by Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
Aefauldlie, (Scots for Sincerely)
Auld Bob Peffers


Racism, the ideology that came into full flower as a justification for
European conquest of most of the planet, is now headquartered in the
United States.


Wrong.
Globalism is 'anti-white' (since you are implying that the US is
'white')

And enormous numbers of headquarters are moving out of the US - along
with their industries therebye 'disempowering' and 'discriminating
against' the 'white people' of the US.

Furthermore, the globalist neocons are engaging in racial
discrimination in workplaces - hiring foreign nationals instead of
'white' Americans.

Think about it...

Lorad:
Today I discovered a racist from the left. What an interesting
specimen. You are a "rara avis" indeed.
You have absolutely no personal achievements or genetic traits, so you
desperately cling to the notion of "if whites are better, and I am
white, how come I don't see the logical conclusion?".
Your problem is that even if we whites were inherently superior by
birth (and that's a huge IF), that is a necessary, and yet no
sufficient condition for success.
You remind me of the Spaniard nobles and others who had to sell not
only their castles but even their titles.
Go on, keep on blaming the new, more energetic, hard working people
for your utter failure.
-Ramon
ps: to complement the package, you are not anti-semitic as well, are
you?
.
User: "strabo"

Title: Re: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA 19 May 2007 05:58:51 PM
Kevin Cunningham wrote:

"Ramon F Herrera" <ramon@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:1179558144.374377.99390@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

On May 18, 9:25 pm,

wrote:

On May 18, 6:39 pm,

wrote:

Imperial White Racism in America
by Robert James (Auld Bob) Peffers
Aefauldlie, (Scots for Sincerely)
Auld Bob Peffers
Racism, the ideology that came into full flower as a justification for
European conquest of most of the planet, is now headquartered in the
United States.

Wrong.
Globalism is 'anti-white' (since you are implying that the US is
'white')

And enormous numbers of headquarters are moving out of the US - along
with their industries therebye 'disempowering' and 'discriminating
against' the 'white people' of the US.

Furthermore, the globalist neocons are engaging in racial
discrimination in workplaces - hiring foreign nationals instead of
'white' Americans.

Think about it...


Lorad:

Today I discovered a racist from the left. What an interesting
specimen. You are a "rara avis" indeed.

You have absolutely no personal achievements or genetic traits, so you
desperately cling to the notion of "if whites are better, and I am
white, how come I don't see the logical conclusion?".

Your problem is that even if we whites were inherently superior by
birth (and that's a huge IF), that is a necessary, and yet no
sufficient condition for success.

You remind me of the Spaniard nobles and others who had to sell not
only their castles but even their titles.

Go on, keep on blaming the new, more energetic, hard working people
for your utter failure.

-Ramon

Ramon, There is no identifiable racial makers other than skin color and
that can mess you up completely.
It is genetically probable that there is
*no* genetic difference between any "races".

So much for physical anthropology and forensics.

Its probable that the skin
color differenced are related to RNA, not DNA.

Remember when Genetic Savings and Clone was going to clone a cat? They did
however it didn't look a thing like the initial cat, different skin tones.
Why? Cat colors are produced through RNA.

And cats of the same litter have different colors and patterns.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.


User: "Day Brown"

Title: Re: IMPERIAL WHITE RACISM IN AMERICA 19 May 2007 12:59:23 AM
On May 18, 9:25 pm,
wrote:

Wrong.
Globalism is 'anti-white' (since you are implying that the US is 'white')

And enormous numbers of headquarters are moving out of the US - along
with their industries therebye 'disempowering' and 'discriminating
against' the 'white people' of the US.

Furthermore, the globalist neocons are engaging in racial
discrimination in workplaces - hiring foreign nationals instead of
'white' Americans.

Think about it...

i have. It is an unstable situation. On historian noted that
Aristocracies make history. But since they never read history, it
keeps repeating.
While the white race may have proportionally more men of character and
talent, its not a dualistic black/white phenomena. There are grays and
downsides from every perspective. But the fact is that we now have the
FMRi brain scans, EEG charts, and even Dr. Paul Ekman's lie detection
techiques that arose out of primate research. So- no matter what the
race, we can tell who we can deal with honorably, and who not.
We dont need affirmative action, and we dont need racial profiling. We
can administer the personality profile and talent assessment tools,
and when we do, we will find *some* who will fit into *some* positions
from many different gene pools. We also have some of the DNA markers
now, and can identify which Y chromosome lines will most likely
produce the thugs and drunks, and which the honorable and contributory
to make the money to pay the taxes to support your retirement.
What we should be doing, is *subsidizing* much more generously the
welfare queens who will accept fertilized eggs that have passed PGD
tests from more talented and rational lines. There are innumerable
19th century reports from highly successful men about the good quality
of care they recieved growing up, raised by non-white nannies. There's
no good reason not to move that process up by 9 months, so that the
really successful women busy with careers can donate eggs to the
fertility clinics who provide them.
If we are going to pay for raising the bastards anyway, we may as well
get a good return on the investment. I have posted a more detailed
analysis of this at http://www.dc-pc.org/fertilty/fertilty.html ; its
a win win for all of us. the welfare queens would end up with children
successful enough later in life to support them in a style to which
they'd like to become accustomed. Never mind how much easier it is to
raise smark kids who are innately better behaved.
I'd leave the choice of which lines to implant in the hands of the
Fertility clinics, based on the best scientific data that will be
available later. But right now, it looks like a crash program to
produce trophy blondes would be the best imaginable investment. We saw
one in SCOTUS last summer there to collect some part of the *billions*
she inherited from making the last few years of some rich lech happy.
IIRC, she was 26, and based on that age, not unusual for that line of
work, would have rewarded investors at tens of millions of dollars/
year for her upbringing. Hello?
Since each current talented trophy blonde could donate something like
300 eggs over a 5 month session with 18 months between to make sure
there were no deleterious health effects, the demad by the rich men,
of all races, all over the world could be well met.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Bush White House admits deception! Let the impeachment proceedings begin!
Gallup/CNN/USA Today: Less than half of US would vote to return Bush to White House
White House vows no more unnamed sources, an unnamed official says.
Greed Rules the White House
White House tries to squirm out of answering Bush AWOL questions.
Patridiot Watch: Political Speeches on White House Web Site
Instead of holding Bush's feet to the fire, the White House Press Corpse kisses 'em.
The ole shell game reaches near perfection in the White House.
Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides
The Bushies diddle with our heads - black is white and white is black.
Scandals and bad news are the hallmarks of a Bush White House under pressure
Are They ALL Forgeries? White House Issued Bush Service Records Contain The Same Errors As The 60 Mintes Documents
Kindaphoney Rice scrambles to cover up White House warmongering lies.
White House Threatened?
White House Leaks: A serious security matter
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER