In Rush Limbaugh We Trust



 Politics > Politics-USA > In Rush Limbaugh We Trust

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "caquixote"
Date: 16 Jun 2004 12:58:14 PM
Object: In Rush Limbaugh We Trust
Bush can't lose when the media is in his pocket, so I guess it will have to
be choice "C."
Bush & Co have ***** the poor, the old, the ethnic minority, parents
and the miltary personel. But he is still even with Kerry? I just don't
get this country anymore.
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-libmedia.htm
ABC and the rise of Rush Limbaugh
The following brief history of ABC offers a perfect snapshot of everything
that has gone wrong with the media. This remarkable story includes ABC's
takeover by a conservative parent corporation, the demise of the Fairness
Doctrine, the rightward shift of the evening news, the rise of conservative
talk radio, and the cozy relationship between a state and a press that are
supposed to be separate.
In 1985, ABC was taken over by Capital Cities, a conservative, Roman
Catholic media organization with extensive ties to the CIA.
(If you think we're making this up, you should know that the Capital Cities
takeover of ABC is one of the most analyzed in history, and the subject of
many books by Wall Street experts and scholars. Especially recommended is
Networks of Power, by Emmy Award-winner Dennis Mazzocco.) (1)
Capital Cities was born in 1954, and rapidly prospered. Many of its founders
had previously worked in the U.S. intelligence community and had a great
amount of wealth, social contacts and influence in government. Yet they
opted to keep the company's actions out of the public eye -- they did not
flaunt their wealth with private planes and lavish offices the way so many
successful companies do. Just exactly how well-connected Capital Cities was
to the CIA is unknown, but it is clear that the CIA concerned itself with
the company at various times. The fact that the CIA has often used private
businessmen, journalists and even entire companies as fronts for covert
operations is not only well-known by historians, but legendary. (Recall
Howard Hughes and Trans-World Airlines...)
One of Capital City's early founders was William Casey, who would later
become Ronald Reagan's Director of the CIA. At the time of Casey's
nomination, the press expressed surprise that Reagan would hire a
businessman whose last-known intelligence experience was limited to OSS
operations in World War II. The fact is, however, that Casey had never left
intelligence. Throughout the Cold War he kept a foot in both worlds, in
private business as well as the CIA. A history of Casey's business dealings
reveals that he was an aggressive player who saw nothing wrong with bending
the law to further his own conservative agenda. When he became implicated as
a central figure in the Iran-Contra scandal, many Washington insiders
considered it a predictable continuation of a very shady career.
Another Capital Cities founder, Lowell Thomas, was a close friend and
business contact with Allen Dulles, Eisenhower's CIA Director, and John
Dulles, the Secretary of State. Thomas always denied being a spy, but he was
frequently seen at events involving intelligence operations. Another founder
was Thomas Dewey, whom the CIA had given millions to create other front
companies for covert operations.
Capital Cities prospered from the start; its specialty was to buy media
organizations that were in trouble. Upon acquisition, it would improve
management and eliminate waste until the company started turning a profit.
This no-nonsense, no-frills approach, as well as its refusal to become
side-tracked with other ventures, made it one of the most successful media
conglomerates of the 60s and 70s. Of course, the journalistic slant of its
companies was decidedly conservative and anticommunist. To anyone who
believes that the government should not control the press, the possibility
that the CIA created a media company to dispense conservative and Cold War
propaganda should be alarming. Rush Limbaugh himself calls freedom of the
press "the sweetest -- and most American -- words you will ever find." (2)
Apparently, he is unaware of the history of his own employers.
By the 1980s, Capital Cities had grown powerful enough that it was now
poised to hunt truly big game: a major television network. A vulnerable
target appeared in the form of ABC, whose poor management in the early 80s
was driving both its profits and stocks into oblivion. Back then, ABC's
journalistic slant was indeed liberal; its criticism of the Reagan
Administration had drawn the wrath of conservatives everywhere, from Wall
Street to Washington. This was in marked contrast to the rest of the White
House press corps, which was, in Bagdikian's words, "stunningly uncritical"
of Reagan. Behind the scenes, Reagan was deregulating the FCC and
eliminating anti-monopoly laws for the media, a fact the media appreciated
and rewarded. The only exception was ABC. Sam Donaldson's penetrating
questions during press conferences were so embarrassing to Reagan that his
handlers scheduled the fewest Presidential press conferences in modern
history.
Another controversy involving the liberal slant of ABC was its airing of the
anti-nuclear war movie The Day After. This movie angered conservatives like
Henry Kissinger, who believe that the willingness to use nuclear weapons is
actually a deterrence to war. But Kissinger got a chance to respond to the
movie on national television. Nightline followed the movie with a group
discussion that included Kissinger and other conservative pundits. The
reason why ABC was so even-handed, presenting both a liberal and
conservative viewpoint on nuclear war, was because they were required to by
law: the Fairness Doctrine.
The Fairness Doctrine was repealed in 1987 by the FCC. Reagan had staffed
the FCC with prominent media businessmen who were intent on slashing
government regulations. the equivalent of letting the fox guard the chicken
coop. Among the many other regulations slashed during the Reagan years were
anti-trust laws that prevented the media from becoming a monopoly. Much of
this was done under heavy pressure by corporate lobbyists.
In this atmosphere of deregulation, Capital Cities found the perfect time to
take over ABC. Not only were all the legal restrictions removed, but by now
Casey was head of the CIA, and whatever contacts existed between the CIA and
Casey's company (in which Casey held substantial stock) were immeasurably
strengthened. Capital Cities soon began buying out ABC stock. The facts of
the acquisition remain curious and unconventional. Capital Cities was only
one-fourth the size of ABC, and there were much wealthier corporate giants
who were salivating over a plum like a television network. But word got out
on Wall Street that the Capital Cities takeover bid was "protected" by
Warren Buffet, a legendary trader often described as the "Darling of Wall
Street." (Until 1995, Buffet was the richest man in America.) With Buffet's
help, Capital Cities took over ABC. According to one source, a high-ranking
CIA official teased Casey, saying, "I understand Sam Donaldson is working
for you now."
Sam Donaldson would not be tormenting Republican presidents for long. By the
Bush Presidency, Donaldson was removed from covering the White House and
paired with Diane Sawyer in a weekly news magazine that covered political
fluff. Brit Hume, a staunch conservative, would take his place, and the same
torment that ABC once reserved for Ronald Reagan would now be directed
towards Bill Clinton.
The new conservatism at ABC was subtle but apparent. Peter Jennings, noting
that the program's "American Agenda" had a liberal slant, stated that the
news would pay more attention to conservatives, since their ideas are "more
provocative and less predictable on some issues."
During the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Washington Post TV critic Tom Shales noted
that of all the networks, ABC was the "friendliest to and least critical of
the Bush Administration and its policies." After the war, ABC marketed a
video of General Schwartzkopf's famous briefing of the war, entitled
"Schwartzkopf: How the War was Won." It sold 80,000 copies. Later, it would
market a video on life and times of Richard Nixon.
It would be wrong, of course, to conclude that ABC had gone Attila the Hun.
ABC News remained a source of somewhat balanced coverage; both Sam Donaldson
and George Will continued to do battle every Sunday on This Week With David
Brinkley. Indeed, some of the most scientific pieces warning about the
destruction of the ozone layer came from ABC. The owners at Capital
Cities/ABC couldn't make the Evening News blatantly conservative because
such a change would be too controversial. But this did not defeat their
effort. They could still create a conservative forum from scratch, and in
this regard, the dying market of AM radio offered the opportunity of a
lifetime.
There are about 11,000 radio stations in the U.S., and Capital Cities/ABC is
by far the largest player. Either through outright ownership or the sale of
numerous services, they reach about half the radio stations in America, and
this number is growing. With the Fairness Doctrine repealed, Capital Cities
was able in 1988 to begin broadcasting one-sided editorials on conservatism.
ABC Radio Network President Edward McLaughlin scoured the nation's radio
stations for conservative talent, and his search led him to Sacramento, to a
little known disc-jockey named Rush Limbaugh. Rush had attracted an audience
with his vigorous and spirited defense of Oliver North during the
Iran-Contra hearings. McLaughlin brought him to New York City for a
one-month "on-air" trial at Capital Cities/ABC's flagship radio station,
WABC. For the next two years, ABC put him on the fast track, handling all
his marketing, advertising and promotion. For legal purposes, and to protect
ABC's image of supposed objectivity, Rush formed his own media company,
Excellence in Broadcasting. But to this day Rush continues to broadcast out
of WABC's studios in New York.
ABC initially promoted Rush by arranging his appearance on other debating
shows, from Nightline to Donahue to MacNeil/Lehrer. (Unfortunately, he did
so poorly against real live experts that this practice was eventually
stopped.) Perhaps the most eye-brow raising example of Rush's promotion was
when he appeared on an episode of ABC's 20/20 for an interview with Barbara
Walters. Given Rush's criticism of feminists as "feminazis," this interview
was built up as a confrontation between a female reporter in the mainstream
media and Rush's supposedly misogynist views. The fact that Barbara Walters
herself is conservative was nowhere mentioned. During the interview, Rush
came across as charming, humorous, reasonable and moderate, and Walters
closed the segment by stating that she actually liked him.
Ted Koppel's incessant praise of Rush Limbaugh is also an attempt to bring
him into the mainstream. The back cover of See, I Told You So blurbs: "As no
less a liberal than Ted Koppel... said, 'You ignore him at your peril.'" On
television, Koppel has laughed with admiration over Limbaugh, calling him
"terribly articulate." But the anchor of Nightline is far from liberal;
indeed, Rush Limbaugh had to publicly apologize to Koppel for calling him
one. And researchers have criticized Nightline for featuring a highly
disproportionate number of experts who are white male conservatives.
Rush Limbaugh explains his success as the result of his individualism, of
his refusal to do it someone's else's way. But the fact is that his success
has been orchestrated, financed and promoted by Capital Cities/ABC. He also
seems extraordinarily well-connected to the Republican leadership in
Washington, carrying out their campaign strategies so faithfully that it is
difficult to distinguish his promotions from their campaign commercials. For
example, when Rush's television show debuted nationally two months before
the 92 election, his producer was Roger Ailes, who was Bush's media advisor
throughout the campaign. Many of the themes that Ailes had inspired earlier
in the campaign showed up in identical form on Rush's show, which resembled
a program-length commercial for the Bush campaign. When asked to give equal
time to his opponents, Rush responded "I am equal time!"
In 1994, not only the Rush Limbaugh Show, but hundreds of other conservative
talk shows dutifully raised the issues that Newt Gingrich's Contract
Information Center faxed to them each morning about the Contract With
America. Many went so far as to read them verbatim over the air. And when
the Republicans captured Congress in 1994, they held a ceremony in honor of
Limbaugh, naming him "an honorary member of Congress" and "the Majority
Maker." That night, the conservative propaganda machine had reached its full
potential.
<ny@wino.com> wrote in message
news:1u%zc.27157$H65.19120@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

Is this post in 2 different groups? Oh, well....

From:



I'm hoping for one of the following scenarios:

A. Bush Wins and he gets impeached.
B. Bush Loses and democrats investigate and put him in jail.


or...
C. Bush wins, turns the US into another religious Taliban, bankrupts the

country,

destroys our environment, pisses of the rest of the world, is impeached,

and then

I can spam all these Bush supporters, "I Told You So!"


.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: Liberal Trust Irony (you can't trust them...trust me)
Highway To Impeachment: Just 24% say they trust the Republican president -- GOP <-- failing Public Relations Arm of Bush Crime Family grinds on...
Can we trust the Jews? (4 McVay!)
Only 29% trust Ashcroft to find White House leaks.
Re: Liberal Trust Irony (you can't trust them...trust me)
What Ever Happened to "In God We Trust" ?
Public’s trust in Bush at low ebb. Bush trails Kerry by 8 points
Re: Would You Trust Your Kids With Geo Bush?
Is it in our national interest to trust Israel?
Republican Slick Willie Frist's blind trust anything but blind
Socialists trust the government but not the people
Top 10 Iraq Blunders (or, trust us - we now know what we're doing)
Robo calls: Trust Republicans to invent new ways to screw up elections.
Why should we trust the Enronization of Social Security?
Re: You can trust Democrats to vote along with the Republicans
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER