| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
28 Oct 2006 07:22:50 AM |
| Object: |
In private, Iraqi prime minister bashes Republican administration policy |
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/10/28/MNGV3M1SB51.DTL
Saturday, October 28, 2006
In private, al-Maliki criticizes U.S. policy
Borzou Daragahi, Los Angeles Times
Baghdad --
The Iraqi prime minister sharply criticized U.S. policy during a
private meeting with the U.S. ambassador Friday, pointing to American
failure to either reduce violence or give his government authority
over security matters.
The criticism in private is the latest example of tension between the
two governments and stands in stark contrast with a joint public
statement issued after the meeting.
_______________________________________________________
Everything the Republicans touch turns to *****.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Neolibertarian" |
|
| Title: Re: In private, Iraqi prime minister bashes Republican administration policy |
28 Oct 2006 01:57:16 PM |
|
|
In article <isi6k21jmfs10ran3lckbou185mtdll8ou@4ax.com>,
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/10/28/MNGV3M1SB51.DTL
Saturday, October 28, 2006
In private, al-Maliki criticizes U.S. policy
Borzou Daragahi, Los Angeles Times
Baghdad --
The Iraqi prime minister sharply criticized U.S. policy during a
private meeting with the U.S. ambassador Friday, pointing to American
failure to either reduce violence or give his government authority
over security matters.
The criticism in private is the latest example of tension between the
two governments and stands in stark contrast with a joint public
statement issued after the meeting.
_______________________________________________________
Everything the Republicans touch turns to *****.
And the Democrats alternative to US policy is:
___________________________________________
(Please fill in the blank. Use reverse side if necessary)
--
NeoLibertarian
"Because nobody inherits civilisation.
You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation, beginning with yourself.
And you can't afford the heating bill of either one.
You must not be fooled by the fact that some of the buttons are
still shiny, and a few still work when you bump them."
--Dennis M. Hammes (7/15/05)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atropos" |
|
| Title: Re: In private, Iraqi prime minister bashes Republican administration policy |
28 Oct 2006 03:57:19 PM |
|
|
In article
<cognac756-5AD4C1.13532228102006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
Neolibertarian <cognac756@yahoo.com> wrote:
In article <isi6k21jmfs10ran3lckbou185mtdll8ou@4ax.com>,
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/10/28/MNGV3M1SB51.D
TL
Saturday, October 28, 2006
In private, al-Maliki criticizes U.S. policy
Borzou Daragahi, Los Angeles Times
Baghdad --
The Iraqi prime minister sharply criticized U.S. policy during a
private meeting with the U.S. ambassador Friday, pointing to American
failure to either reduce violence or give his government authority
over security matters.
The criticism in private is the latest example of tension between the
two governments and stands in stark contrast with a joint public
statement issued after the meeting.
_______________________________________________________
Everything the Republicans touch turns to *****.
And the Democrats alternative to US policy is:
___________________________________________
(Please fill in the blank. Use reverse side if necessary)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PURPOSE OF THE IRAQ WAR : AND THE DEFINITION OF VICTORY --WAS/IS
THE ESTABLISHMENT UNITED STATES HEGEMONY OVER THE PETROLEUM RESOURCES
OF IRAQ AND IRAN; AND THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF A MILITARY
PRESENCE WHICH WOULD/WILL PRESERVE THAT HEGEMONY FOR THE FORESEEABLE
FUTURE. THERE WILL BE NO WITHDRAWAL OF TROOPS SO LONG AS THE PETROLEUM
IS THERE.
UNLESS YOU AGREE WITH THIS DEFINITION OF VICTORY, ALL OF THOSE WHO HAVE
DIED HAVE DIED IN VAIN AND THE OIL HAS BEEN PURCHASED WITH THEIR
BLOOD.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neolibertarian" |
|
| Title: Re: In private, Iraqi prime minister bashes Republican administration policy |
28 Oct 2006 06:17:08 PM |
|
|
In article <281020061357192116%netpost@pochta.ru>,
Atropos <netpost@pochta.ru> wrote:
Everything the Republicans touch turns to *****.
And the Democrats alternative to US policy is:
___________________________________________
(Please fill in the blank. Use reverse side if necessary)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PURPOSE OF THE IRAQ WAR : AND THE DEFINITION OF VICTORY --WAS/IS
THE ESTABLISHMENT UNITED STATES HEGEMONY OVER THE PETROLEUM RESOURCES
OF IRAQ AND IRAN; AND THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF A MILITARY
PRESENCE WHICH WOULD/WILL PRESERVE THAT HEGEMONY FOR THE FORESEEABLE
FUTURE. THERE WILL BE NO WITHDRAWAL OF TROOPS SO LONG AS THE PETROLEUM
IS THERE.
UNLESS YOU AGREE WITH THIS DEFINITION OF VICTORY, ALL OF THOSE WHO HAVE
DIED HAVE DIED IN VAIN AND THE OIL HAS BEEN PURCHASED WITH THEIR
BLOOD.
You don't have to shout. I'm not hard of reading.
So, let's sum up your response:
Neither you nor the Democratic Party have any alternatives to current US
policies.
Correct?
--
NeoLibertarian
"Because nobody inherits civilisation.
You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation, beginning with yourself.
And you can't afford the heating bill of either one.
You must not be fooled by the fact that some of the buttons are
still shiny, and a few still work when you bump them."
--Dennis M. Hammes (7/15/05)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ken" |
|
| Title: Re: In private, Iraqi prime minister bashes Republican administration policy |
28 Oct 2006 07:24:43 PM |
|
|
"Neolibertarian" <cognac756@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cognac756-CB2841.18131528102006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
In article <281020061357192116%netpost@pochta.ru>,
Atropos <netpost@pochta.ru> wrote:
Everything the Republicans touch turns to *****.
And the Democrats alternative to US policy is:
___________________________________________
(Please fill in the blank. Use reverse side if necessary)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PURPOSE OF THE IRAQ WAR : AND THE DEFINITION OF VICTORY --WAS/IS
THE ESTABLISHMENT UNITED STATES HEGEMONY OVER THE PETROLEUM RESOURCES
OF IRAQ AND IRAN; AND THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF A MILITARY
PRESENCE WHICH WOULD/WILL PRESERVE THAT HEGEMONY FOR THE FORESEEABLE
FUTURE. THERE WILL BE NO WITHDRAWAL OF TROOPS SO LONG AS THE PETROLEUM
IS THERE.
UNLESS YOU AGREE WITH THIS DEFINITION OF VICTORY, ALL OF THOSE WHO HAVE
DIED HAVE DIED IN VAIN AND THE OIL HAS BEEN PURCHASED WITH THEIR
BLOOD.
You don't have to shout. I'm not hard of reading.
So, let's sum up your response:
Neither you nor the Democratic Party have any alternatives to current US
policies.
Correct?
--
NeoLibertarian
"Because nobody inherits civilisation.
You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation, beginning with yourself.
And you can't afford the heating bill of either one.
You must not be fooled by the fact that some of the buttons are
still shiny, and a few still work when you bump them."
--Dennis M. Hammes (7/15/05)
The Dems are offering the Non-Contract with America and the anti-foreign
policy initiative, alternative plans to say the least. They are the six year
culmination and pinnacle to their "We're Not Them" campaign that has worked
so well for them in recent national elections.
Ken
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
