In Colorado, total control is not enough.



 Politics > Politics-USA > In Colorado, total control is not enough.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 13 Sep 2003 04:00:33 PM
Object: In Colorado, total control is not enough.
From The Rocky Mountain News, 9/13/03:
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/news_columnists/article/0,1299,DRMN_86_2255821,00.html
Littwin: GOP storms the liberal ivory tower
September 13, 2003
In Colorado, where Republicans control the House, the Senate, the
governor's mansion, both U.S. Senate seats and five of seven U.S.
House seats, that overwhelming degree of control is, for some,
apparently not enough.
In Colorado, where the legislature rigged a last-minute redistricting
in order to help Karl Rove keep Republicans in control of the House to
go with their control of the Senate, White House, Supreme Court and
John Ashcroft's choir group, that apparently, for some, is also not
enough.
In Colorado, where the family-values crowd wants to make sure that
their values are imposed in every schoolroom, where we get vouchers
(though twice voted down by the voters) and where we get students
forced to pledge their allegiance to the American symbol of liberty
and where we get bills that would put the Ten Commandments on
schoolroom walls, that apparently is still not enough.
The problem, you see, is there are a few Democratic cells left in the
state, and one of those is composed of Trotskyite history professors
huddled in dark corners of the state's campuses whispering to
passersby: "Psst, Al Gore actually got more votes than Dubya," and
that, apparently, is too much. Much too much.
And so if you're Senate President John Andrews, or if you're Gov. Bill
Owens, you insist: This shall not stand.
Meaning, with the help of David Horowitz (more on him later), Andrews
and Owens are getting behind a so-called Academic Bill of Rights,
which you'll never confuse with the real thing.
And for you irony buffs, which, I'm guessing, is a bipartisan group,
the way to get more Republicans in faculty dining rooms is to employ -
and excuse the capital letters, but my God - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION in the
hiring process. Yes. Can I get an exclamation point? Yes! I'd love to
see how that might work - maybe plus points for every professor who
can recite from the Project for the New American Century. (You never
heard of it? Blame the liberal media.)
There's some question about how you would enforce this policy, and
Owens has suggested there might be a problem with quotas. I mean, who
will be the first to point out Republican professor "quota kings"
driving their Cadillacs?
Look, I'm sure the numbers are right in that English and history and
other social sciences departments are overwhelmingly Democratic. But
you might ask yourself exactly how many Republicans are applying for
jobs in the women's studies department.
And let's face it, virtually every conservative black and Latino the
Republicans can scrape together already has been nominated for a
federal judgeship.
Maybe this is the time to turn to Mr. Horowitz, who wrote in these
pages that he's a nonpartisan free-speech advocate. He left out a few
parts of his curriculum vitae, such as his radical youth in which he
was possibly the last defender of the Black Panthers or his right-wing
old age in which he issues manifestoes on how to elect Republicans.
He's a provocateur and not expected to be taken seriously outside of
places like the Wall Street Journal editorial page. But Colorado
officials have rushed to embrace Horowitz's plan.
His previous big push was his battle with the slavery-reparations
movement. Among his reasons for opposition, he wrote, was that blacks
have been repaid "in the form of welfare benefits." And there's this:
that blacks already owe a debt to "white Christians" for creating the
"anti-slavery movement." Why didn't Frederick Douglass think of that?
Now Horowitz is taking on campus political correctness, which is, of
course, fertile territory. But, notably, he didn't release any data on
faculty political representation in business schools or in economics
departments. You think they have any Republicans?
I'm trying to figure out where the danger lies in having a surplus of
liberal English scholars. I found this course in the fancy-shmancy
liberal school my daughter attended: "Corsets, crinolines and
codpieces: Literature and fashion." Horowitz claims the political
disparity in English departments shows a bias against Republicans who,
it could be argued, know just as much as Democrats about corsets,
crinolines and possibly even codpieces.
The counter argument is that we're seeing self-selection. Let's start
listing the many conservative poets you know. I mean, since T.S.
Eliot, who started out as a banker.
Besides, why not let the markets take care of this? Isn't that the
proper Republican solution? If this were a problem, wouldn't, say, The
Citadel be overflowing with applicants?
But if this works, I wonder where they might strike next. There are
places, even now, in America where Republicans are underrepresented.
I've listed just a few:
• Anywhere in Boulder outside the offices of Soldier of Fortune
magazine.
• Wherever they test drive the Toyota hybrid.
• Hollywood movie sets, except those where Arnold Schwarzenegger is
working.
• Kennedy family gatherings, even when Arnold is there working.
• Vermont.
• Dixie Chicks concerts.
• Anywhere near my desk at work.
____________________________________________________
'Nuff said.
Harry
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: I Hope Fucktard Bush Can Scrounge Up Enough Oil Nazis To Fulfill His Wet Dream To Steal & Control The World's Oil Supply
FIX IS IN - Dems will gain seats but not enough to take control - So nothing will change
The CIA has had enough of Bush.
Re: Unemployment too high? IBM says it's not high enough. Will ship jobs overseas.
Enough of Bush-appointed convicted felon Poindexter.
Re: Only if you apply enough lies to your scam..
Re: Ahnuld has Balls Enough to Say What NeoCons Believe!!!!
Re: Worldwide Terrorism on the Increase, At least Now We Have a President Brave Enough to Fight It!
Is Bush's hair good enough?
when will al-queda attack ? October 1st, with what ... enough to get the elections canceled
Bremer says: "We never had enough troops on the ground."
ENOUGH Gloating! ENOUGH Bitterness! Let's HEAL!!
!Enough Is Enough!
Attacking anyone with enough sense to raise questions about Iraq
Compass' Departure as New Orleans Chief 'Right, But Not Enough,' says SAF
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER