| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"abelard" |
| Date: |
10 Mar 2006 10:09:27 AM |
| Object: |
is nuclear power dangerous? new book from lovelock.... |
from lovelock's new book...the revenge of gaia p.102...0713999144
just published...
recommended to all luddites....also useful to intelligent posters
category deaths 1970-92 deaths twy*
coal workers 6,400 342
natural gas workers and public 1,200 85
hydro public 4,000 883
nuclear workers 32 8
*terawatt of electricity production
from
http://www.abelard.org/briefings/fossil_fuel_disasters.php
This section is primarily concerned with mining workers. However, that is
a small proportion of those damaged by fossil fuel filth. Here is a claim
we have found concerning the general population:
"Worldwide, particulate and SO2 pollution cause at least 500,000
premature deaths, 4 to 5 million new cases of bronchitis, and millions of
other respiratory illnesses per year." [Quoted from wvhighland.org]
regards...
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
| User: "A Veteran for Peace" |
|
| Title: Re: is nuclear power dangerous? new book from lovelock.... |
10 Mar 2006 10:46:11 AM |
|
|
In article <2m73125onrh2ctn26adg8usto3b7fdqlk2@4ax.com>,
abelard <abelard2@abelard.org> wrote:
from lovelock's new book...the revenge of gaia p.102...0713999144
just published...
recommended to all luddites....also useful to intelligent posters
category deaths 1970-92 deaths twy*
coal workers 6,400 342
natural gas workers and public 1,200 85
hydro public 4,000 883
nuclear workers 32 8
*terawatt of electricity production
from
http://www.abelard.org/briefings/fossil_fuel_disasters.php
This section is primarily concerned with mining workers. However, that is
a small proportion of those damaged by fossil fuel filth. Here is a claim
we have found concerning the general population:
"Worldwide, particulate and SO2 pollution cause at least 500,000
premature deaths, 4 to 5 million new cases of bronchitis, and millions of
other respiratory illnesses per year." [Quoted from wvhighland.org]
regards...
and how Israel got it's bomb.
Former Labour MP Tony Benn on how Britain Secretly
Helped Israel Build Its Nuclear Arsenal
We have an extended
conversation with Tony Benn, one of Britains
most distinguished
politicians and the longest serving MP in the
history of the Labour party.
Benn discusses the new revelations the
British government helped
Israel build the atom bomb. Benn also
speaks about U.S. and U.K.
relations, extraordinary rendition,
Guantanamo Bay, torture,
religion, and the state of the media.
[includes rush transcript -
partial]
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/10/1451237
--
I'm unfettered,unbound,triumphant,glorious& splendid
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Simon T." |
|
| Title: Re: is nuclear power dangerous? new book from lovelock.... |
10 Mar 2006 05:11:47 PM |
|
|
abelard wrote:
from lovelock's new book...the revenge of gaia p.102...0713999144
just published...
recommended to all luddites....also useful to intelligent posters
category deaths 1970-92 deaths twy*
coal workers 6,400 342
natural gas workers and public 1,200 85
hydro public 4,000 883
nuclear workers 32 8
Just bloody wait for a nuke plant to go bang ! Look at the Ukraine.
Whole
counties of Britain would be uninhabitable.
The HSE said an oil storage could never explode with a bang that
would be heared 100 miles away - would you trust them to safeguard a
nuclear site ?
Simon T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Magnus Paterson" |
|
| Title: Re: is nuclear power dangerous? new book from lovelock.... |
14 Mar 2006 03:17:39 AM |
|
|
"Simon T." <xxxx@xxxx.xxx> wrote in news:441207B3.6807@xxxx.xxx:
The HSE said an oil storage could never explode with a bang that
would be heared 100 miles away - would you trust them to safeguard a
nuclear site ?
Cite, please?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "abelard" |
|
| Title: Re: is nuclear power dangerous? new book from lovelock.... |
10 Mar 2006 06:07:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:11:47 +0000, "Simon T." <xxxx@xxxx.xxx>
typed:
abelard wrote:
from lovelock's new book...the revenge of gaia p.102...0713999144
just published...
recommended to all luddites....also useful to intelligent posters
category deaths 1970-92 deaths twy*
coal workers 6,400 342
natural gas workers and public 1,200 85
hydro public 4,000 883
nuclear workers 32 8
Just bloody wait for a nuke plant to go bang ! Look at the Ukraine.
Whole
counties of Britain would be uninhabitable.
complete rubbish...
The HSE said an oil storage could never explode with a bang that
would be heared 100 miles away - would you trust them to safeguard a
nuclear site ?
the fossil fuel industry is highly dangerous...it is a major killer
nuclear power produces vastly less rubbish...
from the same source
~"burning fossil fuels produces 27,000 million tons of carbon dioxide
yearly, enough if solidified, to make a mountain one mile high with
a base 12 miles in circumference
the waste from same amount of energy from nuclear fission would
occupy a 16 metre cube"
"no more than 75 people died during the chernobyl incident"
you are being fed, and swallowing, rhubarb....imv probably assisted
by the fossil fuel industry...
http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter8.html
also get the book and substitute facts for your uninformed scare
mongering...
when you finally catch on to the realities you will discover that as
things stand you will probably have no choice anyway....
http://www.abelard.org/briefings/replacing_fossil_fuels.htm
do some reading and come back informed if you wish to be part
of any decision....
as it is you might as well be reading from the beano....
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "halle" |
|
| Title: Re: is nuclear power dangerous? new book from lovelock.... |
11 Mar 2006 03:38:07 AM |
|
|
Simon T. < > hypisteli näppistään nyyssien yhteydessä
seuraavasti:
abelard wrote:
from lovelock's new book...the revenge of gaia p.102...0713999144
just published...
recommended to all luddites....also useful to intelligent posters
category deaths 1970-92 deaths
twy*
coal workers 6,400
342 natural gas workers and public 1,200 85
hydro public 4,000
883 nuclear workers 32
8
Just bloody wait for a nuke plant to go bang ! Look at the Ukraine.
Whole
counties of Britain would be uninhabitable.
Chernobyl was a soviet plutonium plant for weapons.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
