| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
12 Apr 2007 04:28:56 PM |
| Object: |
IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
Yup.......The Lefties at CBS are afraid ot the Race-Baiting Hypocrites
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.........Ain't that
AMAZING?........Jackson and Sharpton are two of the Biggest HYPOCRITE
Race-Baiters and Racists in America next to Louis
Farrakhan........Jackson is well-remembered for his "Hymie-Town"
Remarks and Sharpton for his Tawana Brawley Hoax Involvement and the
Crown Heights Riots where he Incited The Riot........HOW is it that
either Race-Baiter has ANYTHING to say about Imus?..........And Imus
asked that Question On The Air...........
.
|
|
| User: "Bob Eld" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
12 Apr 2007 04:42:23 PM |
|
|
"theloneranger100@aol.com" <ScreenBeret100@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1176413336.028407.175130@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Yup.......The Lefties at CBS are afraid ot the Race-Baiting Hypocrites
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.........Ain't that
AMAZING?........Jackson and Sharpton are two of the Biggest HYPOCRITE
Race-Baiters and Racists in America next to Louis
Farrakhan........Jackson is well-remembered for his "Hymie-Town"
Remarks and Sharpton for his Tawana Brawley Hoax Involvement and the
Crown Heights Riots where he Incited The Riot........HOW is it that
either Race-Baiter has ANYTHING to say about Imus?..........And Imus
asked that Question On The Air...........
Yeah....Ain't it a Hoot?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Bernardini" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
12 Apr 2007 05:03:36 PM |
|
|
In article <1176413336.028407.175130@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"theloneranger100@aol.com" <ScreenBeret100@aol.com> wrote:
Yup.......The Lefties at CBS are afraid ot the Race-Baiting Hypocrites
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.........Ain't that
AMAZING?........Jackson and Sharpton are two of the Biggest HYPOCRITE
Race-Baiters and Racists in America next to Louis
Farrakhan........Jackson is well-remembered for his "Hymie-Town"
Remarks and Sharpton for his Tawana Brawley Hoax Involvement and the
Crown Heights Riots where he Incited The Riot........HOW is it that
either Race-Baiter has ANYTHING to say about Imus?..........And Imus
asked that Question On The Air...........
Now we can move on to Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Savage...
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
12 Apr 2007 05:34:22 PM |
|
|
On Apr 12, 6:03 pm, Brian Bernardini <bbernarWOOOAHd...@comcast.net>
wrote:
In article <1176413336.028407.175...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"theloneranger...@aol.com" <ScreenBeret...@aol.com> wrote:
Yup.......The Lefties at CBS are afraid ot the Race-Baiting Hypocrites
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.........Ain't that
AMAZING?........Jackson and Sharpton are two of the Biggest HYPOCRITE
Race-Baiters and Racists in America next to Louis
Farrakhan........Jackson is well-remembered for his "Hymie-Town"
Remarks and Sharpton for his Tawana Brawley Hoax Involvement and the
Crown Heights Riots where he Incited The Riot........HOW is it that
either Race-Baiter has ANYTHING to say about Imus?..........And Imus
asked that Question On The Air...........
Now we can move on to Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Savage...
right...freedom of speech has no place on the airwaves.
right Brian? how about getting rid of sharpton and jackson too.
or better yet..getting rid of the crap that the music industry calls
rap?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Bernardini" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
12 Apr 2007 06:58:18 PM |
|
|
In article <1176417261.964229.151480@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"THX1138" <xxxTHX1138xxx@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Apr 12, 6:03 pm, Brian Bernardini <bbernarWOOOAHd...@comcast.net>
wrote:
In article <1176413336.028407.175...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"theloneranger...@aol.com" <ScreenBeret...@aol.com> wrote:
Yup.......The Lefties at CBS are afraid ot the Race-Baiting Hypocrites
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.........Ain't that
AMAZING?........Jackson and Sharpton are two of the Biggest HYPOCRITE
Race-Baiters and Racists in America next to Louis
Farrakhan........Jackson is well-remembered for his "Hymie-Town"
Remarks and Sharpton for his Tawana Brawley Hoax Involvement and the
Crown Heights Riots where he Incited The Riot........HOW is it that
either Race-Baiter has ANYTHING to say about Imus?..........And Imus
asked that Question On The Air...........
Now we can move on to Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Savage...
right...freedom of speech has no place on the airwaves.
They have every right to say what they want. The radio stations have
every right not to carry their racist, homophobic, xenophobic rants.
right Brian? how about getting rid of sharpton and jackson too.
Can't say I'm against that idea.
or better yet..getting rid of the crap that the music industry calls
rap?
"Crap" is a relative term. For years, country music has been dealing
with many of the same issues rap music deals with, but nobody cared,
because it was white folks performing it.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 06:59:21 AM |
|
|
They have every right to say what they want. The radio stations have
every right not to carry their racist, homophobic, xenophobic rants.
define racist, homophobic, xenophobic.
Can't say I'm against that idea.
in thought only. try taking some action.
"Crap" is a relative term. For years, country music has been dealing
with many of the same issues rap music deals with, but nobody cared,
because it was white folks performing it.
really? so you think its relative when snoop dog or 50 cent spews out
derogatory ***** like ho, *****, and nappy?
and what the hell has country music got to do with derogatory
statements?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
12 Apr 2007 06:10:15 PM |
|
|
On Apr 12, 3:34 pm, "THX1138" <xxxTHX1138...@yahoo.com> wrote:
right...freedom of speech has no place on the airwaves.
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech. Are you really
that ignorant? He has the freedom to speak. Hell he could buy his own
radio station and broadcast his ***** to anyone willing to listen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "KK" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 08:21:35 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LarsensAttack BayonetVariation.net" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 01:11:37 PM |
|
|
KK wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Yeah, exactly. It's about the Neocon media trying to shut down
the First Amendment Freedom of Speech to protect themselves and their
pets. They are a collection of Bolsheviks that need the First Amendment
to go to get total control.
--
B3
==
Governments should fear their people, not vice versa.
Reining in out of control government is just a strike away.
Reining in out of control media is just a boycott away.
http://www.opensecrets.org sees where your candidates get their $$
Israel has 200+ Nukes. Iran has 0. Yet, Iran is the problem?
The Bush White House Motto: SO SUE US!
Jesus was a liberal who would have marched on DC to overturn the tables
in lobbyists and "Christian Leaders" offices.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 09:14:05 AM |
|
|
On Apr 13, 7:21 am, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Really. So you think a radio station should be forced to broadcast
whatever anyone wants to say? Interesting.
Matt
.
|
|
|
| User: "KK" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 01:52:58 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:14:05 -0700, Matt wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Really. So you think a radio station should be forced to broadcast
whatever anyone wants to say? Interesting.
You're not very smart.
I agreed that it wasn't a First Amendment issue up to the point where
Sharpton said he'd "change what's permitted and not permitted on the air".
Next time read more slowly. Maybe say the words out loud until they make
sense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 02:07:44 PM |
|
|
On Apr 13, 12:52 pm, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:14:05 -0700, Matt wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Really. So you think a radio station should be forced to broadcast
whatever anyone wants to say? Interesting.
You're not very smart.
I agreed that it wasn't a First Amendment issue up to the point where
Sharpton said he'd "change what's permitted and not permitted on the air".
Next time read more slowly. Maybe say the words out loud until they make
sense.
Really. I didn't mistake anything you said. It isn't a First Amendment
issue
at all. Why don't you go figure out why.
Matt
.
|
|
|
| User: "KK" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 03:12:54 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:07:44 -0700, Matt wrote:
On Apr 13, 12:52 pm, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:14:05 -0700, Matt wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Really. So you think a radio station should be forced to broadcast
whatever anyone wants to say? Interesting.
You're not very smart.
I agreed that it wasn't a First Amendment issue up to the point where
Sharpton said he'd "change what's permitted and not permitted on the air".
Next time read more slowly. Maybe say the words out loud until they make
sense.
Really. I didn't mistake anything you said. It isn't a First Amendment
issue
at all. Why don't you go figure out why.
Dear *****,
Sharpton seeks regulations barring certain speech from the airwaves. You
don't think that's a First Amendment issue?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "queenie" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 09:06:56 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:21:35 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not permitted on
the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Some people seem to think that "freedom of speech" means anyone can
say anything about anybody at anytime they want. Does anybody
actually think that that was what America's Founders had in mind when
they wrote the first amendment to the Bill of Rights?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 09:09:30 AM |
|
|
(queenie) wrote in
news:hh3v13plhvnf3juk9d49tc9n0mn5llk33n@4ax.com:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:21:35 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not
permitted on the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Some people seem to think that "freedom of speech" means anyone can
say anything about anybody at anytime they want. Does anybody
actually think that that was what America's Founders had in mind
when they wrote the first amendment to the Bill of Rights?
Yes.
You ->can say anything about anybody at any time you want.
What happens later is a different story.
In Imus's case, his employers didn't care for the reaction from his
show's sponsors, so they canned him.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "queenie" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 09:47:56 AM |
|
|
On 13 Apr 2007 14:09:30 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
queenie@nospam.com (queenie) wrote in
news:hh3v13plhvnf3juk9d49tc9n0mn5llk33n@4ax.com:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:21:35 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:15 -0700, Tim Crowley wrote:
Hint: this has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech.
It didn't, at first. When Sharpton and Jackson smelled blood
and expanded their mission to change what's permitted and not
permitted on the air, it became a First Amendment issue.
Some people seem to think that "freedom of speech" means anyone can
say anything about anybody at anytime they want. Does anybody
actually think that that was what America's Founders had in mind
when they wrote the first amendment to the Bill of Rights?
Yes.
You ->can say anything about anybody at any time you want.
I don't agree. I think America's founding fathers were referring to
the right to criticize the Government without being punished when they
wrote the 1st amendment. I think they relied on civilized society and
common-sense for the rest.
What happens later is a different story.
In Imus's case, his employers didn't care for the reaction from his
show's sponsors, so they canned him.
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated but not because of the racist remarks--he'd been
doing that for years. Maybe it was about his stance on the war, the
handling of Katrina.... Still, Imus was an incredibly stupid racist,
IMO.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 10:25:23 AM |
|
|
(queenie) wrote in
news:fk5v13t6k42870vmqr2gaa0896da634eum@4ax.com:
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated
How, exactly, were his "1st Amendment rights" violated?
What government action was involved?
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "queenie" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 10:56:11 AM |
|
|
On 13 Apr 2007 15:25:23 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
queenie@nospam.com (queenie) wrote in
news:fk5v13t6k42870vmqr2gaa0896da634eum@4ax.com:
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated
How, exactly, were his "1st Amendment rights" violated?
What government action was involved?
We'd probably have scour Carl Rove's hard drive for some missing memos
to find out for sure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 10:59:18 AM |
|
|
(queenie) wrote in
news:9t9v13tbc6ejh6ugadism68a4lkimd69pd@4ax.com:
On 13 Apr 2007 15:25:23 GMT, Bert Hyman < > wrote:
(queenie) wrote in
news:fk5v13t6k42870vmqr2gaa0896da634eum@4ax.com:
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated
How, exactly, were his "1st Amendment rights" violated?
What government action was involved?
We'd probably have scour Carl Rove's hard drive for some missing
memos to find out for sure.
Do you still maintain that his "1st Amendment rights" were violated,
or not?
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "queenie" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 11:16:55 AM |
|
|
On 13 Apr 2007 15:59:18 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
queenie@nospam.com (queenie) wrote in
news:9t9v13tbc6ejh6ugadism68a4lkimd69pd@4ax.com:
On 13 Apr 2007 15:25:23 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
queenie@nospam.com (queenie) wrote in
news:fk5v13t6k42870vmqr2gaa0896da634eum@4ax.com:
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated
How, exactly, were his "1st Amendment rights" violated?
What government action was involved?
We'd probably have scour Carl Rove's hard drive for some missing
memos to find out for sure.
Do you still maintain that his "1st Amendment rights" were violated,
or not?
I've already expressed my opinion in on this matter. You are not
going to browbeat me into saying anything I choose not to.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 11:19:13 AM |
|
|
(queenie) wrote in
news:1sav135v21vgb4s60fnfq7651mphb22c6k@4ax.com:
On 13 Apr 2007 15:59:18 GMT, Bert Hyman < > wrote:
(queenie) wrote in
news:9t9v13tbc6ejh6ugadism68a4lkimd69pd@4ax.com:
On 13 Apr 2007 15:25:23 GMT, Bert Hyman < > wrote:
(queenie) wrote in
news:fk5v13t6k42870vmqr2gaa0896da634eum@4ax.com:
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st
Amendment rights were violated
How, exactly, were his "1st Amendment rights" violated?
What government action was involved?
We'd probably have scour Carl Rove's hard drive for some missing
memos to find out for sure.
Do you still maintain that his "1st Amendment rights" were
violated, or not?
I've already expressed my opinion in on this matter. You are not
going to browbeat me into saying anything I choose not to.
So, not only do you believe that his "1st Amendment rights" were
violated, you're now proposing some sort of clandestine government
activity, a conspiracy and a cover up.
Now, that's interesting.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 12:50:49 PM |
|
|
you havent expressed anything but liberal propaganda.
either answer the question or shut up!
I've already expressed my opinion in on this matter. You are not
going to browbeat me into saying anything I choose not to. - Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "benrrrrrrrrand, esq" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 02:09:47 PM |
|
|
On 13 Apr 2007 10:50:49 -0700, "THX1138" <xxxTHX1138xxx@yahoo.com>
wrote:
you havent expressed anything but liberal propaganda.
either answer the question or shut up!
DO WHAT HE SAY!!! DO WHAT HE SAY!!!
I've already expressed my opinion in on this matter. You are not
going to browbeat me into saying anything I choose not to. - Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 10:17:01 AM |
|
|
I don't agree. I think America's founding fathers were referring to
the right to criticize the Government without being punished when they
wrote the 1st amendment. I think they relied on civilized society and
common-sense for the rest.>
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated but not because of the racist remarks--he'd been
doing that for years. Maybe it was about his stance on the war, the
handling of Katrina.... Still, Imus was an incredibly stupid racist,
IMO.- Hide quoted text -
no - people have been screaming about the war since it started over
the airwaves for years and are still
on the airwaves. The issue with Imus is free speech and the mob
mentality of the media is what persecuted
him. If I were him, I would sue his employer because his right to free
speech has been violated. I would sue
sharpton too because he is a hypocrite.
There are no laws protecting you from having your feelings hurt and
you do not have
the right to destroy a mans life because of that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "queenie" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 10:32:41 AM |
|
|
On 13 Apr 2007 08:17:01 -0700, "THX1138" <xxxTHX1138xxx@yahoo.com>
wrote:
I don't agree. I think America's founding fathers were referring to
the right to criticize the Government without being punished when they
wrote the 1st amendment. I think they relied on civilized society and
common-sense for the rest.>
The more I think about it, the more I believe Imus 1st Amendment
rights were violated but not because of the racist remarks--he'd been
doing that for years. Maybe it was about his stance on the war, the
handling of Katrina.... Still, Imus was an incredibly stupid racist,
IMO.
no - people have been screaming about the war since it started over
the airwaves for years and are still
on the airwaves. <snip>
Yes, but now Republicans do not control all three branches of
Government; Accountability is now at hand. And it doesn't help their
cause if Imus is speaking against the policies of the current
administration. JMO
There are no laws protecting you from having your feelings hurt and
you do not have the right to destroy a mans life because of that.
But there are the laws of civilized society and society has given
Imus's employers the hook to yank Imus off the air. Buh bye, Imus.
.
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 12:30:19 PM |
|
|
But there are the laws of civilized society and society has given
Imus's employers the hook to yank Imus off the air. Buh bye, Imus.
what laws of civilized society and where they written?
How about I if invoke the civilized society and have the columnist at
the
new york times fired because they hurt my feelings?
*****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 12:34:58 PM |
|
|
(THX1138) wrote in
news:1176485419.492266.67730@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
But there are the laws of civilized society and society has given
Imus's employers the hook to yank Imus off the air. Buh bye,
Imus.
what laws of civilized society
The law of civilized society that says Imus's employer can fire him
if they want to.
and where they written?
Most likely in Imus's contract.
How about I if invoke the civilized society and have the columnist
at the new york times fired because they hurt my feelings?
Go for it.
Tell us how it works out.
*****.
Well, yeah.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 12:56:34 PM |
|
|
The law of civilized society that says Imus's employer can fire him
if they want to.
even for violating his right to free speech?
How about of Imus was black? Would he have been fired?
probably not because of the double standard in this country
that allows black people to get away with racism.
and where they written?
Most likely in Imus's contract.
law of civilized society?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bert Hyman" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 12:59:02 PM |
|
|
(THX1138) wrote in
news:1176486994.464266.136880@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
The law of civilized society that says Imus's employer can fire
him if they want to.
even for violating his right to free speech?
Imus is free to say whatever he likes, on his own dime.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
.
|
|
|
| User: "THX1138" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 01:18:09 PM |
|
|
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
but al sharpton and jesse jackson and other minorites are to be
applauded when the spew hatred against others. And dont give
me the crap they are not allowed to because the media, white liberals,
and other stupid people dont have the balls to hold others
accountable...
only white males.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: IMUS FIRED - RACE-BAITERS SHARPTON AND JACKSON WIN!! |
13 Apr 2007 12:23:06 PM |
|
|
On Apr 13, 11:17 am, "THX1138" wrote:
There are no laws protecting you from having your feelings hurt and
you do not have
the right to destroy a mans life because of that.
There also are no laws preventing CBS from firing anyone they like --
for good reason or bad.
Maybe there should be laws like this, but there aren't.
As for "destroying a man's life" -- well, Imus isn't dead, is he?
And he presumably has a lot of money from all the previous years that
CBS and his sponsors paid him to promote his nasty ***** on the
airwaves.
And since we're talking about the ability to "destroy" a person's life
- I wonder what it does to the brains of the black women on the team,
and on the brains of black women and girls everywhere, when they see
that they can work like hell to become good at what they do, and some
***** with a radio microphone just writes off all that effort and
discipline as worthless -- because of their race.
I think most white Americans, whether we're racists or not, don't
really want young black women to be "hos." We sure don't want them
having any babies out of wedlock, for one thing, because we're scared
of those babies born out of wedlock. We want all black babies to be
born into stable families after a nice church wedding, because that
makes us feel safer.
Whether we're racists or not, most of us white folks also want young
black girls to work hard, to strive to succeed within the system, all
that Sunday School and Girl Scout stuff -- because when they're
working hard and playing by the rules, they're ess trouble to us.
Most African American families, I'd guess -- I'm white, so I don't
really know -- also want young black girls to strive for excellence
and achievement, and not to go the supposedly easier route of walking
the streets and turning tricks.
So here are a bunch of hard-working black women who seem to be playing
by the rules, who are working to make it economically within the
framework govening our system, just as everybody tells them to -- and
jerks like Imus treat them just like streetwalkers, based on their
race.
And sure, some black jerks -- the worst "gangsta" rappers -- are doing
just the same thing. But that's no justification.
What's the effect of either white assholes like Imus or black assholes
like the women-hating gangsta rappers peddling the fantasy that all
young black women are "hos"?
It's got to be destructive. It's 's the kind of idiotic bigotry
that's almost designed to encourage black girls to be criminals or
revolutionaries -- and I don't know about anybody else, but I don't
want them to be playing either role.
And if CBS "destroys Imus's life" when the network fires him for this
kind of anti-social behavior ... well, life is tough sometimes. Too
damned bad for Imus. If he'd thought what he was saying before he
said it, he could have avoided this result.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
