Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In9/11



 Politics > Politics-USA > Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In9/11

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "BruceRoberts"
Date: 30 Sep 2003 08:21:35 AM
Object: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In9/11
"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However, the
following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda. It
would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.
.

User: "BruceRoberts"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly InvolvedIn 9/11 30 Sep 2003 08:26:47 AM
BruceRoberts wrote:

"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However, the
following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda.
It would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34841



.
User: "Mark K"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In 9/11 30 Sep 2003 08:45:15 AM
"BruceRoberts" <roberts@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:rwfeb.14587$lKj.11839@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34841

Revealed again - and again - for the
umpteenth time by worldnetdaily?
.

User: "Sid9"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In 9/11 30 Sep 2003 09:03:09 AM
Are you totally dumb?
Even Georgie Bush,Jr denies it now.
"US President George Bush has said there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein
was involved in the 11 September attacks.
The comments - among his most explicit so far on the issue - come after a
recent opinion poll found that nearly 70% of Americans believed the Iraqi
leader was personally involved in the attacks."
Earlier he said:,"Bush maintains Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda are connected"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm
A Google search turned up thousands of references to Georgie's flip-flop
"BruceRoberts" <roberts@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:rwfeb.14587$lKj.11839@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...



BruceRoberts wrote:

"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However, the
following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda.
It would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34841




.
User: "\The Right One"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In 9/11 30 Sep 2003 05:53:02 PM
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:f2geb.4966$md5.25@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

Are you totally dumb?
Even Georgie Bush,Jr denies it now.

"US President George Bush has said there is no evidence that Saddam

Hussein

was involved in the 11 September attacks.

From the article:
"Mr Bush did however repeat his belief that the former Iraqi president had
ties to al-Qaeda - the group widely regarded as responsible for the attacks
on New York and Washington."
--
We all know the Husien, Bin Laudin, and Arrafat all drink from the same tea
pot.
Terry Pearson
Terry's Useful Idiots:
The NG asylum
Dilbert Deilly Phone 250-727-8330
Maxed out Bushwanker
Hartman Shiftless
Gweg Mcdonald
"Ron" <banmilk@hotmail.com>
A Deilly Quote:
"Perhpas you don't realise it, but you are CLEARLT a "laftist" -- everyone
on
this newsgroup except communist agitator Mark Hansel is laffing at you."


The comments - among his most explicit so far on the issue - come after a
recent opinion poll found that nearly 70% of Americans believed the Iraqi
leader was personally involved in the attacks."

Earlier he said:,"Bush maintains Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda are

connected"


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm

A Google search turned up thousands of references to Georgie's flip-flop



"BruceRoberts" <roberts@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:rwfeb.14587$lKj.11839@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...



BruceRoberts wrote:

"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However,

the

following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda.
It would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34841






.


User: "MonteP"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In 9/11 30 Sep 2003 03:48:39 PM
BruceRoberts <roberts@rogers.com> wrote in news:rwfeb.14587$lKj.11839
@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com:



BruceRoberts wrote:

"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However,

the

following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda.
It would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34841




You jackass! Do you honestly believe that the Fearless Puppet would keep
such information hidden? Since the article says all this was
'discovered' in the months just following 911 are you going to tell all
of us that such information was kept secret? Not used in the
justification speeches to the UN, the US population, and the world? Are
you saying that in the face of seriously falling poll numbers post Iraq,
due mainly to increased doubt of the reasons given for the war that Karl
Rove would let Dubya swing in the wind?
You are not just a jackass, you are an incredibly gullible one to boot!
--
"The Rule of Man may be seductive, but the Rule of Law does not carry
social diseases!
To restore the Rule of Law is simple, send pretzels to the Whitehouse!"
....MonteP
.

User: "Bill"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly Involved In 9/11 30 Sep 2003 09:44:58 AM
This article is nothing but a far fetched and poorly linked agglomeration of
facts and opinions to support it's beliefs. It is not proof of anything.
--
Bill Mech
wmech@att.net
"BruceRoberts" <roberts@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:rwfeb.14587$lKj.11839@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...



BruceRoberts wrote:

"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However, the
following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda.
It would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34841




.


User: "Tim"

Title: Re: Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Revealed. Saddam Indirectly InvolvedIn 9/11 30 Sep 2003 10:38:14 AM
BruceRoberts wrote:

"Liberal" critics of George Bush's conquest of Iraq claim that there
was no involvement of Iraq in the terrorist attack of 9/11. However, the
following article appears to establish at least an indirect linkage
between Saddam's
Hussein's government and the Muslim terrorist organization, al Qaeda. It
would
tend to justify the U.S. led Iraqi war fought to oust a
terrorist-supporting regime.

I can give you better evidence linking the US administration to
terrorists, including the funding of al Qaeda's predecessors.
Would that justify an attack on Washington?
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER